Due to their pivotal role in software engineering, considerable effort is spent on the quality assurance of software requirements specifications. As they are mainly described in natural language, relatively few means of automated quality assessment exist. However, we found that clone detection, a technique widely applied to source code, is promising to assess one important quality aspect in an automated way, namely redundancy that stems from copy & paste operations. This paper describes a large-scale case study that applied clone detection to 28 requirements specifications with a total of 8,667 pages. We report on the amount of redundancy found in real-world specifications, discuss its nature as well as its consequences and evaluate in how far existing code clone detection approaches can be applied to assess the quality of requirements specifications in practice.
Cloning in source code is a well known quality defect that negatively affects software maintenance. In contrast, little is known about cloning in requirements specifications. We present a study on cloning in 11 real-world requirements specifications comprising 2,500 pages. For specification clone detection, an existing code clone detection tool is adapted and its precision analyzed. The study shows that a considerable amount of cloning exists, although the large variation between specifications suggests that some authors manage to avoid cloning. Examples of frequent types of clones are given and the negative consequences of cloning, particulary the obliteration of commonalities and variations, are discussed.