MR MARTINI
...(indistinct - no microphone)	Another error, Chairperson, page 33 ...(indistinct - no microphone) this was confirmed by Mr Alexander, I want to make it very clear that this witness in the forthcoming elections ...(inaudible).  It's a new sentence:  "This was confirmed by Mr Alexander".  This should in fact refer to the forthcoming elections.  So if you want to add on a longer sentence, it would say:  "The disruption of the forthcoming elections was confirmed by Mr Alexander".  In other words, Chairperson, I do not want it to be taken that Mr Alexander confirmed that the Kewtown Youth Movement were involved in bombings.  There was evidence but it wasn't his confirmation.
	And another issue that I needed to clarify as well in my Heads, which actually deals with the Tutu incident, but just to correct it, the evidence wasn't of Region 6, I've raised this earlier in argument, it's Region 9.  Region 7 I think I referred to in here, it should be Region 9, Chairperson.  Page 29, I think it would be, yes the last sentence there Chairperson, if we can make this amendment, to Region 9 and just to make it clear I want to add in the words "and possibly Mr Luitingh could also have told".  So that in my mind I appreciate, I understand what I'm saying there, but others might read it differently.  Region is incorrect, that's an error, that should have been 9.  "Mr Luitingh could have told", Chairperson.  Thank you, Chairperson.