CHAIRPERSON
I think what Mr Bizos is asking you is - let me put it this way, we've got the evidence of the Harms Commission, your evidence in which you say certain things, which you in your explanation given today explain why you didn't tell the truth there, you've admitted that this isn't the correct reflection and it's not the same as what you've said.  What Mr Bizos is putting to you is that yesterday you said that the accusations that what you said and which is contained in here are lies, is false.  Now are you saying that they're not false?  In other words, if you answer in the negative to Mr Bizos' question, then the necessary inference is that what is contained in here is the truth.