CHAIRPERSON
Then all he's doing is he's referring to what you said in your first application.  This is the application that was filled in by this Ms Colleen Henchie, and she's reading from page 10 of the papers.  It appears in paragraph 9(a)(iv), and I'll read the exact words contained in your own application.  They read as follows
"...I feared for my life.  I grabbed my AK-47 which I had always had yet never used before.  I made for the direction of the river, as I knew that should I be able to cross I would be safe."
And then you carry on and tell the story.  Now, Mr Cachalia is saying, in Court you denied having had or used an AK-47, yet in your first application, which is also not, on your own admission, a truthful version, you admit to having had an AK-47, and then later you admit to using it, because later on in that same paragraph you say:
"...I feared for my life and then shot at them with my AK."
Now what Mr Cachalia is asking you, is why put that admission into your first application, if it's not the truth?