Mutual information has been successfully adopted in filter feature-selection methods to assess both the relevancy of a subset of features in predicting the target variable and the redundancy with respect to other variables. However, existing algorithms are mostly heuristic and do not offer any guarantee on the proposed solution. In this paper, we provide novel theoretical results showing that conditional mutual information naturally arises when bounding the ideal regression classification errors achieved by different subsets of features. Leveraging on these insights, we propose a novel stopping condition for backward and forward greedy methods which ensures that the ideal prediction error using the selected feature subset remains bounded by a user-specified threshold. We provide numerical simulations to support our theoretical claims and compare to common heuristic methods.
Mutual information (MI) is used in feature selection to evaluate two key-properties of optimal features, the relevance of a feature to the class variable and the redundancy of similar features. Conditional mutual information (CMI), i.e., MI of the candidate feature to the class variable conditioning on the features already selected, is a natural extension of MI but not so far applied due to estimation complications for high dimensional distributions. We propose the nearest neighbor estimate of CMI, appropriate for high-dimensional variables, and build an iterative scheme for sequential feature selection with a termination criterion, called CMINN. We show that CMINN is equivalent to feature selection MI filters, such as mRMR and MaxiMin, in the presence of solely single feature effects, and more appropriate for combined feature effects. We compare CMINN to mRMR and MaxiMin on simulated datasets involving combined effects and confirm the superiority of CMINN in selecting the correct features (indicated also by the termination criterion) and giving best classification accuracy. The application to ten benchmark databases shows that CMINN obtains the same or higher classification accuracy compared to mRMR and MaxiMin at a smaller cardinality of the selected feature subset.