For most state-of-the-art architectures, Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) becomes a standard component accompanied with each layer. Although ReLU can ease the network training to an extent, the character of blocking negative values may suppress the propagation of useful information and leads to the difficulty of optimizing very deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs). Moreover, stacking layers with nonlinear activations is hard to approximate the intrinsic linear transformations between feature representations. In this paper, we investigate the effect of erasing ReLUs of certain layers and apply it to various representative architectures following deterministic rules. It can ease the optimization and improve the generalization performance for very deep CNN models. We find two key factors being essential to the performance improvement: 1) the location where ReLU should be erased inside the basic module; 2) the proportion of basic modules to erase ReLU; We show that erasing the last ReLU layer of all basic modules in a network usually yields improved performance. In experiments, our approach successfully improves the performance of various representative architectures, and we report the improved results on SVHN, CIFAR-10 100, and ImageNet. Moreover, we achieve competitive single-model performance on CIFAR-100 with 16.53 error rate compared to state-of-the-art.
With the rapid development of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs), numerous works focus on designing better network architectures (i.e., AlexNet, VGG, Inception, ResNet and DenseNet etc.). Nevertheless, all these networks have the same characteristic: each convolutional layer is followed by an activation layer, a Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU) layer is the most used among them. In this work, we argue that the paired module with 1:1 convolution and ReLU ratio is not the best choice since it may result in poor generalization ability. Thus, we try to investigate the more suitable convolution and ReLU ratio for exploring the better network architectures. Specifically, inspired by Leaky ReLU, we focus on adopting the proportional module with N:M (N @math M) convolution and ReLU ratio to design the better networks. From the perspective of ensemble learning, Leaky ReLU can be considered as an ensemble of networks with different convolution and ReLU ratio. We find that the proportional module with N:M (N @math M) convolution and ReLU ratio can help networks acquire the better performance, through the analysis of a simple Leaky ReLU model. By utilizing the proportional module with N:M (N @math M) convolution and ReLU ratio, many popular networks can form more rich representations in models, since the N:M (N @math M) proportional module can utilize information more effectively. Furthermore, we apply this module in diverse DCNN models to explore whether is the N:M (N @math M) convolution and ReLU ratio indeed more effective. From our experimental results, we can find that such a simple yet effective method achieves better performance in different benchmarks with various network architectures and the experimental results verify that the superiority of the proportional module. Very deep convolutional networks with hundreds of layers have led to significant reductions in error on competitive benchmarks. Although the unmatched expressiveness of the many layers can be highly desirable at test time, training very deep networks comes with its own set of challenges. The gradients can vanish, the forward flow often diminishes, and the training time can be painfully slow. To address these problems, we propose stochastic depth, a training procedure that enables the seemingly contradictory setup to train short networks and use deep networks at test time. We start with very deep networks but during training, for each mini-batch, randomly drop a subset of layers and bypass them with the identity function. This simple approach complements the recent success of residual networks. It reduces training time substantially and improves the test error significantly on almost all data sets that we used for evaluation. With stochastic depth we can increase the depth of residual networks even beyond 1200 layers and still yield meaningful improvements in test error (4.91 on CIFAR-10). 