CHAIRPERSON
But if their version directly contradict each other, and the way I understand the evidence and in this particular evidence, as to what had happened at Devon, then there is only one version that could be the truth.  We cannot accept both versions as the truth.
	Either they wouldn't have reconnoitred or they would have reconnoitred.  The first applicant said that they had to shoot for propaganda, the other said, we wouldn't, so it is a very pertinent question which I am asking you.  What is your submission where it comes to a direct contradiction between the first applicant's version and your clients' version.
	Is it your submission that your clients' version should be accepted as probably truthful?