MR VISSER
Well, if he is here, I would be surprised to hear.  I was looking up everybody I could find.
	At page 180 we find the following, it says under "Conclusions - Discussions and Conclusions", 
"... this chapter presents an analysis of the relationship between the landmarks on the face (which you have been talking about) and corresponding locations on radiography of the skull."
and he says this, he says -
"... four groups of standards, using a total of 58 examining targets have been established for identifying a skull by superimposition.  These include eight targets for the examining lines, nine for contour curve (I think which is what you have referred to), 13 for soft tissue thickness, and 28 for the relevant relationships of the landmarks."
Would that be an over-kill or would you say that would be what is necessary to do?