Sentiment analysis is directly affected by compositional phenomena in language that act on the prior polarity of the words and phrases found in the text. Negation is the most prevalent of these phenomena and in order to correctly predict sentiment, a classifier must be able to identify negation and disentangle the effect that its scope has on the final polarity of a text. This paper proposes a multi-task approach to explicitly incorporate information about negation in sentiment analysis, which we show outperforms learning negation implicitly in a data-driven manner. We describe our approach, a cascading neural architecture with selective sharing of LSTM layers, and show that explicitly training the model with negation as an auxiliary task helps improve the main task of sentiment analysis. The effect is demonstrated across several different standard English-language data sets for both tasks and we analyze several aspects of our system related to its performance, varying types and amounts of input data and different multi-task setups.
We consider the task of identifying and labeling the semantic arguments of a predicate that evokes a FrameNet frame. This task is challenging because there are only a few thousand fully annotated sentences for supervised training. Our approach augments an existing model with features derived from FrameNet and PropBank and with partially annotated exemplars from FrameNet. We observe a 4 absolute increase in F1 versus the original model. This paper suggests that it may be easier to learn several hard tasks at one time than to learn these same tasks separately. In effect, the information provided by the training signal for each task serves as a domain-specific inductive bias for the other tasks. Frequently the world gives us clusters of related tasks to learn. When it does not, it is often straightforward to create additional tasks. For many domains, acquiring inductive bias by collecting additional teaching signal may be more practical than the traditional approach of codifying domain-specific biases acquired from human expertise. We call this approach Multitask Learning (MTL). Since much of the power of an inductive learner follows directly from its inductive bias, multitask learning may yield more powerful learning. An empirical example of multitask connectionist learning is presented where learning improves by training one network on several related tasks at the same time. Multitask decision tree induction is also outlined. 