MR RICHARD
I stand corrected, it is quite correct, there is a word "not" missing in the second line of paragraph 1.27.  The transcript may not be used for the purpose of cross-examining the fifth, that is quite correct.  I am sorry, I am not a typist, I made the error while typing it myself.   Now, at page 179 of Exhibit C Mr Currin says
"...  what we have, which I will in a moment hand back to you Mr McBride, is a document which contains detailed information with regard to the Magoo's bombing and we would like (and then there is irrelevancy and it continues later in the paragraphs) which I think is fairly comprehensive."
	And then at the end of that paragraph Mr Currin proceeds to state -
"... and it is also the - this will be part of his application verbatim, part of his application which we will lodge to the Amnesty Committee at a later stage."
	It is important to note that that statement by Mr Currin was made in the context that on the 10th of April 1997, as appears from Exhibit A, Mr McBride's application was received by the Amnesty Committee, there is a date stamp on the first page of the amnesty application.   Then this hearing took place a few days later, on the 21st of that month.  So it is clear that whatever this document is, which we have never seen, was part and parcel of what was the then amnesty application and also part and parcel of the Section 27 enquiry record.  I believe - it is at page 29 - and  I believe that ...