MR MBANDAZAYO
Mr Chairman, I would submit that it support his case in some respects, in some of the instances where there are - in some instances there are, in as far as saying that, "What I did it for was to protect the organisation", though always it crops up the question of the family which, Mr Chairman, I want the Committee to understand in that context that, as he put it, that he regarded the attack in his family as a political incident which was not necessarily aimed at his family, but aimed at him.
	And it's in that context that he always put the family, that his family was attacked and he was next, and that he regard that the primal target was him, not the family.  And it's only on those instances where his family crop up, and that's why there's always the point of revenge always crop up, because he always mentioned the family.  And it's only the way it is put regarding the involvement of the family in the whole incident that I submit, Mr Chairman, creates some questions.  But, Mr Chairman, my submission is that it's only the way it is put, that makes it as if it was sort of a revenge.  But taken as a whole, Mr Chairman, I submit that it's in line, his application forms in line with his testimony today.