Despite the robust structure of the Internet, it is still susceptible to disruptive routing updates that prevent network traffic from reaching its destination. In this work, we propose a method for early detection of large-scale disruptions based on the analysis of bursty BGP announcements. We hypothesize that the occurrence of large-scale disruptions is preceded by bursty announcements. Our method is grounded in analysis of changes in the inter-arrival times of announcements. BGP announcements that are associated with disruptive updates tend to occur in groups of relatively high frequency, followed by periods of infrequent activity. To test our hypothesis, we quantify the burstiness of inter-arrival times around the date and times of three large-scale incidents: the Indosat hijacking event in April 2014, the Telecom Malaysia leak in June 2015, and the Bharti Airtel Ltd. hijack in November 2015. We show that we can detect these events several hours prior to when they were originally detected. We propose an algorithm that leverages the burstiness of disruptive updates to provide early detection of large-scale malicious incidents using local collector data. We describe limitations, open challenges, and how this method can be used for large-scale routing anomaly detection.
The de facto inter-domain routing protocol, Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), plays a critical role in the Internet routing reliability. Invalid routes generated by mis-configurations or malicious attacks will devastate the Internet routing system. In the near future, deploying a secure BGP in the Internet to completely prevent hijacking is impossible. As a result, lots of hijacking detection systems have emerged. However, they have more or less weaknesses such as long detection delay, high false alarm rate or deploy hardness. This paper proposes Argus, an agile system to fast and accurate detect prefix hijacking. Argus already keeps on running in the Internet for two months and identified several possible hijackings. Initial results show that it usually discovers a hijacking in less than ten seconds, and can significantly decrease the false alarm rate.  As more and more Internet IP prefix hijacking incidents are being reported, the value of hijacking detection services has become evident. Most of the current hijacking detection approaches monitor IP prefixes on the control plane and detect inconsistencies in route advertisements and route qualities. We propose a different approach that utilizes information collected mostly from the data plane. Our method is motivated by two key observations: when a prefix is not hijacked, 1) the hop count of the path from a source to this prefix is generally stable; and 2) the path from a source to this prefix is almost always a super-path of the path from the same source to a reference point along the previous path, as long as the reference point is topologically close to the prefix. By carefully selecting multiple vantage points and monitoring from these vantage points for any departure from these two observations, our method is able to detect prefix hijacking with high accuracy in a light-weight, distributed, and real-time fashion. Through simulations constructed based on real Internet measurement traces, we demonstrate that our scheme is accurate with both false positive and false negative ratios below 0.5 . BGP prefix hijacking is a threat to Internet operators and users. Several mechanisms or modifications to BGP that protect the Internet against it have been proposed. However, the reality is that most operators have not deployed them and are reluctant to do so in the near future. Instead, they rely on basic - and often inefficient - proactive defenses to reduce the impact of hijacking events, or on detection based on third party services and reactive approaches that might take up to several hours. In this work, we present the results of a survey we conducted among 75 network operators to study: (a) the operators' awareness of BGP prefix hijacking attacks, (b) presently used defenses (if any) against BGP prefix hijacking, (c) the willingness to adopt new defense mechanisms, and (d) reasons that may hinder the deployment of BGP prefix hijacking defenses. We expect the findings of this survey to increase the understanding of existing BGP hijacking defenses and the needs of network operators, as well as contribute towards designing new defense mechanisms that satisfy the requirements of the operators.