CHAIRPERSON
That's another matter.   If your case is that the murder that he committed was a result of avenging the killing of his mother, it's totally another matter, but to suggest that in defending, as he says, in defending the community to which he was attached is in contradiction to what he says today, that he was acting in terms of an order, which order was in line with defending that community, then that's another matter.   It's not as destructive as you suggest.   But if your line of questioning is based on a possible revenge, so be it, and then you're allowed to proceed.