In 2008, Ben-Amram, Jones and Kristiansen showed that for a simple programming language---representing non-deterministic imperative programs with bounded loops, and arithmetics limited to addition and multiplication - it is possible to decide precisely whether a program has certain growth-rate properties, in particular whether a computed value, or the program's running time, has a polynomial growth rate. A natural and intriguing problem was to move from answering the decision problem to giving a quantitative result, namely, a tight polynomial upper bound. This paper shows how to obtain asymptotically-tight, multivariate, disjunctive polynomial bounds for this class of programs. This is a complete solution: whenever a polynomial bound exists it will be found. A pleasant surprise is that the algorithm is quite simple; but it relies on some subtle reasoning. An important ingredient in the proof is the forest factorization theorem, a strong structural result on homomorphisms into a finite monoid.
For a given finite set Sigma of matrices with nonnegative integer entries we study the growth with t of max parallel to A(1)... A(t)parallel to : A(i) epsilon Sigma . We show how to determine in polynomial time whether this growth is bounded, polynomial, or exponential, and we characterize all possible behaviors. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. We present a new method for inferring complexity properties for imperative programs with bounded loops. The properties handled are: polynomial (or linear) boundedness of computed values, as a function of the input; and similarly for the running time. It is well known that complexity properties are undecidable for a Turing-complete programming language. Much work in program analysis overcomes this obstacle by relaxing the correctness notion: one does not ask for an algorithm that correctly decides whether the property of interest holds or not, but only for "yes" answers to be sound. In contrast, we reshaped the problem by defining a "core" programming language that is Turing-incomplete, but strong enough to model real programs of interest. For this language, our method is the first to give a certain answer; in other words, our inference is both sound and complete. The essence of the method is that every command is assigned a "complexity certificate", which is a concise specification of dependencies of output values on input. These certificates are produced by inference rules that are compositional and efficiently computable. The approach is inspired by previous work by Niggl and Wunderlich and by Jones and Kristiansen, but use a novel, more expressive kind of certificates.