text: Mayor Steve Adler maintains that the ridesharing firms are "welcome to stay," and has offered to keep negotiating. However, it's doubtful that either of the companies will be so quick to come back. Both tend to play hardball when new laws make life difficult, often by threatening to end service -- they give up their main bargaining chip if they don't follow through on that threat. Sure enough, Lyft says this is taking a "stand for a long-term path forward," while Uber feels nothing but "disappointment." 
   
   No matter what, the outcome will be mixed. Opponents to Proposition 1 are happy that companies which do operate should have a stricter vetting process that reduces the chances of drivers committing crimes. It also pleases emergency crews worried that they'll have to dodge around mid-street pickups. However, the withdrawal is bound to be a hassle for both customers and drivers. Austin is a very car-focused city, and going without ridesharing means either paying much more for a cab or else using a mass transit system that's far from ideal. And of course, drivers who made significant cash through these services now have to scramble to find other work. Things aren't set in stone yet (this is just a proposition), but Austinites could still be in for a shock. ||||| AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - On-demand ride companies Uber and Lyft suffered an embarrassing defeat in a Saturday election in Austin as voters backed a measure requiring fingerprint background checks for drivers. 
   
   Campaign signs concerning a municipal vote over fingerprint requirements for ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft are seen along a roadway in Austin, Texas, May 6, 2016. REUTERS/Jon Herskovitz 
   
   The two companies spent more than $8 million to repeal a city ordinance requiring the fingerprint-based criminal checks and launched what turned into the most expensive race in the Texas capital’s history. Voters said by a margin of 56 to 44 percent they wanted the fingerprint checks to stay. 
   
   The companies outspent their opponents by 80-to-1 and when the votes were tallied their campaign contributions broke down to being more than $200 for each vote in favor of their position. 
   
   “Disappointment does not begin to describe how we feel about shutting down operations in Austin,” Uber’s Austin general manager Chris Nakutis said in a statement. 
   
   The stakes were high for the privately held Uber [UBER.UL] and Lyft, which say their background checks are already rigorous and ensure safety. 
   
   “Unfortunately, the rules passed by City Council don’t allow true ridesharing to operate,” Lyft said, adding it will suspend operations in Austin as of Monday. 
   
   The loss could prod other cities to require fingerprint criminal background checks, encouraged that they can survive a bruising electoral battle with the ride-hailing services, analysts said. 
   
   The costly municipal election in Austin came as other cities consider imposing fingerprint-based background checks on drivers. The Austin election marked the first time a major U.S. city put the regulations to a vote, which happened after a petition drive by Ridesharing Works for Austin, the political action group underwritten by Uber and Lyft. 
   
   Residents were asked to decide whether a transportation ordinance passed by the City Council in December should be repealed and replaced with one backed by the on-demand ride companies. 
   
   The city ordinance calls for all ride-hailing service drivers to have fingerprint-based criminal background checks, while the ride-hailing companies backed one that does not. 
   
   The group supporting mandated fingerprinting said the heavy spending was a signal that the Uber and Lyft campaign was motivated more by corporate profits than passenger safety. 
   
   Other places battling over fingerprints include Atlanta and Houston, which along with New York is one of the two major U.S. cities where Uber operates even though its drivers are required to undergo the fingerprint background checks. ||||| Just One More Thing... 
   
   We have sent you a verification email. Please check your email and click on the link to activate your profile. 
   
   If you do not receive the verification message within a few minutes of signing up, please check your Spam or Junk folder. 
   
   Close
target: – Uber and Lyft have made good on their threat to terminate operations in Austin as of Monday morning after a referendum didn't go their way. The companies spent more than $8 million—more than 50 times what their opponents spent—in a failed attempt to overturn the Texas city's requirement for fingerprint-based background checks, reports Reuters. Despite blanketing the area with ads, the companies lost Saturday's vote on Proposition 1 by 56% to 44%, reports Engadget, which notes that the companies were also fighting to be able to pick up passengers in traffic lanes. Mayor Steve Adler says he wants Uber and Lyft to stay in Austin, but the companies say they are "disappointed" and they need to "take a stand." Uber says the withdrawal will leave around 10,000 people out of work. The Uber and Lyft spend on the campaign worked out to around $223 for every vote they received, making it the most expensive campaign in city history. The previous record, Adler's 2014 election campaign, cost only a seventh of what they spent on the Proposition 1 fight. Uber and Lyft "decided they were going to make Austin an example to the nation," political consultant David Butts, who led the opposition campaign, Our City, Our Safety, Our Choice, tells the Austin American-Statesman. "And Austin made Uber an example to the nation." After the Austin vote, other cities are now expected to target Uber on the fingerprinting issue. (The company's drivers are now allowed to encourage tipping.)