MOKOTEDI MPSHE
Mr Chairman, my response to the belief would be by way of what the applicant said.
	I will start with Makarov.   He knew Makarov for a period of ten months, he attended meetings of these new SDU's with Makarov, Makarov stayed in the same area as he did, and he is fully aware that Makarov was a code name, one cannot understand how possible is it for you to operate with a person for a period of ten months, you to know very well that this is a code name, and not know the actual name?  Mr Chairman, in the political circles, as they existed then, people had code names, but people who were involved in those circles or in those cells would tell you that, "We called this man Makarov, but this was his actual name, he was given this name in order that he should not be arrested", that is expected of people in a particular cell, but applicant was in that cell with Makarov, if it can be called a cell, in that cell with Makarov, attended meetings with Makarov, but he does not know Makaroff's real name.   That really should cast doubt as to whether even the other comrades he mentioned actually existed.
	And to take the matter further, Mr Chairman, members of the committee, the onus to prove on the balance in this type of a hearing is on the applicant.   If Makarov actually existed and the other comrades, particularly the one who laid out the plan for them, one would have expected him to have brought that commander and said, "Yes, this man is correct, there was a street defence unit, I was the commander, I was called Makarov and this is my name, this man was our member".   We don't know anything about these people.  Instead some of them disappeared in the 1980's. 
	I don't know whether I have responded correctly.