Robustness and safety are crucial properties for the real-world application of autonomous vehicles. One of the most critical components of any autonomous system is localisation. During the last 20 years there has been significant progress in this area with the introduction of very efficient algorithms for mapping, localisation and SLAM. Many of these algorithms present impressive demonstrations for a particular domain, but fail to operate reliably with changes to the operating environment. The aspect of robustness has not received enough attention and localisation systems for self-driving vehicle applications are seldom evaluated for their robustness. In this paper we propose novel metrics to effectively quantify localisation robustness with or without an accurate ground truth. The experimental results present a comprehensive analysis of the application of these metrics against a number of well known localisation strategies.
This paper is about camera-only localisation in challenging outdoor environments, where changes in lighting, weather and season cause traditional localisation systems to fail. Conventional approaches to the localisation problem rely on point-features such as SIFT, SURF or BRIEF to associate landmark observations in the live image with landmarks stored in the map; however, these features are brittle to the severe appearance change routinely encountered in outdoor environments. In this paper, we propose an alternative to traditional point-features: we train place-specific linear SVM classifiers to recognise distinctive elements in the environment. The core contribution of this paper is an unsupervised mining algorithm which operates on a single mapping dataset to extract distinct elements from the environment for localisation. We evaluate our system on 205km of data collected from central Oxford over a period of six months in bright sun, night, rain, snow and at all times of the day. Our experiment consists of a comprehensive N-vs-N analysis on 22 laps of the approximately 10km route in central Oxford. With our proposed system, the portion of the route where localisation fails is reduced by a factor of 6, from 33.3 to 5.5 .