MR NEMANE
Mr Chairman, the theory that I am pursuing is that many items were removed from Mr Venter's house, and the applicant was found soon after the robbery.  What exhibits were found on him, found in his possession, should have been brought to court, and he has said that only one exhibit was brought to court and that is the watch.  I seek to submit later that it tends to corroborate his version that he was not involved in the operation alone and that he was working in conjunction with other people, who were policemen and those people were not arrested and no investigation was directed towards them and hence we do not find these exhibits in court.