CHAIRPERSON
In that regard, the evidence of the applicant is - I don't know if this is the right word, but somewhat confusing, because at one stage he said at the moment that he started towards the car, that he started walking towards the vehicle, he had already made up his mind to shoot those people.
	Then he said that the proximate cause of him shooting this person, was this movement of the hand and that prompted him to shoot, which is you know, a bit of a confusion there, but one would expect that if the movement of the hand caused him to shoot, that it is not a detail that he would forget.
	He said that he didn't put it in his statements because he can't remember all details, but it is the sort of detail one would think, one wouldn't forget if that was the actual cause of him shooting.  Whether or not he had made up his mind earlier to shoot them or not, but if that prompted him to shoot, why forget it?