The current virtualization solution in the Cloud widely relies on hypervisor-based technologies. Along with the recent popularity of Docker, the container-based virtualization starts receiving more attention for being a promising alternative. Since both of the virtualization solutions are not resource-free, their performance overheads would lead to negative impacts on the quality of Cloud services. To help fundamentally understand the performance difference between these two types of virtualization solutions, we use a physical machine with "just-enough" resource as a baseline to investigate the performance overhead of a standalone Docker container against a standalone virtual machine (VM). With findings contrary to the related work, our evaluation results show that the virtualization's performance overhead could vary not only on a feature-by-feature basis but also on a job-to-job basis. Although the container-based solution is undoubtedly lightweight, the hypervisor-based technology does not come with higher performance overhead in every case. For example, Docker containers particularly exhibit lower QoS in terms of storage transaction speed.
In these days, Cloud computing is provided by various service ways, and it is possible that practical implement and service by virtualized environment. With developing of cloud computing techniques, many companies propose the different type of platforms through research the relevant technique. Among other platforms, we are going to talk about the performance comparison analysis of Linux Container and Virtual Machine in this paper. We built Cloud environment first on Docker which is based on Linux Container and Hypervisor which is Virtual Machine, we analyzed each of the size, Boot speed, and CPU performance. With this analysis result, Users will be able to understand characteristic of each platforms, and they will be able to choose the platforms reasonably what they need. Cloud computing makes extensive use of virtual machines because they permit workloads to be isolated from one another and for the resource usage to be somewhat controlled. In this paper, we explore the performance of traditional virtual machine (VM) deployments, and contrast them with the use of Linux containers. We use KVM as a representative hypervisor and Docker as a container manager. Our results show that containers result in equal or better performance than VMs in almost all cases. Both VMs and containers require tuning to support I Ointensive applications. We also discuss the implications of our performance results for future cloud architectures.