This paper introduces hybrid LU-QR al- gorithms for solving dense linear systems of the form Ax = b. Throughout a matrix factorization, these al- gorithms dynamically alternate LU with local pivoting and QR elimination steps, based upon some robustness criterion. LU elimination steps can be very efficiently parallelized, and are twice as cheap in terms of floating- point operations, as QR steps. However, LU steps are not necessarily stable, while QR steps are always stable. The hybrid algorithms execute a QR step when a robustness criterion detects some risk for instability, and they execute an LU step otherwise. Ideally, the choice between LU and QR steps must have a small computational overhead and must provide a satisfactory level of stability with as few QR steps as possible. In this paper, we introduce several robustness criteria and we establish upper bounds on the growth factor of the norm of the updated matrix incurred by each of these criteria. In addition, we describe the implementation of the hybrid algorithms through an exten- sion of the PaRSEC software to allow for dynamic choices during execution. Finally, we analyze both stability and performance results compared to state-of-the-art linear solvers on parallel distributed multicore platforms.
We present parallel and sequential dense QR factorization algorithms that are both optimal (up to polylogarithmic factors) in the amount of communication they perform and just as stable as Householder QR. We prove optimality by deriving new lower bounds for the number of multiplications done by “non-Strassen-like” QR, and using these in known communication lower bounds that are proportional to the number of multiplications. We not only show that our QR algorithms attain these lower bounds (up to polylogarithmic factors), but that existing LAPACK and ScaLAPACK algorithms perform asymptotically more communication. We derive analogous communication lower bounds for LU factorization and point out recent LU algorithms in the literature that attain at least some of these lower bounds. The sequential and parallel QR algorithms for tall and skinny matrices lead to significant speedups in practice over some of the existing algorithms, including LAPACK and ScaLAPACK, for example, up to 6.7 times over ScaLAPACK. A performance model for the parallel algorithm for general rectangular matrices predicts significant speedups over ScaLAPACK.