MR DUKADA
Yes, thank you Mr Chairperson.  Mr Chairperson, I must state from the beginning that the applicant himself has conceded that there was no need to destroy the house of the Jafta family and that is also my statement.  But now the problem - sorry Chairperson, with a case of this nature is that an applicant must disclose the full facts surrounding his activities as a security policeman.   He went there as a quasi-security policeman and nothing else and property was damaged rightly or wrongly in his presence and he came to the Committee to disclose the whole facts.
	It is for the Committee to decide whether in these circumstances - I'm sorry, let me just withdraw my submission.  My point is that in considering this application, the Committee at the end of the day will have to decide whether he has made a full disclosure of his role as a security policeman and that was an endeavour to avoid hiding some pieces of evidence because if he were to be asked by any of legal representatives of the victims of the policemen here about his role as a security policeman at the premises of Mr Jafta, he would have been exposed as somebody who was not honest to the Commission. 
	But be that as it may, I must reiterate, Mr Chairperson, I'm in no way pursuing, I mean arguing that it was correct for the police to destroy the house of Jafta family, I'm not at 
all.