CHAIRPERSON
Yes.  Yes I'm not specifically calling on any of the other parties, but if you wish to raise something you are free to do so, because it's not apparent at this stage whether this concerns any of your clients or any of the interests that you represent.  There are no details before us at this stage about this, but you are free to raise any issue that you want to raise in regard to this extension.
R U L I N G
	In regard to the formal amendments, those are granted.  They have been detailed by Mr Lubbe.  In regard to the extension of the period which this application covers, or let me put it this way, the period in respect of which the applicant wishes to apply for amnesty, that appears to us to be a substantive issue, a substantive application, which would need full motivation, it will have to be a formal application which is submitted to the Committee, to deal with.  	Sitting here as we are at this stage, we are operating under unfortunate restraints, time restraints and otherwise.  We have a number of interested parties who are attending the hearing in respect of the incidents which are properly before us at this stage.  We regard it as not being in the interest of justice to fully deal with this issue that was raised in the application for amendment, and therefore we will grant the applicant an opportunity to submit a substantive application to the Committee, fully motivated, on affidavit, and for that application to be considered and dealt with by the Committee at a more appropriate stage and at a time when the further incidents which the applicant wishes to introduce, can be considered and investigated and a proper and better view, better informed view, to be formed in regard to those issues.
	So the application in regard to the extension of the date is then dealt with on that basis, so that the nett result of that ruling is that what we will be dealing with in this session are the incidents which are properly identified in terms of paragraph 9(a)(i) of the application form on page 3 of the bundle of documents before us, read with the supplementary affidavit dated the 4th of May 2000.  In fact, we will mark the supplementary affidavit Exhibit A, for the purposes of the record.