UNKNOWN
Chairman, once again, and I have attempted to explain it as such, it depends on what 
their perceptions were, in the mind of the person who was involved.  Against the background of all the 
circumstances which prevailed at the time certain Acts which did take place with the permission of the 
government and also certain utterances which may have been made by members of the previous regime. I 
would like to answer that by saying that if a person was to judge it objectively, then it definitely did not 
bear that approval.  If one was to look at it subjectively from the point of view of the person who 
committed the act, my opinion would be that that person believed that in the light of other similar instances 
could be regarded in a similar light that he was still busy acting within the permission, so there was implied 
permission granted although there was not expressed permission granted.