MR LAX
Except to say this, that Mnini Dlamini wasn't viewed in that light, he was a fellow SDU Commander from a different area, he made it clear, and there were no consequences in that, although he didn't address us on that issue.
	Simply put, if he knew that there was nothing that he could do to stop Pat from going on this attack, then his pointing out doesn't amount to anything.  Pat was determined to go on it, that was his evidence.  He said there was nothing I could have done to stop him, plus I was afraid of being pointed out and to use the colloquial term, in essence he would have been regarded as a traitor if he hadn't supplied the information, to put it as bluntly as that.
	The second aspect is the question of the policy.  He is seeking amnesty for his role in an attack which was against policy.  We heard that yesterday.
	Attacks were only permissible where you could pinpoint the precise individuals, but random hitting of areas, and it is patently clear that it was a random hit, it wasn't a hit on specific individuals, that much is clear from his evidence, that is not within the bounds of the ANC's broad policy.
	It is not even in the bounds of a preemptive hit, because you don't know who you are going to hit.  How do we then get around what political object is there, and is it proportional and proximate, and all that sort of thing?  If we get into that debate?