JUDGE MILLER
Yes, thanks, just briefly.
	Mr Gumengu, in your trial - we've got before us also in bundle 2, a copy of the indictment, that's the charge sheet and also a document on page 4 called a "Summary of Substantial Facts", which is made in terms of Section 149 of the Criminal Procedure Act.  If I could just briefly explain to you, this summary of Statement of Facts is a document that is prepared by the prosecuting staff, right, and if your matter were to go to trial, this document would be handed in or read out into the record.  It contains a very short description of what the State case against you would be and the person who drafts this document is expected to be able to lead evidence to substantiate any fact that he or she discloses in this document.  It's a brief summary of the State's evidence.  Whether the evidence they lead will be accepted by the Court or not, that's another story, but when they draft this document they base it on evidence that they have in their possession.  Now I just want to read to you, just for you comment, from page 6 of the bundle, it's on the fourth line.  I'll read from there, and this is describing the incident that took place on the 11th of January, this is from what the prosecuting authority put in their Statement of Facts, essential facts -
"Once inside the house, accused number 1 (that is your colleague, Mr Tyani) opened fire upon the deceased.  Both accused thereafter took his body into one of the rooms.  In their possession were two handgrenades of Russian origin which the accused', who were both trained in the use of explosive, secretly had in their possession.  One grenade was put on the bed whilst the other was activated behind the deceased who was lying on his side on the floor, so as to create the impression that he was shot and killed in an attempt to stop him from throwing an already activated handgrenade."
What do you say to that?  Which if this matter went to trail, one would expect the State would be able to lead some evidence to substantiate that.  Whether that evidence be accepted by the Court or not is neither here nor there.