In recent years, a number of artificial intelligent services have been developed such as defect detection system or diagnosis system for customer services. Unfortunately, the core in these services is a black-box in which human cannot understand the underlying decision making logic, even though the inspection of the logic is crucial before launching a commercial service. Our goal in this paper is to propose an analytic method of a model explanation that is applicable to general classification models. To this end, we introduce the concept of a contribution matrix and an explanation embedding in a constraint space by using a matrix factorization. We extract a rule-like model explanation from the contribution matrix with the help of the nonnegative matrix factorization. To validate our method, the experiment results provide with open datasets as well as an industry dataset of a LTE network diagnosis and the results show our method extracts reasonable explanations.
Interpretability has become incredibly important as machine learning is increasingly used to inform consequential decisions. We propose to construct global explanations of complex, blackbox models in the form of a decision tree approximating the original model---as long as the decision tree is a good approximation, then it mirrors the computation performed by the blackbox model. We devise a novel algorithm for extracting decision tree explanations that actively samples new training points to avoid overfitting. We evaluate our algorithm on a random forest to predict diabetes risk and a learned controller for cart-pole. Compared to several baselines, our decision trees are both substantially more accurate and equally or more interpretable based on a user study. Finally, we describe several insights provided by our interpretations, including a causal issue validated by a physician. We present the Bayesian Case Model (BCM), a general framework for Bayesian case-based reasoning (CBR) and prototype classification and clustering. BCM brings the intuitive power of CBR to a Bayesian generative framework. The BCM learns prototypes, the "quintessential" observations that best represent clusters in a dataset, by performing joint inference on cluster labels, prototypes and important features. Simultaneously, BCM pursues sparsity by learning subspaces, the sets of features that play important roles in the characterization of the prototypes. The prototype and subspace representation provides quantitative benefits in interpretability while preserving classification accuracy. Human subject experiments verify statistically significant improvements to participants' understanding when using explanations produced by BCM, compared to those given by prior art. Support vector machines (SVMs) are learning systems based on the statistical learning theory, which are exhibiting good generalization ability on real data sets. Nevertheless, a possible limitation of SVM is that they generate black box models. In this work, a procedure for rule extraction from support vector machines is proposed: the SVM+Prototypes method. This method allows to give explanation ability to SVM. Once determined the decision function by means of a SVM, a clustering algorithm is used to determine prototype vectors for each class. These points are combined with the support vectors using geometric methods to define ellipsoids in the input space, which are later transfers to if-then rules. By using the support vectors we can establish the limits of these regions.