ADV STEENKAMP
Mr Chairperson my view is, and my only view, it's only my personal view, is that the evidence as it stands is uncontested.  Regarding the requirements of Section 20 as stipulated in the Act, the only basic requirements is to have a political motivation and furthermore to make a full disclosure.  The bomb blasts, the pile-ons and further on, the police officer they actually caught actually supported the evidence in that regard as far as I'm concerned.  He indicated that they were used; they knew that targets were like pile-ons and throw-away stations ...(indistinct).  So in actual fact the witness that was called by myself is actually supporting that evidence.  Nothing else except if you want to ask me anything else Mr Chairperson.  Thank you Sir.