Finding a good clustering of vertices in a network, where vertices in the same cluster are more tightly connected than those in different clusters, is a useful, important, and well-studied task. Many clustering algorithms scale well, however they are not designed to operate upon internet-scale networks with billions of nodes or more. We study one of the fastest and most memory efficient algorithms possible - clustering based on the connected components in a random edge-induced subgraph. When defining the cost of a clustering to be its distance from such a random clustering, we show that this surprisingly simple algorithm gives a solution that is within an expected factor of two or three of optimal with either of two natural distance functions. In fact, this approximation guarantee works for any problem where there is a probability distribution on clusterings. We then examine the behavior of this algorithm in the context of social network trust inference.
In this paper we present a 2-approximation algorithm for the k-center problem with triangle inequality. This result is “best possible” since for any δ < 2 the existence of δ-approximation algorithm would imply that P = NP. It should be noted that no δ-approximation algorithm, for any constant δ, has been reported to date. Linear programming duality theory provides interesting insight to the problem and enables us to derive, in O|E| log |E| time, a solution with value no more than twice the k-center optimal value. A by-product of the analysis is an O|E| algorithm that identifies a dominating set in G2, the square of a graph G, the size of which is no larger than the size of the minimum dominating set in the graph G. The key combinatorial object used is called a strong stable set, and we prove the NP-completeness of the corresponding decision problem. Data analysis plays an indispensable role for understanding various phenomena. Cluster analysis, primitive exploration with little or no prior knowledge, consists of research developed across a wide variety of communities. The diversity, on one hand, equips us with many tools. On the other hand, the profusion of options causes confusion. We survey clustering algorithms for data sets appearing in statistics, computer science, and machine learning, and illustrate their applications in some benchmark data sets, the traveling salesman problem, and bioinformatics, a new field attracting intensive efforts. Several tightly related topics, proximity measure, and cluster validation, are also discussed. 