MR WILLS
Yes.   What my position is, Chairperson, is that I, in preparation for this case, expected this witness to be hostile to my client's version as a result of what was completed on the application form.   I now find that he's very supportive of my client's version, and in regard to the actual incident itself, I've got one or two questions that I need to clear up, which I would be in a position to put to him immediately, but what I feel would be important for me to exercise my client's mandate properly, is to secure further corroborative evidence from this witness, which will support this particular client's case, and the other two persons whom I represent in these hit squad hearings in relation to the general operations and instructions of hit squads, and in that regard I just need to look at certain things, and I would also like to take some advice on that.  In particular, I'm concerned about instructions, for example you'll be aware, having sat in the other issues, the issues of the indiscriminate killings, what the attitude was, and more general information about how these hit squads operated, because this witness is operating in a different area in relation to - and under different circumstances, so I would perceive that the evidence that he might have in that regard would be seen by the committee who considers the application in the other matter that I'm involved with, as being quite supportive and quite independent, as opposed to the evidence of the three who've basically been together all along, and that's basically my position, but I'm sure, in that regard, it's a very short aspect.   I don't know if you're intending to finish, I don't know, if we could finish tonight, but I don't see that we can, I believe that you were expecting to finish at 7:00, but there's still argument to come and there's also certain questions from my learned friend, Ms Thabete, so I don't know if we would, in any event, finish this evening.