JUSTICE BEKEBEKE
There is nothing except that I think today if we take a retrospective act, of course, we do not deny, I specifically do not deny that I was involved in the killing of the deceased. But I think that if we have to have true reconciliation today is the day when those who were involved in accusing especially people whom I know specifically were not involved in the killing of the deceased, this is the time for us to make a clean breast of it and tell us what happened actually.
	Because, according to me, just to take an example, a 60 year old Mrs de Bruyn, together with her husband, could not have been there. They weren't there. Accused, I think, Mr Menebognon, could not have been there. He was across the street, in King Street. Just prior to us running up Pilane Street, he wanted to cross, but unfortunately, he couldn't, because the police were shooting. And there he was his name accused of murdering the policeman which he wasn't part and parcel of the whole thing. The man was sentenced to death for a crime he did not commit. What would have happened if he was definitely hanged at the end of the day? Do you really say that we are coming for reconciliation when we still cling to untruths? When some people are having their names as criminals today when they didn't commit this crime? And even the way in which it was explained at court, evidence that was given, that was not truthful. Do we today say that we really want to reconcile, but still cling to those untruths? I do not deny I did kill the deceased.