JUDGE WILSON
And that should be done immediately, and then once that has been done, it seems to me, subject to what counsel may have to say, that it might be desirable in the circumstances of this case, to have something in the nature of a pre-trial conference presided over by one of the members of the Committee, where agreement could be reached as to the admissibility and otherwise of documents, as to the necessity for calling certain evidence, as to whether admissions can be made.  So that when the hearing commences again, it can continue uninterruptedly.  I do not want to make it sound as if I am blaming counsel for what has happened this time, there was obviously an unfortunate misunderstanding.  The document that was referred to at the last hearing, went amiss and copies were not made available as they should have.  As a result of which notice has not been given as required.  So we agree with the proposition that the matter should be adjourned to a date to be arranged and recommend that on that occasion it should be set down for the beginning of a week and no other matters should be set down for that week.  But before the date is arranged, I would request that contact be made with all the interested parties to ascertain the date is convenient to all of them.  And it should be done well in advance, because by that time the Committee may have increased in size, we may be spread all over the place, it may be more difficult to reconvene the same three members. So we need a little time to organise that.  So subject to that, I agree that the matter now be adjourned to a date to be arranged.