CHAIRPERSON
I think, Mr Hugo, that is what Adv De Jager put to you earlier on before tea time, he said put your client's version to this witness and you would be surprised to find that the witness does not dispute your client's version.
	You start first by cross-examining, spending a lot of time on concentrating on cross-examining the witness only to find that possibly in the end, after all, that is the common version.  Shouldn't you rather concentrate on putting to the witness your client's version, let's see where he disagrees with you before we spend a lot of time on cross-examination?