CHAIRPERSON
You see if you'd read on you'd see this man appears to be confused - if you read paragraph five:  "I then realised that more shooting took place before this culprit took over and as a result two policemen were already injured but I have in mind that the other policeman was shot by the culprit who was the last to go because I saw the culprit shooting this policeman who was trying to escape.  The security guard was shot by this culprit, fell down and never moved from the spot as he was later said to be dead."  Now he is here saying that the security guard never moved.  Isn't there a little confusion in all this?