In many traditional job scheduling settings, it is assumed that one knows the time it will take for a job to complete service. In such cases, strategies such as shortest job first can be used to improve performance in terms of measures such as the average time a job waits in the system. We consider the setting where the service time is not known, but is predicted by for example a machine learning algorithm. Our main result is the derivation, under natural assumptions, of formulae for the performance of several strategies for queueing systems that use predictions for service times in order to schedule jobs. As part of our analysis, we suggest the framework of the "price of misprediction," which offers a measure of the cost of using predicted information.
 The problem of coloring a graph with the minimum number of colors is well known to be NP-hard, even restricted to k-colorable graphs for constant k ≥ 3. On the other hand, it is known that random k-colorable graphs are easy to k-color. The algorithms for coloring random k-colorable graphs require fairly high edge densities, however. In this paper we present algorithms that color randomly generated k-colorable graphs for much lower edge densities than previous approaches. In addition, to study a wider variety of graph distributions, we also present a model of graphs generated by the semi-random source of Santha and Vazirani (M. Santha and U. V. Vazirani, J. Comput. System Sci.33 (1986), 75-87) that provides a smooth transition between the worst-case and random models. In this model, the graph is generated by a "noisy adversary"-an adversary whose decisions (whether or not to insert a particular edge) have some small (random) probability of being reversed. We show that even for quite low noise rates, semi-random k-colorable graphs can be optimally colored with high probability. We introduce the smoothed analysis of algorithms, which continuously interpolates between the worst-case and average-case analyses of algorithms. In smoothed analysis, we measure the maximum over inputs of the expected performance of an algorithm under small random perturbations of that input. We measure this performance in terms of both the input size and the magnitude of the perturbations. We show that the simplex algorithm has smoothed complexity polynomial in the input size and the standard deviation of Gaussian perturbations. Alon, Krivelevich, and Sudakov [Random Struct Algorithms 13(3–4) (1998), 457–466.] designed an algorithm based on spectral techniques that almost surely finds a clique of size hidden in an otherwise random graph. We show that a different algorithm, based on the Lovasz theta function, almost surely both finds the hidden clique and certifies its optimality. Our algorithm has an additional advantage of being more robust: it also works in a semirandom hidden clique model, in which an adversary can remove edges from the random portion of the graph. ©2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 16, 195–208, 2000 It has been widely observed that there is no single "dominant" SAT solver; instead, different solvers perform best on different instances. Rather than following the traditional approach of choosing the best solver for a given class of instances, we advocate making this decision online on a per-instance basis. Building on previous work, we describe SATzilla, an automated approach for constructing per-instance algorithm portfolios for SAT that use so-called empirical hardness models to choose among their constituent solvers. This approach takes as input a distribution of problem instances and a set of component solvers, and constructs a portfolio optimizing a given objective function (such as mean runtime, percent of instances solved, or score in a competition). The excellent performance of SATzilla was independently verified in the 2007 SAT Competition, where our SATzilla07 solvers won three gold, one silver and one bronze medal. In this article, we go well beyond SATzilla07 by making the portfolio construction scalable and completely automated, and improving it by integrating local search solvers as candidate solvers, by predicting performance score instead of runtime, and by using hierarchical hardness models that take into account different types of SAT instances. We demonstrate the effectiveness of these new techniques in extensive experimental results on data sets including instances from the most recent SAT competition. 