A common problem that arises in radar imaging systems, especially those mounted on mobile platforms, is antenna position ambiguity. Approaches to resolve this ambiguity and correct position errors are generally known as radar autofocus. Common techniques that attempt to resolve the antenna ambiguity generally assume an unknown gain and phase error afflicting the radar measurements. However, ensuring identifiability and tractability of the unknown error imposes strict restrictions on the allowable antenna perturbations. Furthermore, these techniques are often not applicable in near-field imaging, where mapping the position ambiguity to phase errors breaks down. In this paper, we propose an alternate formulation where the position error of each antenna is mapped to a spatial shift operator in the image-domain. Thus, the radar autofocus problem becomes a multichannel blind deconvolution problem, in which the radar measurements correspond to observations of a static radar image that is convolved with the spatial shift kernel associated with each antenna. To solve the reformulated problem, we also develop a block coordinate descent framework that leverages the sparsity and piecewise smoothness of the radar scene, as well as the one-sparse property of the two-dimensional shift kernels. We evaluate the performance of our approach using both simulated and experimental radar measurements and demonstrate its superior performance compared with state-of-the-art methods.
Whenever we use devices to take measurements, calibration is indispensable. While the purpose of calibration is to reduce bias and uncertainty in the measurements, it can be quite difficult, expensive, and sometimes even impossible to implement. We study a challenging problem called self-calibration, i.e., the task of designing an algorithm for devices so that the algorithm is able to perform calibration automatically. More precisely, we consider the setup @math where only partial information about the sensing matrix @math is known and where @math linearly depends on @math . The goal is to estimate the calibration parameter @math (resolve the uncertainty in the sensing process) and the signal object of interest @math simultaneously. For three different models of practical relevance, we show how such a bilinear inverse problem, including blind deconvolution as an important example, can be solved via a simple linear least squares approach. As a co... We investigate a compressive sensing framework in which the sensors introduce a distortion to the measurements in the form of unknown gains. We focus on blind calibration, using measures performed on multiple unknown (but sparse) signals and formulate the joint recovery of the gains and the sparse signals as a convex optimization problem. We divide this problem in 3 sub-problems with different conditions on the gains, specifially i) gains with different amplitude and the same phase, ii) gains with the same amplitude and different phase and iii) gains with different amplitude and phase. In order to solve the first case, we propose an extension to the basis pursuit optimization which can estimate the unknown gains along with the unknown sparse signals. For the second case, we formulate a quadratic approach that eliminates the unknown phase shifts and retrieves the unknown sparse signals. An alternative form of this approach is also formulated to reduce complexity and memory requirements and provide scalability with respect to the number of input signals. Finally for the third case, we propose a formulation that combines the earlier two approaches to solve the problem. The performance of the proposed algorithms is investigated extensively through numerical simulations, which demonstrates that simultaneous signal recovery and calibration is possible with convex methods when sufficiently many (unknown, but sparse) calibrating signals are provided. We consider the problem of calibrating a compressed sensing measurement system under the assumption that the decalibration consists in unknown gains on each measure. We focus on blind calibration, using measures performed on a few unknown (but sparse) signals. A naive formulation of this blind calibration problem, using l 1 minimization, is reminiscent of blind source separation and dictionary learning, which are known to be highly non-convex and riddled with local minima. In the considered context, we show that in fact this formulation can be exactly expressed as a convex optimization problem, and can be solved using off-the-shelf algorithms. Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach even for highly uncalibrated measures, when a sufficient number of (unknown, but sparse) calibrating signals is provided. We observe that the success failure of the approach seems to obey sharp phase transitions. We study the question of reconstructing two signals @math and @math from their convolution @math . This problem, known as blind deconvolution , pervades many areas of science and technology, including astronomy, medical imaging, optics, and wireless communications. A key challenge of this intricate non-convex optimization problem is that it might exhibit many local minima. We present an efficient numerical algorithm that is guaranteed to recover the exact solution, when the number of measurements is (up to log-factors) slightly larger than the information-theoretical minimum, and under reasonable conditions on @math and @math . The proposed regularized gradient descent algorithm converges at a geometric rate and is provably robust in the presence of noise. To the best of our knowledge, our algorithm is the first blind deconvolution algorithm that is numerically efficient, robust against noise, and comes with rigorous recovery guarantees under certain subspace conditions. Moreover, numerical experiments do not only provide empirical verification of our theory, but they also demonstrate that our method yields excellent performance even in situations beyond our theoretical framework.  The implementation of computational sensing strategies often faces calibration problems typically solved by means of multiple, accurately chosen training signals, an approach that can be resource-consuming and cumbersome. Conversely, blind calibration does not require any training, but corresponds to a bilinear inverse problem whose algorithmic solution is an open issue. We here address blind calibration as a non-convex problem for linear random sensing models, in which we aim to recover an unknown signal from its projections on sub-Gaussian random vectors each subject to an unknown multiplicative factor (gain). To solve this optimisation problem we resort to projected gradient descent starting from a suitable initialisation. An analysis of this algorithm allows us to show that it converges to the global optimum provided a sample complexity requirement is met, i.e., relating convergence to the amount of information collected during the sensing process. Finally, we present some numerical experiments in which our algorithm allows for a simple solution to blind calibration of sensor gains in computational sensing applications. Computational sensing strategies often suffer from calibration errors in the physical implementation of their ideal sensing models. Such uncertainties are typically addressed by using multiple, accurately chosen training signals to recover the missing information on the sensing model, an approach that can be resource-consuming and cumbersome. Conversely, blind calibration does not employ any training signal, but corresponds to a bilinear inverse problem whose algorithmic solution is an open issue. We here address blind calibration as a non-convex problem for linear random sensing models, in which we aim to recover an unknown signal from its projections on sub-Gaussian random vectors, each subject to an unknown positive multiplicative factor (or gain). To solve this optimisation problem we resort to projected gradient descent starting from a suitable, carefully chosen initialisation point. An analysis of this algorithm allows us to show that it converges to the exact solution provided a sample complexity requirement is met, i.e., relating convergence to the amount of information collected during the sensing process. Interestingly, we show that this requirement grows linearly (up to log factors) in the number of unknowns of the problem. This sample complexity is found both in absence of prior information, as well as when subspace priors are available for both the signal and gains, allowing a further reduction of the number of observations required for our recovery guarantees to hold. Moreover, in the presence of noise we show how our descent algorithm yields a solution whose accuracy degrades gracefully with the amount of noise affecting the measurements. Finally, we present some numerical experiments in an imaging context, where our algorithm allows for a simple solution to blind calibration of the gains in a sensor array. Blind deconvolution is an inverse problem when both the input signal and the convolution kernel are unknown. We propose a convex algorithm based on @math -minimization to solve the blind deconvolution problem, given multiple observations from sparse input signals. The proposed method is related to other problems such as blind calibration and finding sparse vectors in a subspace. Sufficient conditions for exact and stable recovery using the proposed method are developed that shed light on the sample complexity. Finally, numerical examples are provided to showcase the performance of the proposed method. This paper considers the problem of blindly calibrating sensor response using routine sensor network measurements. We show that as long as the sensors slightly oversample the signals of interest, then unknown sensor gains can be perfectly recovered. Remarkably, neither a controlled stimulus nor a dense deployment is required. We also characterize necessary and sufficient conditions for the identification of unknown sensor offsets. Our results exploit incoherence conditions between the basis for the signals and the canonical or natural basis for the sensor measurements. Practical algorithms for gain and offset identification are proposed based on the singular value decomposition and standard least squares techniques. We investigate the robustness of the proposed algorithms to model mismatch and noise on both simulated data and on data from current sensor network deployments. We consider the multichannel blind deconvolution problem where we observe the output of multiple channels that are all excited with the same unknown input. From these observations, we wish to estimate the impulse responses of each of the channels. We show that this problem is well-posed if the channels follow a bilinear model where the ensemble of channel responses is modeled as lying in a low-dimensional subspace but with each channel modulated by an independent gain. Under this model, we show how the channel estimates can be found by minimizing a quadratic function over a non-convex set. We analyze two methods for solving this non-convex program, and provide performance guarantees for each. The first is a method of alternating eigenvectors that breaks the program down into a series of eigenvalue problems. The second is a truncated power iteration, which can roughly be interpreted as a method for finding the largest eigenvector of a symmetric matrix with the additional constraint that it adheres to our bilinear model. As with most non-convex optimization algorithms, the performance of both of these algorithms is highly dependent on having a good starting point. We show how such a starting point can be constructed from the channel measurements. Our performance guarantees are non-asymptotic, and provide a sufficient condition on the number of samples observed per channel in order to guarantee channel estimates of certain accuracy. Our analysis uses a model with a “generic” subspace that is drawn at random, and we show the performance bounds hold with high probability. Mathematically, the key estimates are derived by quantifying how well the eigenvectors of certain random matrices approximate the eigenvectors of their mean. We also present a series of numerical results demonstrating that the empirical performance is consistent with the presented theory.