ADV TEE
Necessarily on the same basis that he has changed what originally happened and in essence his evidence is unreliable by virtue of the series of events that he has gone through.  First he pleads not guilty then guilty.  Then his guilty plea in mitigation is not quite the same as his evidence in his, in the trial, it is not quite the same as his evidence before this Committee.  He is not reliable where he denies that.  Joe Nkuna is quite clear about it.  What is significant as well about Skosana's evidence, not only does he meet Solly, but he has also met other Comrades and on two occasions he mentions the other Comrades, but you do not really know who they are.
	Now, even if, and one is trying to argue a reconciliation of the versions so that in fact all applicants versions can be accepted if one looks at what could possibly have happened.  Nkuna is absolutely sure he got the order from two people, but it is possible, it is possible that in fact when he says he got the order from two people he is wrong, because he is making an assumption.  He gets the order from Solly, but because the two have arrived together and the order is not contradicted by Derick Skosana he in his mind accepts it is an order from both.  Therefore the versions are, in fact, seemingly to compete, but capable of reconciliation, but what there is nothing to gainsay is the fact that Solly, according to Nkuna, was definitely a member of military intelligence and there is something to gainsay that Skosana is, because he denied it himself, but that is not Nkuna's version and there is a conflict which will have to be resolved as the Committee sees fit.