ADV PRIOR
Mr Chairman, at page 63 of the bundle Mr Justice Liebenberg sets out the detail of the plea explanation and it related to all the counts as I understood, that it was Nahoon, Da Gama and the Highgate as well as the various counts of robbery where the vehicles were highjacked before the attacks as well as the possession of the firearm.
	I do have the record of that trial present, I haven't put it up as a bundle because it was bulky.  If the Committee at any stage wishes to refer to the ipsissima of the trial, I do have that available for the Committee.  
	But it's a general question, that a plea explanation was put on behalf of Mr Ncamazana, that he was, throughout those incident set out in the indictment, it was against his will as if were.  He was under a form of duress, he feared that if he didn't go along with the others he may have been killed or injured.  Could he respond possibly to that?