We study the minimum number of constraints needed to formulate random instances of the maximum stable set problem via linear programs (LPs), in two distinct models. In the uniform model, the constraints of the LP are not allowed to depend on the input graph, which should be encoded solely in the objective function. There we prove a @math 2Ω(n logn) lower bound with probability at least @math 1-2-2n for every LP that is exact for a randomly selected set of instances; each graph on at most n vertices being selected independently with probability @math pź2-n 42+n. In the non-uniform model, the constraints of the LP may depend on the input graph, but we allow weights on the vertices. The input graph is sampled according to the G(n, p) model. There we obtain upper and lower bounds holding with high probability for various ranges of p. We obtain a super-polynomial lower bound all the way from @math p=Ωlog6+źnn to @math p=o1logn. Our upper bound is close to this as there is only an essentially quadratic gap in the exponent, which currently also exists in the worst-case model. Finally, we state a conjecture that would close this gap, both in the average-case and worst-case models.
We prove super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of linear programming relaxations for approximation versions of constraint satisfaction problems. We show that for these problems, polynomial-sized linear programs are exactly as powerful as programs arising from a constant number of rounds of the Sherali-Adams hierarchy. In particular, any polynomial-sized linear program for Max Cut has an integrality gap of 1 2 and any such linear program for Max 3-Sat has an integrality gap of 7 8. We solve a 20-year old problem posed by Yannakakis and prove that there exists no polynomial-size linear program (LP) whose associated polytope projects to the traveling salesman polytope, even if the LP is not required to be symmetric. Moreover, we prove that this holds also for the cut polytope and the stable set polytope. These results were discovered through a new connection that we make between one-way quantum communication protocols and semidefinite programming reformulations of LPs. We develop a framework for proving approximation limits of polynomial size linear programs (LPs) from lower bounds on the nonnegative ranks of suitably defined matrices. This framework yields unconditional impossibility results that are applicable to any LP as opposed to only programs generated by hierarchies. Using our framework, we prove that O(n1 2-ϵ)-approximations for CLIQUE require LPs of size 2nΩ(ϵ). This lower bound applies to LPs using a certain encoding of CLIQUE as a linear optimization problem. Moreover, we establish a similar result for approximations of semidefinite programs by LPs. Our main technical ingredient is a quantitative improvement of Razborov’s [38] rectangle corruption lemma for the high error regime, which gives strong lower bounds on the nonnegative rank of shifts of the unique disjointness matrix. We provide a new framework for establishing strong lower bounds on the nonnegative rank of matrices by means of common information, a notion previously introduced in [1]. Common information is a natural lower bound for the nonnegative rank of a matrix and by combining it with He linger distance estimations we can compute the (almost) exact common information of UDISJ partial matrix. We also establish robustness of this estimation under various perturbations of the UDISJ partial matrix, where rows and columns are randomly or adversarially removed or where entries are randomly or adversarially altered. This robustness translates, via a variant of Yannakakis' Factorization Theorem, to lower bounds on the average case and adversarial approximate extension complexity. We present the first family of polytopes, the hard pair introduced in [2] related to the CLIQUE problem, with high average case and adversarial approximate extension complexity. We also provide an information theoretic variant of the fooling set method that allows us to extend fooling set lower bounds from extension complexity to approximate extension complexity. 