UNKNOWN
Might I just draw two things to your attention, one in relation to Mr Martini filing the subsequent Heads.  If I can make the prognosis as to what you're likely to find in there and maybe set out an in principle objection in advance.  If what Mr Martini's going to do is go trawling through the evidence of Mr Barnard with a view to saying:  "Here are the following contradictions, all of which I could have put to this witness, but I never did", then we object in advance to the Committee being called upon to make a finding on the basis of ex post facto cross-examination by a lawyer by reference to a record in relation to a version that was never put.  That can't ever be the basis on which one makes a finding.