CHAIRPERSON
I am not sure I understand you, but I understand the rulings which was made by the Committee.  In fact, the full Committee a long time ago was that implicated people do not have an automatic right of cross-examination and whether or not, in a particular case, they should enjoy such a right will depend on the circumstances of each case and if granted such a right, it will be enjoyed to a certain extent.  Now, I do not think the sitting in Bloemfontein could have set a new ruling which over, could have overridden the previous one, but if you are talking about this particular case whether, if what you want to know is whether, simply because the Committee in Bloemfontein had said that people would cross-examine, we are today duty bound to say to those people, well, look in Bloemfontein a ruling was made that implicated people could cross-examine and we, you must therefore, in line with that ruling in Bloemfontein, ruling in inverted commas, you are entitled to cross-examine. I do not think that that would be the case.  I do not think a previous, you see the truth of the matter is that whether or not a right of cross-examination can be enjoyed in a particular case would depend on circumstances of that particular case.  So, you cannot make that a ruling before  you are aware of the circumstances of the case and make it in advance.