MR LAX
The simple question I'm putting to you is based on this assumption.  Either you obeyed orders or you exercised your own discretion.  If you exercised your own discretion as you say you would have done because you're then challenging the very thesis of the instruction.  You know, either it's not for you to reason why or but for you to do and die, or it is for you to reason why in which case in the very basis upon which your reasoning works is challengeable by everybody present in the sense that we need to then examine what your thought process was and why you arrived to certain conclusions in which case it's also logical that to simply rely on person X being identified as a target isn't good enough, if you follow the logic?