This paper presents a study of operational and type-theoretic properties of different resolution strategies in Horn clause logic. We distinguish four different kinds of resolution: resolution by unification (SLD-resolution), resolution by term-matching, the recently introduced structural resolution, and partial (or lazy) resolution. We express them all uniformly as abstract reduction systems, which allows us to undertake a thorough comparative analysis of their properties. To match this small-step semantics, we propose to take Howard's System H as a type-theoretic semantic counterpart. Using System H, we interpret Horn formulas as types, and a derivation for a given formula as the proof term inhabiting the type given by the formula. We prove soundness of these abstract reduction systems relative to System H, and we show completeness of SLD-resolution and structural resolution relative to System H. We identify conditions under which structural resolution is operationally equivalent to SLD-resolution. We show correspondence between term-matching resolution for Horn clause programs without existential variables and term rewriting.
Coalgebra may be used to provide semantics for SLD-derivations, both finite and infinite. We first give such semantics to classical SLD-derivations, proving results such as adequacy, soundness and completeness. Then, based upon coalgebraic semantics, we propose a new sound and complete algorithm for parallel derivations. We analyse this new algorithm in terms of the Theory of Observables, and we prove correctness and full abstraction results. Logic programming (LP) is a programming language based on first-order Horn clause logic that uses SLD-resolution as a semi-decision procedure. Finite SLD-computations are inductively sound and complete with respect to least Herbrand models of logic programs. Dually, the corecursive approach to SLD-resolution views infinite SLD-computations as successively approximating infinite terms contained in programs' greatest complete Herbrand models. State-of-the-art algorithms implementing corecursion in LP are based on loop detection. However, such algorithms support inference of logical entailment only for rational terms, and they do not account for the important property of productivity in infinite SLD-computations. Loop detection thus lags behind coinductive methods in interactive theorem proving (ITP) and term-rewriting systems (TRS). Structural resolution is a newly proposed alternative to SLD-resolution that makes it possible to define and semi-decide a notion of productivity appropriate to LP. In this paper, we prove soundness of structural resolution relative to Herbrand model semantics for productive inductive, coinductive, and mixed inductive-coinductive logic programs. We introduce two algorithms that support coinductive proof search for infinite productive terms. One algorithm combines the method of loop detection with productive structural resolution, thus guaranteeing productivity of coinductive proofs for infinite rational terms. The other allows to make lazy sound observations of fragments of infinite irrational productive terms. This puts coinductive methods in LP on par with productivity-based observational approaches to coinduction in ITP and TRS. Automated analysis of recursive derivations in logic programming is known to be a hard problem. Both termination and non-termination are undecidable problems in Turing-complete languages. However, some declarative languages offer a practical work-around for this problem, by making a clear distinction between whether a program is meant to be understood inductively or coinductively. For programs meant to be understood inductively, termination must be guaranteed, whereas for programs meant to be understood coinductively, productive non-termination (or “productivity”) must be ensured. In practice, such classification helps to better understand and implement some non-terminating computations. We introduce a Three Tier Tree Calculus (T 3C) that defines in a systematic way three tiers of tree structures underlying proof search in logic programming. We use T 3C to define a new – structural –version of resolution for logic programming. Coinductive definitions, such as that of an infinite stream, may often be described by elegant logic programs, but ones for which SLD-refutation is of no value as SLD-derivations fall into infinite loops. Such definitions give rise to questions of lazy corecursive derivations and parallelism, as execution of such logic programs can have both recursive and corecursive features at once. Observational and coalgebraic semantics have been used to study them abstractly. The programming developments have often occurred separately and have usually been implementation-led. Here, we give a coherent semantics-led account of the issues, starting with abstract category theoretic semantics, developing coalgebra to characterize naturally arising trees and proceeding towards implementation of a new dialect, CoALP, of logic programming, characterised by guarded lazy corecursion and parallelism.