Recovering a sparse signal from an undersampled set of random linear measurements is the main problem of interest in compressed sensing. In this paper, we consider the case where both the signal and the measurements are complex. We study the popular reconstruction method of @math -regularized least squares or LASSO. While several studies have shown that the LASSO algorithm offers desirable solutions under certain conditions, the precise asymptotic performance of this algorithm in the complex setting is not yet known. In this paper, we extend the approximate message passing (AMP) algorithm to the complex signals and measurements and obtain the complex approximate message passing algorithm (CAMP). We then generalize the state evolution framework recently introduced for the analysis of AMP, to the complex setting. Using the state evolution, we derive accurate formulas for the phase transition and noise sensitivity of both LASSO and CAMP.
Compressed sensing posits that, within limits, one can undersample a sparse signal and yet reconstruct it accurately. Knowing the precise limits to such undersampling is important both for theory and practice. We present a formula that characterizes the allowed undersampling of generalized sparse objects. The formula applies to approximate message passing (AMP) algorithms for compressed sensing, which are here generalized to employ denoising operators besides the traditional scalar soft thresholding denoiser. This paper gives several examples including scalar denoisers not derived from convex penalization-the firm shrinkage nonlinearity and the minimax nonlinearity-and also nonscalar denoisers-block thresholding, monotone regression, and total variation minimization. Let the variables e = k N and δ = n N denote the generalized sparsity and undersampling fractions for sampling the k-generalized-sparse N-vector x0 according to y=Ax0. Here, A is an n×N measurement matrix whose entries are iid standard Gaussian. The formula states that the phase transition curve δ = δ(e) separating successful from unsuccessful reconstruction of x0 by AMP is given by δ = M(e|Denoiser) where M(e|Denoiser) denotes the per-coordinate minimax mean squared error (MSE) of the specified, optimally tuned denoiser in the directly observed problem y = x + z. In short, the phase transition of a noiseless undersampling problem is identical to the minimax MSE in a denoising problem. We prove that this formula follows from state evolution and present numerical results validating it in a wide range of settings. The above formula generates numerous new insights, both in the scalar and in the nonscalar cases.