We give fault-tolerant algorithms for establishing synchrony in distributed systems in which each of the n nodes has its own clock. Our algorithms operate in a very strong fault model: we require self-stabilisation, i.e., the initial state of the system may be arbitrary, and there can be up to f< n 3 ongoing Byzantine faults, i.e., nodes that deviate from the protocol in an arbitrary manner. Furthermore, we assume that the local clocks of the nodes may progress at different speeds (clock drift) and communication has bounded delay. In this model, we study the pulse synchronisation problem, where the task is to guarantee that eventually all correct nodes generate well-separated local pulse events (i.e., unlabelled logical clock ticks) in a synchronised manner. Compared to prior work, we achieve exponential improvements in stabilisation time and the number of communicated bits, and give the first sublinear-time algorithm for the problem: • In the deterministic setting, the state-of-the-art solutions stabilise in time Θ (f) and have each node broadcast Θ(f log f) bits per time unit. We exponentially reduce the number of bits broadcasted per time unit to Θ (log f) while retaining the same stabilisation time. • In the randomised setting, the state-of-the-art solutions stabilise in time Θ(f) and have each node broadcast O(1) bits per time unit. We exponentially reduce the stabilisation time to polylog f while each node broadcasts polylog f bits per time unit. These results are obtained by means of a recursive approach reducing the above task of self-stabilising pulse synchronisation in the bounded-delay model to non-self-stabilising binary consensus in the synchronous model. In general, our approach introduces at most logarithmic overheads in terms of stabilisation time and broadcasted bits over the underlying consensus routine.
Consider a complete communication network on n nodes. In synchronous 2-counting, the nodes receive a common clock pulse and they have to agree on which pulses are "odd" and which are "even". Furthermore, the solution needs to be self-stabilising (reaching correct operation from any initial state) and tolerate f Byzantine failures (nodes that send arbitrary misinformation). Prior algorithms either require a source of random bits or a large number of states per node. In this work, we give fast state-optimal deterministic algorithms for the first non-trivial case f = 1 . To obtain these algorithms, we develop and evaluate two different techniques for algorithm synthesis. Both are based on casting the synthesis problem as a propositional satisfiability (SAT) problem; a direct encoding is efficient for synthesising time-optimal algorithms, while an approach based on counter-example guided abstraction refinement discovers non-optimal algorithms quickly. We develop computational techniques to find algorithms for synchronous 2-counting.Automated synthesis yields state-optimal self-stabilising fault-tolerant algorithms.We give a thorough experimental comparison of our two SAT-based synthesis techniques.A direct SAT encoding is more efficient for finding time-optimal algorithms.An iterative CEGAR-based approach finds non-optimal algorithms quickly.  Consider a fully-connected synchronous distributed system consisting of @math nodes, where up to @math nodes may be faulty and every node starts in an arbitrary initial state. In the synchronous @math -counting problem, all nodes need to eventually agree on a counter that is increased by one modulo @math in each round for given @math . In the self-stabilising firing squad problem, the task is to eventually guarantee that all non-faulty nodes have simultaneous responses to external inputs: if a subset of the correct nodes receive an external "go" signal as input, then all correct nodes should agree on a round (in the not-too-distant future) in which to jointly output a "fire" signal. Moreover, no node should generate a "fire" signal without some correct node having previously received a "go" signal as input. We present a framework reducing both tasks to binary consensus at very small cost. For example, we obtain a deterministic algorithm for self-stabilising Byzantine firing squads with optimal resilience @math , asymptotically optimal stabilisation and response time @math , and message size @math . As our framework does not restrict the type of consensus routines used, we also obtain efficient randomised solutions, and it is straightforward to adapt our framework for other types of permanent faults. Algorithms are described for maintaining clock synchrony in a distributed multiprocess system where each process has its own clock. These algorithms work in the presence of arbitrary clock or process failures, including “two-faced clocks” that present different values to different processes. Two of the algorithms require that fewer than one-third of the processes be faulty. A third algorithm works if fewer than half the processes are faulty, but requires digital signatures. In this paper, we show how to build synchronized clocks of arbitrary size atop of existing small-sized clocks, despite arbitrary faults. Our solution is both self-stabilizing and Byzantine fault-tolerant, and needs merely single-bit channels. It involves a reduction to Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus, which allows different consensus algorithms to be plugged in for matching the actual clock sizes and resilience requirements best. We demonstrate the practicability of our approach by means of an FPGA implementation and its experimental evaluation. To also address the cases where deterministic algorithms hit fundamental limits, we provide a novel randomized self-stabilizing Byzantine consensus algorithm that works very well also in these settings, along with its correctness proof and stabilization time analysis. Consider a distributed network in which up to a third of the nodes may be Byzantine, and in which the non-faulty nodes may be subject to transient faults that alter their memory in an arbitrary fashion. Within the context of this model, we are interested in the digital clock synchronization problem; which consists of agreeing on bounded integer counters, and increasing these counters regularly. It has been postulated in the past that synchronization cannot be solved in a Byzantine tolerant and self-stabilizing manner. The first solution to this problem had an expected exponential convergence time. Later, a deterministic solution was published with linear convergence time, which is optimal for deterministic solutions. In the current paper we achieve an expected constant convergence time. We thus obtain the optimal probabilistic solution, both in terms of convergence time and in terms of resilience to Byzantine adversaries. The problem of synchronizing clocks of processes in a fully connected network is considered. It is proved that, even if the clocks all run at the same rate as real time and there are no failures, an uncertainty of e in the message delivery time makes it impossible to synchronize the clocks of n processes any more closely than e(1−1 n ). A simple algorithm is given that achieves this bound. Abstract We describe a new fault-tolerant algorithm for solving a variant of Lamport's clock synchronization problem. The algorithm is designed for a system of distributed processes that communicate by sending messages. Each process has its own read-only physical clock whose drift rate from real time is very small. By adding a value to its physical clock time, the process obtaines its local time. The algorithm solves the problem of maintaining closely synchronized local times, assuming that processes' local times are closely synchronized initially. The algorithm is able to tolerate the failure of just under one-third of the participating processes. It maintains synchronization to within a small constant, whose magnitude depends upon the rate of clock drift, the message delivery time and its uncertainty, and the initial closeness of synchronization. We also give a characterization of how far the clocks drift from real time. Reintegration of a repaired process can be accomplished using a slight modification of the basic alborithm. A similar style algorithm can also be used to achieve synchronization initially. Consider a complete communication network of @math nodes, where the nodes receive a common clock pulse. We study the synchronous @math -counting problem: given any starting state and up to @math faulty nodes with arbitrary behavior, the task is to eventually have all correct nodes labeling the pulses with increasing values modulo @math in agreement. Thus, we are considering algorithms that are self-stabilizing despite Byzantine failures. In this work, we give new algorithms for the synchronous counting problem that (1) are deterministic, (2) have optimal resilience, (3) have a linear stabilization time in @math (asymptotically optimal), (4) use a small number of states, and, consequently, (5) communicate a small number of bits per round. Prior algorithms either resort to randomization, use a large number of states and need high communication bandwidth, or have suboptimal resilience. In particular, we achieve an exponential improvement in both state complexity and message size for deterministic algorithms. Moreover, ...