MR KOOPEDI
Well, I am referring to that matter, for a number of issues raised in the matter.   One of the issues in that matter was that someone was being called an informer, and on the basis of that assumption that someone could have been an informer, the applicant, the first applicant in that matter, ordered that these people or this person, be attacked.
	I am also referring to this application in terms of saying it was not clear as to what motivated that applicant to issue the order, and one may only suspect that there were other reasons, personal reasons, but as that Honourable Committee found, a decision could not be based on suspicions.  It could not be based on the fact that it is not clear as to what motivated this.
	It is on those basis that I refer to that decision.  Thank you.