MR MAPOMA
Yes, the objective of maintaining peace, it was, I assume, it must have been focused on the community, because the conflict that must have existed was conflict which involved the community.   Therefore, sir, in this particular case, I may argue that whatever approach they were adopting, if it was geared at achieving peace in the community, the community surely should have been involved.  	Now it is highly inconceivable that when peace is geared at, some members of the community are killed by those who claim that their intention is to restore peace.
	One can go, Chairperson, to the distance of quoting the assertions which were made by some of the members when they were advising the community of what happened, when they were inviting them also to see those who were captured, they were referred to as dogs, I mean Mr Mneba Sonti, acknowledges that, that he went around the community to announce that anyone who has his dog must go identify him at the place which he describes.   Surely, sir, that kind of an atmosphere is in contrast with an intended object of maintaining peace in the society?   Even before going to the act of killing itself, that in itself does not seem to have created an atmosphere that an intention was to restore peace in the community.   
	The question of killing them now, it goes, sir, a great deal against that intended purpose also, because the deceased persons now had to be killed with the sole purpose of achieving peace.   It's very difficult, Chairperson, to comprehend that.