CHAIRPERSON
Can I add something?  We are not here to investigate the allegations made about police officers by other witnesses.  It's not an applicant who's saying this, it's one of the witnesses who has seen fit to say things about some policemen.
	And I agree entirely with what my brother says that if we're starting to devote time to collateral matters of this nature we will not complete the matter in the time we have left to us.  It is not a matter that we are here to make findings on.  
	I think that we should stress that our function is not to make credibility findings about police officers, our function is to decide whether the applicants have made out a case in terms of the Act for amnesty.  And their credibility may be in issue but I do not think it's necessary to reopen matters of this nature which are very much collateral.