MR DE KLERK
I know that was said, my only explanation for that is if that person did receive information at a later stage, we don't know how.  He knew that this information was the correct information.  Let's say he did testify regarding the information that he got, he wouldn't have known what was the real reason behind it and the only reason at that stage would have been the robbery of the firearm.  But I don't think it fits into the logic following of the facts.