CHAIRPERSON
I think we must distinguish between points for argument which you can argue at the end after the evidence, and leading evidence and not interrupt the flow of evidence with arguments and start being engaged in arguments about that.
	I'm not so sure - even on that argument of yours, I'm not so sure whether you're right in saying so you know.  I'm not so sure whether we are on the same wavelength as to the purpose of the: "Green Book" because as I understood the situation yesterday, the purpose of the "Green Book" was not to try and show that this incident was listed, that was not the purpose for which it was referred to.