MR MBANDAZAYO IN FURTHER ARGUMENT
Yes Mr Chairperson.  Mr Chairperson, I would not go back to the first incident as my learned friend has conceded.
	I was going to deal with (e), (f), (g), but the Honourable member of the Committee, Mr Lax, asked me does it matter whether he was a member.  I was trying to stress that point, but as it has already been ironed out, I am coming to the point that is raised by my learned friend regarding that the applicant shot this person by mistake.
	If it was deliberate, then we would say it was in furtherance.  Mr Chairperson, the argument is that the reason why it was by mistake, the applicant has put before this Committee that if we shot him in a moving car, we would not have achieved our purpose, because we wanted the car.  We would have been injured, also ourselves.
	Hence the accidental shooting.  What we wanted was the car.  If we shot him, the car would have been damaged also.  We would not use it for our specific purpose.  Definitely the threatening and the accidental going off of the - was in furtherance of that objective, to be able to fulfil their mission, because if we shoot this person, we would not fulfil our mission, which eventually happened.
	They did not fulfil their mission.