Compensating changes between a subjects' training and testing session in brain-computer interfacing (BCI) is challenging but of great importance for a robust BCI operation. We show that such changes are very similar between subjects, and thus can be reliably estimated using data from other users and utilized to construct an invariant feature space. This novel approach to learning from other subjects aims to reduce the adverse effects of common nonstationarities, but does not transfer discriminative information. This is an important conceptual difference to standard multi-subject methods that, e.g., improve the covariance matrix estimation by shrinking it toward the average of other users or construct a global feature space. These methods do not reduces the shift between training and test data and may produce poor results when subjects have very different signal characteristics. In this paper, we compare our approach to two state-of-the-art multi-subject methods on toy data and two datasets of EEG recordings from subjects performing motor imagery. We show that it can not only achieve a significant increase in performance, but also that the extracted change patterns allow for a neurophysiologically meaningful interpretation.
Common spatial pattern (CSP) is a popular feature extraction method for electroencephalogram (EEG) classification. Most of existing CSP-based methods exploit covariance matrices on a subject-by-subject basis so that inter-subject information is neglected. In this paper we present modifications of CSP for subject-to-subject transfer, where we exploit a linear combination of covariance matrices of subjects in consideration. We develop two methods to determine a composite covariance matrix that is a weighted sum of covariance matrices involving subjects, leading to composite CSP. Numerical experiments on dataset IVa in BCI competition III confirm that our composite CSP methods improve classification performance over the standard CSP (on a subject-by-subject basis), especially in the case of subjects with fewer number of training samples. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals are highly subject-specific and vary considerably even between recording sessions of the same user within the same experimental paradigm. This challenges a stable operation of Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) systems. The classical approach is to train users by neurofeedback to produce fixed stereotypical patterns of brain activity. In the machine learning approach, a widely adapted method for dealing with those variances is to record a so called calibration measurement on the beginning of each session in order to optimize spatial filters and classifiers specifically for each subject and each day. This adaptation of the system to the individual brain signature of each user relieves from the need of extensive user training. In this paper we suggest a new method that overcomes the requirement of these time-consuming calibration recordings for long-term BCI users. The method takes advantage of knowledge collected in previous sessions: By a novel technique, prototypical spatial filters are determined which have better generalization properties compared to single-session filters. In particular, they can be used in follow-up sessions without the need to recalibrate the system. This way the calibration periods can be dramatically shortened or even completely omitted for these ‘experienced’ BCI users. The feasibility of our novel approach is demonstrated with a series of online BCI experiments. Although performed without any calibration measurement at all, no loss of classification performance was observed. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are limited in their applicability in everyday settings by the current necessity to record subjectspecific calibration data prior to actual use of the BCI for communication. In this paper, we utilize the framework of multitask learning to construct a BCI that can be used without any subject-specific calibration process. We discuss how this out-of-the-box BCI can be further improved in a computationally efficient manner as subject-specific data becomes available. The feasibility of the approach is demonstrated on two sets of experimental EEG data recorded during a standard two-class motor imagery paradigm from a total of 19 healthy subjects. Specifically, we show that satisfactory classification results can be achieved with zero training data, and combining prior recordings with subjectspecific calibration data substantially outperforms using subject-specific data only. Our results further show that transfer between recordings under slightly different experimental setups is feasible. A major limitation of Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI) is their long calibration time, as much data from the user must be collected in order to tune the BCI for this target user. In this paper, we propose a new method to reduce this calibration time by using data from other subjects. More precisely, we propose an algorithm to regularize the Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) algorithms based on the data from a subset of automatically selected subjects. An evaluation of our approach showed that our method significantly outperformed the standard BCI design especially when the amount of data from the target user is small. Thus, our approach helps in reducing the amount of data needed to achieve a given performance level.   Motor-imagery-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) commonly use the common spatial pattern filter (CSP) as preprocessing step before feature extraction and classification. The CSP method is a supervised algorithm and therefore needs subject-specific training data for calibration, which is very time consuming to collect. In order to reduce the amount of calibration data that is needed for a new subject, one can apply multitask (from now on called multisubject) machine learning techniques to the preprocessing phase. Here, the goal of multisubject learning is to learn a spatial filter for a new subject based on its own data and that of other subjects. This paper outlines the details of the multitask CSP algorithm and shows results on two data sets. In certain subjects a clear improvement can be seen, especially when the number of training trials is relatively low.