CHAIRPERSON
I see there is the Logistics Officer.  You needn't clarify, I don't think.  Perhaps we can sort this out during the tea break.  Just one point, Mr McBride, you are talking in your statement of what you have to, what you require to prove or not.  This is not really a question of proving like in a court case.  What is required here is for us to receive your evidence, and then to determine in terms of the criteria contained in the Act, whether what you have told us, suffices to make a decision on your applications in so far as the incidents in which you, for which you apply for amnesty.  The main criteria, and there are various other criteria which Mr Dehal knows is that whether your actions at all times in respect of each of the incidents, were performed in furtherance of a political objective, committed during the conflict of the past and secondly whether there has been a full disclosure in our view as to what role you played in respect of each of the incidents.   Whether a victim, any victim in any amnesty application is opposing or not opposing, does not really have a major impact in regard to the satisfaction by the applicant of those criteria contained in the Act.