MR RICHARD
Section 29 hearing, sorry, I thought people were reminding me of page numbers, Section 29 investigative proceedings.   Now any law such as that applicable in this debate, has to be applied in a factual context.
	Now the next issue that I would address is what in fact is the applicant's objection.  In paragraph 13 under paragraph 3.2.2.5 and here I have used the work the fifth and first applicants appeared, I have stressed the word appear, because there have never been a formalised notice of objection,  object to the use of the Section 29 transcript by the Amnesty Committee.  If that is not correct, I would ask Mr Dehal to amplify or to alter it.  Then the second point, the client provide the victim's legal representative and the Committee with copies of the document described as the and I set out the quote, as referred to in paragraph 9(b)(iii) in his application and mentions in paragraph 1.17 above.   
	The third one is an objection to the transcript and whatever is referred therein, being used in cross-examination.  At that stage, since we both are reserving our rights to reply, I think I might ask Mr Dehal if there is anything that he would like to add to make sure that we are focused as to what objection is before us.