Deciding which vocabulary terms to use when modeling data as Linked Open Data (LOD) is far from trivial. Choosing too general vocabulary terms, or terms from vocabularies that are not used by other LOD datasets, is likely to lead to a data representation, which will be harder to understand by humans and to be consumed by Linked data applications. In this technical report, we propose TermPicker: a novel approach for vocabulary reuse by recommending RDF types and properties based on exploiting the information on how other data providers on the LOD cloud use RDF types and properties to describe their data. To this end, we introduce the notion of so-called schema-level patterns (SLPs). They capture how sets of RDF types are connected via sets of properties within some data collection, e.g., within a dataset on the LOD cloud. TermPicker uses such SLPs and generates a ranked list of vocabulary terms for reuse. The lists of recommended terms are ordered by a ranking model which is computed using the machine learning approach Learning To Rank (L2R). TermPicker is evaluated based on the recommendation quality that is measured using the Mean Average Precision (MAP) and the Mean Reciprocal Rank at the first five positions (MRR@5). Our results illustrate an improvement of the recommendation quality by 29 - 36 when using SLPs compared to the beforehand investigated baselines of recommending solely popular vocabulary terms or terms from the same vocabulary. The overall best results are achieved using SLPs in conjunction with the Learning To Rank algorithm Random Forests.
As more ontologies become publicly available, finding the "right" ontologies becomes much harder. In this paper, we address the problem of ontology search: finding a collection of ontologies from an ontology repository that are relevant to the user's query. In particular, we look at the case when users search for ontologies relevant to a particular topic (e.g., an ontology about anatomy). Ontologies that are most relevant to such query often do not have the query term in the names of their concepts (e.g., the Foundational Model of Anatomy ontology does not have the term "anatomy" in any of its concepts' names). Thus, we present a new ontology-search technique that helps users in these types of searches. When looking for ontologies on a particular topic (e.g., anatomy), we retrieve from the Web a collection of terms that represent the given domain (e.g., terms such as body, brain, skin, etc. for anatomy). We then use these terms to expand the user query. We evaluate our algorithm on queries for topics in the biomedical domain against a repository of biomedical ontologies. We use the results obtained from experts in the biomedical-ontology domain as the gold standard. Our experiments demonstrate that using our method for query expansion improves retrieval results by a 113 , compared to the tools that search only for the user query terms and consider only class and property names (like Swoogle). We show 43 improvement for the case where not only class and property names but also property values are taken into account.