MR RICHARD
Quite correct.   And for it to say that the evidence is now privileged, I don't know how any of us have ever extended this Section or the other Sections into that phraseology.  I think what is being intended to be said is that it is protected and its use is circumscribed and conditional on all sorts of provisions within the Act, but to say that it is privilege, is not the correct notional concept.  In fact what we have been arguing about, Section 29(5), is not, it has nothing to do with privilege.