MR VISSER
Yes, well are you going to concentrate in fact, on the possible.  Because let me immediately put it to you that in terms of the article, looking at page 200 and I said to you before that Iskan and Loth appear to be in conformity with this article and what I was referring to was at page 200 where this article says
"... however, we must stress that the degree of medical certainty of this method (and this refers to a video superimposition) cannot be considered adequate for positive identification.  It is used in combination with other corroborative evidence when confirmatory evidence, such as fingerprinting, dental records and DNA profiling are not available."
So what it says, if I understand the English, is that it is a good, it is a useful method of providing assistance for identification where other foolproof, if I may call it that, information does not exist.  Would you agree with that?