feat_summary_path: finished_summaries/sparknotes/The Prince/section_8_part_3.txt
feat_book_id: The Prince.chapter xxii
feat_summary_id: chapter xxii
feat_summary: {"name": "Chapter XXII", "url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20210303115306/https://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/prince/section9/", "summary": "Concerning the Prince's Ministers The selection of ministers is a critical task because ministers give visitors their first impression of the prince. Wise and loyal ministers contribute to the image of a wise prince. Inversely, incompetent and disloyal ministers give the prince the image of incompetence. There are three types of intellect that men can possess: the ability to understand things independently, the ability to appreciate another person's ability to understand things, and the ability to do neither. The first kind is best, the second acceptable, and the third useless. If a prince possesses at least the second kind of intellect, he can judge whether his ministers' actions are good or bad. If a minister thinks more of himself than of the prince and does everything for personal profit, then he is a bad minister. A prince should recognize this state of affairs. Good ministers, however, should be rewarded to maintain their loyalty. Rewards can be paid in money, honor, and expanded responsibilities. It is crucial for a prince to have a confident relationship with his ministers", "analysis": ""}
text: 
  The choice of servants is of no little importance to a prince, and they
  are good or not according to the discrimination of the prince. And the
  first opinion which one forms of a prince, and of his understanding, is
  by observing the men he has around him; and when they are capable and
  faithful he may always be considered wise, because he has known how
  to recognize the capable and to keep them faithful. But when they are
  otherwise one cannot form a good opinion of him, for the prime error
  which he made was in choosing them.
  
  There were none who knew Messer Antonio da Venafro as the servant of
  Pandolfo Petrucci, Prince of Siena, who would not consider Pandolfo to
  be a very clever man in having Venafro for his servant. Because there
  are three classes of intellects: one which comprehends by itself;
  another which appreciates what others comprehended; and a third which
  neither comprehends by itself nor by the showing of others; the first is
  the most excellent, the second is good, the third is useless. Therefore,
  it follows necessarily that, if Pandolfo was not in the first rank, he
  was in the second, for whenever one has judgment to know good and
  bad when it is said and done, although he himself may not have the
  initiative, yet he can recognize the good and the bad in his servant,
  and the one he can praise and the other correct; thus the servant cannot
  hope to deceive him, and is kept honest.
  
  But to enable a prince to form an opinion of his servant there is one
  test which never fails; when you see the servant thinking more of his
  own interests than of yours, and seeking inwardly his own profit in
  everything, such a man will never make a good servant, nor will you ever
  be able to trust him; because he who has the state of another in his
  hands ought never to think of himself, but always of his prince, and
  never pay any attention to matters in which the prince is not concerned.
  
  On the other hand, to keep his servant honest the prince ought to study
  him, honouring him, enriching him, doing him kindnesses, sharing with
  him the honours and cares; and at the same time let him see that he
  cannot stand alone, so that many honours may not make him desire more,
  many riches make him wish for more, and that many cares may make him
  dread chances. When, therefore, servants, and princes towards servants,
  are thus disposed, they can trust each other, but when it is otherwise,
  the end will always be disastrous for either one or the other.
  
  
  
  
feat_summary_name: Chapter XXII
target: Concerning the Prince's Ministers The selection of ministers is a critical task because ministers give visitors their first impression of the prince. Wise and loyal ministers contribute to the image of a wise prince. Inversely, incompetent and disloyal ministers give the prince the image of incompetence. There are three types of intellect that men can possess: the ability to understand things independently, the ability to appreciate another person's ability to understand things, and the ability to do neither. The first kind is best, the second acceptable, and the third useless. If a prince possesses at least the second kind of intellect, he can judge whether his ministers' actions are good or bad. If a minister thinks more of himself than of the prince and does everything for personal profit, then he is a bad minister. A prince should recognize this state of affairs. Good ministers, however, should be rewarded to maintain their loyalty. Rewards can be paid in money, honor, and expanded responsibilities. It is crucial for a prince to have a confident relationship with his ministers