MR SHAYI
If my memory serves me well, I think the affidavit was made Tuesday last week, that will be, I think that will be - may I just bring it to the attention of the Committee that I actually received the bundle on Friday last week, and that is the day on which I actually started working on the application itself.
	My understanding of the matter was when I first received notice that I may actually come to represent mr Manyamala in the application, my understanding was, because at that stage I had a copy of the affidavit, my understanding was, he in the application, that is in the form, dealt with the firearms that are mentioned on pages 13 and 15.
	So, when I received the bundle on Friday, that is when I actually noted that the firearms on pages 13 and 15 are not mentioned in the form.  But I came to the conclusion, or it is my submission that as far as the application is concerned, if an amendment can be allowed, the facts pertaining to the firearms, are adequately mentioned in the affidavit.
	He actually alluded when evidence was adduced by Mr Manyamala, he actually told the Committee as to how he came to be in possession of the firearms, mentioned on page 13 as well as the firearms mentioned on page 15.  My submission is as far as Section 74 of the Act is concerned, there wouldn't have been any need to actually give notice to any other third parties, as the Committee pleases Mr Chairman.