The calculation of the SIR distribution at the typical receiver (or, equivalently, the success probability of transmissions over the typical link) in Poisson bipolar and cellular networks with Rayleigh fading is relatively straightforward, but it only provides limited information on the success probabilities of the individual links. This paper introduces the notion of the meta distribution of the SIR, which is the distribution of the conditional success probability @math given the point process, and provides bounds, an exact analytical expression, and a simple approximation for it. The meta distribution provides fine-grained information on the SIR and answers questions such as "What fraction of users in a Poisson cellular network achieve 90 link reliability if the required SIR is 5 dB?". Interestingly, in the bipolar model, if the transmit probability @math is reduced while increasing the network density @math such that the density of concurrent transmitters @math stays constant as @math , @math degenerates to a constant, i.e., all links have exactly the same success probability in the limit, which is the one of the typical link. In contrast, in the cellular case, if the interfering base stations are active independently with probability @math , the variance of @math approaches a non-zero constant when @math is reduced to @math while keeping the mean success probability constant.
Motivated by the ongoing discussion on coordinated multipoint in wireless cellular standard bodies, this paper considers the problem of base station cooperation in the downlink of heterogeneous cellular networks. The focus of this paper is the joint transmission scenario, where an ideal backhaul network allows a set of randomly located base stations, possibly belonging to different network tiers, to jointly transmit data, to mitigate intercell interference and hence improve coverage and spectral efficiency. Using tools from stochastic geometry, an integral expression for the network coverage probability is derived in the scenario where the typical user located at an arbitrary location, i.e., the general user, receives data from a pool of base stations that are selected based on their average received power levels. An expression for the coverage probability is also derived for the typical user located at the point equidistant from three base stations, which we refer to as the worst case user. In the special case where cooperation is limited to two base stations, numerical evaluations illustrate absolute gains in coverage probability of up to 17 for the general user and 24 for the worst case user compared with the noncooperative case. It is also shown that no diversity gain is achieved using noncoherent joint transmission, whereas full diversity gain can be achieved at the receiver if the transmitting base stations have channel state information. Cellular networks are usually modeled by placing the base stations on a grid, with mobile users either randomly scattered or placed deterministically. These models have been used extensively but suffer from being both highly idealized and not very tractable, so complex system-level simulations are used to evaluate coverage outage probability and rate. More tractable models have long been desirable. We develop new general models for the multi-cell signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) using stochastic geometry. Under very general assumptions, the resulting expressions for the downlink SINR CCDF (equivalent to the coverage probability) involve quickly computable integrals, and in some practical special cases can be simplified to common integrals (e.g., the Q-function) or even to simple closed-form expressions. We also derive the mean rate, and then the coverage gain (and mean rate loss) from static frequency reuse. We compare our coverage predictions to the grid model and an actual base station deployment, and observe that the proposed model is pessimistic (a lower bound on coverage) whereas the grid model is optimistic, and that both are about equally accurate. In addition to being more tractable, the proposed model may better capture the increasingly opportunistic and dense placement of base stations in future networks.