In this paper, we aim to provide a systematic study of the relationship between Chernoff information and topological, as well as algebraic properties of the corresponding Gaussian tree graphs for the underlying graphical testing problems. We first show the relationship between Chernoff information and generalized eigenvalues of the associated covariance matrices. It is then proved that Chernoff information between two Gaussian trees sharing certain local subtree structures can be transformed into that of two smaller trees. Under our proposed grafting operations, bottleneck Gaussian trees, namely, Gaussian trees connected by one such operation, can thus be simplified into two 3-node Gaussian trees, whose topologies and edge weights are subject to the specifics of the operation. Thereafter, we provide a thorough study about how Chernoff information changes when small differences are accumulated into bigger ones via concatenated grafting operations. It is shown that the two Gaussian trees connected by more than one grafting operation may not have bigger Chernoff information than that of one grafting operation unless these grafting operations are separate and independent. At the end, we propose an optimal linear dimensional reduction method related to generalized eigenvalues.
The success of machine learning algorithms generally depends on data representation, and we hypothesize that this is because different representations can entangle and hide more or less the different explanatory factors of variation behind the data. Although specific domain knowledge can be used to help design representations, learning with generic priors can also be used, and the quest for AI is motivating the design of more powerful representation-learning algorithms implementing such priors. This paper reviews recent work in the area of unsupervised feature learning and deep learning, covering advances in probabilistic models, autoencoders, manifold learning, and deep networks. This motivates longer term unanswered questions about the appropriate objectives for learning good representations, for computing representations (i.e., inference), and the geometrical connections between representation learning, density estimation, and manifold learning.