MR DEHAL
It reflects adversely, Mr Chairperson, on the credibility of the previous witness who premised his version on the basis that he did not know well the age of this child for he hardly ever sees the child.  His version is the child lived far from where he presently lives.  He also said that he had not seen the child for many years and therefore the variants from two years to eights years to ten years was explained.  This evidence is elicited to show ...(intervention)