Non-convex optimization problems arise from various areas in science and engineering. Although many numerical methods and theories have been developed for unconstrained non-convex problems, the parallel development for constrained non-convex problems remains limited. That restricts the practices of mathematical modeling and quantitative decision making in many disciplines. In this paper, an inexact proximal-point penalty method is proposed for constrained optimization problems where both the objective function and the constraint can be non-convex. The proposed method approximately solves a sequence of subproblems, each of which is formed by adding to the original objective function a proximal term and quadratic penalty terms associated to the constraint functions. Under a weak-convexity assumption, each subproblem is made strongly convex and can be solved effectively to a required accuracy by an optimal gradient-type method. The theoretical property of the proposed method is analyzed in two different cases. In the first case, the objective function is non-convex but the constraint functions are assumed to be convex, while in the second case, both the objective function and the constraint are non-convex. For both cases, we give the complexity results in terms of the number of function value and gradient evaluations to produce near-stationary points. Due to the different structures, different definitions of near-stationary points are given for the two cases. The complexity for producing a nearly @math -stationary point is @math for the first case while it becomes @math for the second case.
 Interest in linear programming has been intensified recently by Karmarkar's publication in 1984 of an algorithm that is claimed to be much faster than the simplex method for practical problems. We review classical barrier-function methods for nonlinear programming based on applying a logarithmic transformation to inequality constraints. For the special case of linear programming, the transformed problem can be solved by a "projected Newton barrier" method. This method is shown to be equivalent to Karmarkar's projective method for a particular choice of the barrier parameter. We then present details of a specific barrier algorithm and its practical implementation. Numerical results are given for several non-trivial test problems, and the implications for future developments in linear programming are discussed. Many scientific and engineering applications feature nonsmooth convex minimization problems over convex sets. In this paper, we address an important instance of this broad class where we assume that the nonsmooth objective is equipped with a tractable proximity operator and that the convex constraint set affords a self-concordant barrier. We provide a new joint treatment of proximal and self-concordant barrier concepts and illustrate that such problems can be efficiently solved, without the need of lifting the problem dimensions, as in disciplined convex optimization approach. We propose an inexact path-following algorithmic framework and theoretically characterize the worst-case analytical complexity of this framework when the proximal subproblems are solved inexactly. To show the merits of our framework, we apply its instances to both synthetic and real-world applications, where it shows advantages over standard interior point methods. As a byproduct, we describe how our framework can obtain points on t... Interior methods for optimization were widely used in the 1960s, primarily in the form of barrier methods. However, they were not seriously applied to linear programming because of the dominance of the simplex method. Barrier methods fell from favour during the 1970s for a variety of reasons, including their apparent inefficiency compared with the best available alternatives. In 1984, Karmarkar's announcement of a fast polynomial-time interior method for linear programming caused tremendous excitement in the field of optimization. A formal connection can be shown between his method and classical barrier methods, which have consequently undergone a renaissance in interest and popularity. Most papers published since 1984 have concentrated on issues of computational complexity in interior methods for linear programming. During the same period, implementations of interior methods have displayed great efficiency in solving many large linear programs of ever-increasing size. Interior methods have also been applied with notable success to nonlinear and combinatorial problems. This paper presents a self-contained survey of major themes in both classical material and recent developments related to the theory and practice of interior methods. Abstract : This report gives the most comprehensive and detailed treatment to date of some of the most powerful mathematical programming techniques currently known--sequential unconstrained methods for constrained minimization problems in Euclidean n-space--giving many new results not published elsewhere. It provides a fresh presentation of nonlinear programming theory, a detailed review of other unconstrained methods, and a development of the latest algorithms for unconstrained minimization. (Author) In the Newton log-barrier method, Newton steps are taken for the log-barrier function for a fixed value of the barrier parameter until a certain convergence criterion is satisfied. The barrier parameter is then decreased and the Newton process is repeated. A naive analysis indicates that Newton’s method does not exhibit superlinear convergence to the minimizer of each instance of the log-barrier function until it reaches a very small neighborhood, namely within O(μ2) of the minimizer, where μ is the barrier parameter. By analyzing the structure of the barrier Hessian and gradient in terms of the subspace of active constraint gradients and the associated null space, we show that this neighborhood is in fact much larger –O(μσ) for any σ∈(1,2] – thus explaining why reasonably fast local convergence can be attained in practice. Moreover, we show that the overall convergence rate of the Newton log-barrier algorithm is superlinear in the number of function derivative evaluations, provided that the nonlinear program is formulated with a linear objective and that the schedule for decreasing the barrier parameter is related in a certain way to the step length and convergence criteria for each Newton process. We propose a new proximal, path-following framework for a class of---possibly non-smooth---constrained convex problems. We consider settings where the non-smooth part is endowed with a proximity operator, and the constraint set is equipped with a self-concordant barrier. Our main contribution is a new re-parametrization of the optimality condition of the barrier problem, that allows us to process the objective function with its proximal operator within a new path following scheme. In particular, our approach relies on the following two main ideas. First, we re-parameterize the optimality condition as an auxiliary problem, such that a "good" initial point is available. Second, we combine the proximal operator of the objective and path-following ideas to design a single phase, proximal, path-following algorithm. Our method has several advantages. First, it allows handling non-smooth objectives via proximal operators, this avoids lifting the problem dimension via slack variables and additional constraints. Second, it consists of only a single phase as compared to a two-phase algorithm in [43] In this work, we show how to overcome this difficulty in the proximal setting and prove that our scheme has the same O(ν√log(1 e)) worst-case iteration-complexity with standard approaches [30, 33], but our method can handle nonsmooth objectives, where ν is the barrier parameter and e is a desired accuracy. Finally, our framework allows errors in the calculation of proximal-Newton search directions, without sacrificing the worst-case iteration complexity. We demonstrate the merits of our algorithm via three numerical examples, where proximal operators play a key role to improve the performance over off-the-shelf interior-point solvers. Interior methods are an omnipresent, conspicuous feature of the constrained optimization landscape today, but it was not always so. Primarily in the form of barrier methods, interior-point techniques were popular during the 1960s for solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, their use for linear programming was not even contemplated because of the total dominance of the simplex method. Vague but continuing anxiety about barrier methods eventually led to their abandonment in favor of newly emerging, apparently more efficient alternatives such as augmented Lagrangian and sequential quadratic programming methods. By the early 1980s, barrier methods were almost without exception regarded as a closed chapter in the history of optimization. This picture changed dramatically with Karmarkar's widely publicized announcement in 1984 of a fast polynomial-time interior method for linear programming; in 1985, a formal connection was established between his method and classical barrier methods. Since then, interior methods have advanced so far, so fast, that their influence has transformed both the theory and practice of constrained optimization. This article provides a condensed, selective look at classical material and recent research about interior methods for nonlinearly constrained optimization. In this paper we develop a new affine-invariant primal–dual subgradient method for nonsmooth convex optimization problems. This scheme is based on a self-concordant barrier for the basic feasible set. It is suitable for finding approximate solutions with certain relative accuracy. We discuss some applications of this technique including fractional covering problem, maximal concurrent flow problem, semidefinite relaxations and nonlinear online optimization. For all these problems, the rate of convergence of our method does not depend on the problem’s data. We propose an algorithmic framework for convex minimization problems of composite functions with two terms: a self-concordant part and a possibly nonsmooth regularization part. Our method is a new proximal Newton algorithm with local quadratic convergence rate. As a specific problem instance, we consider sparse precision matrix estimation problems in graph learning. Via a careful dual formulation and a novel analytic stepsize selection, we instantiate an algorithm within our framework for graph learning that avoids Cholesky decompositions and matrix inversions, making it attractive for parallel and distributed implementations.