MR BERGER
That they do not intend leading any evidence at this stage.  In particular, we would just like to make one point abundantly clear if it hasn't been made clear already and that is in regard to Advocate Strydom's clients and up until this point and I think it still continues to represent the interests of the IFP, we will argue at the end of this amnesty hearing that the applicants, amongst other things, do not qualify for amnesty because they do not meet the requirements of Section 22(a) of the Act.  In other words, that they were not properly authorised to act on behalf of the Inkatha Freedom Party.  Their case is that they committed these crimes on behalf of the Inkatha Freedom Party.  The evidence thus far is that the person who sanctioned the attack was Mr Bhekinkosi Mkhize, on his own evidence not an official of the Inkatha Freedom Party.