CHAIRPERSON
Our understanding is that we were here to deal with the Heidelberg Tavern massacre.  When we look at the application form we find that reference is made therein to other matters in respect of which he believes he has applied for amnesty and counsel - the leader of evidence, is also here to deal entirely with the Heidelberg Tavern case.
	There seems to be a decision that has been taken or rather there's some contemplation of a decision that matters which originated in the Eastern Cape will be dealt with on a regional basis.  I don't know very much about it yet but I have no doubt that matters relating to what happened in the Eastern Cape will be heard just as matters relating to other parts of the country.  
	For present purposes we'll just confine the hearing to the Heidelberg matter and maybe we'll be able to position - the Amnesty Committee has been inundated with applications, sometimes their cross-referencing may not have been up to date and that might cause some difficulties.  But I think that for the time being let us just concern ourselves with the Heidelberg matter.