In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language---representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid.
Many applications require conformance with specifications that constrain the use of resources, such as execution time, energy, bandwidth, etc. We have presented a configurable framework for static resource usage verification where specifications can include lower and upper bound, data size-dependent resource usage functions. To statically check such specifications, our framework infers the same type of resource usage functions, which safely approximate the actual resource usage of the program, and compares them against the specification. We review how this framework supports several languages and compilation output formats by translating them to an intermediate representation based on Horn clauses and using the configurability of the framework to describe the resource semantics of the input language. We provide a more detailed formalization and extend the framework so that both resource usage specification and analysis verification output can include preconditions expressing intervals for the input data sizes for which assertions are applicable, proved, or disproved. Most importantly, we also extend the classes of functions that can be checked. We provide results from an implementation within the Ciao CiaoPP framework, and report on a tool built by instantiating this framework for the verification of energy consumption specifications for imperative embedded programs. This paper is under consideration for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP). This paper presents a new approach for automatically deriving worst-case resource bounds for C programs. The described technique combines ideas from amortized analysis and abstract interpretation in a unified framework to address four challenges for state-of-the-art techniques: compositionality, user interaction, generation of proof certificates, and scalability. Compositionality is achieved by incorporating the potential method of amortized analysis. It enables the derivation of global whole-program bounds with local derivation rules by naturally tracking size changes of variables in sequenced loops and function calls. The resource consumption of functions is described abstractly and a function call can be analyzed without access to the function body. User interaction is supported with a new mechanism that clearly separates qualitative and quantitative verification. A user can guide the analysis to derive complex non-linear bounds by using auxiliary variables and assertions. The assertions are separately proved using established qualitative techniques such as abstract interpretation or Hoare logic. Proof certificates are automatically generated from the local derivation rules. A soundness proof of the derivation system with respect to a formal cost semantics guarantees the validity of the certificates. Scalability is attained by an efficient reduction of bound inference to a linear optimization problem that can be solved by off-the-shelf LP solvers. The analysis framework is implemented in the publicly-available tool C4B. An experimental evaluation demonstrates the advantages of the new technique with a comparison of C4B with existing tools on challenging micro benchmarks and the analysis of more than 2900 lines of C code from the cBench benchmark suite. Difference constraints have been used for termination analysis in the literature, where they denote relational inequalities of the form @math xź≤y+c, and describe that the value of x in the current state is at most the value of y in the previous state plus some constant @math cźZ. We believe that difference constraints are also a good choice for complexity and resource bound analysis because the complexity of imperative programs typically arises from counter increments and resets, which can be modeled naturally by difference constraints. In this article we propose a bound analysis based on difference constraints. We make the following contributions: (1) our analysis handles bound analysis problems of high practical relevance which current approaches cannot handle: we extend the range of bound analysis to a class of challenging but natural loop iteration patterns which typically appear in parsing and string-matching routines. (2) We advocate the idea of using bound analysis to infer invariants: our soundness proven algorithm obtains invariants through bound analysis, the inferred invariants are in turn used for obtaining bounds. Our bound analysis therefore does not rely on external techniques for invariant generation. (3) We demonstrate that difference constraints are a suitable abstract program model for automatic complexity and resource bound analysis: we provide efficient abstraction techniques for obtaining difference constraint programs from imperative code. (4) We report on a thorough experimental comparison of state-of-the-art bound analysis tools: we set up a tool comparison on (a) a large benchmark of real-world C code, (b) a benchmark built of examples taken from the bound analysis literature and (c) a benchmark of challenging iteration patterns which we found in real source code. (5) Our analysis is more scalable than existing approaches: we discuss how we achieve scalability. In this system description, we present the tool AProVE for automatic termination and complexity proofs of Java, C, Haskell, Prolog, and rewrite systems. In addition to classical term rewrite systems (TRSs), AProVE also supports rewrite systems containing built-in integers (int-TRSs). To analyze programs in high-level languages, AProVE automatically converts them to (int-)TRSs. Then, a wide range of techniques is employed to prove termination and to infer complexity bounds for the resulting rewrite systems. The generated proofs can be exported to check their correctness using automatic certifiers. To use AProVE in software construction, we present a corresponding plug-in for the popular Eclipse software development environment. One means of analyzing program performance is by deriving closed-form expressions for their execution behavior. This paper discusses the mechanization of such analysis, and describes a system, Metric, which is able to analyze simple Lisp programs and produce, for example, closed-form expressions for their running time expressed in terms of size of input. This paper presents the reasons for mechanizing program analysis, describes the operation of Metric, explains its implementation, and discusses its limitations.  There has been a great deal of research done on the evaluation of the complexity of particular algorithms; little effort, however, has been devoted to the mechanization of this evaluation. The ACE (Automatic Complexity Evaluator) system is able to analyze reasonably large programs, like sorting programs, in a fully mechanical way. A time-complexity function is derived from the initial functional program. This function is transformed into its nonrecursive equivalent according to MacCarthy's recursion induction principle, using a predefined library of recursive definitions. As the complexity is not a decidable property, this transformation will not be possible in all cases. The richer the predefined library is, the more likely the system is to succeed. The operations performed by ACE are described and the use of the system is illustrated with the analysis of a sorting algorithm. Related works and further improvements are discussed in the conclusion. Cost analysis statically approximates the cost of programs in terms of their input data size. This paper presents, to the best of our knowledge, the first approach to the automatic cost analysis of object-oriented bytecode programs. In languages such as Java and C#, analyzing bytecode has a much wider application area than analyzing source code since the latter is often not available. Cost analysis in this context has to consider, among others, dynamic dispatch, jumps, the operand stack, and the heap. Our method takes a bytecode program and a cost model specifying the resource of interest, and generates cost relations which approximate the execution cost of the program with respect to such resource. We report on COSTA, an implementation for Java bytecode which can obtain upper bounds on cost for a large class of programs and complexity classes. Our basic techniques can be directly applied to infer cost relations for other object-oriented imperative languages, not necessarily in bytecode form.