MR HATTINGH
Mr Chairman, I am asking you for direction.  In a normal court, in a criminal trial obviously the State would say that we would wish to submit certain confessions and or other documentation and there would be a trial within a trial, if it is not admitted.
	Now, here we have the position where we act on behalf of certain of the victims, and I would like to get full disclosure from this applicant.  I have to confront him with certain evidence or certain documentation which does form part of the document, the Amnesty Committee's documentation where we obtained these from, if we need to hold a trial within a trial, then so be it.   While we are only going to bring evidence or submit testimony after the applicant has already testified and been cross-examined, my own opinion and which I would like to submit, in the circumstances where we don't have any specific direction within the Act, that I should at least put to this applicant whatever I am going to prove later on.
	If the applicant now says that he is not admitting it, I don't think that I am not allowed to make use of the documents at all during this hearing, but there should be some way of putting them before this Committee and if a trial within a trial is necessary and if I need from my side, to prove these confessions and the pointing out, then I obviously need to call on those witnesses, but at what stage, I don't know.