CHAIRPERSON
Another aspect also of the evidence which I found a little bit strange was the applicant said that he saw this movement of the hand, and that caused him to shoot, and then he was asked, well, who did you shoot first and he didn't say it was the person who moved the hand.
	Wouldn't it be natural if he thought somebody was going for a gun, that that would be the person you would shoot first and you would know that?  But he says he doesn't know the order in which he shot or whether it was the man who moved his hands or not, which seems somewhat strange.  It could of course happen like that, but one would think that the first shot would be directed at the person who he thought was the danger because he was going for the gun.