MOKOTEDI MPSHE
Thank you, Mr Chairman, Members of the Committee.
	Mr Chairman, it is so interesting that my learned friend is trying to cloth the applicant, Mr Sapele, with clothes that he never had, the clothing of a political organisation.  Mr Chairman, I will just respond to what my learned friend has said, that will be my argument.
	My learned friend has correctly used the word "aspirant member", that is a very important word.  In other words, if we have analyse the word "aspirant member", it means he was aspiring to become one, he was not one at that time when this robbery was committed. 
	Mr Chairman, even if it can be said that what Mr Sapele did he did under the instruction, as it was said he acted at the instance of Mr Masilela, Mr Chairman, the TRC Act knows no general amnesty or amnesty for a group of persons, it makes mention of individuals for specific offences.  It cannot be said that if Mr Masilela was an activist, which I do not dispute, and whatever he did can also be imputed onto Mr Sapele, that is untenable, completely untenable.
	Mr Chairman, it has been stated to you and the Honourable Members of the Committee, that the offence committed by Mr Sapele whilst in prison, was in the interest of PAC.  One wonders as to what would PAC stand to gain by a person escaping out of jail.  That really brings a very big question mark.
	Inasfar as the money is concerned, I don't see how it can be clothed with any political motive or motivation.  The evidence is very clear from both Mr Masilela as well as Mr Sapele that the money was for personal use and thus it cannot be said that it was intended to be in the interest of the PAC.
	Mr Chairman, with the greatest of respect, I fail to understand how my learned friend could be so ambitious to cloth Mr Sapele with the provisions of the ACT.  And I want to move that no amnesty has been - no successful application for amnesty in this regard has been done.  Thank you.