MR VISSER
Sorry, that has fallen out in the wash Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, really the point about which we wish to make about the public interest, is this, and we make this in paragraph 48 and I want to conclude my argument with that.
	The public interest which is served by the whole process of amnesty, is that of the promotion of national and reconciliation.  That really adds a new dimension to the tests which have existed up until Carla's case.  Mr Chairman, the question will be for you to decide how ordering the disclosure of the identity of a witness, is going to advance int he present circumstances, national unity and reconciliation.
	And with respect Mr Chairman, one needs not to be very astute to realise immediately that it will do everything but, it will only kindle hatred, promote violence which is directly in opposition to the spirit and intention of the TRC Act.
	Mr Chairman, we would ask you not to allow questions in cross-examination directed at establishing the identity of informers and that you would not order witnesses to answer questions by which it is reasonably possible that the identity of informers might be established, thank you Mr Chairperson.