MR MBANDAZAYO
Mr Chairperson, if that's the case, the only thing left with me to make is closing argument.
	Mr Chairperson, Section 20 (1) of the Act provides as follows:  
"If the Committee after considering an application for amnesty is satisfied that the application complies with the requirement of this Act, the act, omission or offence with the application relates is an a act associated with political objective committed in the course of conflict in the past in accordance with provision Sub-section 2 and 3, that the applicant has made full disclosure of relevant facts, it shall grant amnesty".
	Mr Chairperson, I submit that the applicants have complied with the Act, Section 20 (1) and (2).  That they were quite clearly acting on behalf of APLA, a publicly known political organisation and liberation movement which was engaged in a political struggle against the State at the time.
	Mr Chairperson, I won't like to waste the time of this Committee.  You have heard the applicants.  They have told the Committee that they were given instructions to go to Mr Franciscato's house and kill Mr Franciscato and repossess arms and this instruction came from Mr Duma.  Mr Duma came and told the Committee that he indeed gave those instructions and that he got those instructions in his capacity as a commander then, of APLA.
	Mr Chairperson, the applicants have told this Committee their roles, their respective roles in regard to this incident.  It is my humble submission that with regard to their roles they have made full and proper disclosure before this Committee.
	Mr Chairperson, there is no doubt that the first applicants, Mr Biko and Veveza have previous criminal records.  There is no doubt about that.  And that they were related to various incidents regarding dishonesty. 	Mr Chairperson, with regard, there is a difference with this one.  If one looks at all the incidents that they were involved in, none of them involved the taking of human life.  It was the first incident where a human life was taken.  ...[intervention]