MR MARTINI
Sorry, Mr Chairperson, that's not correct, when we ended last time my client was asked to compare his Section 29 statement, and I even noted an objection for this very reason, I said this would be an ambush to say well, go refresh your memory and then he's going to say well, you assured us it's all correct, now it wasn't correct.  That was the very objection I raised.  His statement which my client said he read was his main Section 29 statement.  Now maybe there was method in my madness to suggest to Mr Kahanovitz to go through the statements issuably in order to avoid this dispute.