CHAIRPERSON
Before we took the adjournment, the question arose as to whether the applicant was obliged to disclose the names of two persons who were referred to as informers although that may not necessarily be the correct description of them.
	The question was objected to by Mr Visser and he raised the question as to whether in our law such evidence was admissible.  It is a matter which in my view, clearly has to be decided in terms of the law, which is not a discretionary matter, and I accordingly would request that all those interested in the subject, prepare argument, and we can hear argument on the matter, next week.
	We will prefer written Heads if possible.  It does not as I understand it, in any way effect the continuing cross-examination of the applicant.  The purpose we were told by Mr Ngubane was merely to supply information to the family.  They can await that information next week and you can continue with your cross-examination.
	What day would you suggest gentlemen?  Mr Visser has the advantage of having a laptop computer in front of him, which the rest of you don't.  Should we say Tuesday of next week?