MR DREYER
That was your evidence.    Now I'd just like to refer you to your own application, your own application in paragraph 5 on page 93, it starts on page 92, where you say
"Phil Kloppers told us that he just came from a meeting and that the waiting is over and the revolution is going to start on that day, the 12th of December 1993.   Two weeks before the time we were already told that we should be on standby 24 hours because the revolution's going to start.   Phil Klopper put it clearly to us that General Oelofse wanted to see bodies and that we should fulfil hard options, and later Phil Klopper told us that General Oelofse gave instruction that we had to have a roadblock and during this roadblock we must also intercept weapons which would be taken into our towns in order to kill our people, farmers and children, and then we would use these weapons against the ANC, SACP alliance, as well as the PAC, and the leader of the AWB, Terreblanche, also told us at several meetings that we must cause chaos and make sure that the election on the 24th of April do not take place."
	Now I find a few things strange.   The first thing is, yesterday you found the opportunity to reply to the answer to the advocate, "What was the instruction, was there anything else?", and you said, "No, I can't recall anything", but in your own application under oath you deal with all these instructions, and now this morning it was amended by saying that, "Later Phil Klopper told us that General Oelofse gave instructions concerning the roadblock".   Now I'd just like to know, the amendment which was made this morning, this "later", does this refer to later or by the roadside cafe, or later referring to when you left the roadside cafe?