Mining of spatial data is an enabling technology for mobile services, Internet-connected cars and the Internet of Things. But the very distinctiveness of spatial data that drives utility can cost user privacy. Past work has focused upon points and trajectories for differentially private release. In this work, we continue the tradition of privacy-preserving spatial analytics, focusing not on point or path data, but on planar spatial regions. Such data represent the area of a user’s most frequent visitation—such as “around home and nearby shops”. Specifically we consider the differentially private release of data structures that support range queries for counting users’ spatial regions. Counting planar regions leads to unique challenges not faced in existing work. A user’s spatial region that straddles multiple data structure cells can lead to duplicate counting at query time. We provably avoid this pitfall by leveraging the Euler characteristic for the first time with differential privacy. To address the increased sensitivity of range queries to spatial region data, we calibrate privacy-preserving noise using bounded user region size and a constrained inference that uses robust least absolute deviations. Our novel constrained inference reduces noise and promotes covertness by (privately) imposing consistency. We provide a full end-to-end theoretical analysis of both differential privacy and high-probability utility for our approach using concentration bounds. A comprehensive experimental study on several real-world datasets establishes practical validity.
Over the past five years a new approach to privacy-preserving data analysis has born fruit [13, 18, 7, 19, 5, 37, 35, 8, 32]. This approach differs from much (but not all!) of the related literature in the statistics, databases, theory, and cryptography communities, in that a formal and ad omnia privacy guarantee is defined, and the data analysis techniques presented are rigorously proved to satisfy the guarantee. The key privacy guarantee that has emerged is differential privacy. Roughly speaking, this ensures that (almost, and quantifiably) no risk is incurred by joining a statistical database. In this survey, we recall the definition of differential privacy and two basic techniques for achieving it. We then show some interesting applications of these techniques, presenting algorithms for three specific tasks and three general results on differentially private learning. Due to the high uptake of location-based services (LBSs), large spatio-temporal datasets of moving objects' trajectories are being created every day. An important task in spatial data analytics is to service range queries by returning trajectory counts within a queried region. The question of how to keep an individual user's data private whilst enabling spatial data analytics by third parties has become an urgent research direction. Indeed, it is increasingly becoming a concern for users. To preserve privacy we discard individual trajectories and aggregate counts over a spatial and temporal partition. However the privacy gained comes at a cost to utility: trajectories passing through multiple cells and re-entering a query region, lead to inaccurate query responses. This is known as the distinct counting problem. We propose the Connection Aware Spatial Euler (CASE) histogram to address this long-standing problem. The CASE histogram maintains the connectivity of a moving object path, but does not require the ID of an object to distinguish multiple entries into an arbitrary query region. Our approach is to process trajectories offline into aggregate counts which are sent to third parties, rather than the original trajectories. We also explore modifications of our aggregate counting approach that preserve differential privacy. Theoretically and experimentally we demonstrate that our method provides a high level of accuracy compared to the best known methods for the distinct counting problem, whilst preserving privacy. We conduct our experiments on both synthetic and real datasets over two competitive Euler histogram-based methods presented in the literature. Our methods enjoy improvements to accuracy from 10 up to 70 depending on trip data and query region size, with the greatest increase seen on the Microsoft T-Drive real dataset, representing a more than tripling of accuracy.