Most peoples' actual problem with the way that left wing academia/science handles the issue of human genetic diversity isn't that they won't admit blacks are backwards or whatever, rather it's that they a priori swear off the idea that there can possibly be such a thing as a behaviorial trait in a human that can at least partially be attributable to certain underlying genes, the distribution of which is uneven across different ancestral populations. Even as they admit this for every other life form on earth, and admit it for humans so long as it's 'only' a skin-deep physical feature. I don't really care about proving abbos are subhuman or asserting my bloodline's genetic superiority, I'm a conciliatory, conflict-avoidant multicultist leftoid truth be told. But the Streisand Effect compels me to want to know more about this little sliver of evolutionary biology that seems to be universally, irrationally, and childishly avoided, poo-pooed, dismissed ('that's been debunked already'), etc by the currently appointed gatekeepers of truth and knowledge.