Since the discovery of adversarial examples in machine learning, researchers have designed several techniques to train neural networks that are robust against different types of attacks (most notably @math and @math based attacks). However, it has been observed that the defense mechanisms designed to protect against one type of attack often offer poor performance against the other. In this paper, we introduce Randomized Adversarial Training (RAT), a technique that is efficient both against @math and @math attacks. To obtain this result, we build upon adversarial training, a technique that is efficient against @math attacks, and demonstrate that adding random noise at training and inference time further improves performance against attacks. We then show that RAT is as efficient as adversarial training against @math attacks while being robust against strong @math attacks. Our final comparative experiments demonstrate that RAT outperforms all state-of-the-art approaches against @math and @math attacks.
Neural networks provide state-of-the-art results for most machine learning tasks. Unfortunately, neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples: given an input x and any target classification t, it is possible to find a new input x' that is similar to x but classified as t. This makes it difficult to apply neural networks in security-critical areas. Defensive distillation is a recently proposed approach that can take an arbitrary neural network, and increase its robustness, reducing the success rate of current attacks' ability to find adversarial examples from 95 to 0.5 .In this paper, we demonstrate that defensive distillation does not significantly increase the robustness of neural networks by introducing three new attack algorithms that are successful on both distilled and undistilled neural networks with 100 probability. Our attacks are tailored to three distance metrics used previously in the literature, and when compared to previous adversarial example generation algorithms, our attacks are often much more effective (and never worse). Furthermore, we propose using high-confidence adversarial examples in a simple transferability test we show can also be used to break defensive distillation. We hope our attacks will be used as a benchmark in future defense attempts to create neural networks that resist adversarial examples. State-of-the-art deep neural networks have achieved impressive results on many image classification tasks. However, these same architectures have been shown to be unstable to small, well sought, perturbations of the images. Despite the importance of this phenomenon, no effective methods have been proposed to accurately compute the robustness of state-of-the-art deep classifiers to such perturbations on large-scale datasets. In this paper, we fill this gap and propose the DeepFool algorithm to efficiently compute perturbations that fool deep networks, and thus reliably quantify the robustness of these classifiers. Extensive experimental results show that our approach outperforms recent methods in the task of computing adversarial perturbations and making classifiers more robust.1