MR MALAN
No sorry Mr Visser, this is important, because it also goes as to credibility.  Mr Rosslee makes a statement under oath, in which he makes very specific statements as to the planning, the task for the abduction, then he continues to say who in fact were used by the planning team to do, to effect the abduction.
	Now suddenly he tells us he can remember something that didn't take place.  That is a major problem.  If you could bring him back to the beginning of paragraph 2 and try to explain to us why that stands there, and furthermore why does he deny the correctness of that paragraph at this moment in time.