MR DU PLESSIS
Mr Chairman, the purpose of the cross-examination goes further to the extent that my client denies that such an incident ever took place where he was involved in.  I'm not saying that the incident never took place, all I'm trying to do is I'm trying to place a question mark upon the evidence of the witness so as to be able to argue at the end of the day that where he says that my client was involved in this incident, cannot be true.
	If certain other aspects of his evidence in doubtful then it also becomes doubtful if my client was ever involved in this matter.  And I'm simply pointing out contradictions to be able to argue to you at the end of the day that the probability that Bokaba was involved, is next to nothing Mr Chairman.