MR MARTINI
And 20(3)(e), that deals with the factors to be taken into account, where it does talk about
"an agent or supporter"
Correct, Chairperson.  I actually thought during the proceedings that that was common cause, so it was quite a surprise when I saw it in the Heads of Argument.
	Chairperson, it can never be said that Mr van Zyl acted out of malice or personal gain.  In fact, on the issue of malice, it was never even put to him, he was never challenged that his deeds or his conduct was out of malice to the victims.