CHAIRPERSON
But you seem to miss my point.  The position is that you must lead your witness on whatever.  Strictly speaking you should be leading him on the offences for which he applies, or has applied, timeously and properly for amnesty.
	In an attempt to do so, we ask what he is applying for and we got a long list of offences.  Most, at least half of them, don't fall in our view, within the ambit of any offence mentioned in the application. 
	Further to that, you ask for a postponement for the purposes of giving out the necessary notices.  The necessary notice must be based on the application.  How are we, or the TRC, going to identify those people who deserve notices, or who are entitled to notices?  It is not here?