CHAIRPERSON
Before you proceed, Mr Sardiwalla, just to expedite these proceedings so that we don't have to come back as a Committee to ask questions of clarity, you might as well try and interject, which is quite an uncomfortable position for you but maybe it will also afford you an opportunity to try and do whatever damage might be done by your client whilst he's still giving his evidence in chief.  Your paragraph 6.14 speaks of Saul Mkhize, Khumbu Shangase, Sishe Madlala and the applicant as having been deployed to ambush the vehicle at the meeting of the 1st of March 1993.  My concern, I hope you will appreciate, is the fact that the evidence that we have thus far, is that nobody deployed them to ambush the vehicle, that they themselves volunteered to do this aside.  Now we have no evidence whether this was taken back to the meeting and the meeting then confirmed that since you have volunteered you may proceed.  How, in what context is this word deployed used having regard to the viva voce evidence of Mr Zulu?