Aggregate computation in relational databases has long been done using the standard unary aggregation and binary join operators. These implement the classical model of computing joins between relations two at a time, materializing the intermediate results, and then proceeding to do either sort-based or hash-based aggregate computation to derive the final result. This approach, however, can be dramatically sub-optimal in the case of low-selectivity joins, and often ends up generating large intermediate results even if the relations involved as well as the final result sets themselves are quite small. Moreover, many of the computed intermediate results may never be part of the final result. In this paper we propose a novel aggregate query processing technique that leverages graph data structures towards efficiently answering aggregate queries over joins, without materializing intermediate join results. We wrap this technique inside a multi-way composite database operator called JOIN-AGG that combines Join and Aggregation. We provide a general framework for executing aggregation queries over arbitrary acyclic joins, involving any number of group-by attributes from any relation. We also present a thorough experimental evaluation on both real world and synthetic datasets. Our experiments show that our operators can achieve orders of magnitude lower query times and memory requirements compared to the traditional approach, even when implemented outside of the database system.
We study a class of aggregate-join queries with multiple aggregation operators evaluated over annotated relations. We show that straightforward extensions of standard multiway join algorithms and generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs) provide best-known runtime guarantees. In contrast, prior work uses bespoke algorithms and data structures and does not match these guarantees. Our extensions to the standard techniques are a pair of simple tests that (1) determine if two orderings of aggregation operators are equivalent and (2) determine if a GHD is compatible with a given ordering. These tests provide a means to find an optimal GHD that, when provided to standard join algorithms, will correctly answer a given aggregate-join query. The second class of our contributions is a pair of complete characterizations of (1) the set of orderings equivalent to a given ordering and (2) the set of GHDs compatible with some equivalent ordering. We show by example that previous approaches are incomplete. The key technical consequence of our characterizations is a decomposition of a compatible GHD into a set of (smaller) unconstrained GHDs, i.e. into a set of GHDs of sub-queries without aggregations. Since this decomposition is comprised of unconstrained GHDs, we are able to connect to the wide literature on GHDs for join query processing, thereby obtaining improved runtime bounds, MapReduce variants, and an efficient method to find approximately optimal GHDs. Evaluating the relational join is one of the central algorithmic and most well-studied problems in database systems. A staggering number of variants have been considered including Block-Nested loop join, Hash-Join, Grace, Sort-merge (see Grafe [17] for a survey, and [4, 7, 24] for discussions of more modern issues). Commercial database engines use finely tuned join heuristics that take into account a wide variety of factors including the selectivity of various predicates, memory, IO, etc. This study of join queries notwithstanding, the textbook description of join processing is suboptimal. This survey describes recent results on join algorithms that have provable worst-case optimality runtime guarantees. We survey recent work and provide a simpler and unified description of these algorithms that we hope is useful for theory-minded readers, algorithm designers, and systems implementors. Much of this progress can be understood by thinking about a simple join evaluation problem that we illustrate with the so-called triangle query, a query that has become increasingly popular in the last decade with the advent of social networks, biological motifs, and graph databases [36, 37] In this paper, we study the communication complexity for the problem of computing a conjunctive query on a large database in a parallel setting with @math servers. In contrast to previous work, where upper and lower bounds on the communication were specified for particular structures of data (either data without skew, or data with specific types of skew), in this work we focus on worst-case analysis of the communication cost. The goal is to find worst-case optimal parallel algorithms, similar to the work of [18] for sequential algorithms. We first show that for a single round we can obtain an optimal worst-case algorithm. The optimal load for a conjunctive query @math when all relations have size equal to @math is @math , where @math is a new query-related quantity called the edge quasi-packing number, which is different from both the edge packing number and edge cover number of the query hypergraph. For multiple rounds, we present algorithms that are optimal for several classes of queries. Finally, we show a surprising connection to the external memory model, which allows us to translate parallel algorithms to external memory algorithms. This technique allows us to recover (within a polylogarithmic factor) several recent results on the I O complexity for computing join queries, and also obtain optimal algorithms for other classes of queries.  Efficient join processing is one of the most fundamental and well-studied tasks in database research. In this work, we examine algorithms for natural join queries over many relations and describe a novel algorithm to process these queries optimally in terms of worst-case data complexity. Our result builds on recent work by Atserias, Grohe, and Marx, who gave bounds on the size of a full conjunctive query in terms of the sizes of the individual relations in the body of the query. These bounds, however, are not constructive: they rely on Shearer's entropy inequality which is information-theoretic. Thus, the previous results leave open the question of whether there exist algorithms whose running time achieve these optimal bounds. An answer to this question may be interesting to database practice, as we show in this paper that any project-join plan is polynomially slower than the optimal bound for some queries. We construct an algorithm whose running time is worst-case optimal for all natural join queries. Our result may be of independent interest, as our algorithm also yields a constructive proof of the general fractional cover bound by Atserias, Grohe, and Marx without using Shearer's inequality. In addition, we show that this bound is equivalent to a geometric inequality by Bollobas and Thomason, one of whose special cases is the famous Loomis-Whitney inequality. Hence, our results algorithmically prove these inequalities as well. Finally, we discuss how our algorithm can be used to compute a relaxed notion of joins. We study a class of aggregate-join queries with multiple aggregation operators evaluated over annotated relations. We show that straightforward extensions of standard multiway join algorithms and generalized hypertree decompositions (GHDs) provide best-known runtime guarantees. In contrast, prior work uses bespoke algorithms and data structures and does not match these guarantees. We extend the standard techniques by providing a complete characterization of (1) the set of orderings equivalent to a given ordering and (2) the set of GHDs valid with respect to the given ordering, i.e., GHDs that correctly answer a given aggregate-join query when provided to (simple variants of) standard join algorithms. We show by example that previous approaches are incomplete. The key technical consequence of our characterizations is a decomposition of a valid GHD into a set of (smaller) unconstrained GHDs, i.e., into a set of GHDs of sub-queries without aggregations. Since this decomposition is comprised of unconstrained GHDs, we are able to connect to the wide literature on GHDs for join query processing, thereby obtaining improved runtime bounds, MapReduce variants, and an efficient method to find approximately optimal GHDs.  We define and study the Functional Aggregate Query (FAQ) problem, which encompasses many frequently asked questions in constraint satisfaction, databases, matrix operations, probabilistic graphical models and logic. This is our main conceptual contribution. We then present a simple algorithm called "InsideOut" to solve this general problem. InsideOut is a variation of the traditional dynamic programming approach for constraint programming based on variable elimination. Our variation adds a couple of simple twists to basic variable elimination in order to deal with the generality of FAQ, to take full advantage of Grohe and Marx's fractional edge cover framework, and of the analysis of recent worst-case optimal relational join algorithms. As is the case with constraint programming and graphical model inference, to make InsideOut run efficiently we need to solve an optimization problem to compute an appropriate variable ordering. The main technical contribution of this work is a precise characterization of when a variable ordering is semantically equivalent' to the variable ordering given by the input FAQ expression. Then, we design an approximation algorithm to find an equivalent variable ordering that has the best fractional FAQ-width'. Our results imply a host of known and a few new results in graphical model inference, matrix operations, relational joins, and logic. We also briefly explain how recent algorithms on beyond worst-case analysis for joins and those for solving SAT and #SAT can be viewed as variable elimination to solve FAQ over compactly represented input functions.