MR DU PLESSIS
: Yes.   Mr Chairman if this is a problemthen I can foresee various difficult problems for people in theposition of the applicants.   If, for instance, they ask amnestyonly pertaining to these 10 and the Attorney-General for somereason or another, after the cut-off date of the amnesty period,determines and finds that two of these people were wrongly identifiedand there were another two
8.1b people /...
MR CURRIN 666 M MAKOLANE
people, then the applicants would have been prejudiced and theycannot ask amnesty in respect of those other two that have beenidentified.   So that is why the applicants say Mr Chairman theonly obligation on the applicants is to apply for amnesty in respectof that which they know, and as I understand criminal law, theycould have been prosecuted for murder and other acts, but let'stake murder, specifically pertaining to the people who were inthe Kombi and in respect of which an inquest has been held.  That is how I understand it Mr Chairman.