MR BERGER
Thank you Chairperson.  Chairperson, we've put the documents into a new bundle which we've called bundle "D" and we've numbered it through from page 1 through to page 53.
	What the bundle seeks to do is to put the ballistics evidence which was led at the inquest, and which is not disputed by any of the parties, before the Committee so that the evidence which has been led and further evidence which may be led can be seen in its context.  The memorandum itself, Chairperson, is very short, it runs for the first six pages.  In going through the memorandum I will refer the Committee to the various annexures and I will just highlight the various parts of those annexures to help the Committee read through the memorandum.  I'm not going to go through each annexure in detail.
	What we say in the memorandum is that the ballistics evidence essentially falls into two categories.  The first category concerns the observations of the experts at Shell House and Lancet Hall and the conclusions drawn from those observations.  The second part concerns the exhibits which were picked up, seized by the Police immediately after the shooting at Shell House, which were analyzed by Superintendent Du Plessis, and as a result of his analysis certain conclusions can be drawn.
	I deal firstly with the observations at Shell House.  Superintendent Du Plessis conducted an investigation at Shell House on the day after the incident, the 29th of March.  His report is contained in a document called Exhibit "Y2", and that's already been shown to the Committee, you will recall photographs of King George Street and the Woburn Pharmacy and the Cobbler's shop and all of that, that is the Exhibit "Y2" that ...(intervention)