diff --git "a/cleaned_hf_10_techniques_train.csv" "b/cleaned_hf_10_techniques_train.csv"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/cleaned_hf_10_techniques_train.csv"
@@ -0,0 +1,53521 @@
+,input,output,instruction
+0,Stop Islamization of America,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1,We condemn all those whose behaviours and views run counter to our shared values,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2,the nation that gave the world the Magna Carta is dead,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+3,The UK should never become a stage for inflammatory speakers who promote hate,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+4,delighted with the decision,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+5,a striking blow against freedom,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+6,socalled land of democracy and freedom of speech,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+7,hair trigger in singleaction mode,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+8,pinned blame for Steinles death on illegal immigration and insufficiently aggressive deportation policies,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+9,This tragedy could have been prevented if San Francisco had simply turned the alien over to ICE as we requested instead of releasing him back onto the streets,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+10,Steinle would still be alive were it not for an insecure border and lenient treatment toward suspected undocumented immigrants in local jails,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+11,a complete travesty of justice,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+12,The Kate Steinle killer ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+13,the biggest political gift possible ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+14,a gang that cant shoot straight ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+15,hazy oldtime Hollywood casting,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+16,Exploding in Trumps Face,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+17,how badly Trump does his job ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+18,reflected the realityTV stars weakness as a presidential candidate,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+19,Trump hasnt learned it yet,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+20,Trump is easily manipulated by those around him,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+21,Trump and his White House staff failed to do their jobs ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+22,As the political scientist Richard Neustadt said political elites are constantly evaluating and reevaluating the president,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+23,someone who hires based on what he thinks someone doing that job should look like,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+24,a slur on all women ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+25,a President who cares about nothing about the country and everything about his narrow selfinterest,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+26,This is evidently of no consequence to a President who cares about nothing about the country and everything about his narrow selfinterest,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+27,has hamstrung the administration for more than 18 months,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+28,disgraced former FBI officials ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+29,fired FBI Special Agent ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+30,are touting the presidents order,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+31,Trump has decided to intervene in a pending law enforcement investigation by ordering the selective release of materials he believes are helpful to his defense team and thinks will advance a false narrative,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+32,a red line that must not be crossed ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+33,clear abuse of power,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+34,People are going to be very impressed,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+35,Trumps gutdriven normshattering tenure,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+36,heralded a new era,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+37,Working together well get it taken care of,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+38,Bypassing the class left her vulnerable to bullying,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+39,You dont need to be reading thisYou need to be reading the Bible,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+40,You are not a Christian,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+41,liberty of conscience is not up for a vote,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+42,If you die tonightHeaven or Hell,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+43,totally false and deliberately libelous,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+44,willing to bet the Guardian a million dollars and its editors head that Manafort never met Assange,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+45,the worst school shootings in US history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+46,for certain public adulterers,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+47,All of the critics of AL are wrongevery one of thembecause you see the original Latin text does not say what the English text does,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+48,And that is exactly the nonsense Fastiggi and Goldstein expect us to swallow,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+49,all those ignorant critics of AL,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+50,all the tumult triggered by AL is just a misunderstanding caused by uninformed people who havent consulted the Latin text,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+51,those ignorant Vatican translators,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+52,But such embarrassing truths need not impede the Bergoglian Mercy Train as it barrels toward a train wreck at the end of the line,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+53,In a sense what Bergoglio is doing is worse than explicit heresy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+54,the humble apostle of mercy depicted in his carefully crafted public relations narrative but rather a cunning ecclesiastical politician constantly plotting and scheming to get what he wants,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+55,the grim reality of this unprecedented pontificate,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+56,the old reliable mistranslation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+57,Paddock could not have carried out the massacre,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+58,Paddocks body may have been left in the hotel room while other assailants carried out the shooting,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+59,I can tell you 100 this is not that kind of guy,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+60,Its gotta be a setup,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+61,This throws their entire narrative into question and makes one wonder what else is being hidden from the public,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+62,seemingly covering up the ISIS connection,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+63,Laura Loomer proves that authorities have directly lied to the American people ,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+64,lied to the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+65,What Else Are They Hiding,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+66,lied to the country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+67,According to Loomer she obtained the image from a source which shows that Paddocks car first arrived September 25th,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+68,cannot be trusted and should be considered as disinformation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+69,antiIsrael BDS hate group,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+70,accused Jews of drinking blood,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+71,Holocaust Syndrome of entitlement,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+72,Hezbollah as an armedresistance movement,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+73,Either you stand with BDS Hamas blood libels and those who want to destroy Israel or with Jews,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+74,Zionism does not only dispossess Palestinians but it also dispossesses in a very sophisticated way nonwhite JewsBeing Jewish is highly identified with being white because of Zionism,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+75,very dirty and unappealing water under the Catholic bridge,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+76,Who can read this without cringing at what we now know was about to happen,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+77,Pope Pauls gracious and beautiful exposition and in part on the sheer radical mad unlikeliness of it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+78,The idea of transubstantiation struck me as I read that document as possibly the strangest and most earth shattering thing Id ever heardIt shocked me out of a kind of swamp of intellectual worldliness presenting the idea to my thirsty mind that there could indeed be fantastic realities far more wonderful than the banal and painfully uninteresting secularist worldview I had been taught to acceptIt was as though someone had plausibly told me that yes there were fairies and magical kingdoms in real life just around the corner,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+79,it was outright wicked,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+80,this sacramental reality that was about to be catastrophically obscured,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+81,it is not allowable to emphasize what is called the communal Mass to the disparagement of Masses celebrated in private or to exaggerate the element of sacramental sign as if the symbolism which all certainly admit in the Eucharist expresses fully and exhausts completely the mode of Christs presence in this sacrament,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+82,Nor is it allowable to discuss the mystery of transubstantiation without mentioning what the Council of Trent stated about the marvelous conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the Body and of the whole substance of the wine into the Blood of Christ speaking rather only of what is called transignification and transfiguration,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+83,We know it is demonically inspired because their hatred is for Christ Himself in the first place and for anyone who loves and wants to serve Him secondThey are men who refuse to bend the knee before the God whom they will not serve,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+84,will be ruling embattled islands of Catholicism in a poisoned sea of systematic heresy and desecration,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+85,If the Mass were ever reduced in our minds to being merely a commemorative meal and the priest as only a community leader or functionary then the celibacy of the Catholic Priesthood might seem extravagant,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+86,A dark impenetrable and irreversible winter of persecution of the faithful by their own shepherds will fall,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+87,why werent the police rushing to the scene immediately,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+88,While we may never know the exact circumstances,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+89,a natural disaster of a magnitude not seen in over a century,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+90,the unprecedented level of destruction,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+91,we are doing everything possible to address the needs of the American citizens of Puerto Rico during this time of crisis,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+92,series of shocking comments,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+93,we are not being told what actually happened that fateful night,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+94,a huge bombshell in the ongoing investigation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+95,Pope Francis explains this again in AL 305 when he says a small step in the midst of great human limitations can be more pleasing to God than a life which appears outwardly in order,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+96,With all due respect to Dr Fastiggi his argument and that of Buttiglione that a move away from sin is what is pleasing to God even if the moral norm is not adhered to is sophistical,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+97,A moral catastrophe is selfevidently underway and it is not possible honestly to deny its cause,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+98,with an open heart and mind but above all with open eyes,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+99,I have read the Cardinals exposition in both Italian and English and I only find mention of the help of the sacraments in certain cases,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+100,Does Mr Ferrara believe that the Catholic Church under Pope Francis is a Leviathan Church and not the Catholic ChurchIf this is so then it would suggest that Mr Ferrara is refusing submission to the Roman Pontiff and communion with the members of the Church subject to him,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+101,Dr Fastiggi has succumbed to an unfortunate literalmindedness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+102,demonstrate a pronounced lack of comprehension of pertinent ecclesiological and theological basics and a rather embarrassing lack of rhetorical finesse,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+103,I respectfully suggest that Dr Fastiggis comments evince a need for serious study and reflection before he ventures further opinions on this controversy in public,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+104,foot soldiers of a Leviathan Church,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+105,What exactly do they want us to believe,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+106,There are obviously certain things that the FBI and other investigators seem intent on covering up,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+107,so why change the narrative to make it even more unbelievable,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+108,Keep in mind this is all information that the police and the FBI has hidden,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+109,Keep in mind this is all information that the police and the FBI has hidden from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+110,One can only speculate as to what the reasons for these lies actually are,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+111,you move closer to legalizing all illegals,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+112,Any Jew who opposes the Occupation  or opposes Zionism itself  knows that feeling of being shunned from the places that are supposed to shelter and nurture you families synagogues community centers arts organizations,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+113,radical antiIsrael hate group,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+114,go whine to the New York Times some more,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+115,burn crosses on their lawn,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+116,EU no longer considers Hamas a terrorist groupTime for US to do same,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+117,If our Jewish institutions  particularly the American Jewish Historical Society  cannot accommodate dissent and effectively exclude all Jewish antiZionists then they have not only lost a rapidly growing Jewish population but they have lost a key aspect of their Jewishness,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+118,knapsack of entitled nonsense,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+119,Either that or they can go whine to the New York Times some more because the Jewish community wont let them burn crosses on their lawn,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+120,Further the FBI insists there is no jihad motive while saying they dont know his motive,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+121,That raised a number of question,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+122,Are they for real,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+123,Do the FBI and law enforcement think people wont talk about it or speculate as to what happenedAre they for real,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+124,contradicting a timeline they had offered earlier this week,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+125,These discrepancies on basic facts are feeding conspiracy theories,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+126,they want the public to believe,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+127,His mere existence appears to have been fabricated by the very authorities who are cramming lies down our throats about this massacre for the sake of political agendas,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+128,mysteriously vanished into thin air,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+129,cramming lies down our throats,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+130,they desperately want us to believe,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+131,Trump is in the drivers seat because the CIA cannot afford to permit the American people to see the records it wants to continue to be kept secret,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+132,no reasonable person can honestly believe ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+133,ReallyWhat like the CIA was using typewriters instead of computers and pay telephones instead of cell phones,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+134,once the CIA gives Trump what he wants he will cave and give the CIA the continued secrecy it so desperately needs,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+135,the two most important and meaningless words,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+136,result in the United States falling into the ocean,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+137,the communists are going to take over the federal government,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+138,Its essentially an admission of guilt,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+139,the mainstream media has never given any serious consideration,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+140,They had to make certain that Oswald was not on to them and had not discovered that he was being set up for a frameup,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+141,it knows that those records will further implicate the CIA in the Kennedy assassination,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+142,by seeking continued secrecy its essentially an implicit acknowledgment of guilt,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+143,because it knows that its assets and allies in the mainstream press will continue to come to its defense,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+144,the CIA steadfastly kept secret from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+145,Every American owes it to himself to read that manual,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+146,to keep some of the CIAs decadesold JFKs related assassination records secret from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+147,lone nut former US Marine communist,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+148,crisis of epic proportions,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+149,the blurry picture feels like its worth a good deal more than 1000 wordsIt illuminates just a small sliver of the public health crisis ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+150,the postapocalyptic ravaged territory,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+151,The islands are grappling with ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+152,the power grids utter annihilation ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+153,Crisis Of Epic Proportions,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+154,The islands are grappling with physician shortages Medicaid programs facing an impending funding cliff and widespread disparities in Federal health programsand that was before hurricane season,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+155,but more can and should be done to help Americans impacted by these disasters,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+156,grandson of a monkey and a pig,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+157,white nationalist plowed his car into a group of people who were protesting the rally killing one,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+158,the greatest leader in modern Western history,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+159,Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+160,DrDavid Duke Exposes the Real Racist Jewish Supremacists Who Orchestrate the Destruction of European Mankind,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+161,a man to believe in,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+162, know exactly what the reaction would be if a student paper refused to publish any proIslamist content,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+163,First they came for the JewsAnd then they came for everyone else,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+164,the campus antiIsrael crowd ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+165,punch a Zionist today,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+166,a toxic campus press,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+167,I have no doubt from the information circulated about me and campaign run against me prior to this vote that this was about my Jewish identity and nothing more,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+168,why did a BDSled campaign name and shame me for my affiliation with a Jewish organization and call on students to remove me from student government for this reason,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+169,If BDS is not antiSemitic why was I barred from participating in student government because of my Jewish identity,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+170,Donald Art of the Deal Trump,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+171,Art of the Deal Trump,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+172,they demonstrate their lack of understanding about how things work in Washington DC,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+173,isnt even questioning that ludicrous notion,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+174,a grave threat to national security,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+175,suspension of logic and common sense,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+176,Americas sworn Cold War enemy ,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+177,skate blissfully across the Cold War stage of history with nary any abuse or harassment at all,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+178,Dont make me laugh,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+179,A blind man could see what was happening,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+180,obviously sat on the request undoubtedly hoping that he could get what he wanted in return if he just continued holding out and conveying that he was ready to release the records,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+181,with some earthshattering new information,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+182,the United States would fall into the ocean if Americans were finally permitted to see the CIAs longsecret,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+183,it is a virtual certainly that when Art of the Deal Trump sent out those two tweets he was sending a message to the CIA as part of the negotiations,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+184,the records undoubtedly contain more incriminating circumstantial evidence that fills in the mosaic of a US nationalsecurity regimechange operation on November 22 1963,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+185,it knew would point to the CIAs guilt in the assassination,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+186,the obvious inference that people would draw  that the CIA was continuing to cover up incriminatory evidence,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+187,Lets state the obvious The CIA records that are still being suppressed have nothing to do with national security They have everything to do with covering up the CIAs role,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+188,a grave threat to national security ie befriending the Russians ie the Soviets and Cubans and entering into peaceful coexistence with the communist world,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+189,who had absolutely no motive to kill President Kennedy,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+190,For a more detailed analysis of motive read FFFs ebook,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+191,the same motive that motivated the CIA and Pentagon to target other political leaders for regime change or assassination around that time,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+192,a lone nut former US Marine communist,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+193,For anyone who has a critical analytical independent mindset the official story is filled with holes,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+194,or even an iota of harassment,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+195,they call Julian Assange a traitor,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+196,They needed to get rid of Kennedy to protect national security and elevate Johnson who had the same anticommunist mindset as the Pentagon and the CIA to the presidency,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+197,no doubt being told that he was being prepared for an important mission,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+198,the United States did not fall into the ocean or fall to the communists,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+199,But how likely is that,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+200,Give me what I want or I will release the records,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+201,the CIA has argued that the release of any of its JFK records would threaten national security,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+202,Imagine spending all that time studying Islam and yet still misunderstanding its true peaceful message,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+203,We can only hope that learned imams such as Pope Francis and HRMcMaster will go to Virginia forthwith and explain to Mohamad Jamal Khweis the proper understanding of the Religion of Peace,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+204,I ruined my life and my familys life,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+205,executed his plan to perfection,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+206,This is not the Soviet Union this is not Iran or Riyadh  this is America,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+207,still the incompetent clueless authorities know nothing,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+208,local and federal authorities are refusing to fill in the blanks,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+209,Thats the information they seek to blackout,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+210,I have done what I believe God wanted me to do,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+211,bolstered my own Great Clarifier theory,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+212,the poor poor woman,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+213,brave defenders of the status quo,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+214,cheap and vulgar ritual humiliation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+215,midget bishops and minicardinals,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+216,the cool kids in the Vatican,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+217,with whom I guess she has also no choice but to have sexual relationsBecause of kindheartedness,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+218,falsely elevated to the rank of a decisive question of Catholicism and a measure of ideological comparison in order to decide whether one is conservative or liberal in favor or against the pope,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+219,To teach with such an intentional lack of clarity inevitably risks sinning against the Holy Spirit the Spirit of truth,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+220,dont speak out publicly for fear they will be marginalized or worse,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+221,theyll be marginalized or worse if they speak out,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+222,Presumably because adultery itself is no longer sinful,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+223,even threatening to go into schism if they didnt get their way,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+224,the American people are clearly not being told the truth,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+225,authorities are actually actively covering up what really happened,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+226,a reign of terror,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+227,admitted perjurer and convicted liar,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+228,one of the most brilliant and cunning ruses in history,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+229,gets Earl Warren and Sen Richard Russel to join the Warren Commission by telling them that the assassination could lead to World War III,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+230,one of the most ingenious and cunning plots ever designed,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+231,The coverup of this particular US regimechange operation,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+232,the CIA succeeded in keeping secret from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+233,kept secret from the American people since 1963,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+234,unelected rightwing proUS military general,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+235,The Guatemalan operation was brilliant and ingenious,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+236,The CIAs coverup in the JFK assassination was even more brilliant and ingenious,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+237,the brilliance ingenuity and cunningness of the coverup,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+238,There could be only one answer communistsSoviet and Cuban communists to be more specific,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+239,The communist part and the nuclearwar part were concoctedThat was all part of the plan,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+240,to never reveal the meeting to the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+241,commentators should do more complete research maybe even use Google before they jump to conclusions,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+242,he failed to conclude his article with one great big important point about former CIA Director Richard Helms,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+243,great big important point,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+244,Shapira failed to note that Helms was convicted in a federal district court of lying to Congress under oath,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+245,harass abuse humiliate persecute or prosecute him,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+246,without nary a care in the world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+247,The answer Helms lied,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+248,There is no reasonable doubt that Oswald was a US intelligence agent,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+249,keeping secret from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+250,when Oswald was claiming that he was being framed there could be only one entity that he could have been thinking about the CIA,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+251,were secretly monitoring his activities in the weeks leading up to the assassination no doubt to ensure that Oswald had not figured out what was about to happen to him,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+252,Thats why the CIA has to continue keeping those records secret,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+253,Then why the hidden rifleBecause its consistent with a frameup,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+254,ingenuity and cunning come into play,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+255,Thats why they had shots fired from the front and placed Oswald in the rear,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+256,a secret fraudulent and bogus autopsy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+257,See my book The Kennedy Autopsy,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+258,as a communist sympathizer or a conspiracy theorist,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+259,to continue keeping 98 percent of the CIAs decadeslong secret records secret from the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+260,continues to work brilliantly today,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+261,ingenious and cunning plots ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+262,orders him to shut down any investigation of a conspiracy because it might lead to nuclear war,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+263,pernicious campaign of hate,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+264,a campaign of hate laced with blatant antiSemitic overtones,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+265,public and humiliating reversals ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+266,The malevolent BDS campaign ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+267,But Democratize SSMU was anything but democratic,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+268,repulsive display leftistfascist bigotry at its worst,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+269,The bigoted BDS provocateurs ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+270,their manifestly antiSemitic campaign antics were beyond the pale,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+271,manifestly antiSemitic campaign antics ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+272,The vitriolic BDS campaign ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+273,Judging by past investigations conducted by other schools  SFSU CUNY and UCI to name a few  I am not optimistic,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+274,He was warned by others who had prior dealings with the SSMU to keep his Jewish identity secret lest he sabotage his chances,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+275,Slowly but surely we are beginning to see the truth about the horrific attack come to light despite authorities desperately trying to prevent it from reaching the American people,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+276,authorities desperately trying to prevent it from reaching the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+277,Sadly the picture emerging is one that includes a shocking amount of evidence pointing towards a classic deep state false flag operation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+278,classic deep state false flag operation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+279,a chronic confusion seems to mark your pontificate,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+280,To teach with such a seemingly intentional lack of clarity inevitably risks sinning against the Holy Spirit the Spirit of truth,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+281,Pharisaic stonethrowers who embody a merciless rigorism,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+282,The only answer that comes to mind is that Jesus wants to manifest just how weak is the faith of many within the Church even among too many of her bishops,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+283,Ironically your pontificate has given those who hold harmful theological and pastoral views the license and confidence to come into the light and expose their previously hidden darkness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+284,from deep within the postconciliar ecclesial establishment things that exceed in their candor,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+285,a withering indictment of a papacy that constitutes nothing less than a menace to the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+286,meaning he hasnt bothered to do any serious investigation beyond a few Google searches,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+287,And what inference might one draw from the coincidence that Saint Francis prophecy of a future destroyer in the papal office seems to correspond rather well with the pontificate of the only Pope who has taken Francis name as his own,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+288,innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel destroy the universal flame of the Church reject her ornaments and make her feel remorse for her historical past,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+289,Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits themLike Mary Magdalene weeping before the empty tomb,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+290,t what he claimed were factual errors elsewhere in the Roche biographyBut he had no evidence that the quotation as such was a fabricationHe simply wished that it was so,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+291,Lets give our neoCatholic friends another apocryphal quotation to dismiss out of hand,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+292,the malice of the wicked will increaseThe devils will have unusual power the immaculate purity of our Order and of others will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who obey the true Supreme Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal ears and perfect charity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+293,Those who persevere in their fervor and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth will suffer injuries and persecutions as rebels and schismatics,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+294,phony quotations of the saint,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+295,Act bravely my brethren take courage and trust in the Lord,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+296,the fact remains that the official story has been proven time and time again to be absolutely false and in fact nothing more than a pathetic attempt at a coverup,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+297,strobes it remains unlikely,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+298,While we may never know,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+299,Theres no other way you can coin it,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+300, If this was a college student or Swedish kid would he be charged with murder,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+301,No Justice for Kate Steinle,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+302,means to foment hate to foment division and to foment a program of mass deportation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+303,today is a day of vindication for the rights of immigrants,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+304,catapult a presidency along that philosophy of hate of others,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+305,Were just shocked  saddened and shocked,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+306,Justice was rendered but it was not served,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+307,the verdict was horrifying,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+308,enjoyed all the rights of the American legal system,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+309,Garcia Zarates background and nationality played a role in his prosecution,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+310,He has already proved that in the sanctuary state of California falsedocumented illegals are a privileged class,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+311,utter and complete and total failure ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+312,Conservative Ben Shapiro told Fox news the verdict was horrifying,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+313,For Jeff Sessions San Franciscos sanctuary city policy led to the preventable and heartbreaking death of Kate Steinle,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+314,According to the Attorney Generals statement the Justice Department will continue to ensure that all jurisdictions place the safety and security of their communities above the convenience of criminal aliens,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+315,The backlash to his release into the community crescendoed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+316,When jurisdictions choose to return criminal aliens to the streets rather than turning them over to federal immigration authorities they put the publics safety at risk,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+317,my own damn bricks  building this damn wall myself,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+318,So flipping outraged by this unjustice,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+319,May San Francisco rot in hell,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+320,A great injustice has been done,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+321,San Franciscos decision to protect criminal aliens led to the preventable and heartbreaking death of Kate Steinle,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+322,SF city just proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they dont care if YOU or others get killed by their policies,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+323,grieve from the bottom of my heart ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+324,British authorities want to ignore that and shoot the messenger,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+325,and issue an official ban on Donald Trump from entering the UK on the grounds he is condoning fascism and his presence is not conducive to the public good,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+326,Islam is a religion and is a belief system that mandates warfare against unbelievers,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+327, If theres homosexual men the punishment is one of five thingsOne  the easiest one maybe  chop their head off thats the easiestSecond  burn them to deathThird  throw em off a cliffFourth  tear down a wall on them so they die under thatFifth  a combination of the above,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+328,praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistans blasphemy laws,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+329,defense of Britain and its values,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+330,destructive Radical Islamic Terrorism ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+331,Im not sure were doing just fine,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+332,If theres homosexual men the punishment is one of five thingsOne  the easiest one maybe  chop their head off thats the easiestSecond  burn them to deathThird  throw em off a cliffFourth  tear down a wall on them so they die under thatFifth  a combination of the above,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+333,did she really think she or anyone would be safe,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+334,Safe by surrenderWhen did they ever work in the history of humankind,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+335,he is condoning fascism and his presence is not conducive to the public good,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+336,once great nations darkest moments and a low point for freedom,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+337,the victory of Islamic law over Western law sharia over freedom,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+338,a true rainbow coalition of human rights activists,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+339,The worldwide howl at Trumps retweets of videos tweeted out by a British politician is further proof of the Islamization of the West,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+340,grim and increasingly common reality,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+341,If Muslims sincerely condemn jihad terror and sharia oppression they shouldnt oppose him,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+342,the voices of sanity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+343,call that nation back to a path that would secure freedom for her children and her childrens children instead of a path to national suicide,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+344,the most tyrannical and unprincipled papacy of recent history,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+345,the Mystical Body would then be without its head,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+346,The document is very good and completely explains the meaning of chapter VIII of Amoris LaetitiaThere are no other interpretations,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+347,the San Francisco showtrial in which he costarred,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+348,The Great Left Hope,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+349,secret version of Russian roulette,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+350,society is progressing toward a social justice paradise ruled by a wise elite that knows whats best for all,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+351,That explains the effort of The Great Left Hope to have his clients felony gun possession conviction tossed,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+352,He has a great steadfast commitment to justice,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+353,single worst act of tyranny,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+354,toying with the teaching office,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+355,a tyrant on the Chair of Peter,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+356,a powerhungry manipulative dictator who celebrated the abdication of Benedict XVI,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+357,We elected you to make reforms not to smash everything,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+358,in the explosive bestseller,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+359,given the disordered mélange of bits and pieces of things he has read that constitutes his theology,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+360,But never before Francis has there been a Pope who dared to tyrannize the Magisterium itself by attempting to bend it to his errant personal opinions,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+361,is derived from divine law and transcends the domain of positive ecclesiastical laws,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+362,Even if the attempt is void and of no effect before man and Godan immoral law is no law at all,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+363,cloak his absurd novelties,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+364,No Pope before him has ever dared to do such a thing,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+365,that at the epicenter of the chaos is the most wayward Pope the Church has ever had to endure,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+366,is a standing rebuke to all the hierarchs who know what we all know,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+367,the abuses of a tyrant on the Chair of Peter,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+368,Continued inaction while the laity and a few good priests are left to themselves to defend as best they can the constant teaching of the Church against the abuses of a tyrant on the Chair of Peter threatens the hierarchs with a legacy of shame and a terrible accountability before the Just Judge,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+369,a papal tyranny the Church has never before seen,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+370,to cut out the cancerous growth of modernist theology that has implanted itself and is festering within the celebration of even the most sacred mysteries before the cancer spreads and causes even greater damage,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+371,a reckless Pope in love with his own ideas and filled with contempt for Tradition,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+372,the divinely bestowed power to repel an assault on marriage family and the very integrity of the Faith that is now,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+373,May Our Lady of Fatima intercede to obtain for them the grace of fortitude to do what must be done and what only they can doOur hopes and prayers are with them as the foremost instruments of divine providence in the ecclesia Dei adflicta,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+374,True love for the Church indeed true charity toward Francis himself requires of them nothing less than what was required of Saint Paul when the first Pope fell into error that jeopardized the very mission of the Church that Peter be withstood to his face Gal211,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+375,lacking in any magisterial weight whatsoever,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+376,Francis made it clear that the Argentine bishops interpretation of AL allowing public adulterers to receive Holy Communion explains precisely the meaning of Chapter VIII of Amoris Laetitia There are no other interpretations,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+377,outrageous overreach of papal authority,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+378,this latest papal travesty,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+379,Gods Holy Name we beg you to act now  before Pope Francis succeeds in tearing the Church in half completely,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+380,A team of experts have warned that huge seismic events including volcanic eruptions plunging global temperatures and destabilization of the Earths crust will become more common after worrying changes to the surface of the Sun were recorded,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+381,Does this new footage reveal muzzle flashes from helicopters an air assault on the night of the massacre,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+382,the imaginary Catholic Pharisees,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+383,nullity how can an individual priest be capable of making such a judgment having to do with the eternal salvation of the soul in question,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+384,Apparently They Think We are Fools,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+385,he and his collaborators are busily engineering neoPharisaical escape hatches from the negative precepts of the divine and natural law emanating from the Sixth Commandment,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+386,Do they think we are fools,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+387,moral and canonical nonsense,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+388,No Catholic whether or not he consults a priest can declare for himself that his marriage in the Church was invalid especially whenindeed becausehe lacks canonical proof of invalidity,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+389,the conspiracy culminating in Amoris Laetitia,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+390,If a college of judges in a matrimonial tribunal is not able to arrive at moral certitude regarding the nullity of a marriage after a careful and thorough examination of the petition of nullity how can an individual priest be capable of making such a judgment having to do with the eternal salvation of the soul in question,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+391,all of which will be utter fakes including some form of pastoral integration of homosexual unions,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+392,Silence at best is the price it must pay for remaining in good standing with the prohomosexual bishop Francis has installed in San Diego,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+393,But we are not foolsAnd God will not be mockedFrancis and all his designs will ultimately come to nothing,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+394,lie from the pit of hell ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+395,sexual assaults by Muslim migrants attacks on Christians and theres no telling the amount of damage to the unethical welfare system in the country,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+396,Thank you Prime Minister Orban for saying what needed to be said,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+397,man behind the curtain,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+398,Refugees Are Actually Muslim Invaders,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+399,they dont want immigration,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+400,the best example of discipline and the rule of law,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+401,Christian and Muslim societies will never unite,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+402,They have absolutely nothing in common,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+403,They are in Europe to conquer and Islamize it with willing and eager help from Europes shortsighted selfserving internationalist intelligentsia,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+404,an Islamic dominionist attitude,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+405,He has genuinely reached out his hand to help Christian migrants instead of Muslim migrants and he seems to be one that holds to the Christian faith as emulated by the Protestant Reformers saying That which serves the glory of God is the best for the people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+406,Hits Nail On The Head,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+407,The reason why people are in your country is not because they are refugees but because they want a German life,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+408,chaos anarchy and illegal border crossings,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+409,including the united States,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+410,They cannot agree on Gods law which most Western societies were base on,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+411,leave Hungary and never come back,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+412,Hungary would defend its borders and it has,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+413,them want to overwhelm German values and European values in general with sharia values,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+414,to conquer and Islamize it,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+415,If Islam is a good religion in itself as you seem to teach why did we become Catholic,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+416,if you dont believe that Islam is a Religion of Peace you will be ruthlessly harassed and silenced by the US Conference of Catholic Bishops and the hierarchy elsewhere as well,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+417,the worst of Creation,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+418, Naiveté in the face of Islam is suicidal and very dangerous,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+419,disgusted by her cowardice wounded by equivocal gestures confused by the lack of evangelization scandalized by the praise given to Islam,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+420,The bishops of the Catholic Church are much more concerned that you believe that Islam is a religion of peace than that you believe in say the Nicene Creed,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+421,it does not account for the fact that Islam came AFTER Christ and so is and can only be an Antichrist,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+422,As a proper Antichrist Islam exists only as an enemy of all,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+423,For the Quran Christians are only impurity,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+424,the worst of Creation ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+425,all condemned to Hell,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+426,so Allah must exterminate them,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+427,Allah has nothing to offer but war and murder of the infidels in exchange for his paradise,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+428,Jesus has never indicated any other way than that of the Cross,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+429,the utter scandal of the popes failure,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+430,disgusted by her cowardice wounded by equivocal gestures confused by the lack of evangelization scandalized by the praise given to Islam  Thus ignorant souls are misled,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+431,Taking the matter further they warn too of the physical danger the popes disposition toward Islam invites saying that it has resulted in Christiansnot preparing for a confrontation with Islam,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+432,The headquarters of my archdiocese and my apostolate have been occupied by radical Islamists who want us to convert or die,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+433,You are welcoming into your country an ever increasing number of MuslimsYou are in danger as wellYou must make strong and courageous decisions,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+434,This is a matter of life and death and any complacency towards Islam is treasonousWe do not wish the West to continue with Islamization nor that your actions contribute to it,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+435,This is a matter of life and death,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+436,Our present sufferings are the prelude to those that you Europeans and Western Christians will suffer in the near future,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+437,Why would the autopsy report be something that needs to be withheld from the public or his family,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+438,What is surprising is the level of secrecy surrounding the Las Vegas shooting and the containment of information more than three months after it occurred,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+439,Somethings not adding up,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+440,government is covering up a big story about terrorism,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+441,something is not adding up,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+442,If ISIS warns about an attack and then an attack occurs and claims responsibility after the fact it seems to me that at a minimum they should have some portion of the investigation to clearly debunk that claim and yet it hasnt happened he said,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+443,kiss and fondle them in the swank,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+444,These people are truly crazy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+445,How was this victim overlooked by investigators but known by IntellihubWho was this victim,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+446,a massive coverup of the truth the FBIand LVMPD,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+447,law enforcement investigators have never asked to see the footage,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+448,Will the FBIand LVMPD please explain what in the Hell is going on here,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+449,How many more victims went ignored by investigators,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+450,a massive coverup of the truth,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+451,please explain what in the Hell,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+452,were people getting haircuts at the crime scene,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+453,Lets face it twice before the attack ISIS warned the United States that they would attack Las Vegas and then after the attack claimed responsibility four times,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+454,One can imagine that,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+455,ridiculous exercise in virtuesignaling,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+456,for the crime of telling the truth about Islam and jihad,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+457,We must be vigorous in our intolerance of his intolerance,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+458,he has allegedly bigoted attitude towards women ethnic minorities and Muslims,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+459,hypocrisy and double standards ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+460,He is failing in his leadership and we should not welcome him hereWe must be vigorous in our intolerance of his intolerance,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+461,the charismatic homosexualpederast predator Fernando Karadima ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+462,Neither lefties nor stupid,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+463,Its all in the air,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+464,the abuse was approved by God,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+465,her voice cracked with nervousness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+466,the charismatic homosexualpederast predator Fernando Karadima,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+467,this horrified me a lot,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+468,the notorious Italian priestpederast,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+469,a loudly trumpeted part,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+470,The reluctance of some in the Vatican Curia to implement recommendations or cooperate with the work of a commission when the purpose is to improve the safety of children and vulnerable adults around the world is unacceptable,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+471,unending stream of outrages and embarrassments,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+472,serious and painful evil,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+473,leftists who have set up this thing,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+474,the kingpin of South American Catholicism,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+475,given Franciss usual methods its anyones guess who in reality is actually dealing with these cases if anyone,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+476,the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+477,the guy who sold him a hamburger for lunch,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+478,in one fell swoop ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+479,The family finally got the remains in a box marked evidence over three months after the shooting and the autopsy report hasnt been finalizedWait were the same guys in the autopsy room that were there when the doctors and coroners examined John F Kennedy ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+480,How can the autopsy report not be finalized when the body was cremated more than five weeks ago,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+481,Thats exactly rightSomething is rotten in Denmark,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+482,On top of that we have questions as to whether the body was even that of Stephen Paddock given the fact that certain elements of the Paddock in the preliminary police report which mentioned the autopsy are apparently at odds with the Paddock of other documentation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+483,By the way the toxicology report was not mentioned in the preliminary report,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+484,Not only did the coroner drag his feet and release the autopsy reports late Wednesday but all of the names were redacted in the reports with no mention of ballistic data bullet caliber or trajectories,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+485,Haig did not mention the incendiary rounds  which are meant to ignite what they hit  in Fridays news conference,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+486,One woman was screaming through my door that I should be killed and I should die,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+487,will proclaim with all clarity unambiguity and beauty,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+488,would be a beautiful common voice defending the sanctity and the indissolubility of marriage in the midst of a real neopagan society where divorce has become a plague and where sexual depravity is increasingly spreading,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+489,Such a reading is causing rampant confusion will spread a plague of divorce in the Church and is alien to the Churchs entire faith and Tradition,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+490,and it would be a beautiful common voice defending the sanctity and the indissolubility of marriage in the midst of a real neopagan society where divorce has become a plague and where sexual depravity is increasingly spreading,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+491,the beautiful explanations that are being presented to clergy and faithful as discernment and pastoral accompaniment or a change of paradigm and discovery of the subjective part of the truth when translated into common sense language are tantamount to an allowance to sin,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+492,As Successors of the Apostles Schneider said they could not act in another way,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+493,Some of these norms Schneider told LifeSiteNews give implicit approval of divorce and of sexual activity outside a valid marriage,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+494,pounded on his door ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+495,to lob wild claims ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+496,posted an article this week that pointed to Haigs background in the aerospace industry as a sign of US government involvement in the massacre,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+497,a noxious farright personality ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+498,had absolutely nothing to do ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+499,the Las Vegas mass shooter,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+500,Las Vegas mass murderer ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+501,Did he know something that Stephen Paddock was going to do,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+502,his most theologically unsettling point,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+503,Could we possibly say for instance that its impossible to judge the presidency of Donald Trump relative to past presidents,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+504,a genuinely surprising position,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+505,a combination of rhetorical tricks and softpeddled Hegelianism,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+506,has a dog in this fight,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+507,For Faggioli the implication is that at least 50 percent of German Catholic children never see their parents receive communion and lose their faith because of it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+508,Were priests throughout history in fact misleading their divorced and remarried parishioners by telling them they could not receive communion,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+509,If we dont we will find ourselves in the words of Pope Benedict in a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of ones own ego and desires,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+510,Failure to do so exposes the partys liberal agenda as a sham,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+511,This may seem an innocent mistake on the imams part but his actions against the gay community and sinister views are anything but,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+512,tired of fighting crying and suffering,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+513,doing all the dirty work,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+514,dont be like the others,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+515,horror of having experienced this abuse and how I wanted to kill myself,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+516,the three bishops solemnly professed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+517,in defense of the sanctity and the indissolubility of marriage,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+518,will proclaim with all clarity unambiguity and beauty the sanctity of marriage and of the family and of the Eucharist,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+519,a beautiful common voice defending the sanctity and the indissolubility of marriage in the midst of a real neopagan society where divorce has become a plague and where sexual depravity is increasingly spreading,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+520,I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate and he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+521,Would a Republican get a pass on meeting with a racist hate group leaderObviously not,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+522,Dont expect it to condemn Rep Davis commentsHe was just saying what most of them think,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+523,Would a Republican get a pass on meeting with a racist hate group leader,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+524,I refuse to contribute to the destruction of the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+525,You have no authority to compose this schema because it is a theological thesis and therefore within the competence of the Theological Commission,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+526,And if He is God we must give Him the adoration of God,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+527,It is impossible to do all this without Gods assistance,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+528,Stay in the fightKeep the FaithNever surrender,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+529,the infallible teachings of Mother Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+530,a mutation a change in the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+531,the mutation in the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+532,I do have the right to compose this schema because if anything concerns Christian Unity it is religious liberty and I am the President of the Secretariat for Promoting Christian Unity,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+533,a mutation in the church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+534,if the reforms are bad then it is impossible that the Council is good and all the reforms are bad because that is the authentic interpretation of the Council by Rome,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+535,in the name of the Holy See,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+536,We must tolerate  have tolerance for the error  but never give the same right to error and truthThat is impossible,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+537,he is an infamous Freemason,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+538,the devil is in Rome,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+539,AyImpossibleImpossibleNo no no no,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+540,the pope is not man of true conviction,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+541,if I do that then I betray my mother the ChurchThe Church,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+542,if the Church continues to remain under the influence of the prince of the revolution then in the future a crisis will come upon the Church,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+543,We were in a very sad serious situation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+544,I do everything possible for the Council and the Catholics in our country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+545,in the name of the Declaration of Religious Freedom of Vatican II we ask the President to remove this article in the Constitution,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+546,We must take care because this change in the church is a liberal changeThe liberal principles have entered the Church now and they destroy the Church,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+547,They learn nothing now,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+548,How is it possible that the pope gives the authorization to this changeHow is it possible the pope signed this decreeSigned this constitution,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+549,Because if this crisis continues many people will go to hell,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+550,But Jewish groups on and off campus have denounced the report as flawed saying it missed the significance of an antiSemitic text circulated online before Noah Lew was removed from the board last fall,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+551,a target was placed squarely upon me ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+552,My Jewish identity was now public and a target was placed squarely upon me by the McGill BDS movement,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+553,antiSemitic tropes of Jewish people ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+554,The Jewish groups said this antiSemitic rhetoric was used to encourage students to vote specifically against Noah LewIt is under this context that the general assembly occurred and the report fundamentally misunderstands this which alters the entire findings of the report,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+555,absolutely no place for antiSemitism ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+556,a holy war between Muslims and nonMuslims,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+557,in the application process he lied to military recruiters about a recent trip hed taken to Jordan in a failed attempt to make contact with the Islamic State and join a real Muslim Army,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+558,he wanted to do something bigger better and more purposeful  like dying in the cause of Allah,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+559,In the process however he misidentified Hasan as Nidal Hussein and said the shooting happened at Fort Knox in KentuckyHe also said Hasan had died a martyr though in fact he remains alive on military death row,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+560,He also sang an Islamic State fight song and recalled making a replica of the groups flagHe said he wanted to replace his neighbors American flag with it,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+561,Patel agreed to bring it by but two days later he told the State Department he had accidentally thrown it away in October and needed a new one,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+562,blessing for gay unions is trulysacrilegious,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+563,Marxs idea truly seems sacrilegious and ignores the clear Revelation of God,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+564,homosexuality always contradicts the Will of God,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+565,citing church teaching through the centuries,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+566,Rather than being about receiving Gods assistance for themselves those engaging in sodomy and wishing to have it blessed by the Church aim with their request at the recognition and acceptance of their homosexual way of life and its ecclesial valorization,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+567,The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that under no circumstances can homosexual activity be approved as it is intrinsically disordered Such acts are contrary to the natural lawThey close the sexual act to the gift of lifeThey do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity CCC 2357,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+568,Any such blessing rite would cooperate in a morally forbidden act no matter how sincere the persons seeking the blessing,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+569,such a blessing would encourage people to continue living in a way the Church considers gravely sinful and spiritually damaging and therefore would be uncharitable,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+570,as children of God with inherent dignity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+571,there is no truth no real mercy and no authentic compassion in blessing a course of action that leads persons away from God,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+572,Jesus said the truth will make us freeNowhere did he suggest it will make us comfortable,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+573,the Pale Blue Dot,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+574,the mostdistant coursecorrection manoeuvre ever,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+575,the farthest planetary encounter in history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+576,the next recordbreaking encounter,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+577,Australia is both a country and a continentIts the only country that is bothI provided a resource in the first email that clarifies that for youIf you need further clarification google or the SNHU Shapiro Library has that information you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+578,her professor believed Australia is not a country,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+579,the professor incorrectly thought Australia is not a country,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+580,Australia is a continent it is not a country,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+581,the accusations are after all still lies and that theres still no evidence against Barros,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+582,We cool and hip people dont hate gays do we,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+583,his good friend Bishop Juan Barros,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+584,the convicted sexpredator Karadima,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+585,It also calls into question his stated empathy with abuse survivors,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+586,I am the pope I do not need to give reasons for any of my decisionsI have decided that they have to leave and they have to leave,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+587,cool and hip people,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+588,Squandering the capital of trust,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+589,blatantly using lies and manipulation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+590,if Paul VI is canonised their loss of faith in the Church as an institution will be complete,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+591,terrorising his subordinates into submission,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+592,apparently unbreachable shell of papal teflon,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+593,lie big and lie brazenly,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+594,blatant and enormous lie,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+595,That is a danger,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+596,We are simply asked to take the popes word for it,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+597,a serious emotional dysfunction that must preclude a man from being ordained,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+598,one of the great confidence scams ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+599,They warn that the general loss of trust in institutions leads to a general state of chaos in which laws on the books matter little as citizens turn to their last resort of protecting themselves and their own families,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+600,Not that anyone in Rome was trying very hard,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+601,researchers say it will have very little effect on the overall global warming trend that mankind has created for itself,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+602,alleging layers of corruption within the student government and favouritism in appointing board members,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+603,there is absolutely no place ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+604,However he said any Jewish students thinking of being involved in student politics or activism will have encounters that are profoundly disturbing and unpleasant,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+605,Christian Identity of Europe,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+606,Christian identity of Hungary and Europe,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+607,Were the Ammonites and Moabites not kept out of the assembly of Israel because of their hatred of the people of GodDeuteronoy 2336,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+608,Hungary will not become an immigrant country it has never admitted and will never admit illegal immigrants,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+609,Hungary has never admitted and will never admit illegal immigrants,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+610,ordered all illegal Muslim invaders to get out of Hungary and never come back,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+611,people with immigrant backgrounds have committed 27 major terrorist attacks in Europe,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+612,one cannot allow such an influx into the country or all you are asking for is the judgments God warned about in Deuteronomy 28,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+613,For us Hungary is first,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+614,We will fight those who want to change the Christian identity of Hungary and Europe,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+615,the threat of terrorism becomes an everyday regularity,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+616,a perfect storm of sociology stupidity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+617,a toxic stew of racism and meaningless jargon,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+618,Sociology helped generate a whole range of fake new academic subjects while corrupting existing ones into a toxic stew of racism and meaningless jargon,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+619,SociologyYou really dont need to know anything,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+620,The professor who has a PhD in philosophyOf course she does,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+621,the age of My truth,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+622,greatest leader in modern Western history,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+623,If the board members of Crime Stoppers and Citizens Crime Watch do not wish to be associated with antiSemitism or white supremacism or Hamas or Holocaust denial or Steve Anderson or David Duke or Louis Farrakhan then they must cut ties with Sofian Zakkout,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+624,making the claim that Jews have experienced such abuse because they have somehow been cursed,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+625,Cause theyre under the curse of God for having rejected the Lord Jesus Christ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+626,David Duke a man to believe in,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+627,documented threat to national security,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+628,is tumbling chaotically as the result of a violent collision,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+629,a greatest distance from Earth than any in the history of mankind,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+630,fastest spacecraft ever launched,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+631,farther from Earth than any spacecraft in history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+632,gorgeously detailed eye candy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+633,Yeah its kind of crazy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+634,principal in a coverup,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+635,a classic move of his,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+636,infamous Chilean priest abuser,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+637,scandal of epic proportions,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+638,violating his seal of Confession with Karadima,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+639,The whole of Latin America including Argentina was well aware of what was happening,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+640,there were never any cases of clerical abuse in the entirety of the twomillionplus member Archdiocese of Buenos Aires,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+641,a grooming gang a predator priest,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+642,to be haunting this papacy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+643,grooming gang a predator priest,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+644,but if one dares something one might win but one also can perish,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+645,there is only one Catholic answer No,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+646,your addition in individual cases is absolutely worthless it has no argumentative force,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+647,Why not one could say since the Church is ready to bless nearly everything on the earth,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+648,only then when there is a blessing upon a cause or a project will something good come out of it,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+649,That is to say one could not consecrate a brothel one could not bless a concentration camp or weapons which are not explicitly ordained for hunting or for legitimate selfdefense,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+650,one may not bless a relationship which is sinful one may not bless the mafia no blessing for organizations or institutions which promote or procure abortions or which propagate ideologies which are against the Faith antisemitic contents or other forms of racist thought,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+651,If one considers and weighs this matter one knows one may not bless a union of two homosexual men or of lesbian women,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+652,To contradict two popes  whom the Church has already beatified the one and canonized the other  so shortly after their deaths and in such a radical and open manner probably has never happened before in the Churchs history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+653,Isaiah says that such people draw unto them Gods punishment with thick cords,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+654,To bless always means that something shall flourish because only then when there is a blessing upon a cause or a project will something good come out of it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+655,would be an atrocity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+656,If a priest blesses a homosexual couple then this is an atrocity at a holy site namely to approve of something that God does not approve of,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+657,this is an atrocity at a holy site,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+658,submissive change of the Church into a NGO for the embetterment of the thisworldly life conditions is a suicidal modernization that denies mankind the Truth of God,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+659,In dogmatic questions there cannot be a plurality,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+660,There is only one Magisterium he said and bishops conferences can only decide about pastoral questions,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+661,the Sacraments have to be celebrated the way Christ Himself willed it when he instituted them,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+662,he who lives in the state of mortal sin cannot receive Holy Communion,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+663,The Commandments are an expression of the Love of God for usIf we fulfill them we are united with God,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+664,A gird failure would almost immediately fling the United States into a state of panic and its always good to be prepared just in case,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+665,breathe its dying gasps,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+666,Stütz also quotes in the article itself Father Franz Harant a pastoral worker in the field of marriage and the family at the Ursulinenkirche in LinzHarant himself shows himself a supporter of blessings for homosexual couples and he makes here an explicit reference to Amoris Laetitia,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+667,He sees himself in this in union with Pope Francis who himself says in his magisterial document Amoris Laetitia that each person independent of his sexual orientation is to be respected in his dignity and welcomed with respect,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+668,it has an enormous power,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+669,If I dont expect the Catholic Church to do anything then I wont be too disappointed when they dont do anything,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+670,notorious Chilean pedophile priest,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+671,the churchs inertia on the issue,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+672,he has set his expectations at rock bottom,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+673,continues to be blind to what the church has done,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+674,Ive seen little that has changed,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+675,Orban poses as a saviour of Europes Christian nations,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+676,Christianity is Europes last hope,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+677,our worst nightmares can come true,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+678,The West falls as it fails to see Europe being overrun,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+679,a direction different from ours,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+680,the danger we face comes from the West from politicians in Brussels Berlin and Paris,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+681,unleashing immigration onto Europe,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+682,the Islamic civilization which always considers its vocation to convert Europe to what it calls the true faith,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+683,European nations which have encouraged migration have opened the way to the decline of Christian culture and the advance of Islam,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+684,a funnel for antinationalist views,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+685,Soros 87 whose name was used in a tough antimigrant bill,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+686, Christianity is Europes last hope,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+687,Western Europe becomes saturated with Muslim occupants Islamists would soon seek to stream in to his country from both Western Europe as well as from Islamic nations,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+688,foreigner meddling in his countrys affairs,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+689,Christianity is not Europes last hope its the worlds only hope,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+690,The fight isnt hopeless for those whose hope is in the Lord and will stay the course,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+691,our worst nightmares can come trueThe West falls as it fails to see Europe being overrun,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+692,as a savior of Europes Christian nations,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+693,direction different from ours,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+694,park the priest out of harms way,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+695,had caused great pain to victims,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+696,If Francis was not listening to the commission about Barros whom was he listening to,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+697,the man considered to be the countrys largest arms dealer,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+698,the arms trafficking operation had been dismantled with Barbieris arrest,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+699,awkward attempt to whitewash,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+700,And if they cant whitewash this theyll ignore it,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+701,the ADL is wrong and he loves Farrakhan,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+702,The people who talk about the Jewish question are generally antiSemites,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+703,raging antiSemite and racemonger,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+704,loony militant black nationalist organization,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+705,the inferior white devil,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+706,filth and degenerate behavior,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+707,White folks are going downAnd Satan is going down,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+708,your time is up your world is through,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+709, Jews Are My Enemy ,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+710,powerful Jews are my enemy,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+711,openly racist and antiSemitic Farrakhan,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+712,WowRun for your lives,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+713,so deliriously and devilishly,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+714,one of the most egregious gun control machinations of all gun confiscation,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+715,Take the guns first go through due process second,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+716,and ALL of Congress would have no rights,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+717,Fifthly a US citizen who has committed NO CRIME is denied his Natural right of selfdefense for a whole yearAnd the media report says the confiscations only last a year with the caveat that they may be extendedIndeedThey could and very likely will be extended indefinitely,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+718,he opened Pandoras Box,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+719,Proving a negative is nearly impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+720,Adding insult to injury,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+721,Donald Trump has opened the door for more damage being done to the Second Amendment than any other president Democrat or Republican in our lifetime,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+722,uttered his stupid comment ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+723,has opened the door ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+724,This Im offended or his gun scares me complaint is nothing but cover for little Nazis to try and deny another person their Natural Godgiven liberty,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+725,First the open carry of a firearm is LEGAL in the area where this took placeSo the fellow was violating NO gun laws whatsoever,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+726,Thirdly what does volume of complaints meanHow many complaints were received over a YEARS timeTwoFiveTenPeople complaining about other people happens all of the time,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+727,Fifthly a US citizen who has committed NO CRIME is denied his Natural right of selfdefense for a whole yearAnd the media report says the confiscations only last a year with the caveat that they may be extended,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+728,At some point the American people will be forced to view these governmental attacks against our Second Amendment liberties as a declaration of war,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+729,If you keep a handgun in the bedside table and drink beer regularly you may be in trouble,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+730,But if you are a freedomloving American ,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+731,a Democrat who pals around with Farrakhan ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+732,white people deserve to die,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+733,praising Adolf Hitler as a very great man,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+734,So seriously that J Street cant decide,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+735,The world is so much bigger than Farrakhan and the Jewish question and his position on that and so forth,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+736,supporter of Israel means Farrakhan supporter,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+737,fails to explain why he met with him,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+738,the harmful and divisive views,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+739,The statement though is full of conspiracy theories and blames everyone else for Davis behavior except him,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+740,But weve seen that beforeSo it likely doesnt represent his views,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+741,Obviously not going to happen,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+742,They were bowing to jihadist intimidation,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+743,preaching of hatred and jihad violence,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+744,he was told by authorities that his speaking at Hyde Park could cause violence and disrupt community cohesion,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+745,Thats just what they claimed about Pamela Geller and me that our visit could cause violence and disrupt community cohesion,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+746,One  the easiest one maybe  chop their head off thats the easiestSecond  burn them to deathThird  throw em off a cliffFourth  tear down a wall on them so they die under thatFifth  a combination of the above,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+747,one of the most bizarre aspects of this whole bizarre situation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+748,so trivial so inappropriately so disproportionately petty,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+749,absurd responses to serious questions of grave import,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+750,turned the Vatican into a den of thieves,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+751,watches his children beaten and led astray,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+752,was known as a progressive,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+753,progressive academic theologian Frings,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+754,a man full of goodness,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+755,the water and the blood that poured from the open side of her crucified Lord,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+756,burned like an unchecked wildfire throughout the Catholic world,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+757,progressive destroyer of Ottaviani,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+758,a man called progressive,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+759,godfather of the liberal European Catholic Church,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+760,brazen enemies of the Faith,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+761,alleged brains of the Sankt Gallen Mafia,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+762,mediasavvy frontman for the ultraliberal wing,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+763,another Sankt Gallen member,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+764,what kind of creature Kasper was,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+765,trumpeting in his blatant heresies from every rooftop he could find,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+766,finishing touch to the poisoned cake,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+767,whatever you want to call yourself,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+768,wolves in the episcopate,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+769,incredible brazenness of their hatred of the Catholic Faith,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+770,Sankt Gallen Mafia prelates,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+771,charade of postconciliar Catholicism,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+772,schizophrenic mindset of the Churchs leadership,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+773,conservative champion of orthodoxy,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+774,we played the Anglican game,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+775,the last gasp of the old Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+776,wolves in shepherds clothing eating the sheep,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+777,New Paradigm of Merciful Conciliar Wonderfulness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+778,Could we have been wrong about him,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+779,And if so could we have been this wrong,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+780,prisoner of the Vatican,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+781,How can you just sit there smiling issuing bland platitudinous nonsense while this lunatic drives the sheep off a cliff,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+782,blatantly denying and undermining ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+783,the godfather of the liberal wing of European Catholicism,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+784,Is it any wonder that so many Catholics have become disaffected,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+785,Why is this man still a cardinalWhy is he still a bishopWhy is he still allowed to call himself a Catholic theologianWhy did you apparently deliberately ensure that he was able to enter the Conclave to decide who your successor was going to be,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+786,Why have we so often seen these men  compromised intellectually and morally  elevated to superior rank despite the incredible brazenness of their hatred of the Catholic Faith,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+787,one of the main figures of the liberal wing of the Catholic Church,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+788,He will do a fantastic job,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+789,nothings looking any brighter,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+790,Shes a big fan of torture,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+791,and it may be the most important one to date,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+792,The move creates some big questions about both the administrations foreign policy ambitions as well as the presidents relationship with the deep state,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+793,If you enjoyed Hillary Clintons tenure as Secretary of State youll like Pompeos,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+794,reasserting  itself aggressively invading and occupying Ukraine threatening Europe and doing nearly nothing to aid in the destruction and defeat of ISIS,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+795,Pompeo also isnt a huge fan of calling the federal government out when it is clearly violating the rights of Americans,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+796,Are these really the values the US should be promoting,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+797,will be much happier now,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+798,From Bad To Worse,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+799,a lot of us can just shout out What are you thinking as President Donald Trump brings CIA Director Mike Pompeo a man that blasted the likes of Edward Snowden for revealing the crimes of our government to the State Department and installs Gina Haspel in the position of head of the Central Intelligence Agency,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+800,shout out What are you thinking,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+801,start issuing uniforms decorated with skulls and lightning bolts,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+802,This isnt a radical departure for CIA Greenwald addedAfter all Haspel did this under George TenetAt the time John Brennan  who became Obamas CIA director  was an advocate of rendition  other torture methodsAnd Pompeo was fine with black sitesStill notable shes an actual torturer,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+803,The new CIA Director Haspel who tortured some folks probably cant travel to the EU to meet other spy chiefs without facing arrest due to an ECCHRBerlin complaint to Germanys federal prosecutor,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+804,The CIA might as well start issuing uniforms decorated with skulls and lightning bolts,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+805,This is more of the same old same old going on and it looks like its about to get a lot worse,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+806,notorious for extreme violence and bloodshed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+807,white people are devils and Jewish people are satanic,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+808,white people are devils,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+809,plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+810,wonder how far a white congressman would get,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+811,I personally know Farrakhan Ive been to his home done meetings participated in events with him Davis told TheDCI dont regard Louis Farrakhan as an aberration or anything I regard him as an outstanding human being who commands a following of individuals who are learned and articulate and he plays a big role in the lives of thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of people he emphasized later,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+812,a notorious racist and antiSemite,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+813,a politician who praised a racist hate group leader and discussed the Jewish question,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+814,another jihad terror attack,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+815,the most important priority for all too many American officials,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+816,a nomad and a vagabond,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+817,It was nothing anymore,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+818,freedom from jihad and Shariah shines forth ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+819,Protecting the image of Islam not protecting the public still seems to be the most important priority for all too many American officials,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+820,Willfully Ignorant FBI Cant Discover Motive For Muslim Jihadi Who Drove Into Propane Tanks At Travis Air Force Base,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+821,Of course even if they had found those things given their track record of denial and deception they may still be searching for Kazis motive,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+822,We know that the Islamic State alQaeda and other groups have called upon Muslims in the US to try to kill military personnel and police as well as civilians,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+823,In any case a larger point is being lost hereAnd that is that there is a war going on,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+824,The FBIs bafflement here is part of its deep deep corruptionThe FBI doesnt acknowledge that there is a global jihad or that Islam has anything to do with terrorismIt doesnt admit that there is a war going on and treats each act of Islamic terror as if it were a separate and discrete criminal event unrelated to all the others,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+825,So each time something like this happens theyre back at Square One trying to figure out motive,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+826,Ragan most likely means that investigators didnt find an ISIS membership card in Kazis wallet or lots of phone calls to Iraq or Syria or a note from Kazi reading I did this for Allah and IslamAllahu akbar,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+827,the machete begins to slice through their necks,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+828,burkaclad widow who does not drive and speaks only Uurdu,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+829,Shes a wacko lunatic,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+830,Muslim Dem IT Aides Family Member ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+831,For the sake of money they would have done anything,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+832,Hadeed did not introduce any evidence to the judge about a pattern of possible fraud by Abid the timing of the move as it relates to the federal criminal case or the mental capacity of the dying man to understand paperwork,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+833,You have no control over Gilani do you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+834,I dont understand why the witness is having such trouble with the question,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+835,threatened that he is very powerful ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+836,if I ever call the police again he will do harm to me,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+837,There are possibilities that Imran or them might have been selling House information,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+838,Why is that even relevant,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+839,talking to a wall,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+840,Why do your signatures look different,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+841,public health emergency with international impact,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+842,highly infectious and extremely lethal,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+843,a deadly virus that causes severe bleeding and organ failure,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+844,Ebola victims can be a risk if mourners have direct contact with the body of the deceased,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+845,That will likely change however,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+846,ica will face a choice between accepting a nucleararmed Iran or acting to destroy as much of this capability as possibleT,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+847,Who was in that room,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+848,I dont doubt itT,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+849,Dont say you were not warned,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+850,America will face a choice between accepting a nucleararmed Iran or acting to destroy as much of this capability as possible,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+851,How did that work in Libya,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+852,Thats the real threat,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+853,killed dozens of Americans,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+854,Does anyone really think Iran will be better off if Trump puts a bunch of former terrorists in charge of the country,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+855,We need to worry about blowback from President Trumps fullyneoconized Middle East policy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+856,The potential for an explosive increase in cases,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+857,roll over and be good,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+858,eat sand and die,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+859,Is this what Bolton has in mind for North Korea,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+860,Was Trump involved in this intrigue,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+861,the death toll from the infectious disease continues to climb,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+862,it can kill up to 90 of victims,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+863,alarm as Ebola can spread more quickly in urban centers,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+864,the disease could also move into nine neighboring countries,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+865,absolutely no problems whatever,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+866,Anyone attempting to do this are Bad Nuns,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+867,gravely offended and outraged,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+868,the most outspokenly heretical and politicised organisation of female religious in the world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+869,hellbent on destroying President Trump ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+870,retailing Soviet fictions and titillating porn stories,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+871,lashed out at her,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+872,Maam you lied to me didnt you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+873,You lied to me didnt you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+874,the biggest story of treason and espionage in the recent memory,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+875,Congress must investigate and act,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+876,Youre a liar arent you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+877,In order to convert to Islam one says the shahadaSaying the shahada makes you a MuslimThe shahada is what is on the black flag of jihad,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+878,the most vicious and brutal ideology on the face of the Earth,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+879,ripping my organs out,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+880,hang my 3yearold and 1yearold and kidnap my 14yearold,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+881,Stop the Islamization of America,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+882,Is the principal acting on this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+883,And do the police have any interest in this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+884,Or would that be islamofauxbic,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+885,The Democrats are criminal treasonous and sleazy,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+886,Hellbent to destroy President Trump,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+887,toil in Soviet fictions and titillating porn stories,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+888,Treasure Trove of Evidence ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+889,Muslim IT Spys Defense Attorney,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+890,goes to extraordinary lengths ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+891,HOUSE HACKING SUSPECTS DEFENSE ATTORNEY ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+892,He was very very angry,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+893,Capitol Police didnt make arrests despite numerous red flags and then inadvertently gave evidence to defense attorneys that was supposed to go to prosecutors,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+894,Jewish tourists plunderers of holy lands,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+895,we shall fight the Jews and the Americans until they leave the land of Islam,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+896,it would be dangerous suicidal folly for Infidels to pretend that Ramadan is not the month of jihadAnd as our Ramadan willful blindness continues more Infidels will die,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+897,Ramadan is quintessentially the month of jihad,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+898,holy war and death for Allah,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+899,the religious tapestry of American life,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+900,Islams core beliefs make it clear that the latter statement is closer to the truth,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+901,Murdering infidels thus doesnt contradict the spirit of Ramadan it embodies it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+902,this blessed month the month of jihad,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+903,to the religious tapestry of American life,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+904,severely misleading the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+905,dangerous suicidal folly for Infidels ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+906,the frost of Vatican IIs perpetual winter,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+907,the world or Christ,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+908,those that are distancing themselves from the council to make another path are killing themselves,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+909,the most virulently antiCatholic organisation of Catholic religious in the world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+910,complete loss of our rights,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+911,would not rest until,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+912,sooner or later they will die,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+913,They will be outside the church,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+914,What are these people smoking,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+915,like a funeral bell,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+916,the misnamed federal GunFree Schools law,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+917,They used me as an example because of the backlash over Hillary Clinton,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+918,There is no Republican PartyTheres a Trump party,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+919,if Trumpism is not the future of the GOP it is hard to see what a promising GOP agenda might look like,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+920,their own country Great Britain,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+921,China was allowed to run 4 trillion in trade surpluses at our expense converting herself into the worlds first manufacturing power and denuding America of tens of thousands of factories and millions of manufacturing jobs,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+922,so disillusioned the nation that it elected Barack Obama,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+923,watershed moment in US and world history and in the future of the GOP,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+924,its time has come and gone,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+925,end tyranny in our world,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+926,Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+927,discretion is the better part of valor,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+928,dangerous to our democracy,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+929,Trump is president because he read the party and the country right,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+930,How could the Beltway GOP not see,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+931,What had a quarter century of Bushite free trade produced,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+932,Could Republicans not see,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+933,no two people are more responsible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+934,Should Trump fall and a restored establishment attempt to reimpose the old policies there will be a truly uncivil war in this country,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+935,After the Trumpian revolt there is no going back,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+936,most American of writers,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+937,to end tyranny in our world,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+938,tens of thousands of wounded,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+939,trillions of dollars sunk,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+940,millions uprooted and homeless,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+941,About which of half a dozen wars were they right,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+942,Do they believe their old agenda of open borders amnesty free trade globalism and democracycrusading can become Americas agenda again,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+943,So much time and money wasted so many lives ruined,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+944,They used me as an example because of the backlash over Hillary Clinton ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+945,actively destroyed his life an made it all but impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+946,a fine young man,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+947,It is commonly said that wage stagnation contributed to an economic anxiety in middle America that carried Donald Trump into the White House,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+948,the Wolff book brouhaha ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+949,and which I argued meant that an unreported illegal alien surge was underway,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+950,the picture is still bleaker,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+951,Can the same be said for the Obama Administration,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+952,Simply put the 21st century has not been good for nonHispanic job seekers,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+953,Only legislation above all an immigration moratorium can secure the fruits of the current economic expansion for Americans,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+954,The only answer is legislation border wall to stop the illegal alien flow a second Operation Wetback including EVerify to get the illegal alien selfdeporting a moratorium on legal immigration,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+955,too steeped in economic euphoria ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+956,the term native born will refer to a minuscule fraction of the US population,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+957,the conservative nonMain Stream Media ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+958,comes on the heels of gains ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+959,Companies doing business in Iran face substantial risks and those risks are even greater as we reimpose nuclearrelated sanctions,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+960,activities could be quickly expanded,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+961,betraying the interest of the American people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+962,How could Ryan possibly know this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+963,lacking push zeal and enthusiasm,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+964,the rotten inner workings,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+965,Isnt he prejudging the case without even finding out what actually happened,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+966,how many more are there,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+967,to dance to his tunes,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+968,One of the biggest stories of 2017 and 2018 ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+969,the biggest crime of spying in US history ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+970,to kill the investigation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+971,easy access to the corridors of power ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+972,his IT position in Congress gave him the power to change the US president,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+973,Wasserman Schultz was defending someone investigators allegedly told her was suspected of cybersecurity violations despite having resigned from her position as DNC head following a devastating hack during the 2016 election,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+974,profane with every official she could buttonhole,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+975,crook and an economic Leftist,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+976,for years and probably decades,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+977,Its the very reason the governments of the world still exist,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+978,Governments are nothing more than a handful of people,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+979,the worst president in American history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+980,the storms of raw truth that have blown through the capitals of rapacious power,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+981,prolific journalist and publisher ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+982,sucking up to the United States in the timehonored way,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+983,ending up in a hell hole,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+984,But it is also about freedom of speech about our right to know which is enshrined in the United States Constitution,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+985,a vindictive delight in tormenting Julian,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+986,beating the hell out of him,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+987,These four overweight obviously illtrained young men ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+988,he regarded what they are doing to Julian now as torture,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+989,The injustice done to this man is legion,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+990,in jail forever or even executed,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+991,in bed with the Russians is ludicrous,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+992,he is a renegade ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+993,the leader of the Russiagate frenzy,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+994,one who has exposed a system that threatens humanity,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+995,have not destroyed the man,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+996,Only the silence of good people will allow them to win,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+997,totally left out in the cold to fend for himself,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+998,a great miscarriage of justice ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+999,the bogus Swedish case ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1000,I have never known anything quite like it in my career,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1001,Their investigations turned up not a shred of real evidence ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1002,taken such a battering,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1003,the utter hypocrisy of news organizations,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1004,I find this one of the most unsavory and immoral things I have seen in my career,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1005,One of Assanges great tormentors The Guardians Luke Harding,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1006,it was a hack through Julian Assange,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1007,the dozen or so pissedoff people ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1008,he was rolled by the Clinton organization,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1009,one of their brethren was being brutalized,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1010,one of their brethren ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1011,both shocking and surreal,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1012,the shocking and the surreal ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1013,dark and menacing developments,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1014,the word journalism is becoming blighted,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1015,Never has there been a collusion like the one between the US and Israel,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1016,some of the most wickedly experimental munitions in the world ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1017,an extraordinary public service,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1018,they dressed it up ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1019,and put flesh on the expression ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1020,hang him from the rafters ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1021,they should be full of people saying that we are with you,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1022,There is no better way to keep the Catholic family together and committed to the Catholic restoration than the Catholic home school,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1023, keep the Catholic family together,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1024,Red Flag Laws save lives,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1025,emerged in a disappointingly watereddown form,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1026,willful intent to commit an act she knew was wrongful,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1027,sharply critical of Mr Trump,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1028,as disappointing as the rigged outcome of the email investigation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1029,give Hillary Clinton a Get Out of Jail Free card,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1030,treat Hillary Clinton with kid gloves,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1031,How in the world can we trust them,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1032,Peter Strzok a key investigator on both the Clinton email case and the investigation of Russia and the Trump campaign assured an FBI lawyer in August 2016 that well stop Trump from making it to the White House,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1033,we did not have confidence that Strzoks decision to prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the Midyearrelated investigative lead discovered on the Weiner laptop was free from bias,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1034,unpersuasive illogical and inconsistent,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1035,I fully believe IG Horowitz findings,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1036,Foolish Religion Author Gary Wills,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1037,the only reason why there is general interest in the Quran among nonMuslims is to seek an answer to the question of whether or not it justifies and encourages Islamic terrorism,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1038,Wills is no more trustworthy when he deals with the question of violence in the Quran,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1039,Wills doesnt mention the existence of such interpretations even to dismiss them,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1040,Likewise when he claims that the Quran has not a thing to say about Sharia he appears unaware that the Quran is one of the sources of Sharia,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1041,Again and again it turns out that Wills has ignored key passages in order to make his case,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1042,How would Garry Wills explain all thatHe cant,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1043,Leftist Catholic Pope Francis,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1044,the duty to kill infidels,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1045,That would be good to know were Wills a reliable witnessUnfortunately he proves to be just the opposite,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1046,Wills not surprisingly does not offer any quotation from me to back up his false claim,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1047,the best possible face on the Quran,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1048,unlimited warfare against nonMuslims,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1049,He ignores the fact that some Islamic authorities see this passage as calling for nothing less than unlimited warfare against nonMuslims,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1050,inexhaustible mercy and forgiveness,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1051,Wills has omitted all mention of the primary Quranic passage on this topic,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1052,Gods inexhaustible mercy indeed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1053,so very many Muslims worldwide ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1054,blow up the White House and conquer Rome and Spain,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1055,Wills naïve inaccurate misleadingly sunny view of the Quran,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1056,headinthesand posture toward Quranbased Islamic jihad violence ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1057,It isnt remotely accurate but it feels good and for the Catholic and Leftist establishment today that seems to be all that matters,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1058,Wills never mentions Quran 929 which commands Muslims to wage war against Jews and Christians and subjugate them as inferiors under the rule of Sharia,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1059,Wills doesnt give any source for it,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1060,To eradicate these Muslims are required to wage war until there exists none of it in the world and the only religion is that of Allah,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1061,if the Islamic holy book is really as peaceful and benign as Garry Wills makes it out to be why do so very many Muslims worldwide misunderstand it,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1062,naïve inaccurate misleadingly sunny view ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1063,if we do that we wont have to worry about mass shooters,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1064,they are about as antiAmerican as it comes in their new demands for gun confiscation measures,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1065,couldnt tell you any of these devices or items if they saw them,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1066,This has nothing to do with medicine or health,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1067,a right not a permission to keep and bear arms,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1068,carnage of gun violence,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1069,they dont want to bite the hand that feeds them,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1070,Where is Bergs blog post on that,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1071,Where is the AMA statement against the pharmaceutical companies and big government,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1072,but British establishment politicians have done everything they could to sabotage that vote since then,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1073,stance of denial and appeasement ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1074,the global jihad threat,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1075,If dealing with Islamic fundamentalism becomes a battle between us and the entire religion Ill tell you the result well loseWe will simply loseWe absolutely have to get that Muslim majority living in many of our towns and cities on our side more attuned to Western values than some pretty hardline interpretations of the Quran,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1076,a battle between us and the entire religion,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1077,No sane person is saying that the West should go to war with the entire Islamic world,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1078,with the entire Islamic world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1079,But if we dont speak about such facts how will we ever convince Muslims not to follow hardline interpretations of the Quran,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1080,Another problem with Farages statement is that it manifests a remarkable ignorance of historyWhile he is deeply concerned that British people not begin to think that resisting jihad terror means that they are in a battle with the entire religion of Islam he appears unaware of the fact that many Muslims throughout history have considered their entire religion to be at war with the entire nonMuslim world,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1081,remarkable ignorance of history,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1082,a battle with the entire religion,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1083,entire religion to be at war with the entire nonMuslim world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1084,I document this abundantly in my new book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS ,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1085,Sharaf adDin Ali Yazdi a fifteenthcentury Persian who wrote a biography of the Mongol Muslim warrior Tamerlane observed that the Quran says the highest dignity man can attain is that of making war in person against the enemies of his religion,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1086,Muhammad advises the same thing according to the tradition of the Muslim doctors,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1087,to exterminate the infidels,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1088,the People of the Book,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1089,and the imposition of their poll tax jizya until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled Koran 929 is a divinely ordained obligation,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1090,Fatimid caliph AlAmir biAhkamillah issued this edictNow the prior degradation of the infidels in this world before the life to comewhere it is their lotis considered an act of piety and the imposition of their poll tax jizya until they pay the tribute out of hand and have been humbled Koran 929 is a divinely ordained obligationThe dhimmis payment of his dues by a bill drawn on a Muslim or by delegating a real believer to pay it in his name will not be toleratedIt must be exacted from him directly in order to vilify and humiliate him so that Islam and its people may be exalted and the race of infidels brought lowThe jizya is to be imposed on all of them in full without exception,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1091,the race of infidels ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1092,the Umayyad caliph Umar ibn Abd alAziz sent out a message to the governors of the various Islamic provincesO you who believeThe nonMuslims are nothing but dirtAllah has created them to be partisans of Satan most treacherous in regard to all they do whose whole endeavor in this nether life is useless though they themselves imagine that they are doing fine workUpon them rests the curse of Allah of the Angels and of man collectively,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1093,The nonMuslims are nothing but dirt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1094,partisans of Satan most treacherous in regard to all they do,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1095,whose whole endeavor in this nether life is useless,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1096,at war with the entire religion,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1097,just another mainstream hack politician,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1098,Nigel Farage has become just another mainstream hack politician,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1099,The persecution of Julian Assange must endOr it will end in tragedy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1100,a tsunami of lies and smear engulf him endlessly vindictively perfidiously,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1101,murdered publicly and gruesomely ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1102,to crush starving and stricken people in a genocidal assault ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1103,a tool of Russian intelligence,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1104,a nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1105,Assange is Putins bitch,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1106,a damaged personality and callous,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1107,Screw the terroristHell be eating cat food forever,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1108,the suburban home of Americas warmaking elite ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1109,Like a spurned lover,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1110,Assange is in mortal danger,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1111,They can remain silent for which history will be unforgivingOr they can act in the interests of justice and humanity and bring this remarkable Australian citizen home,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1112,gross miscarriage of justice and the extreme danger that await him ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1113,a person of extraordinary resilience and courage,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1114,a tsunami of lies and smear engulf him endlessly,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1115,they planned a war on a single human being and on the very principle of freedom of speech,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1116,over whom she fawned ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1117,the icon for your generation,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1118,one of the instigators of the invasion and destruction of Libya as a modern state,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1119,Like the invasion of Iraq it was based on lies,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1120,a breeding ground for ISIS and other jihadists,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1121,Thanks largely to her Libya became a breeding ground for ISIS and other jihadistsThanks largely to her tens of thousands of refugees fled in peril across the Mediterranean and many drowned,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1122,the biggest arms sale ever ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1123,a highly paid reporter,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1124,She offered no evidence  nor was asked for any  to back her grave allegations,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1125,We all know it,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1126,personal petty inhuman and craven attacks ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1127,one of the greatest journalistic scoops of the last 30 years,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1128,not a penny going to WikiLeaks,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1129,gloated on his blog ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1130,trying to clamp down ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1131,with their attendant rape murder and destruction,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1132,The authorities care so little about violence against women that they manipulate rape allegations at will,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1133,a Manhunt target list,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1134,a nice bride in prison,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1135,No investigative journalism in my lifetime can equal the importance of what WikiLeaks has done in calling rapacious power to account,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1136,a oneway moral screen has been pushed back to expose the imperialism of liberal democracies,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1137,division and degradation of unworthy lives,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1138,a vast tapestry of lies up on which we feed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1139,systematic brutality the widespread atrocities the ruthless suppression of independent thought,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1140,baldfaced lies of governments ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1141,warmongering sycophantic embarrassing speech ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1142,until she was told she could not do this that Assange had committed no crime that WikiLeaks was a publisher whose work was protected under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights to which Australia was one of the original signatories,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1143,Malcolm Turnbull can remain silentOr he can seize this opportunity and use his governments diplomatic influence to defend the life of an Australian citizen whose courageous public service is recognised by countless people across the world,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1144,defend the life of an Australian citizen,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1145,is recognised by countless people across the world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1146,gross miscarriage of justice ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1147,Take the guns first and then due process,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1148,unconstitutional and unlawful laws,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1149,despite the fact that government has never been given authority to restrict or regulate arms,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1150,attacking the rights of the people,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1151,We wouldnt be doing our jobs as mayors if we werent focusing on gun violence,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1152,nothing could be further from the truth,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1153,the Second Amendment recognizes the right to keep and bear arms is a right given to us by our Creator not a permission we gain from government,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1154,And just what kind of policies are we talking about,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1155,Jim Comey and Jim Comey alone,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1156,the victim of a scurrilous slander campaign ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1157,the systematic brutality the widespread atrocities the ruthless suppression of independent thought,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1158,Long live the Fifth Estate,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1159,ossified bureaucracies incapable of acting quickly and decisively,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1160,Fourth Estate on Life Support,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1161,Fourth Estate now on life support,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1162,All for spreading unwelcome truth around,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1163,get their hands on him,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1164,the noble profession of journalism ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1165,No investigative journalism in my lifetime can equal the importance of what WikiLeaks has done ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1166,a Fourth Estate more important far then they all,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1167,the brutality of the celebrated surge in Iraq,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1168,far more a patriot ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1169,had the temerity to lavish praise ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1170,Do you want a Church that remains silent when she should speak  a Church that does not condemn the suppression of conscience and does not stand up for the just liberty of the people  a Church that locks herself up within the four walls of her temple in unseemly sycophancy ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1171,Where is the voice of conscience to condemn what is happening to Julian Assange whose only crime is publishing documents exposing the criminal activities and corruption of governments and other Establishment elites,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1172,One might ask is unseemly sycophancy at work among the media,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1173,When he says that Muslims never killed Jews just for being Jews he is lying and relying on the historical ignorance of his audience,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1174,groaned under the heavy yoke of the Almohads,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1175,Dont allow yourself to be deceived by the likes of Jihad AlAyeshPreorder The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1176,banished tortured and annihilated ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1177,to shed crocodile tears about their sorrows their heresy and their historical lies,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1178,In my new book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS  I detail many instances in which Muslims did exactly that,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1179,enraged by the humiliation ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1180,The twelfthcentury Muslim historian Ibn Baydhaq detailed how the Almohads treated the Jews as they advanced,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1181,clinging to their Jewish faith,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1182,the vogue today is ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1183,The Jews claim that it happened to them alone and that the number of Jews who died in that Holocaust was six millionWhat we have here are historical errors,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1184,Inhuman and criminal annihilation ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1185,No it never happened,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1186,tormenting and persecuting them,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1187,Since Germany and Europe did not want the Jews the Nazis came up with the idea of sending the Jews to another country,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1188,had no stomach for an invasion,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1189,Americans no longer have to fear North Korea,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1190,can sleep peacefully at night,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1191,a very real threat,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1192,the Houses top cop ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1193,Muslim Spy Ring Investigation,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1194,God knows what else,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1195,how deeply has America been compromised,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1196,Becerra  now Californias Democratic attorney general  failed to ensure that the Awans didnt have access to House computer systems during the 2016 election which was wrought with cybersecurity scandals,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1197,numerous and egregious violations ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1198,He didnt provide any support for his claim which is contrary to evidence Kiko and Irving presented to Congress,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1199,Why was the ringleader of the widespread Muslim spy scandal just offered a plea dealWho has been exposed to blackmail and God knows what elseAnd how deeply has America been compromised,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1200,Its unclear why that request was not granted or why it was a request rather than an order,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1201,Make America Great Again,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1202,I support my President,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1203,scum bag of the year,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1204,Make American Great Again,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1205,The civility of the Left on full display,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1206,support my President a,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1207,Is this the America Maxine Waters wanted,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1208,FE SPACE FOR EVERYONE,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1209,We got kicked out of a public school for reenforcing Americas values by teaching the US Constitution,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1210,who care more about saving face than they do the souls of men Luke 1910 as well as saving their country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1211,the reason I dropped the J word was because you havent in 40 years ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1212,They are people pleasers and nothing more,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1213,to put boots on the ground,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1214,it seems like when you do the wrong thing before God and man somehow people seem to give it a passYet when you begin to do the right things and obey God and love man according to the Word of God all of a sudden the world acts like youre doing something wrong,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1215,the rock n roll world ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1216,the revisionists and propagandists ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1217,abortion is murder and that 58 million babies have been murdered since 1973 under the guise of womans choice ,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1218,homosexuality is an abomination,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1219,the reprobates and hypocrites ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1220,They are being exposed for who they are and they do not like it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1221,Of course they did and of course they still do,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1222,political leader of the pack,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1223,because they have simply forsaken the cross,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1224,hide behind a microphone ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1225,The reason they dont is because they are guilty of what they fail to confront,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1226,They can write all big and bad but when it comes to what someone else should doHowever when it is time for them to put boots on the ground they are simply missing in action MIA,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1227,the freest country in the world ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1228,to live in the freest country in the world ,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1229,convict them unto godly repentance ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1230,deceiving themselves into believing that they are demanding a lawful change just as long as it does not offend anyone ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1231,these counterfeits will be the first ones to get angry with and denounce and attack the ones that are sent by the Spirit of God ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1232,in a righteous sense reverse the lawlessness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1233,These groups of people are simply enemies of the cross of Christ and know not the power of God unto salvation ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1234,those who are counterfeits,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1235,jog comfortably along together,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1236,slandered lied about defamed ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1237,fighting the good fight of faith ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1238,taking ground for the kingdom ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1239,crammed with very many and various kinds of evil,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1240,Yet you do not see any warfare or opposition around them and why,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1241,If Christians were equally as faithful to the Lord separated from the world 2 Corinthians 617 and living so that their lives were a reproof to all ungodliness the world would hate them as much as it ever did,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1242,hard toilsome and unquiet life crammed with very many and various kinds of evil,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1243,very eccentric but not stupid,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1244,ate grass for decades,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1245,foreign affairs experience appears to have been limited to the International House of Pancakes,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1246,End The Korean War,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1247,They would be immediate targets should the US and South Korea attack the north,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1248,only three nuclear weapons to shatter Japan and just two to cripple South Korea not to mention polluting the globe with radioactive dust and contaminating North Asias water sources,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1249,Nuclear explosions would spread radioactive contamination over northern China and Pacific Russia,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1250,War against North Korea would be a slow and bloody slog,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1251,number in the millions,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1252,Its not coming back,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1253,There will be no turning back,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1254,Why are the people responsible for these wars still being listened to,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1255,the warriors of jihad ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1256,The public treasure has been consumed private wealth has been destroyed the temples have been stripped of gold silver jewels the relics of the saints and other most precious ornamentsMen have been butchered like cattle women abducted virgins ravished and children snatched from the arms of their parents,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1257,Dont allow yourself to be fooled arm yourself with the truth by preordering The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS ,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1258,couldnt resist an antiSemitic shot at Israeli occupation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1259,have profaned Gods name ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1260,he deplored the fact that ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1261,the Middle East today is weeping suffering and silent as others trample upon those lands ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1262,These are odd statements coming from Pope Francis a worldclass Islamopanderer notice that he said nothing about who was doing the persecuting and implied that it was the fault of powers outside the Middle East,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1263,Why we ask the western world why not raise ones voice over so much ferocity and injustice,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1264,No one defends Islam like Arab Christians,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1265,It is to defend Islam that Western clerics do not raise their voice against such acts of brutalityIt is to pursue a fruitless and chimerical dialogue that bishops in the US and Europe keep silent about Muslim persecution of Christians and enforce that silence upon others,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1266,extreme militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1267,Talk about extreme militant Islamists and the atrocities that they have perpetrated globally might undercut the positive achievements that we Catholics have attained in our interreligious dialogue with devout Muslims,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1268,The Catholic Church is following Pope Francis lead and Francis has said Christian terrorism does not exist Jewish terrorism does not exist and Muslim terrorism does not existThey do not exist And he has also said Authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1269,Why are your bishops silent on a threat that is yours today as well,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1270,respected contributors to their local community,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1271,I have faith in our president,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1272,If anyone is going to help them hed be the one,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1273,grossly disproportionate to the severity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1274,shrugging at the murder,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1275,because it would have been damaging to Obama,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1276,While Obama pardoned drug dealers and locked up ranchers Trump pardons ranchers and locks up drug dealers,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1277,tragic comedy of denial,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1278,Every other Muslim terrorist,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1279,every Islamic terrorism investigation inevitably becomes,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1280,Gun Control Is Now Truly Impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1281,wannabe statist dictator and naive dogooder ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1282,The latter think that removing guns will suddenly force humanity to stop all animosity toward one another hold hands and sing Kumbaya,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1283,The former recognizes that an armed populace is a threat to any tyrant and pushes for gun control out of selfpreservation,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1284,has now made gun control virtually impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1285,an anarchist video manifesto,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1286,gun control would never be the same in an era when anyone can download and print their own firearm with a few clicks,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1287,demanding that he take down his printablegun blueprints or face prosecution for violating federal export controls,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1288,I thought my life was over,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1289,It will be an irrevocable part of political life that guns are downloadable and we helped to do that,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1290,hold hands and sing Kumbaya,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1291,obscure set of US regulations ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1292,the genie is out of the bottle ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1293,What has the NRA done for you lately,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1294,Clearly they were acting unlawfully when they did what they did,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1295,anyone can make a deadly weapon at home with no government oversight,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1296,and I highly recommend the Wired article which is quite lengthy and has lots of information,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1297,his efforts have officially killed gun control,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1298,I barely put a million bucks into this and I got you the Second Amendment forever,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1299,The DNA of our culture is preservedThis is the first pillar in the internet gun culture of tomorrow and it is permanent,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1300,This is a huge milestone in the history of our county,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1301,the man who began developing 3D printing files so that you could manufacture your own guns,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1302,a Cold Warera law intended to control exports of military articles,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1303,Americas great intelligence agencies,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1304,Our Nations Great Comeback,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1305,because they thought Hillary Clinton was going to win,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1306,because they thought that Hillary Clinton was going to win,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1307,weakness on a pathetic scale,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1308,driven by their own guilt,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1309,The stronger NATO is the less maneuvering room Russia has,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1310,No King but King Jesus,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1311,REBELLION TO TYRANTS IS OBEDIENCE TO GOD,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1312,Whosoever therefore resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1313,Maybe he should have taken the time to look to the founding forefathers and that document which they drew up called The Declaration of Independence,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1314,I ask are Christians to submit to those who have sanctioned the murder of the innocent in the womb ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1315,Are Christians to submit to those who have redefined marriage where a man can now marry a man and a woman can now marry a woman ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1316,a confused biblically illiterate friend ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1317,this protestant ought to have stayed home to read their Bible rather than to protest corruption in government,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1318,maybe this individual should take the time to know a little bit of his own historyThere is nothing worse than when a person who doesnt know what they are talking about tries to tell you what the truth is,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1319,the Tyrant King George ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1320,Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1321,John Hancock the first signer of the Declaration of Independence said,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1322,the tyrant King George ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1323,this protestant should know what the Bible says about those in authority,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1324,Representatives work for us we do not work for them,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1325,the minister of God a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1326,unfruitful works of darkness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1327,No enactment of man can be considered law unless it conforms to the Law of God,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1328,those who have sanctioned the murder of the innocent in the womb ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1329,those who have redefined marriage where a man can now marry a man and a woman can now marry a woman ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1330,those who lie continuously to them that steal and even kill,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1331,the perverse modernday professing Christians ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1332,the children of God,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1333,hostile corrupt civil authorities ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1334,corrupt civil authorities of all stripes ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1335,a terror to good works,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1336,execute wrath upon him that doeth evil,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1337,execute wrath upon him that doeth good,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1338,Anyone who teaches that they have authority to execute wrath upon him that doeth good is ignorant and uneducated in their misleadings ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1339,the LORD God of the Hebrews,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1340,to tell him to obey or else,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1341,the meekest man alive ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1342,the troubler of Israel,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1343,whoso falleth not down and worshippeth shall the same hour be cast into the midst of a burning fiery furnace,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1344,the corrupt priests and the corrupt king ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1345,all of the evils ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1346,unlearned and ignorant men,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1347,the wicked that were at war with Christ ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1348,the corrupt and wicked priests,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1349,the corrupt and wicked in government,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1350,Furthermore the individual that wrote the article teaching people to submit to authorities might want to take the time to read Romans 1221 before perverting and twisting Romans 13 so that the next time he will not be guilty of twisting Scripture the way that Satan twists Scripture,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1351,Submit to those who lie continuously to them that steal and even kill,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1352,This isnt a case where the underlying facts of the law changedThe only thing that changed was the administration,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1353,deals a death blow ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1354,extremely restrictive handgun regulations in those countries,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1355,it will be difficult if not impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1356,make the already extremely difficult job of controlling access to guns practically impossible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1357,which have proven quite useless anyway,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1358,The government has been no more effective at stopping criminals from getting guns than at stopping them from obtaining drugs,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1359,a lifelong homosexual rapist and sexual predator,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1360,grossly corrupt and evil men,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1361,dedicated to the destruction of everything we want to preserve,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1362,Well suck it up,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1363,manifestly evil and apostate men,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1364,Then its up to us,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1365,Long live Hitler to death the Jews,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1366,beaten her to death,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1367,Infidel you must die,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1368,Maybe its the authorities who are insane,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1369,If President Trump were a mole wouldnt he have made life easier for Putin,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1370,Wouldnt he have eased sanctions,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1371,Wouldnt he have been less confrontational than Obama in Syria,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1372,Wouldnt the President be making Putins attempts at expanding his influence easier,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1373,most flagrant lies ever dreamed up,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1374,but not surprising given this administrations worship at the altar of gun rights ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1375,a troubling and dangerous settlement,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1376,Why on earth would the Trump administration make it easier for terrorists and gunmen to produce undetectable plastic guns,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1377,an avowed anarchist who hopes for a world in which governments cant stop individuals from getting guns,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1378,Ghost guns are already a problem they are used not just by lone shooters but as part of criminal enterprisesReleasing instructions for their manufacture which now only circulate on the dark Web will lead directly to the loss of more innocent livesThe administration should stop the State Department from going ahead with this foolhardy move and Congress should act to plug the loopholes that these guns are designed to take advantage of,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1379,put carnage a click away,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1380,felons those with mental illness domestic abusers or possible terrorists,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1381,Credit for this dangerous scenario  in which getting an AR15style rifle is just a matter of a few computer clicks  goes to the Trump administration for its inexplicable decision to settle a lawsuit it was on the verge of winning,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1382,So it was stunning ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1383,to plug the loopholes ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1384,the most prolific serial predator,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1385,Expose and rout every last predator,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1386,Purge every homosexual from its clerical ranks,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1387,Are you thoroughly disgusted by this farce,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1388,All credibility is lost,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1389,will destroy the future of the Church,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1390,push the envelope further ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1391,So much time and money wasted so many lives ruined ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1392,Prosecutors Doing Muellers Dirty Work Are A Disgrace To America,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1393,PROSECUTORS DOING MUELLERS DIRTY WORK ARE A DISGRACE TO AMERICA,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1394,his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1395,opening up on Mueller and his team with both barrels of his massive Twitter ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1396,his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1397,A Disgrace To America,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1398,This leftwing witch hunt has been ongoing since day one of Trumps presidency in order to impair and impede his ability to get the job done,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1399,A DISGRACE TO AMERICA,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1400,Sessions is a weak sister,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1401,this Rigged Witch Hunt ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1402,a disgrace to USA,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1403,the Mueller witch hunt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1404,one of the most successful in history is a TOTAL HOAX,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1405,the phony and discredited Dossier ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1406,the lovely Lisa Page,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1407,the Attorney General of the United States should step in and put an end to Special Counsel Robert Muellers longrunning Russia probe,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1408,Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1409,The Democrats paid for the phony and discredited Dossier which was along with Comey McCabe Strzok and his lover the lovely Lisa Page used to begin the Witch HuntDisgraceful,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1410,stain our country and further,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1411,the 17 angry Democrats ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1412,before it continues to stain our country any further,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1413,Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now before it continues to stain our country any further,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1414,his 17 angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to sic USA,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1415,a conflicted Muellers dirty work,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1416,his 17 angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1417,The Rigged Witch Hunt ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1418,the rigged witch hunt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1419,STOP THE ELECTION OF DONALD TRUMP,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1420,He should never ever been allowed to,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1421,a deep state coo attempt ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1422,to stop the will of We the People,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1423,Lock them all up this has to end,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1424,FJmng7Z  Sen Patrick Le,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1425,This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now before it continues to stain our country any further,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1426,the presidents most explicit post or statement to date ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1427,Bob Mueller is totally conflicted and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1428,This is an attempt to obstruct justice hiding in plain sightAmerica must never accept it,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1429,Ive looked at all those tweets and they dont amount to anything,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1430,and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1431,Manafort was being treated worse than Al Capone the notorious Prohibitionera Chicago gangster,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1432,hiding in plain sight,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1433,Two months ago Trump tweeted that he should have chosen a different person as attorney general who wouldnt have needed to recuse himselfI wish I did he wrote,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1434,In his tweets Trump also quoted criticism of the investigation from Alan Dershowitz a Harvard Law School professor who frequently defends Trump on televisionIn an interview with the Los Angeles Times Dershowitz said he does not believe Sessions has the authority to end the probeYou cant be both recused and making decisions about the investigation he said,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1435,one of Trumps earliest and most active supporters,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1436,deadliest wars in history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1437,most flagrant lies ever dreamed up ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1438,What proof of this can possibly be offeredHow can we know,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1439,a miscarriage of human justice beyond any the world could ever have imagined,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1440,TO ARGUE AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY is to contend with constituted reality,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1441,life for life eye for eye tooth for tooth hand for hand foot for foot,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1442,Every one of us is born on Death Row and lives out his allotted lifespan in its shadow without hope of reprieve,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1443,thou shalt die the death,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1444,there has always been a death penaltyGod instituted it and He was the first to impose it embedding it in the very fabric of natural law,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1445,from that point in history lawful killing in atonement for taking the life of another is sanctioned by God,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1446,After all it is not the injury to relatives or any other human consideration that makes homicide the serious sin that it is but as God Himself pointed out to Noah it is the fact that man was made to the image of God that makes an assault on him tantamount to an assault on GodIt is therefore to God and not to His creatures that reparation is primarily due,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1447,it was instituted by God Himself,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1448,the new mancentered conciliar religion,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1449,threats to the sacredness of human life,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1450,the new mancentered theology ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1451,when sentence is not speedily pronounced against the evil the children of men commit evils without any fear,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1452,a tool for revenge,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1453,the fallen human condition,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1454,the author of the letter falls headlong into the very error Pius XII warns against,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1455,The supernatural dimension of the punishment ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1456,leaps to the eye ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1457,the spiritual welfare of citizens ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1458,future bliss in heaven,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1459,the death penalty as administered by society must be viewed against the backdrop of divine revelation if it is to make any real sense,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1460,it terminates only his temporal life on earth catapulting him into eternity for his final judgment before almighty God,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1461,Suffering the penalty not only allows the criminal to render expiation to God and to society but if accepted in Christs grace with due repentance it preserves his soul from hell and eliminates much of his purgatory,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1462,the problem of the death penalty is insoluble except from a Christian point of view,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1463,the faith teaches that eternal damnation is incalculably worse,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1464,cannot be compared with his future endless existence in heaven,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1465,through the fabric of human civilizations ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1466,Converts to the prevailing conciliar religion and its New Pentecost,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1467,obliterating the death penalty,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1468,without the shedding of blood there is no remission,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1469,eternal bliss in heaven,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1470,one of the cruelest means ever devised,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1471,the glorified man who is Christ the King,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1472,From that point on it is Christ who delegates the divine authority to punish by killing and both Scripture and tradition testify that it is lawfully wielded by those to whom He entrusts the temporal sword in His Kingdom,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1473,the minister of God and avenger to execute wrath upon him that doth evil ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1474,the wages of sin ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1475,capable of committing incalculably more grievous sins than heretofore,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1476,our hereditary inclination to evil,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1477,the inescapable consequence of our fallen nature ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1478,As with everyone else the moment of death ushers them either into heaven hell or purgatory,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1479,By divine decree it will perdure until the end of time when the former things are passed away Only then death shall be no more nor mourning nor crying nor sorrow shall be any more and not one minute sooner,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1480,how shallow Catholic thinking on the death penalty has become and how far it has deviated from the ageold doctrine of the Church,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1481,The desire for swift and firm convictions has sent many to death who never deserved such a punishment nor was such a punishment truly necessary for the safety of society,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1482,the most unprecedented persecution,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1483,Putting aside freedom of speech the persecution of this man has been something that should horrify all freethinking peopleIf it doesnt horrify us then we have surrendered something very valuable,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1484,It is a true disgrace,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1485,it was an absolute disgrace,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1486,the tsunami of vindictive personal abuse ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1487,his own government the government of his homeland Australia applied legitimate diplomatic pressure on behalf of its citizen,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1488,bogus sexual assault charges,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1489,If Julian is allowed to be spirited away to some supermax hellhole it will be a great atrocity,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1490,We must ask ourselves why this hasnt happened,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1491,something he would not even contemplate,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1492,the British police would offer Julian a warm welcome when he came out,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1493,the milieu of machination ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1494,such a significant journalist,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1495,a publisher and reporter who has changed history,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1496,Nothing in my time as a journalist has equaled the rise of WikiLeaks and its extraordinary impact on journalism,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1497,the only journalistic organization that has a 100 record of accuracy and authenticity,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1498,a very principled individual,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1499,an extremely interesting man,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1500,to do all within his power to return Julian home before Julians situation becomes an irreversible tragedy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1501,the fiftyfirst state of the United States,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1502,an almost totally servile relationship ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1503,it does move in lockstep with the US ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1504,virtually none of this emerges,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1505,You are absolutely right ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1506,the most enlightened newspaper in the country,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1507,This is precisely because WikiLeaks is producing the kind of journalism that they ought to be doing,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1508,if Julian Assange is allowed to literally go under it represents the conquest of all of us,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1509,the great atrocities of histories ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1510,if you know the theater is in fact on fire and you do not shout out what happens after is your responsibility,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1511,In the world of human rights silence equals mass murder,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1512,What didnt emerge was the whole conflict of interest in this hearingThe judges husband is a figure deep within the national security establishment in Britain who was named in WikiLeaks documentsBecause there is no serious media examining the whole WikiLeaks witch hunt virtually none of this emerges,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1513,In the library silence is goldenIn the world of human rights silence equals mass murder,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1514,remain in the toilet,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1515,if that is even possible,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1516,gross dereliction of duty,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1517,May God bless and keep Bishop Robert Morlino,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1518,sin so grave that it cries out to heaven for vengeance,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1519,hated with a perfect hatred,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1520,poses serious moral and physical dangers,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1521,Stop the Synod Here,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1522,a group of Angry Democrat Thugs,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1523,the president dictated a misleading statement about it a year later and it remains murky just when he learned about the meeting,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1524,his staff amounts to nothing more than a group of Angry Democrat Thugs,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1525,they know there is no Russian Collusion,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1526,Trump also continued to cast himself as a victim in the matter saying when he attempts to FIGHT BACK or say anything bad about the Rigged Witch Hunt his critics scream Obstruction,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1527,the Rigged Witch Hunt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1528,But legal experts say anyone in Trumps orbit would be charged with conspiracy making false statements to federal investigators or obstructing justiceAll are federal crimes,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1529,What kind of man is this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1530,nearly constant complaints from Trump ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1531,Youre wrong Mr President,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1532,one of Trumps favorite pinatas,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1533,the presidents public scorn,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1534,the former Alabama senator never took control of the Justice Department,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1535,unprecedented success at effectuating the Presidents agenda ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1536,no nation has a more talented more dedicated group of law enforcement investigators and prosecutors than the United States,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1537,one that protects the safety and security and rights of the American people reduces violent crime enforces our immigration laws promotes economic growth and advances religious liberty,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1538,However no nation has a more talented more dedicated group of law enforcement investigators and prosecutors than the United States,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1539,Ungrateful reprobates pretenders counterfeits and hypocrites ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1540,She and her daughters were arrogant overfed and unconcerned they did not help the poor and needyThey were haughty and did detestable things before me,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1541,Instead of preaching out against sin they advocate for that which God clearly condemns thereby making war against God Micah 35 which at length destroys our government our country and our families,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1542,Sodom and Gomorrah was Judged by God Because Men Refused to Keep His Commandments in Dealing with the Wicked,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1543,love wounds itself by killing justice,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1544,How often I see and hear the professors of Christianity today walking contrary to the word and spirit of the Living Christ ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1545,they that forsake the law praise the wicked,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1546,How willing they are to overlook judgment when it comes to the criminals that run rampant in this country and on the other hand how willing they are to show compassion to the criminals while overlooking the victims,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1547,so that we can have sex with them,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1548,rained down burning sulfur ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1549,wanted to perform homosexual gang rape on the two angels,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1550,gave themselves up to sexual immorality and perversion,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1551,There is probably nothing more inhospitable than homosexual gang rape,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1552,homosexuality was the reason God poured fiery sulfur on the cities completely destroying them and all of their inhabitants,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1553,Sodom and Gomorrah serve as a powerful example of how God feels about sin in general and homosexuality specifically,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1554,Professed Christians in America today ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1555,the Biblical patriarchs and our American forefathers ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1556,to submit to tyranny ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1557,the prevailing immoralities and debauchers of society,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1558,Professed Christians in America today talk much of love through inaction and yet know nothing of it 1 John 318They read what to do but do it notIn fact they declare and proclaim how much they love God and yet if you were to have them read His moral law and look to their own lives they would find how much they actually hate God through their actions Matthew 158,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1559,Instead of reaching out to the greatest demographic here in America public high schools they send missionaries to foreign lands to do there what they fail to do for their own hereInstead of fighting for their posterity and shutting down the illegalities of sodomy in all 50 states they teach them to just do their best to understand that they cannot help themselves while God says the opposite Leviticus 2018,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1560,Instead of fighting on their behalf against the federal government that is illegally indoctrinating them they simply give their kids over to them to be dumbed down,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1561,And instead of protesting the murder of 58 million innocent babies Proverbs 617 they merely pass it off as a choice that being the lessons that they learned from the media that they say that they do not believe Romans 118The American Church instead of protesting corruption in government through the example of the Biblical patriarchs and our American forefathers Matthew 51718 teach to submit to tyranny as if to suggest that it is somehow obedience to God Romans 1221,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1562,The Church in America has failed to keep the Commandments of the God of Israel,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1563,Look to their feigned strength that they profess to possessIt is gauged by simply looking to the prevailing immoralities and debauchers of societyThey are weak and pathetic and they have no excuses as to why America is where we is today,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1564,Its the same reason that he is judging America today Amos 412 He cannot find the righteous in order to spare her ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1565,through tolerance and apathy Americans are bringing upon themselves destruction ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1566,bringing upon themselves destruction ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1567,which leaves no alternative as to why God judges and is judging America today ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1568,How do you show mercy to a people who observe lying vanities Jonah 24 and refuse to return to the Lord Jeremiah 616 on His terms,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1569,Instead of reaching out to the greatest demographic here in America public high schools they send missionaries to foreign lands to do there what they fail to do for their own here,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1570,They are weak and pathetic and they have no excuses as to why America is where we is today,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1571,to take another dig ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1572,and so much more,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1573,Comey lies  leaks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1574,The recordsetting prison sentence ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1575,her sentence of 63 months in federal prison was unfair and accused Sessions of having a double standard,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1576,So unfair Jeff Double Standard,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1577,theres only one possible explanation,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1578,Pedophile priests sell papers,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1579,Yet everything right is good and everything wrong is evil,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1580,Prince of this World,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1581,before this crisis gets any more outofcontrol than it already is,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1582,Do not be afraid,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1583,delighted screams of Allahu akbar,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1584,the establishment of an Islamic staterequires the conquest of America Britain Russia France and Italy  Rome and other infidel lands will be conquered,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1585,After the laws of Allah were abandoned and the heretic regimes were imposed on the Muslims the most important thing to do is to restore the rule of the Muslims through the Quran and the Sunna in order to renew Islamic life and to deliver the Islamic message to the worldMy brothers the implication of this today should be the establishment of an Islamic state over all the lands of the Muslims,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1586,a swipe at the Jews,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1587,after the elimination of the filthy Jewish entity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1588,a tiny minority of extremists abhorred by the vast majority of peaceful Muslims for hijacking their religion,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1589,They have yet to come to grips with the fact that extremism is and always has been so distressingly widespread in Muslim communitiesBut they will,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1590,the worst enemies of the Muslims,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1591,astonishing and indeed providential development,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1592,deeply scandalized by the abominable and sacrilegious behavior ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1593,Everyone is guilty for the good he could have done and did not do If we do not oppose evil we tacitly feed it,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1594,emerges mountainously into view never to be buried again,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1595,the professional Catholic dissident ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1596,a trafficker in conspiracy theories who mixes fact fiction and venom,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1597,a disgruntled former employee and always a crackpot,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1598,A putsch is afoot and if the US bishops do not as a body stand up to defend the Holy Father in the next 24 hours we shall be slipping towards schism long before the bishops,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1599,the Greatest Catholics of All Time ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1600,their itching ears want to hear ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1601,whose living guts they have hated from the moment of his election ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1602,issued a statement affirming that he has known Viganò for 39 years has always known and respected him as a man of truthfulness faith and integrity and that his testimony should be taken seriously by all,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1603,Bishop Athanasius Schneider declares Archbishop Viganò confirmed his statement by a sacred oath invoking the name of GodThere is therefore no reasonable and plausible cause to doubt the truth content of the document of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1604,Cardinal Raymond Burkes statement declares The declarations made by a prelate of the authority of Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò must be totally taken to heart by those responsible in the Church,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1605,If Cardinal Wuerl was unaware of the sanctions and unaware of the reason for them why did he ask no questions of the nuncio regarding the reason for his demand,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1606,the pedophile summit of 2002 in Rome,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1607,a parasite in the Body of Christ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, ���Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1608,to the bitter end,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1609,thoroughly infested with homosexuals,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1610,Pope Francis Must Resign,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1611,sounding the neoCatholic air raid siren,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1612,brazenly lies about it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1613,If as he now continues to state he knew nothing of the abuses committed by McCarrick and the measures taken by Pope Benedict how can his answer be explained,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1614,the most wayward Pope in Church history,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1615,the Churchs supreme pastor who in the case of McCarrick not only did not oppose evil but associated himself in doing evil with someone he knew to be deeply corrupt,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1616,Which is just Allens more nuanced way of saying Dont believe it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1617,Ignoring eleven pages of detail written and published under oath he suggests there has been no Documentation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1618,Communist dictators of Beijing,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1619,The idea of a purge of gay priests is both ridiculous and dangerousAny purge would empty parishes and religious orders of the thousands of priests and bishops who lead healthy lives of service and faithful lives of celibacy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1620,Too little too late ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1621,Faggiolis argument demonstrates that neoCatholicism has never been about making the authentic Faith more appealing to a modern world founded precisely on a rejection of the Churchs authorityIt is not about the Faith at allRather it is an ideological movement dedicated to the facesaving defense of a catastrophic failure in ecclesial innovation that has corrupted the human element of the Church in practically every department,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1622,As Edward Pentin notes all 3 prelates have since been special advisors of Francis or rehabilitated by him,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1623,who covered up homosexual rape committed by a priest against his own nephewhas supported samesex marriage and advised the King of Belgium to sign a law legalizing abortion in 1990,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1624,disfigured by so many ignominies,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1625,the grave disconcerting and sinful conduct ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1626,someone he knew to be deeply corrupt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1627,someone he knew well to be a pervert,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1628,their active destruction of the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1629,encouraged the wolves to continue to tear apart the sheep ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1630,debacle without equal in Church history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1631,Yet there is little doubt they will continue the same polemic that for nearly sixty years has doggedly defended every one of the ruinous reforms that have resulted in a debacle without equal in Church history,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1632,advancement to religious vows and ordination should be barred to those who are afflicted with evil tendencies to homosexuality or pederasty since for them the common life and the priestly ministry would constitute serious dangers,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1633,to smear the man,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1634,for Winters it is not the Church or the integrity of her doctrine and discipline that must be defended against enemies but only Bergoglio and the regime of novelty he is leading to its final extremity,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1635,with a large grain of salt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1636,he has a history of innuendo and conspiracy theories,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1637,the most insufferable of the neoCatholic polemicists,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1638,a stunning concession coming from him,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1639,if those people believe it it cant be true,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1640,The neoCatholic propaganda mill ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1641,Monsignor JeanFrançois Lantheaume who served as first Counsellor of the Nunciature in Washington confirmed that Viganò said the truthThats all,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1642,a worldwide storm of outrage,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1643,issued a statement calling Viganòs account another daunting challenge to our confidence in the reliability of the Churchs leadership during a summer of devastating news regarding clergy sexual abuse and infidelity,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1644,a summer of devastating news ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1645,must be totally taken to heart ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1646,Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone of San Francisco wrote a letter to his faithful which speaks to Viganos integrity and sincere love of the Church,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1647,the propaganda machine gearing up to impeach Viganòs testimony,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1648,sycophants in the Vatican press corps and shifty polemicists ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1649,expects his readers to swallow his explanation ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1650,as Bergoglio cannot deny the allegations without lying he will say nothing at all about them in the hope they will go away,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1651,The American Gay Church ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1652,the dreaded traditionalist revival,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1653,a new bumper crop of homosexual ordinands ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1654,a new harvest of scandal for the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1655,The struggle to the extent there even was one obviously has been lost,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1656,details conveniently ignored by Winters Allen and Shea,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1657,muttering in a barely comprehensible way,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1658,perhaps made the mistake of sleeping in the same bed with some seminarians at his beach house,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1659,very grave words of mine ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1660,He clearly wanted to find out if I was an ally of McCarrick or not,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1661,united by a wicked pact of abuses by the first and at least of coverup of abuses by the other two,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1662,the obscure Bishop of Rapid City,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1663,He is the very exemplar of the crisis we must still endure,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1664,the 2002 pedophile summit,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1665,the men who control this establishment will never restore it to anything resembling the vibrant Church that a long line of militant uncompromising Popes delivered into their hands at Vatican II,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1666,the servitors of Vatican II ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1667,We must no longer subsidize the malpractice of the architects of ruinNor must we join the neoCatholics in their mindless applause when one of these incompetents attempts to repoint a brick or two in the crumbling façade they have erected to obscure the Church of old,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1668,the architects of ruin,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1669,one of these incompetents ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1670,repoint a brick or two in the crumbling façade they have erected to obscure the Church of old,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1671,William nightynight baby Tobin,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1672,another episcopal booster of Martins prohomosexual propaganda,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1673,yet another promoter of Martins homosexual activism,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1674,an avid promoter of Martins homosexual subversion of the Church,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1675,the classic fox in charge of the hen house,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1676,a wellknown activist who promotes the LGBT agenda chosen to corrupt the young people who will soon gather in Dublin for the World Meeting of Families,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1677,Any purge would empty parishes and religious orders of the thousands of priests and bishops ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1678,revels in smug certitude ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1679,intrinsically disordered homosexual bishops and priests ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1680,legions of intrinsically disordered homosexual bishops and priests ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1681,a flagrantly active homosexual,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1682,prelate of the gay lobby,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1683,mired in financial corruption ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1684,a chasm of abuses of power,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1685,From the seminaries to the clergy to the bishops to the cardinals homosexuals are present at all levels by the thousand,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1686,Janet Smith Professor of Moral Theology at the Sacred Heart Major Seminary in Detroit recently wrote The problem of clergy abuse cannot be resolved simply by the resignation of some bishops and even less so by bureaucratic directivesThe deeper problem lies in homosexual networks within the clergy which must be eradicated,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1687,with the power of octopus tentacles and strangle innocent victims and priestly vocations and are strangling the entire Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1688,the CEO of the Catholic Church world,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1689,For Faggioli not only would Bergoglios resignation be unthinkable so also would a purge of the homosexual and prohomosexual prelates Bergoglio and his Vatican henchmen have systematically enabled,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1690,the conservative bishops and even Cardinals Burke and Müller he has sacked because their conservatism offended him or one of his friends,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1691,who sacks conservative bishops and cardinals according to his pleasure ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1692,under fire from the media,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1693,an obscene gay culture,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1694,orthodox normal heterosexual males,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1695,in hush money to bury sexual abuse claims ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1696,maintaining a key bulwark against the neotraditionalist threat,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1697,sheds light on the darkness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1698,However he failed to acknowledge receipt of my two letters contrary to what he customarily did,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1699,he put other seminarians at risk,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1700,Better a thousand septuagenarian Wuerls in their lavish sties of corruption financed by the faithful than a single young neotraditionalist prelate,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1701,septuagenarian Wuerls in their lavish sties of corruption,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1702,single young neotraditionalist prelate,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1703,an orthodox Catholic who has had enough of the homosexualinfested regime of novelty imposed on the Church by the old men of the Council,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1704,As Faggioli puts it In the last fifteen years the American Catholic Church has been traversed by a radicalization of religious conservatism in the neotraditionalism sense especially in the younger generations of priests and intellectualsThey interpret the current abuse crisis as fruit of the mistakes of the Council itself and not only of the postCouncil,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1705,opened the way to ecclesial disaster,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1706,demolition of the sacred liturgy ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1707,in the depths of his conciliar delirium ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1708,wave of affection and admiration flowed from the council over the modern world of humanity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1709,its aspirations purified and blessed,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1710,Thus did Paul describe the conciliar opening to the world through which the world promptly invaded the Church including large numbers of homosexuals who should never have been admitted to the seminary,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1711,a young clergy marked by personal sanctity but also by a fascination for a mythical Middle Ages ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1712,young clergy marked by personal sanctity,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1713,Any abandonment of the regime must be viewed as ecclesiastical treasonCatholic Jacobinismif not criminal activity,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1714,a massive infestation by homosexual priests and prelates ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1715,the final beachhead of the neoCatholic defense of their disintegrating regime,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1716,what he is really arguingthe final beachhead of the neoCatholic defense of their disintegrating regimeis that homosexuals in the hierarchy must remain in authority as an indispensable seawall against a neotraditionalist storm surge,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1717,a catastrophic failure in ecclesial innovation that has corrupted the human element of the Church in practically every department,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1718,mount under this reckless Pope to an unsustainable indeed apocalyptic level,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1719,of what is ever ancient but ever new,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1720,candidates known to be active homosexuals ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1721,stripped of its prophetic and admonitory content regarding the epochal malfeasance and corruption of the upper hierarchy ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1722,the sufferings of the Church ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1723,a really terrifying way,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1724,a deep need to relearn penance to accept purification to learn forgiveness ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1725,I believe that Archbishop Viganòs precious testimony is a sign that Heaven itself is now responding to the need for justice in the Church,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1726,in the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1727,a young clergy marked by personal sanctity but also by a fascination for a mythical Middle Ages,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1728,an unsalvageable mass of corruption ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1729,a Churchworld relationship based on a principle of reality,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1730,Today neoCatholic commentators cowed by the demands of political correctness refuse to state the simple truth that homosexuality is a perversion that precludes ordination as does any other grave psychological disorder,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1731,more than a little obsessed with homosexuality,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1732,Take it seriously but with a large grain of salt,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1733,Does Pope Francis have an enemies list,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1734,the same Pope who sacks conservative bishops and cardinals according to his pleasure and has just removed a cardinal from the College of Cardinals in an unprecedented disciplinary act under fire from the media is somehow powerless to dismiss Modernist bishops who have created an obscene gay culture in the Church and replace them with orthodox normal heterosexual males,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1735,Francis cannot simply fire even Cardinal Wuerl who covered up crimes of homosexual predation by the priests he transferred elsewhere while Archbishop of Pittsburgh and who authorized payment of 900000 in hush money to bury sexual abuse claims against a homosexual priest involved in the production of child pornography,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1736,Homosexuality in the clergy exists and is a matter that must be addressed,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1737,And how does the Church address a massive infestation by homosexual priests and prelates without removing them from authority and ensuring that they cannot promote homosexual successors for generation after generation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1738,You are the Popes representative in the US and you are urging me to read a book that questions what the secretary of state wrote,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1739,disgraced antiTrump FBI agent ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1740,touts Googles multifaceted efforts ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1741,She brags that the company used its power ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1742,also brags that Google used its power ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1743,NOTHING is being done ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1744,the world is watching and they get it completely,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1745,a couple hundred thousand dollars of ad spends and some Russian bots on Facebook swayed the election to Donald Trump,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1746,that is a sham,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1747,Google has yet to answer why their search results for the word Idiot are vastly different from DuckDuckGo,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1748,blew the cover off the 2016 election influence charade,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1749,Mario touts Googles multifaceted efforts ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1750,Hispanics  ALL Hispanics are in President Trumps crosshairs,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1751,according to a Breitbart report by Allum Bokhari,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1752,Maybe thats why they refused to appear before Congress last week,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1753,When will something be done about these tech and social media companies,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1754,critical miscalculation Murillo wrote in a stunning admission ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1755,rapists and drug dealers,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1756,Make America Great Again ,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1757,In the next paragraph Murillo again openly admits she was not objective when it came to the election,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1758,some rogue staffer inside Google,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1759,huge swaths of voters,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1760,grieving Hillary Clinton supporters ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1761,to control and shutter conservative ideas,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1762,a getoutthevote for Hispanic voters operation,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1763,only to undercut her own commentary in later passages in the emails by openly admitting the entire effort to boost Latino turnout using Google products with official company resources was to elect Clinton over Trump,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1764,voted in recordbreaking numbers,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1765,Carlson cited Dr Robert Epstein a social scientist and an expert on Google who has said in Carlsons words Google alone could determine the outcome of almost any election just by altering its search selections and we would never know it,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1766,Google alone could determine the outcome of almost any election ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1767,But of course they were both,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1768,tried to rein it in,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1769,the Latino Community Foundations nonpartisan YoVoyaVotaryTu Im going to vote are youcampaign ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1770,our social media influencer friends,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1771,the openly partisan intent of Googles actions,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1772,this was finally the year that the sleeping giant had awoken,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1773,Latino Voters Show Trump What It Means to Be American,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1774,to give grieving Hillary Clinton supporters hugs ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1775,she and another person cried after Trump won ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1776,how much they hurt how much they need support right now and that they are coordinating in different offices to meet up to just hold each other,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1777,Ive never cried after an election until last night,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1778,this election result hurt her badly,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1779,it hurts more than I could have ever imagined,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1780,They are probably hurting right now,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1781,Google is throwing its weight around ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1782,the duly elected President of the United States,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1783,made a giant difference,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1784,to Googlers and beyond,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1785,scratching the surface of bias ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1786,Trump crushed her on election day,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1787,another indication that Googles efforts were clearly attempting to use company resources to elect Democrat Clinton over Republican Trump and influence the results of the election,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1788,Hes a precedence man,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1789,for the American people to see,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1790,the corrupt DOJ and FBI ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1791,if they did then someone might actually have to act on something that actually was a crime,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1792,why dont they bring up his involvement in the Vince Foster coverup,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1793,I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1794,This is nothing more than a lastminute attempt at character assassination and there should no delay in confirming Judge Kavanaugh,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1795,have sunk to their lowest level ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1796,categorically and unequivocally deny ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1797,cesspool of public gossip ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1798,this is all a ruse to block Judge Kavanaughs confirmation by all means necessary,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1799,slink back into their shadowy corner,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1800,gaping hole in the therapists notes,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1801,Ms Ford may believe her story to be true but the lack of any credible corroborating evidence her partial memory of details surrounding the alleged incident and the absence of any pattern of such sexual misconduct by Judge Kavanaugh undercut the reliability of her version of the incident,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1802,For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1803,their standard contemptible obstructionist tactics,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1804,assassinate Judge Kavanaughs character,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1805,gave the serial sexual predator Bill Clinton a free pass because his policies were in line with their ideology,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1806,why didnt Senator Feinstein set the ball rolling back in July when she first received word of the allegation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1807,no low to which the Democrats will not sink ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1808,strengthening America and protecting Americans,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1809,Democrats Want Us To Believe All WomenUnless Theyre Accusing Keith Ellison Bill Clinton Al Franken Or George Soros,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1810,This is clearly a setup ,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1811,boys will be boys,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1812,it falls far short of the evidence against virtually any other politician or celebrity who has faced consequences ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1813,and if six years ago she told the therapist four men and says two men now that suggests that her memory of the event may be suspect,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1814,I can tell you that while neither notes nor memories are infallible in a contest between contemporaneous notes and later verbal testimony about those notes the content of the written notes usually prevails,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1815,Open Society Foundation tentacles,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1816,so incredibly stupid to begin with,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1817,My biggest concern is all the damage that this did to the US government and the mockery it made out of the Constitution and all of the wrongdoing that was done by various officials within the Department of Justice the FBI and the DNC Democratic National Committee,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1818,panicking right about now,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1819,the mockery it made out of the Constitution ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1820,and all of the wrongdoing that was done by various officials within the Department of Justice the FBI and the DNC Democratic National Committee,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1821,the monster once known as Cardinal McCarrick ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1822,a preening Internetcreated neoCatholic doyenne ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1823,a powermad ecclesiastical tyrant,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1824,Bergoglios very presence on the Chair of Peter is a grave threat to the common good of the Church and the integrity of the Faith,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1825,the former apostolic nuncioturnedwhistleblower ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1826,Everything depends on it,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1827,insane drive to shatter the Churchs bimillennial discipline ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1828,was covering for McCarrick big time,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1829,Either the human element of the Church will act according to the means which seem possible however extraordinary or Heaven itself will intervene ,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1830,that serial homosexual rapist ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1831,crude and often unprintable invective ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1832,unload on Pope Bergoglio ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1833,the corrupt Benedict IX,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1834,disgrace to the Chair of Peter,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1835,To the victims of the Church and to those who love them it sounds like he is saying Who do you think you areI dont have to explain myself to youYoure the guilty oneYou brought this on yourselfIf you want to be loved then know your placeIm the victim here not youIf you know whats good for you keep your mouth shut,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1836,Fisher knows that Francis knows it even if she still cannot bring herself to say explicitly what should now be apparent to the entire body of the faithful,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1837,this man who promised so much fresh air is really so intent on slamming doors shut before we find out even worse things hidden inside,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1838,By what possible stretch of the imagination would such an occupant be suited for the Chair of Peter,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1839,Bergoglio will not of course resignHe will cling to power with his last breath in order to carry out the many other acts of ecclesial subversion he clearly has in mind,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1840,the plague of Bergoglio ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1841,the execrable Benedict IX,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1842,the interloper Sylvester III,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1843,the wellintentioned but dimwitted Gregory VI,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1844,a pious and austere Christian and an exponent of the Cluniac spirit of reform,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1845,stripped of his sacerdotal rank and shut up in a monastery,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1846,the scurrilous Benedict IX ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1847,to dispel the pious fable,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1848,has exploited to the hilt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1849,the leader of a personality cult everyone is commanded to love in the superficially emotional sense and obey no matter what he says or does,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1850,a custodian and defender of the Deposit of Faith whose lovability personality and opinions are utterly irrelevant to the exercise and scope of his office,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1851,There are too many contrary instances of popes the Holy Spirit obviously would not have picked Bergoglio is undeniably one of them,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1852,the massive evidence of his unspeakable crimes,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1853,in accordance with Article 81 of John Paul IIs Universi Dominici Gregis which providesThe Cardinal electors shall further abstain from any form of pact agreement promise or other commitment of any kind which could oblige them to give or deny their vote to a person or personsIf this were in fact done even under oath I decree that such a commitment shall be null and void and that no one shall be bound to observe it and I hereby impose the penalty of excommunication latae sententiae upon those who violate this prohibition,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1854,To quote Cajetan on this point citations taken from the linked article by Robert Siscoe deposition by an imperfect council is appropriate when one or more Popes suffer uncertainty with regard to their election as seems to have arisen in the schism of Urban VI and othersThen lest the Church be perplexed those members of the Church who are available have the power to judge which is the true pope if it can be known and if it cannot be known it has the power to provide that the electors agree on one or another of them,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1855,Bergoglio has deposed himself by promulgating heresy fracturing the Churchs universal discipline respecting marriage and the Eucharist and undermining the teaching of even his own immediate predecessors on matters of fundamental morality upheld by the Magisterium for two millennia,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1856,a Pope who relentlessly attacks her very foundations,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1857,To quote Cajetan again Indeed the Church has the right to separate herself from an heretical pope according to divine lawConsequently it has the right by the same divine law to use all means of themselves necessary for such separation and those that juridically correspond to the crime are of themselves necessarymeaning the resort to an imperfect council,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1858,the totally unprecedented situation ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1859,And are we not in the midst of schisms already provoked by none other than Bergoglio himself whose insane drive to shatter the Churchs bimillennial discipline has produced the totally unprecedented situation in which what is still considered mortally sinful in one diocese is an imperative of mercy in another,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1860,the negligence of timeserving pastors who left their sheep completely undefended against the wolves who preyed upon them,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1861,the wolf the cardinals improvidently elected Pope,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1862,the bishops and above all the Successor of Peter fail to maintain and transmit faithfully and in unity the deposit of faith contained in Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1863,a Pope who as a prominent cardinal declares to the whole world fails to maintain and transmit faithfully  the deposit of faith contained in Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture and is leading an apostasy from the truth,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1864,a papal malefactor treated as if were an absolute dictator,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1865,wreaking havoc upon faith and morals ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1866,to the detriment of countless souls,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1867,to end his rampage,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1868,The successors of the Apostles the only ones in a position to end his rampage must demand his resignation and should he refuse as expected act in this unprecedented emergency to declare his removal from the office he has criminally abused and whose very credibility he threatens to destroy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1869,during the height of the worst crisis in her history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1870,Does Francis know he sounds like an abuser,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1871,This is how abusers talkTheyre not content with power they have to keep their victims doubting and blaming themselves constantly so they dont become a threatWhether Francis knows it or not this is how he sounds,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1872,But he is not making it easyI am not saying he is an abuserBut he sounds like one,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1873,this is one of the great scandals in the history of our country ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1874,nameless faceless bureaucrats of the Deep State ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1875,the Gang of Eight ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1876,a brazen abuse of power,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1877,the DNC paid rentaspy ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1878,The authors of the letter even lie about the nature of the broadbased request claiming Trump is selectively declassifying information to save himself,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1879,the Deep State Plotters,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1880,one of the crowning achievements of his presidency,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1881,this might be the most important thing ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1882,who nobody even knew,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1883,used Carter Page as a foil ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1884,Its a hoax beyond a witch hunt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1885,Although the conspiracy theory is baseless nonsense it continues to dog the Trump administration,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1886,prove a political masterstroke ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1887,the duly elected 45th president of the United States,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1888,so much leftist dirt ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1889,Trumps nefarious links to Russia,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1890,and let the chips fall where they may,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1891,alarmed at the prospect of being exposed as frauds and publicly humiliated ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1892,an attempt to usurp the powers vested in the president,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1893,to defy the presidential directive,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1894,unaccountable Deep State operatives ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1895,What weve done is a great service to the country really,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, ���Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1896,hoax beyond a witch hunt,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1897,are in panic mode,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1898,Deep State DOJ tool ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1899,a two year multimillion dollar witch hunt,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1900,The US President wants every American citizen to see the full unredacted version of the FISA documents used to spy on Carter Page,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1901,the hoax that was and is TrumpRussia collusion ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1902,are doing everything in their power to make sure the truth about how the FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page was obtained remains hidden from the eyes of the American public,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1903,demanding that the agencies defy President Trump,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1904,as weak and ridiculous as they are,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1905,hurl the wild claims like a grenade ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1906,lawyers are masters of delay,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1907,obviously unbalanced the accuser is,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1908,I think hes an extraordinary man  I think hes a man of great intellect as Ive been telling you and he has an unblemished record,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1909,hoping to torpedo President Trumps agenda ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1910,her lawyer is even loonier,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1911,nevercredible accusations of sexual abuse ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1912,They deliberately refused to bring up the allegations as weak and ridiculous as they are at Kavanaughs Senate confirmation hearings because they didnt want to have a rational discussion,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1913,she is going to look like the loon she is,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1914,look like the loon she is,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1915,Fords request for an FBI probe is clearly a desire to delay proceedings,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1916,an excellent job destroying herself ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1917,the loon she is,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1918,If Kavanaugh Is Not Confirmed By Senate Then We Are All Just One Accusation Away From Ruin,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1919,Without a shred of evidence,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1920,political lynch mob out for blood,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1921,I worry about this country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1922,highly partisan activist attorney ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1923,What is happening in the Brett Kavanaugh nomination process should concern every American,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1924,I fear for this nation when this is now the standard,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1925,Why not MondayDoes she have an important dentist appointment she cant get out of,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1926,Democrats want to delay this vote until after the midterms because they believe they have a chance to retake the Senate as well as the House,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1927,even a mediocre defense attorney could shatter her credibility within minutes under crossexamination,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1928,You believe any woman who goes against a Republican and you dont believe any woman who goes against a Democrat,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1929,I dont care who you are,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1930,chose to sit on it until the moment it could inflict maximum political damage,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1931,overestimating the integrity of the supportive lawmakers and lawyers currently handling her,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1932,supportive lawmakers and lawyers ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1933,sensitive lawmakers and high profile activist attorneys ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1934,If this had been such a pivotal moment for her how could she have forgotten any those facts,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1935,In no circumstance in the country does that happen,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1936,You didnt give a damn back then,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1937,flimsy and meritless accusations ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1938,You Dicky Durban sic are a complete FRAUD,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1939,Ive found every single piece of information ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1940,They kick and scream and lie and pout,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1941,a bunch of welldocumented liars ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1942,such a pathetic attempt at a smear campaign,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1943,President Trump is the antipolitician ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1944,taken together as a whole its far too suspicious to lend it any credibility,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1945,every time theres a man that you dont like running for public office or being nominated for a position some woman crawls out from a line of protesters and makes an ambiguousatbest claim about unwanted sexual advances,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1946,next time a man is nominated to a position who really has committed a crime people will be that much less likely to believe his accuser,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1947,Women everywhere should be furious,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1948,they dig up some Trumphating woman from Kavanaughs past and convince her to say that he assaulted her thinking that such an allegation will surely delay the vote long enough for them to regain control of Congress,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1949,Everything else is just noise,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1950,a man promising to Drain the Swamp ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1951,worse than a travesty,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1952,completely destroy Judge Kavanaughs life ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1953,pulling out all the stops ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1954,suddenly emerged from left field,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1955,Haters of Judge Kavanaugh ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1956,simply because Ms Ford is a woman who has made what they call without any corroborating evidence to date a credible charge,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1957,What we do know so far tends to undercut the credibility of Ms Fords accusation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1958,Whatever corroboration Ms Ford was hoping for from witnesses she claimed were at the alleged party is nonexistent,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1959,The only problem with Dr Friedmans thesis is that Ms Ford has apparently forgotten such key details surrounding the alleged sexual assault as when and where it happened and how she got home,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1960,she doubts Judge Kavanaughs credibility because of how he approaches his cases,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1961,I believe her because she is telling the truth and you know it by her story,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1962,turns the fundamental constitutional principle of due process upside down,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1963,In a nation guided by fairness and law a person is innocent until proven guilty,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?�� The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1964,materialized out of thin air ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1965,Suspiciously Ford cant or wont say when or where the alleged incident happened and can provide few details,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1966,Give leftwingers an inch and theyll take a mile,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1967,exactly a zero percent chance ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1968,find the stomach to put an end to the farce ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1969,stooped so low with these smears ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1970,to beclown themselves on,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1971,obviously partisan and hypocritical ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1972,stop feeding the alligator in the hopes that you will be eaten last,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1973,amoral unfair or vicious,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1974,The lastminute accusations from Christine Blasey Ford a woman who claims that decades ago Kavanaugh groped her at a high school party and Deborah Ramirez who accused Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her at a frat party at Yale are transparent acts of aggression against the judge and Republicans one engineered by the Democrats,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1975,politicians with one eye on the polls,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1976,I am woman hear me roar,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1977,our bedrock principle that an accused has the right to confront his accusers charges,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1978,rabid partisans and officeseekers,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1979,every accusation of sexual assault no matter how much its unsupported by corroborating evidence or even plausibility must be believed,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1980,increasingly rabid leftwing base,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1981,caterwauling protestors and grandstanding Senators ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1982,attentioncraving politically ambitious Senators ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1983,Her own details of the event dont jibe Four boys or threeOne girl or two,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1984,why has Grassley so far allowed himself to be played by the Dems,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1985,dubious ideology and dishonest narrative,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1986,trendoid socialists armed with torches and pitchforks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1987,ridiculous and from the Twilight Zone,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1988,a third rate lawyer ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1989,this other con artist Avenatti,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1990,Ford is lying or suffering from some kind of psychological disorder such as false memory syndrome,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1991,You can kiss the MIDTERMS goodbye ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1992,drastically altered my life,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1993,mud Democrats have been slinging at ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1994,have materialized out of thin air ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1995,battens down the hatches ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1996,Avenatti is a third rate lawyer who is good at making false accusations like he did on me and like he is now doing on Judge Brett Kavanaugh,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1997,Brett Kavanaugh the boy who sexually assaulted me,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1998,leftwingers and feminists like Maureen Dowd ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+1999,utterly undistinguished politically correct scholar ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2000,the Lefts frenzied demagogic assault ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2001,the purpose of the Lefts frenzied demagogic assault is to damage the nominee and by extension the president who nominated him,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2002,You can kiss the MIDTERMS goodbye if you dont get highly qualified Kavanaugh approved,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2003,hightech lynching for uppity blacks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2004,How can one avoid concluding that the reason they do not provide the documentation is that they know it confirms my testimony,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2005,voice crying in the wilderness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2006,for that martyr Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2007,I wish to encourage you dear faithful my brothers and sisters in Christ,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2008,the most courageous prelate in the Church todayArchbishop Carlo Maria Viganò,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2009,a substitute of our Lord,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2010,This is clearly the testimony of an honest man who has only the good of the Church in his hearta modernday Athanasius standing against something so much worse than Liberius,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2011,an honest man who has only the good of the Church in his heart,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2012,standing against something so much worse than Liberius,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2013,the most dangerous pontificate in history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2014,the forces of hell itself,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2015,Archbishop Viganò is fighting for the very survival of the human element of the Catholic Church,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2016,The enemy is not only at the gates but has now made their way to the thrones of power and the seats of the ApostlesGod help us,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2017,wish him every blessing and heavenly consolation as he undergoes this passion for the sake of the Master he serves so well,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2018,the most painful and serious decision that I have ever made in my life,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2019,during months of profound suffering and anguish during a crescendo of continual news of terrible events with thousands of innocent victims destroyed and the vocations and lives of young priests and religious disturbed,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2020,a devastating crime for the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2021,how perverse and evil ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2022,the great accuser Satan who sows scandal and division in the Church ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2023,Now the popes reply to my testimony was I will not say a word But then contradicting himself he has compared his silence to that of Jesus in Nazareth and before Pilate,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2024,But how can journalists discover and know the truth if those directly involved with a matter refuse to answer any questions or to release any documents,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2025,Many more instances have recently been documented in the press showing that Pope Francis has defended homosexual clergy who committed serious sexual abuses against minors or adults,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2026,The faithful deserve to know,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2027,two homosexual friends of his dicastery,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2028,His long article in LOsservatore Romano in which he came out in favor of the more controversial aspects of Amoris Laetitia represents his surrender,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2029,Make your own the act of faith and complete confidence in Christ Jesus our Savior of Saint Paul in his second Letter to Timothy Scio cui credidi which I choose as my episcopal mottoThis is a time of repentance of conversion of prayers of grace to prepare the Church the bride of the Lamb ready to fight and win with Mary the battle against the old dragon,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2030,the most courageous prelate in the Church today,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2031,a modernday Athanasius standing against something so much worse than Liberius,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2032,profound suffering and anguish,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2033,crescendo of continual news of terrible events,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2034,instead of taking the measures that every good pastor would have taken the pope made McCarrick one of his principal agents in governing the Church in regard to the United States the Curia and even China as we are seeing these days with great concern and anxiety for that martyr Church,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2035,The popes unwillingness to respond to my charges and his deafness to the appeals by the faithful for accountability are hardly consistent with his calls for transparency and bridge building,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2036,did the pope refuse to carry out a Vatican investigation into McCarricks crimes and of those responsible for covering them up,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2037,constitutionhating and tyrannical tendencies,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2038,a mudslinging orgy of victim shaming and kangaroo courts,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2039,it is just fine and dandy ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2040,Gestapo like police state surveilling ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2041,champion of the police and surveillance state and an enemy to privacy,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2042,to be executed over the sex abuse allegations ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2043,his record indicates that he all but cannot stand the Fourth and hes not that big a fan of the First either,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2044,he shouldnt even be in this position based solely on his previous record,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2045,The only question is will the Senate confirm one who is really bad on the 4thAmendment,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2046,When Kavanaugh is on the Supreme Court undermining our 4thAmendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures it will be too late for others to join me,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2047,enemy of the Fourth Amendment ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2048,Privacy advocates must fight,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2049,I hope the American people can see through this sham that you knew about it and you held it,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2050,blasted Democrats for their attacks on him,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2051,Boy yall want powerBoy I hope you never get it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2052,Most Unethical Sham Since Hes Been In Politics,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2053,believing every word of Dr Christine Ford without any evidence,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2054,What you want to do is destroy this guys life hold this seat open and hope you win in 2020,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2055,the most unethical sham since Ive been in politics,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2056,through hell and then some,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2057,What you want to do is destroy this guys life,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2058,the most unethical sham ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2059,I hope the American people can see through this sham,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2060,this is worse than Robert Bork and I didnt think it could get any worse than thatThis is worse than Clarence ThomasI didnt think it could get any worse than thatThis is a national disgrace the way youre being treated,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2061,This is a national disgrace the way youre being treated,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2062,perpetually vulnerable redstate senator,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2063,search and destroy strategy ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2064,trembled with righteous indignation,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2065,Hard to do much else when the witness conveniently has no corroborating evidence no memory of any verifiable facts of what happened and everyone she says was present at the alleged incidenteven her best friendhas denied it,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2066,cried out for vigorous crossexamination,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2067,Ford has a bad longterm memory and a bad shortterm memory,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2068,Boy you all want power,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2069,the most despicable thing I have seen in my time in politics,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2070,I hope you never get it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2071,the worst in our politics,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2072,porn star lawyers with facially implausible claims ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2073,The Senate must vote,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2074,Kavanaugh stole the show,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2075,Afraid of their own shadows,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2076,is there a political motivation for your coming forward with your account of the assault by Brett Kavanaugh,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2077,If theyre really concerned with going to the truth why wouldnt you want to talk to the accused,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2078,if you vote no youre legitimizing the most despicable thing I have seen in my time in politics,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2079,is being ripped apart ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2080,without a shred of evidence,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2081,Perhaps Arizona will put someone in that actually has a spine rather than living up to Senator Flakes name,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2082,selfprofessed sexual assaulter Cory Booker ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2083,This country is being ripped apart here and weve got to make sure we do due diligence,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2084,that actually has a spine ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2085,a radical political activist who promotes baby murder and other unlawful actions,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2086,slander a mans character ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2087,Of course she was part of it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2088,her story didnt exactly lend credibility ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2089,She knew it would be made public,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2090,to destroy Brett Kavanaugh,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2091,to destroy Trumps nomination for the Supreme Court ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2092,If you think Mrs Ford is ignorant of this considering her father works for the Central Intelligence Agency and her prior criminal political activism then you arent thinking clearly,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2093,Ford obviously has mental issues and that was on display on Thursday during her testimony,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2094,that attack on him was orchestrated it was political and Ford was a part of it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2095,Ford is not seeking justice nor is she seeking to do her civic dutyShe is seeking to slander a mans character for something she cannot prove that she claims happened over 36 years ago,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2096,promotes baby murder and other unlawful actions,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2097,She wasnt angry it was made publicWhy,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2098,And whether or not it ultimately defeats the nominee it will I think help people understand why its so important that they vote,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2099,but did she go to local law enforcement,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2100,more of a circus than it already is,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2101,Absolutely nothing will be found,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2102,huge waste of time ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2103,one of the worst swamp creatures in DC,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2104,Appointing her to the UN would give Trump Jeb Bushs policies,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2105,same old failed politics,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2106,willfully ignorant McMaster crowd,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2107,Dina Powell is everything that was wrong with the Bush administration,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2108,a good thing for Americans,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2109,Again and I have asked this before how do you fight the Deep State by putting Deep State operatives in these positions,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2110,How do you drain the swamp by adding to it,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2111,beaten to death and then dismembered,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2112,body was cut up with a bone saw,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2113,Pompeo reiterated his confidence that the Saudi government would conduct a thorough complete and transparent investigation adding that they will show the entire world the results,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2114,an assault on the nation,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2115,if unable to do so I will call up the US Military and CLOSE OUR SOUTHERN BORDER,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2116,coming to engage in criminal activity,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2117,Trump encouraged them to go out and vote Republican if they didnt want to be uttering the words Speaker Pelosi over the next two years,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2118,Trumps base is all that energized it seems pretty energetic to me ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2119,have only furthered their outrage at the establishment,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2120,thats just my gut feeling,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2121,good people of Massachusetts do us all a favor and elect someone else in her place,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2122,The Senates own rules prohibit this kind of behavior but will the Senate hold these women to the standard theyve set,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2123,This is a clear violation of the Senate Ethics rules which safeguard against the appearance or actuality of elected officials cashing in on their official position for political purposes said Kendra Arnold executive director of FACT,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2124,Could the good people of Massachusetts do us all a favor and elect someone else in her place,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2125,put out their scorecard and for some it will be eyeopening,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2126,They are motivated to get to the polls this NovemberSo it is crucial that you and your progun friends get to the polls,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2127,riding on the line,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2128,an incredibly powerful motivating issue in politics,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2129,an ace up our proverbial sleeve,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2130,the most astonishing thing I have witnessed in my lifetime,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2131,the greatest publisher of his age,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2132,That supposedly great newspaper titles like the Guardian New York Times and Washington Post are involved in the spreading of lies to damage Assange and are seeking his imprisonment for publishing state secrets is clear evidence that the idea of the liberal media no longer exists in the new plutocratic ageThe press are not on the side of the people they are an instrument of elite control,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2133,churn out its production line of fake documents ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2134,By a wonderful coincidence of timing,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2135,Previously Harding and the Guardian have published documents faked by the Moreno government regarding a diplomatic appointment to Russia for Assange of which he had no knowledgeNow they follow this up with more documents aimed to provide fictitious evidence to bolster Muellers pathetically failed attempt to substantiate the story that Russia deprived Hillary of the Presidency,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2136,The right wing Ecuadorean government of President Moreno continues to churn out its production line of fake documents regarding Julian Assange and channel them straight to MI6 mouthpiece Luke Harding of the Guardian,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2137,probably the worlds greatest expert on electronic surveillance,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2138,I knew the US security services were conducting a fake investigation the moment it became clear that the FBI did not even themselves look at the DNC servers instead accepting a report from the Clinton linked DNC security consultants Crowdstrike,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2139,this massive Big Lie,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2140,Assange never met ManafortThe DNC emails were downloaded by an insiderAssange never even considered fleeing to RussiaThose are the facts and I am in a position to give you a personal assurance of them,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2141,I can also assure you that Luke Harding the Guardian Washington Post and New York Times have been publishing a stream of deliberate lies in collusion with the security services,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2142,the partisans of the defeated candidate ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2143,a particularly obnoxious defeated candidate,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2144,But to see the partisans of the defeated candidate and a particularly obnoxious defeated candidate manipulate the security services and the media to create an entirely false public perception in order to attempt to overturn the result of the US Presidential election is the most astonishing thing I have witnessed in my lifetime,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2145,Plainly the government of Ecuador is releasing lies about Assange to curry favour with the security establishment of the USA and UK and to damage Assanges support prior to expelling him from the EmbassyHe will then be extradited from London to the USA on charges of espionage,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2146,a whistleblower or a spy ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2147,and has done more to bring the crimes of governments to light than the mainstream media will ever be motivated to achieve,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2148,the worlds greatest expert on electronic surveillance,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2149,But I fear that state control of propaganda may be such that this massive Big Lie will come to enter public consciousness in the same way as the nonexistent Russian hack of the DNC servers,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2150,Luke Harding the Guardian Washington Post and New York Times have been publishing a stream of deliberate lies in collusion with the security services,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2151,to rush the border ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2152,to rush the border,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2153,We need people in our country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2154,President Trump has initiated the military to protect our border from the invading migrants,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2155,Anyone who doubts this is an invasion only need look at the size of the caravan and those that make up the majority of those marching towards our border,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2156,will overtake the border,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2157,suppress them with brutal force,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2158,Say Hola To Trumps RAZOR Wire,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2159,migrants taunting security forces ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2160,no climbers anymore under our Administration,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2161,They couldnt have been more wrong,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2162,No evidence of fraud in FloridaElection,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2163,Why she wasnt fired a long time ago is beyond anyones ability to answer but Broward County election supervisor Brenda Snipes has resigned amid what is clearly voter fraud that she oversaw,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2164,full of botched elections legal disputes and blistering criticism,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2165,She should be ready for prison bars after the fiasco she has created,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2166,Now that federal prosecutors have gotten involved perhaps its time to quit talking about it and actually arrest this woman and charge her with crimes against the people of Broward County before more people end up dead in Broward County over their corrupt voting practices,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2167,a county whose supervisor of elections has a history of losing ballots and breaking laws by allowing illegal immigrants and felons to vote as well as illegally destroying ballots,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2168,She ignored a court order mixed invalid provisional ballots in with valid ones and destroyed ballots but dont worry a Democrat attorney says that doing so has nothing to do with fraud or corruption,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2169,what appears to be voter fraud and election meddling and manipulation ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2170,GOP wants to Florida and Georgia stolen,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2171,Some people point to Brenda Snipes Browards Elections chief for her troubling history of election transgressions,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2172,Democratic ineptitude or deception ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2173,It looks like Democrats may have hurt their own interests by misleading their votersThey may have believed that they were supplying the correct information but they still should not have altered official documents without verifying that they were right which they werent,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2174,Bradley McVay DOS interim general counsel asked attorneys in Florida to investigate the conflicting datesAltering a form in a manner that provides the incorrect date for a voter to cure a defect  imposes a burden on the voter significant enough to frustrate the voters ability to vote McVay wrote in a letter sent on Nov 9 and publicly released on Tuesday,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2175,Have you ever heard of a close election in which a recount and found ballots gave the Republican victory,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2176,This is a disgrace,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2177,This massive Democrat voter fraud could be the end of our free republic,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2178,Mayor Gillum conceded on Election Day and now Broward County has put him back in play Bill Nelson conceded Election  now hes back in play,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2179,This is an embarrassment to our County and to Democracy,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2180,It is high time ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2181,on a massive scale,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2182,the Democrats are likewise working feverishly to overturn the will of the people,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2183,They are insane in their lust for power and will destroy even our democratic system to get it,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2184,Republicans have pointed to embattled Broward Elections chief Brenda Snipes record of past election gaffes in arguing that the largely Democratic country is tilted against them  perhaps fraudulently so,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2185,embattled Broward Elections chief Brenda Snipes,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2186,The information was sent on Nov 9 by Bradley McVay DOS interim general counsel who asked that the altered dates be investigatedAltering a form in a manner that provides the incorrect date for a voter to cure a defect  imposes a burden on the voter significant enough to frustrate the voters ability to vote McVay wrote in a letter that was sent Nov 9 and released publicly on Tuesday,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2187,a projihad Marxist Democrat ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2188,Climb Atop Fencing Effortlessly ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2189,The Guardian an otherwise solid and reliable paper has such a pervasive and unprofessionally personal hatred for Julian Assange that it has frequently dispensed with all journalistic standards in order to malign him,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2190,the man who led Britain on false pretences into the largest crime against humanity in living memory  the attack on Iraq,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2191,According to Greenwald If Paul Manafort  visited Assange at the Embassy there would be ample amounts of video and other photographic proof demonstrating that this happenedThe Guardian provides none of that,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2192,It appears the Guardian has simply taken this story provided by spooks at face valueEven if it later turns out that Manafort did visit Assange the Guardian clearly had no compelling evidence for its claims when it published themThat is profoundly irresponsible journalism  fake news  that should be of the gravest concern to readers,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2193,a platform overrun by Russian trolls,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2194,profoundly irresponsible journalism  fake news  that should be of the gravest concern to readers,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2195,apparently because maintenance of the Guardians reputation is more important than Assanges fate and the right of journalists to dig up embarrassing secrets without fear of being imprisoned,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2196,a highlevel Washingtonbased thinktank founded to drum up support for NATO and justify its imperialist agenda,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2197,Its job is to shore up a consensus on the left for attacks on leading threats to the existing neoliberal order,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2198,Donald Trumps disgraced former campaign manager ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2199,is so full of holes that even hardened opponents of Assange in the corporate media are struggling to stand by it,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2200,Faced with the backlash the Guardian quickly  and very quietly  rowed back its initial certainty that its story was based on verified factsInstead it amended the text without acknowledging it had done so to attribute the claims to unnamed and uncheckable sources,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2201,The Guardians latest story provides a supposedly stronger foundation for an existing narrative that Assange and Wikileaks knowingly published emails hacked by Russia from the Democratic partys serversIn truth there is no public evidence that the emails were hacked or that Russia was involvedCentral actors have suggested instead that the emails were leaked from within the Democratic party,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2202,the head of an organisation engaged in espionage for a foreign power,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2203,Even when a United Nations panel of experts in international law ruled in 2016 that Assange was being arbitrarily  and unlawfully  detained by the UK Guardian writers led efforts to discredit the UN report,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2204,The problem for the Guardian which should have been obvious to its editors from the outset is that any visits by Manafort would be easily verifiable without relying on unnamed sources,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2205,In fact the Guardian obtained the embassys logs in May and has never made any mention of either Manafort or Russians being identified in themIt did not refer to the logs in its latest story,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2206,No factcheckingIt is worth noting it should be vitally important for a serious publication like the Guardian to ensure its claims are unassailably true  both because Assanges personal fate rests on their veracity and because even more importantly a fundamental right the freedom of the press is at stake,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2207,the most stringent checks imaginable ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2208,Given this one would have expected the Guardians editors to have insisted on the most stringent checks imaginable before going to press with Hardings storyAt a very minimum they should have sought out a response from Assange and Manafort before publicationNeither precaution was taken,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2209,I worked for the Guardian for a number of years and know well the layers of checks that any highly sensitive story has to go through before publicationIn that lengthy process a variety of commissioning editors lawyers backbench editors and the editor herself Kath Viner would normally insist on cuts to anything that could not be rigorously defended and corroborated,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2210,And yet this piece seems to have been casually waved through given a green light even though its profound shortcomings were evident to a range of wellplaced analysts and journalists from the outset,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2211,Despite all this even analysts critical of the Guardians behaviour have shown a glaring failure to understand that its latest coverage represents not an aberration by the paper but decisively fits with a pattern,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2212,longstanding and welldocumented hostility towards Assange,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2213,a pervasive and unprofessionally personal hatred for Julian Assange ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2214,It was also apparently evidence of the papers clickbait tendencies,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2215,They Guardian editors knew that publishing this story would cause partisan warriors to excitedly spread the story and that cable news outlets would hyperventilate over it and that theyd reap the rewards regardless of whether the story turned out to be true or false,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2216,Assanges most devoted haters,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2217,Rather than being the reason for the Guardian violating basic journalistic standards and ethics the papers hatred of Assange is a symptom of a deeper malaise in the Guardian and the wider corporate media,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2218,a deeper malaise in the Guardian and the wider corporate media,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2219,relentless and unhinged attacks ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2220,Even aside from its decadelong campaign against Assange the Guardian is far from solid and reliable as Greenwald claimsIt has been at the forefront of the relentless and unhinged attacks on Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn for prioritising the rights of Palestinians over Israels right to continue its belligerent occupationOver the past three years the Guardian has injected credibility into the Israel lobbys desperate efforts to tar Corbyn as an antisemite,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2221,Similarly the Guardian worked tirelessly to promote Clinton and undermine Sanders in the 2016 Democratic nomination process  another reason the paper has been so assiduous in promoting the idea that Assange aided by Russia was determined to promote Trump over Clinton for the presidency,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2222,populist leftwing governments that have rebelled against traditional and oppressive US hegemony in the region,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2223,democratically elected but official enemies of the US,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2224,the regions rightwing authoritarians beloved of Washington,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2225,The Guardians coverage of Latin America especially of populist leftwing governments that have rebelled against traditional and oppressive US hegemony in the region has long grated with analysts and expertsIts especial venom has been reserved for leftwing figures like Venezuelas Hugo Chavez democratically elected but official enemies of the US rather than the regions rightwing authoritarians beloved of Washington,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2226,The Guardian has been vocal in the socalled fake news hysteria decrying the influence of social media the only place where leftwing dissidents have managed to find a small foothold to promote their politics and counter the corporate media narrative,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2227,the entrenched neoliberal order that is hurtling us towards climate breakdown and economic collapse,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2228,the largest crime against humanity in living memory  the attack on Iraq,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2229,Equally the Guardian has made clear who its true heroes areCertainly not Corbyn or Assange who threaten to disrupt the entrenched neoliberal order that is hurtling us towards climate breakdown and economic collapseIts pages however are readily available to the latest effort to prop up the status quo from Tony Blair the man who led Britain on false pretences into the largest crime against humanity in living memory  the attack on Iraq,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2230,The Guardian has painted social media chiefly as a platform overrun by Russian trolls arguing that this should justify evertighter restrictions that have so far curbed critical voices of the dissident left more than the right,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2231,an arbiter of what is good for Britain and the worlds future,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2232,That humanitarian intervention cost the lives of many hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and created a vacuum that destabilised much of the Middle East sucked in Islamic jihadists like alQaeda and ISIS and contributed to the migrant crisis in Europe that has fuelled the resurgence of the farrightNone of that is discussed in the Guardian or considered grounds for disqualifying Blair as an arbiter of what is good for Britain and the worlds future,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2233,a selfstyled weapons expert,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2234,The Guardian also has an especial soft spot for blogger Elliot Higgins who aided by the Guardian has shot to unlikely prominence as a selfstyled weapons expertLike Luke Harding Higgins invariably seems ready to echo whatever the British and American security services need verifying independently,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2235,Higgins and his wellstaffed website Bellingcat have taken on for themselves the role of arbiters of truth on many foreign affairs issues taking a prominent role in advocating for narratives that promote US and NATO hegemony while demonising Russia especially in highly contested arenas such as Syria,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2236,Improbably the Guardian has adopted Higgins as the posterboy for a supposed citizen journalism it has sought to undermine as fake news whenever it occurs on social media without the endorsement of statebacked organisations,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2237,The truth is that the Guardian has not erred in this latest story attacking Assange or in its much longerrunning campaign to vilify himWith this story it has done what it regularly does when supposedly vital western foreign policy interests are at stake  it simply regurgitates an eliteserving western narrative,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2238,the existing neoliberal order,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2239,a corrupt western elite,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2240,the rapacious financial industries ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2241,a damaging and exploitative US dominance of Americas backyard,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2242,the elitefriendly narratives of corporate media,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2243,The Guardian did not make a mistake in vilifying Assange without a shred of evidenceIt did what it is designed to do,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2244,Reporter Luke Hardings latest article claiming that Donald Trumps disgraced former campaign manager Paul Manafort secretly visited Assange in Ecuadors embassy in London on three occasions is so full of holes that even hardened opponents of Assange in the corporate media are struggling to stand by it,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2245,The propaganda function of the piece is patent,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2246,an otherwise solid and reliable paper,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2247,This Guardian Fake News Story Proves That The Media Cant Be Trusted,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2248,The story was weakly sourced and included some details that seemed unlikely to be true,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2249,a notorious fraud a russophobe intelligence asset with a personal grievance towards Assange and Wikileaks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2250,political operatives or hacks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2251,he is just storytelling  in other words it is fiction,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2252,a hack job in the purest sense of the term,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2253,Unfortunately no western main stream media can any longer be trusted to publish the truth,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2254,This defensive Guardian claim is like its story evidently completely falseWikileaks publicly denied the Guardians claims 90 minutes before the story was first publishedManafort asserts that his lawyers had notified the Guardian that the story was false before the Guardian proceeded with the story,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2255,The story was completely false and the Guardian knew it wasIt disregarded and left out the denials the subjects of the story had issued before it was published,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2256,The Guardian has become a main outlet for British government disinformation operations aimed at defaming RussiaIt smeared Assange and Snowden as Russian collaboratorsIt uncritically peddled the Russiagate story and the nonsensical Skripal claims which are both obviously concocted by British intelligence servicesThat seems to have become its main purpose,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2257,the nonsensical Skripal claims ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2258,even the tiniest modicum of respect as a journalist ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2259,cranky identity grievances stories,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2260,While it earlier made attempts to balance its shoddier side with some interesting reporting it is now solidly main stream in the worst senseIt promotes neoliberalism and a delves into cranky identity grievances storiesIt also became an main outlet for manipulative propaganda peddled by the British secret services,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2261,jailed former Trump campaign manager ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2262,In letter today to Assanges lawyers Guardians Luke Harding winner of Private Eyes Plagiarist of the Year falsely claims jailed former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort had secret meetings with Assange in 2013 2015 and 2016 in story Guardian are planning to run,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2263,the claim is 100 false,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2264,But several people who had followed the Russiagate fairytale and the Mueller investigation were immediately suspicious of the Guardian claim,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2265,In sum the Guardian published a story today that it knew would explode into all sorts of viral benefits for the paper and its reporters even though there are gaping holes and highly sketchy aspects to the story,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2266,gaping holes and highly sketchy aspects ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2267,Moreover the main author of the story Luke Harding is known to be a notorious fraud a russophobe intelligence asset with a personal grievance towards Assange and Wikileaks,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2268,the Russian influence nonsense ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2269,there is absolutely no evidence in the book to support its claims,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2270,Take for example Luke Harding of the Guardian who just published a book titled Collusion Secret Meetings Dirty Money and How Russia Helped Donald Trump WinHe was taken apart in a Real News interview vid about the bookThe interviewer pointed out that there is absolutely no evidence in the book to support its claimsWhen asked for any proof for his assertion Harding defensively says that he is just storytelling  in other words it is fictionHarding earlier wrote a book about Edward Snowden which was a similar shamJulian Assange called it a hack job in the purest sense of the termHarding is also known as plagiarizerWhen he worked in Moscow he copied stories and passages from the now defunct Exile run by Matt Taibbi and Mark AmesThe Guardian had to publish an apology,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2271,the alleged Russian malfeasance ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2272,The new Guardian story looked like another weak attempt to connect the alleged Russian malfeasance with Assange and the Wikileaks publishing of the DNC emailsAssange and other involved people deny that such a relation existedThere is no public evidence that support such claims,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2273,a main outlet for British government disinformation operations aimed at defaming Russia,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2274,readily dismiss the Guardians smear on its face,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2275,While most readers with functional critical thinking capacity may readily dismiss the Guardians smear on its face the fact that the Guardian published this piece and that Luke Harding is still operating with even the tiniest modicum of respect as a journalist despite his history of deceit tells us something bonechilling about journalism,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2276,an eliteserving western narrative,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2277,Its job is to shore up a consensus on the left for attacks on leading threats to the existing neoliberal order The Guardian did not make a mistake in vilifying Assange without a shred of evidenceIt did what it is designed to do,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2278,It is no accident that Luke Harding is still employed in fact it is because of Hardings consistent loyalty to establishment specifically the UK intelligence apparatus over the truth that determines his success amongst legacy press outletsHarding is not a defacement or a departure from the norm but the personification of it,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2279,With this story it has done what it regularly does when supposedly vital western foreign policy interests are at stake  it simply regurgitates an eliteserving western narrative,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2280,We have previously shown that the Guardian even uses fascist propaganda tropes to smear the Russian peopleIt is openly publishing Goebbels cartoons and rhetoric against Europes biggest stateThere is no longer any line that it does not dare to crossUnfortunately other western media are not much better,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2281,Politico allowed a former CIA officer writing under a pen name to suggest  without any evidence  that the Guardian has been duped  not by its MI56 and Ecuadorian spy sources but by Russian disinformation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2282,the bombshell smoking gun that directly connects the Trump campaign to WikiLeaks,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2283,Is it possible someone planted this story as a means to discredit the journalists,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2284,The is zero evidence in the Politico screed that supports its suggestions and claims,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2285,The is zero evidence in the Politico screed that supports its suggestions and claimsIt is fake news about a fake news story,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2286,the enemies of the ruling western interests,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2287,It is on all of us to debunk them and to educate the public about their scheme,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2288,Its recent fake news story about Paul Manafort Wikileaks and Julian Assange aptly demonstrates this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2289,This is the new Sweden the new exciting dynamic multicultural paradise that so many here in this assembly  have fought to create for so many years,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2290,Its a new monster,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2291,Barack Obamas reckless appeasement of the Iranian regime has enabled its rise as a hegemonic threat,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2292,turned his back on millions of dissidents,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2293,giving rise to ISISs reemergence in Iraq,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2294,turning Iraq into a virtual vassal state of the largest state sponsor of terrorism,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2295,legitimized Irans path to eventually becoming a nucleararmed state,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2296,could actually accelerate the cycle of violence and perpetuate conflict rather than get us to a sustainable outcome,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2297,Whether the Trump administration follows through remains to be seen,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2298,their dream of independence is all but dead,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2299,Do we accept that outcome pack up and go homeOr do we leave our forces in Syria and Iraq and defy any demand from Assad to vacate his country,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2300,apparently clueless to the presence of 800 US troops in Niger,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2301,Would the American people support such a war with US troops,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2302,If we rely on the Kurds in Syria we lose NATO ally Turkey,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2303,And only one force in the region has the power to reverse the present outcome of Syrias civil warthe United States,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2304,A failure by the United States to defend its allies or promote new political arrangements for Syria and Iraq will lead only to more war the rise of new terrorist threats and ultimately the necessity of more USintervention,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2305,Or do we leave our forces in Syria and Iraq and defy any demand from Assad to vacate his country,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2306,secure is that really a victory,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2307,If we rely on the Kurds in Syria we lose NATO ally Turkey which regards Syrias Kurds as collaborators of the PKK in Turkey which even the US designates a terrorist organization,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2308,ERO has removed more than 1700 foreign fugitives from the United States who were sought in their native countries for serious crimes including kidnapping rape and murder,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2309,Our dedicated officers strive to make our communities safer,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2310,Our dedicated officers strive to make our communities safer by arresting convicted criminal aliens and removing them from the United States despite the reckless sanctuary policies that are currently in place in Cook County that put our communities at risk,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2311,By removing criminal aliens from the streets our ICE officers provide an invaluable community service by improving public safety,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2312,protect the integrity of our immigration laws,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2313,a hopeless hellhole where the native population is overtaxed and terrorized by warring foreign gangs,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2314,Of course they cant cope,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2315,Mass repression and police powers that dont actually address the cause of the problem,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2316,Have the American people been had again,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2317,Are the 2000 US troops in Syria really up to that task,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2318,risks a major US war with no allies but the Kurds,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2319,Have the generals taking us into Syria told the president how and when if ever they plan to get us out,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2320,blatant attack on the sovereignty and territorial integrity,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2321,flagrant violation of international law,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2322,by what authority do US forces remain to arm troops to keep the Damascus government from reimposing its authority on its own territory,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2323,Donald Trump won the presidency on a promise of no more unnecessary wars,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2324,Are we prepared for a shooting war with a Syrian army backed by Russia Iran Hezbollah and Shiite militias from Iraq Afghanistan and Pakistan to hold onto a fourth of Syrias territory in alliance with Kurds,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2325,If Erdogan is serious a clash with the US is coming,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2326,Does not the Syrian government have a point,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2327,But who authorized this strategic commitment,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2328,Of course we know what Obama did with his daily briefingsThey are somewhere in the White House sewer system,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2329,Has President Trump thought through where we are going with this deepening commitment in Syria,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2330,If you Americans are committed to countering Iran in the region then you must do so in Syriafirst,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2331,active diplomacy not military action,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2332,What outcome would justify another US war in a region where all the previous wars in this century have left us bleeding bankrupt divided and disillusioned,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2333,bleeding bankrupt divided and disillusioned,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2334,what would be the US vital interest,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2335,When he was running  Donald Trump seemed to understand this,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2336,ICE help keep our communities safe,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2337,efforts to protect the nation,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2338,protect the integrity of our immigration laws and border controls,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2339,And Dems have become honorary members of MS13,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2340,making clear that this reckless decision was based on her political agenda,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2341,some of them were able to elude us thanks to the mayors irresponsible decision,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2342,communitys a lot less safe than it wouldve been,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2343,a gang lookout yelling police,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2344,mayors decision to publicize her suspicions about ICE operations further increased that risk for my officers and alerted criminal aliens  making clear that this reckless decision was based on her political agenda,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2345,Unlike the politicians who attempt to undermine ICEs critical mission our officers will continue to fulfill their sworn duty to protect public safety,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2346,True to the lefts support for criminality over law and order,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2347,criminal convictions and other public safety threats remain at large in the area  an indeterminate number of whom may have been tipped off by a Democrat mayor who betrayed the lawabiding citizens of Northern California,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2348,further increased that risk for my officers and alerted criminal aliens,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2349,our officers will continue to fulfill their sworn duty to protect public safety,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2350,The price of a sanctuary city for illegal aliens is paid in abused childrenJust ask the abused children of Oakland,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2351,ICEs ongoing and steady commitment to public safety,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2352,Because of the tireless efforts of these professional officers there are fewer criminals in our communities,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2353,Sanctuary City Mayor Protected Illegal Alien Mexican Rapist,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2354,Except when shes fighting for their rapists instead,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2355,its good odds that it began with Obama holdovers ensconced in the governme,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2356,just keeps getting worse,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2357,there is no doubt that businesses employing illegal aliens are committing a crime,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2358,Illegal Alien Wife Beaters,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2359,How dare you needlessly endanger the lives of our law enforcement officers to promote a radical open borders agenda,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2360,said that hundreds more escaped because of Schaafs warning,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2361,real war on women,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2362,This operation reflects ICEs commitment to public safety through targeted enforcement efforts,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2363,I applaud the brave men and women of ICE who put themselves in harms way daily,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2364,I applaud the brave men and women of ICE who put themselves in harms way daily to keep our community safe,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2365,war against Jews and Christians,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2366,kill them wherever you find them,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2367,How would Garry Wills explain all that,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2368,To emigrate in the cause of Allah is to leave ones home and join up with the Muslims,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2369,to end national security,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2370,only shameless Zionists would attempt to equate killing Jews with killing Jews,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2371,The attacks here are motivated by a desire for open borders,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2372,We will simply lose,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2373,most treacherous in regard to all they do,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2374,some very good actors on the Left,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2375,wholesale slaughter of Jews,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2376,what the Jews call the Holocaust,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2377,Inhuman and criminal annihilation runs in the veins of many in the West,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2378,groaned under the heavy yoke,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2379,The Democrats want open borders and they dont care about crime,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2380,We want children staying together,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2381,Illegals Have To Go,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2382,a somewhat geeky exlawyer ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2383,bringing a saint to Newark,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2384,an abuser of seminarians minors or priests,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2385,Are Father Martin and his pals in the episcopacy really so enlightened over every pope saint and moral theologian in history,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2386,So why are our bishops playing dumb,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2387,This is what the Church of Accompaniment is all about,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2388,Who are these bishops that think they can play fast and loose not only with the moral theology of the Catholic Church but also with the immortal souls of their flock,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2389,Under no circumstancesexcept for those dreamed up by a number of bishops in this country who apparently think that it should be left up to individual parishes to decide if they are LGBTQfriendly or not,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2390,an ideology of evil,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2391,the 2005 and 2007 settlements were apparently considered ancient history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2392,Pope John Paul THE GREAT ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2393,the strong and vibrant faith ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2394,one of the most prominent Churchmen in the United States in the last quarter century,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2395,I dont think that the Church in the United States will rest  and confidence will be restored  until the matter is independently investigated and explained and assurances are given that there are safeguards in place to make sure that something like this couldnt happen again,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2396,no one can be above the law regardless of rank or privilege,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2397,an inclusive community that welcomes all and judges none,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2398,All very well and good except for the fact that the Churchs constant and unchanging moral teaching on this makes no such allowance,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2399,Basing itself on Sacred Scripture which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity tradition has always declared that homosexual acts are intrinsically disorderedThey are contrary to the natural lawThey close the sexual act to the gift of lifeThey do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarityUnder no circumstances can they be approved,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2400,Pope John Paul The GREATs,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2401,thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorderTherefore special concern and pastoral attention should be directed to those who have this condition lest they be led to believe that the living out of this orientation in homosexual activity is a morally acceptable optionIt is not,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2402,stop humiliating herself by stooping to accommodate ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2403,a special interest group that obviously doesnt care about her or the moral code by which she governs,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2404,a new ideology of evil,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2405,to pit human rights against the family and man,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2406,and his pals in the episcopacy ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2407,everlasting damnation is the price to be paid for this kind of inclusivity and toleration,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2408,Or is it not so that it is both negligent and uncharitable for some bishops to refuse to inform their faithful that according to the Churchs own infallible teaching everlasting damnation is the price to be paid for this kind of inclusivity and toleration,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2409,we call FOUL even louder ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2410,ANY sins of the flesh,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2411,closing an episcopal eye to ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2412,Quite obviously it is because what they are actually closing an episcopal eye to are the folks who want to keep right on sinningand sinning proudly,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2413,greenlighting vice and mortal sin,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2414,a hideous violation of everything these bishops supposedly believe as Catholic priests,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2415,cries to heaven for vengeance,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2416,The Catholic Churchs newfound climate of tolerance is exactly what McCarrick and company are counting on,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2417,It is truly homophobic for any bishop to lie to the gay community about this and to risk the immortal souls of the sheep merely so that the shepherd might pride himself on occupying the politically correct high ground,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2418,we hope and pray that all the good US bishops would jump at the opportunity to issue statements reaffirming the Churchs clear teaching against all sins of the flesh homo and heterosexual,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2419,This is gross dereliction of duty and we hope and pray that all the good US bishops would jump at the opportunity to issue statements reaffirming the Churchs clear teaching against all sins of the flesh homo and heterosexual,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2420,Our bishops must make it absolutely clear that the Churchs moral theology on homosexuality will not and can not be trumped by the dictates of political correctness,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2421,an evil spirit that can be driven out only by prayer and fasting,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2422,Until the Church and her bishops get back to reaffirming traditional Catholic teaching on human sexuality we can forget about seeing an end to the sexual abuse crisis and the massive problem of homosexuality in the clergy,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2423,remain in the toilet ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2424,will remain in the toilet indefinitely,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2425,the forces of darkness ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2426,we would also humbly beg him to take it one step further by publicly proclaiming his profession of belief in the Churchs official teaching against the mortal sin of homosexual acts and the socalled gay lifestyle which includes her longheld teaching that homosexual activity between clerics is an ecclesiastical crime,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2427,To make matters worse if that is even possible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2428,Is it any wonder that priests and laity alike are changing their attitude on the gay lifestyle and violations of the Sixth Commandment when so many bishops are working to remove the stigma attached to this sin that Scripture tells us cries to heaven for vengeance,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2429,Well played Cardinal Wuerl,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2430,heretical homilies sodomitical clergy and an increasingly lavender liturgy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2431,after the scandal erupted ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2432,have reopened wounding questions ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2433,All this and rampant homosexuality in the priesthood too along with a trivialized liturgy according to Pope Benedict XVI and widespread apostasy among the faithfulRemind me again What exactly has Vatican II and the last fifty years of aggiornamento given usBecause I cant seem to think of a darn thing apart from heretical homilies sodomitical clergy and an increasingly lavender liturgy,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2434,of a darn thing,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2435,You know what guysThanks but no thanksYou can take your Church of Accompaniment to prison with youId sooner let my kids be accompanied by fans of the Oakland Raiders than turn them over to you,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2436,on the cutting edge of change,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2437,Thanks but no thanks,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2438,But recent abuserelated scandals from Chile to Australia have reopened wounding questions about accountability and whether church officials are still covering up crimes at the highest levels,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2439,The new wave of allegations has called Pope Franciss handling of abuse into question as many Catholics look to him to help the church regain its credibility,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2440,The popes track record has been mixed something some outsiders attribute to his learning curve or shortcomings ,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2441,a notoriously changeaverse institution,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2442,a towering figure in the US church ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2443,And how honest the church has been about this crisisMost bishops besides apologies have not been on the cutting edge of change,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2444,I know lots of luck with that one,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2445,a God of Surprises who is ubermerciful and doesnt judge,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2446,a pope who according to Father Thomas Rosica breaks Catholic traditions whenever he wants because he is free from disordered attachments,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2447,These are the people that are going to accompany us and our children in the synodal Church with its new orientation,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2448,take your Church of Accompaniment to prison with you,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2449,the most vile clergy sex scandal in history,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2450,Unless and until we take seriously our call to sanctity we as an institution and as individuals will continue to suffer the wages of sin,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2451,nowculturallyacceptable acts of homosexuality ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2452,publicallydeplorable acts of pedophilia,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2453,the degenerate and even criminal shepherds,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2454,wreaking great devastation in the vineyard of the Lord,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2455,stave off this deep illness in the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2456,the wrath of the enemies of the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2457,a whole slew of issues ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2458,a port in the storm ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2459,light in the darkness ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2460,a bishop with the courage to look the beast in the eye and speak its name out loud,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2461,the Church needs now is more hatred,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2462,It is an act of love to hate sin and to call others to turn away from sin,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2463,They will be crucified in the media yes,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2464,their thoroughly scandalized flocks ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2465,they are absolutely committed to the defense and enforcement of the Churchs moral teaching ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2466,But they will also be doing their sacred duty before God in reassuring their thoroughly scandalized flocks that they are absolutely committed to the defense and enforcement of the Churchs moral teaching at a time when it is under scurrilous attack from withinNothing less will do,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2467,we respectfully demand that the rest of the American bishops either follow suit or face the charge of being complicit with the degenerate and even criminal shepherds accounts of whose betrayal and vice now dominate the news,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2468,I am tired of this,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2469,those entrusted with immense responsibility from the Lord for the care of His people,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2470,quite literally enough to make someone sick,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2471,evil evil that cries out for justice ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2472,we have excused sin in the name of a mistaken notion of mercy,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2473,In the end the excuses do not matterWe must be done with sinIt must be rooted out and again considered unacceptable,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2474,the license for sin to have a home in individuals at every level of the Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2475,what the Church needs now is more hatred,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2476,powerful priests bishops and cardinals,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2477,but also are in violation of the natural moral law for all,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2478,the most notorious and highest in ranking case,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2479,it also offers the guilty party an opportunity to make expiation for his sin in this life if he willingly accepts his punishment thus sparing him worse punishment in the life to come,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2480,many good and virtuous priests bishops and cardinals,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2481,many great and respectable seminaries ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2482,so many holy and faithful seminarians,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2483,as a holy priest a hard working priest and a pure and happy priest ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2484,injure the very Body of Christ His Church,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2485,our own personal holiness ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2486,cast out sin from our own lives and run toward holiness,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2487,we will serve the Lord,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2488,look the beast in the eye and speak its name out loud,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2489,These actions committed by more than a few can only be classified as evil evil that cries out for justice and sin that must be cast out from our Church,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2490,Why do we do thisIs it out of an earnest desire to display a misguided sense of being pastoral Have we covered over the truth out of fearAre we afraid of being disliked by people in this worldOr are we afraid of being called hypocrites because we are not striving tirelessly for holiness in our own lives,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2491,a sin so grave that it cries out to heaven for vengeance,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2492,Failure to do so will lead to dismissal from diocesan sponsorship,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2493,credibly accused child sex abusers ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2494,With shame and repentance we acknowledge as an ecclesial community that we were not where we should have been that we did not act in a timely manner realizing the magnitude and the gravity of the damage done to so many livesWe showed no care for the little ones we abandoned them,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2495,Like his predecessor Francis has promised zero tolerance on child abuse but scandals have kept recurring in several parts of the world  including in Australia recently,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2496,rocked by clergy sex abuse scandals,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2497,which cries out to heaven,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2498,with sorrow and shame,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2499,Im not sure what his words will be and Im not sure that a simple apology is what survivors of abuse want,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2500,If he expresses an apology it needs to be more than were sorry,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2501,With shame and repentance,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2502,no effort to beg pardon and to seek to repair the harm done will ever be sufficient,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2503,The pope begs for forgiveness but still does not admit or own the deliberate policy of cover up designed  implemented by the Vatican,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2504,According to church expert John L Allen an editor at specialized website Cruxcom the Catholic Church has a structural problem when it comes to dealing with cover up accusationsSixteen years since the crisis first erupted in the US almost ten years since that happened in Ireland and now more than five years since Francis was elected the Catholic Church still has no credible transparent process for handling cases when the accusation against a bishop isnt the direct commission of abuse but rather covering up someone elses crimes Allen said in a Sunday column,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2505,the Catholic Church still has no credible transparent process for handling cases when the accusation against a bishop isnt the direct commission of abuse but rather covering up someone elses crimes,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2506,It is essential that we as a Church be able to acknowledge and condemn with sorrow and shame the atrocities perpetrated by consecrated persons clerics and all those entrusted with the mission of watching over and caring for those most vulnerable,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2507,the Catholic Church has a structural problem when it comes to dealing with cover up accusations,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2508,baffling and shameful silence ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2509,contemptuous snickering and roaring laughter ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2510,the disastrous Obama administration,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2511,the lifesaving turnaround disposition ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2512,9 concrete steps that if implemented by a future American administration would make a big difference in preserving our civilization and in defending Americans from terrorism,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2513,our enemy ieIslamic Jihad,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2514,The Obama administration continues to refuse to label our enemy and therefore it continues to enable our defeat in the terror war,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2515,our enemy ieIslamic law,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2516,whom the administration obviously considers to be the real threat to American security,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2517,is trash and needs to be thrown in the garbage,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2518,to destroy our civilization from within ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2519,as Robert Spencer advises there needs to be legislation that will bar all such groups and affiliated individuals from advising the government or receiving any grants from it,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2520,as Sebastian Gorka urges in Defeating Jihad The Winnable War the government needs to lay down a vision an actual threat doctrine analysis in a thorough document just like George Kennans Long Telegram and NSC68 did in laying out the strategic foundation to fighting communism in the Cold WarIt is absolutely mindboggling that nothing of this sort exists today in our terror war  and it is a reflection of the Left being in charge and of the destructive defeat that it is sowing,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2521,Sebastian Gorka is crucially correct therefore when he recommends a national counterpropaganda campaign that involves a twopart approach,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2522,an antiJihadist version of Islam,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2523,the suicidal leftist notion ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2524,buffer their lipservice against terror ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2525,As Robert Spencer counsels,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2526,we need to bring in people who actually love America and want to protect it,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2527,noble and courageous individuals ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2528,brave Muslim individuals who genuinely reject Jihad ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2529,Islam cannot be Islam without Jihad,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2530,at least a million hilarious satirical sketches,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2531,totalitarian leftist and Islamic forces,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2532,pathetic rules and lives ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2533,Below are 9 concrete steps that if implemented by a future American administration would make a big difference in preserving our civilization and in defending Americans from terrorism,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2534,On the other hand this focus allows the administration to perpetuate the destructive fantasy that there are other types of extremists  who just happen to be the Lefts political opponents  that pose a great threat to the country,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2535,getting surreal in the creepiest and most harrowing Stalinist sense,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2536,totalitarian suffocation of free thought and expression,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2537,that daring to give suggestions on how our civilization can stop jihadist attacks and another 911 is against Facebooks community standards,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2538,that merit at least a million hilarious satirical sketches,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2539,how to best defend American lives from jihad,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2540,Charming Seducing and Devouring Us,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2541,enslaved and dutifully following his orders,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2542,is a real doozy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2543,the skyrocketing jihadist stabbings in Europe ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2544,a move that is clearly horrifying to Facebooks masters and therefore also violates their community standards,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2545,honor killings and other Shariah barbarities,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2546,the anger and hatred ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2547,who are clearly on the side of the Shariah enforcers and oppressors of Muslim women and girls,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2548,Shariah enforcers and oppressors of Muslim women and girls,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2549,The government needs he said to implement a concrete counteringjihad strategy,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2550,And he said it needs to affirm Shariahs assault on the US Constitution as seditious,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2551,It goes without saying that this retraction and surrender by Facebook occurred only because of the wide publicity that Jamies banning had received,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2552,of the insane variety,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2553,their unrelenting effort to suffocate dissent and conservative voices,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2554,leftist brownshirtstyle assault on free speech,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2555,a standup noble gentleman ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2556,a racially charged event,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2557,At this dire moment we all need to amplify our voices in defense of free speechAnd we need to adamantly defend all the truthtellers at the very moment they come under attackWe also need to contact our representatives and to call for a Congressional investigation into this pernicious assault by the fascist Left on our liberties,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2558,our free speech victory,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2559,We have no doubt of course that no mistake had actually occurred in this matter and that the ban has only been lifted because of the publicity that we engaged in  and received,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2560,this story is crucial to amplify now more than ever,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2561,Facebooks Unholy Alliance masters ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2562,This suggested of course that giving advice on how to prevent another 911 and all other Jihadist attacks against America is now against Facebooks community standards,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2563,we are immensely grateful for all the massive support that was given to us across the Internet,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2564,Leading brave conservative figures ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2565,with absolutely no explanation,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2566,the Southern Poverty Law Center SPLC hate machine,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2567,trying to run the Center out of business and suffocate free speech in America,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2568,and suffocate free speech in America,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2569,are preparing new attacks against the Freedom Center and other conservative groups and individuals 247,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2570,disgusting and venomous level ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2571,the Stalinist Lefts war on America and on everything on which it stands,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2572,The battle for America  and for the West  is on,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2573,why would Facebook remove such a page let alone in such a fascistic manner  and never explain why,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2574,because no one wants to be gay and black,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2575,Im a generation older than all of you I know comedy,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2576,no one looks in the mirror and thinks this black thing is too easy let me just add another thing to it,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2577,none of his remarks were offensive,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2578,The message they were trying to send with the event was opposite to the jokes he was making and using peoples ethnicity as the crux of his jokes could be funny but still offensiveHe definitely wasnt the most crass comedian Ive ever heard but for the event it was inappropriate,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2579,the biggest terror threat in this country is white men,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2580,Nah its just CNN doing what CNN does spewing more fake news for your viewing pleasure,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2581,thought it would be fun ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2582,Talk about an absolute hypocrite,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2583,How can he contradict himself like that and not even bat an eyelid,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2584,gotten incredible help along the way,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2585,We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men most of them radicalized to the right and we have to start doing something about them Lemon saidThere is no travel ban on them there is no white guy ban,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2586,the biggest terror threat ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2587,Don Lemon thinks things like this are just fine and wants these people in the USHe just doesnt want white men here,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2588,There I said it,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2589,is a progressive who is a part of the crazy crazy crazies,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2590,to appeal to white guilt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2591,Good luck with that,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2592,Gillum is not a lawful man as he does not support the right to keep and bear arms but rather considers Americans as criminals who need to prove their innocence before obtaining a gun,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2593,Florida gubernatorial candidate and George Sorosbacked ,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2594,the utter racism of Smith,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2595,This is a fed up state,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2596,Its a cracker state,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2597,how mean nasty and evil they have been ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2598,and every person with dark skin on the planet,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2599,kick them in the shins,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2600,What was even more amazing ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2601,Clearly she was speaking of all black people and not being specific to Holder or Booker as they look nothing alike,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2602,They are rooted in bigotry toward a belief about what Muslims are stereotyped to believe,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2603,Evil Doings Of Israel,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2604,she will cruise to victory,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2605,The Evil Doings Of Israel,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2606,Israel has hypnotized the world,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2607,the evil doings of Israel,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2608,She is a hijabwearing devout Muslim and Islamic Jewhatred is in the Quran,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2609,but this is the way the Democrat leadership and the Democrat base thinksThey want candidates like Ilhan OmarAnd they know theyll win because this is their base today,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2610,Neither the Democrat leadership nor the Democrat base cares that she married her brotherShe is a Muslim and a leftist so she can further their identity politicsThats all that matters to them,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2611,the Left hates America,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2612,its just a reaction to the evil deeds of the US and Israel,causal oversimplification fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2613,If you like down with dogs youre going to get fleas,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2614,paralleled Jews with termites,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2615,I absolutely unqualifiedly denounce and reject the views of Louis Farrakhan,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2616,his views and mine were absolutely incompatible,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2617,to pull an Obama,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2618,Youre a failure if you cant keep a man,black and white fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2619,Murder and lying comes easy for white people,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2620,absolutely unqualifiedly denounce and reject ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2621,have been overwhelmingly elected ,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2622,unfortunately in reality neither one is worth celebrating,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2623,no country not one,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2624,is even more hateful than Tlaib,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2625,she doubled down and attacked ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2626,You are a hateful sad man I pray to Allah you get the help you need and find happiness,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2627,There is much much worse about Omar,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2628,Forthrightly proAmerica proIsrael candidates would stand little to no chance in either of their districtsAnd that is indicative of a much larger problem,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2629,triumphs of Americas diversity,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2630,For me US aid should be leverageI will be using my position in Congress so that no country not one should be able to get aid from the US when they still promote that kind of injustice,flag waving fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2631,a hateful sad man,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2632,they are normalizing and enabling Nazis by supporting Rick Scott and Ron DeSantis,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2633,just how evil and awful ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2634,Sorry Hillary we dont think they look anything alikeOr did you mean all black people,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2635,As The American Mirrors Kyle Olsen concludes so eloquently Hillary Clinton appears to benefit from her progressive privilege  it is the only thing that protects her from getting the Roseanne treatment and not being dismissed in disgrace,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2636,Death to America  America Is The Great Satan,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2637,Victory Will Be Yours,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2638,America has never been a democracy,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2639,Satan seeks to divide Muslims ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2640,a part of the crazy crazy crazies,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2641,a Fed up cracker state,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2642,a crazy crazy Democrat,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2643,You whip em up,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2644,What we found in the Gillum campaign was just what we found in Missouri Tennessee and Arizona a candidate lying to the voters he needs to win the election,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2645,Omar Smith who says he went to college with Gillum reveals Gillum cannot fulfill his campaign promises even if he wanted to,appeal to authority fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2646,Whip up the poor into a frenzy ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2647,whip lower income individuals into a frenzy,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2648,whip them up into a frenzy ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2649,Gillum Makes Promises He Cant Keep,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2650,You have to whip them up into a frenzy in order for them to vote,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2651,Gillum campaign makes promises it knows it cant keep,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2652,reveals Gillum cannot fulfill his campaign promises even if he wanted to,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2653,When asked how Gillum would fund all the programs he says he wants to fund Smith says Gillum cant,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2654,Smith explains that most of Gillums campaign promises could never be implemented,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2655,So lets go back to Mr Gillums platform rightRaise the corporate tax in Florida from 7 to 11 percentThat will never happenRaise teachers pay to 50000 that will never happenGive me another positionMedicare for all that will never happen,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2656,Whip up the poor into a frenzy in order for them to vote,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2657,Gillums fairy tale platform,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2658,You whip em upThe poor the middle incomeYou have to whip them up into a frenzy in order for them to vote,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2659,needs to appeal to white guilt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2660,You have to appeal to white guilt,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2661,you are way out of left field,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2662,We dont do we have to let the voters know what the agenda is ahead of timeWe cant We cannot You alienate everybody,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2663,Gillum had to campaign on values he does not really believe,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2664,left not left of center,name calling/labeling fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2665,But I dont think he can say it just because hes trying to get the moderates and the guntoting people in North Florida,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2666,The rules in Florida are fed up,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2667,if Gillum is elected none of the things outlined in his platform would happenHe says that thats not for voters to know,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2668,Not for voters to know programs wont happen,Doubt fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2669,walltowall coverage in the media eviscerating Gilllum ,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2670,if Gillum is elected none of the things outlined in his platform would happen,appeal to fear fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2671,a fed up ass state,loaded language fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2672,Also the Left killed comedyThis is what its corpse looks like,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2673,the Left killed comedy,Slongs fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2674,Comrades these jokes you have been listening to are thought crimes,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"
+2675,Im sure Patel felt very like accepted,exaggeration/minimisation fallacy,"You are a propaganda techniques classifier and fallacies detector indetifying 10 propaganda techniques within news paper articles. 
+Here is some context about the 10 fallacies.
+An argument has 2 parts:
+Claim: The statement expressing what the arguer is trying to persuade others to accept, whether or not it actually is true.
+Evidence: The statements that the arguer (or other participants in the debate) provide to show that the claim is true. The evidence answers the question, “Why do you believe [the claim] to be true?” The claim and evidence might appear in any order.
+A fallacy is an argument where the evidence does not support the claim.
+
+- An appeal to authority fallacy (also known as argument from authority fallacy, argumentum ad verecundiam) is an argument in which an arguer asserts that something is good or bad based on the opinion of an authority on a topic. It is a fallacy because the primary premise is that ""this is right because so-and-so said that"". If an arguer adds further some facts to support the opinion of the authority, then it is no longer a fallacy. Keep in mind that providing supporting evidence makes the argument non-fallacious, it does not matter if the arguer is right or wrong. Note that the authority can be relevant (eg: quoting a doctor's opinion on a medical issue) but, if there is no fact or evidence to supplement what the authority says, it will still be a fallacy.
+- A black or white fallacy (also called false dilemma fallacy, false dichotomy fallacy, fallacy of bifurcation) is an argument in which an arguer wrongly limits the conclusion to only one of few (usually two), often extreme, possibilities and refuses to acknowledge that there could be more possibilities. Of course there are cases with only two possibilities, and if the arguer lists out all of them, then it is not considered a fallacy.
+- A causal oversimplification fallacy is assuming a single cause or reason when there are actually multiple causes for an issue. It includes transferring  blame to one  person or  group of people without investigating  the complexities of the issue
+- An appeal to fear is a fallacy when a person seeks to build support for an idea by instilling anxiety and panic in the population towards an alternative. In some cases the support is built based on preconceived judgements.
+- A Name calling/labeling is a fallacy when labeling the object of the propaganda campaign as either something the target audience fears, hates, finds undesirable or loves, praises. 
+- A Loaded Language is a fallacy when using specific words and phrases with strong emotional implications (either positive or negative) to influence an audience. 
+- An Exaggeration/Minimisation fallacy is when either representing something in an excessive manner: making things larger, better, worse (e.g., ""the best of the best"", ""quality guaranteed"") or making something seem less important or smaller than it really is (e.g., saying that an insult was just a joke). 
+- A Flag Waving fallacy is when playing on strong national feeling (or to any group; e.g., race, gender, political preference) to justify or promote an action or idea 
+- A Doubt is a fallacy when questioning the credibility of someone or something. 
+- A Slongs is a brief and striking phrase that may include labeling and stereotyping. Slogans tend to act as emotional appeals. 
+
+What fallacy/technique is used in this sentence
+"