ADV SANDI
Sorry Mr Hattingh, can I interrupt you for a moment.  Would it not be correct to say that perhaps what the lawmaker intended to do, is to introduce what one would call a stigmatising provision in the Act, in other words one can have a situation where the conduct of the applicant on the face of it, was politically motivated and there is no question about full disclosure, but the moment you have this element of personal gain, does it not mean that one does not even have to begin to exercise his mind as to whether the requirements of the Act have been complied with?  Is it not the end of the matter the moment you have this element of personal gain creeping in?