GEORGE BIZOS
Mr Chairman, although they are not our witnesses in the strict sense of the word, we have asked for Mr Visser to be made available for examination.  If our memory serves us correctly he was warned to be here today.  He is not.  I am informed by Mr Mpshe that he has spoken to him and that he has undertaken to be here tomorrow morning.
	Also Mr Chairman, on the evidence appearing in Mr Visser's application for amnesty, it would appear that a Mr Clark has some information relating to the matter.  You will remember Mr Chairman this is a person who frequented the Derby-Lewis' home apparently, so it is said, for the purposes of looking after Mrs Derby-Lewis' computer.  If Mr Visser's information is correct, we may ask you do different inferences and it may be necessary to examine Mr Clarke.  He has proved to be an elusive person to find but counsel for the second applicant informed me during the luncheon adjournment that they have managed to establish contact with him and that he too will be here tomorrow morning.  We would submit that these two witnesses ought to appear arising out of information which the Commission itself had for examination.  It's no fault of ours that they are not here today but it would appear Mr Chairman that the Commission may be constrained to adjourn the proceedings until tomorrow morning.