Data sent over the Internet can be monitored and manipulated by intermediate entities in the data path from the source to the destination. For unencrypted communications (and some encrypted communications with known weaknesses), eavesdropping and man-in-the-middle attacks are possible. For encrypted communication, the identification of the communicating endpoints is still revealed. In addition, encrypted communications may be stored until such time as newly discovered weaknesses in the encryption algorithm or advances in computer hardware render them readable by attackers. In this work, we use public data to evaluate both advertised and observed routes through the Internet and measure the extent to which communications between pairs of countries are exposed to other countries. We use both physical router geolocation as well as the country of registration of the companies owning each router. We find a high level of information exposure; even physically adjacent countries use routes that involve many other countries. We also found that countries that are well connected' tend to be more exposed. Our analysis indicates that there exists a tradeoff between robustness and information exposure in the current Internet.
An increasing number of countries are passing laws that facilitate the mass surveillance of Internet traffic. In response, governments and citizens are increasingly paying attention to the countries that their Internet traffic traverses. In some cases, countries are taking extreme steps, such as building new Internet Exchange Points (IXPs), which allow networks to interconnect directly, and encouraging local interconnection to keep local traffic local. We find that although many of these efforts are extensive, they are often futile, due to the inherent lack of hosting and route diversity for many popular sites. By measuring the country-level paths to popular domains, we characterize transnational routing detours. We find that traffic is traversing known surveillance states, even when the traffic originates and ends in a country that does not conduct mass surveillance. Then, we investigate how clients can use overlay network relays and the open DNS resolver infrastructure to prevent their traffic from traversing certain jurisdictions. We find that 84 of paths originating in Brazil traverse the United States, but when relays are used for country avoidance, only 37 of Brazilian paths traverse the United States. Using the open DNS resolver infrastructure allows Kenyan clients to avoid the United States on 17 more paths. Unfortunately, we find that some of the more prominent surveillance states (e.g., the U.S.) are also some of the least avoidable countries.