GEORGE BIZOS
Mr Chairman, I am rather concerned that this 
evidence has been in the possession of the applicants and their 
legal representatives over this long period of time.  I have no 
objection of them being put in as exhibits, but I submit that if 
there is anything specific which the applicants want to draw 
attention to, they must of necessity do so, they cannot put an 
onus on the Committee or on us, to say well, you know there 
maybe something there which was not referred to them in 
argument, that we've had no opportunity of checking whether it 
was there originally and without our being given an opportunity 
to make any submission in relation to it.
	That doesn't mean that I am objecting that they should go in 
as an exhibit, on the other hand, we cannot have a carte blanche 
that, or put an onus on the Committee to spend some 60 hours 
viewing things in order to try and pick something up either for 
the applicants or against the applicants.
	It is a task which I submit that the Committee cannot be 
asked to undertake.  If the applicants say that in tape number so 
and so, this is what appears and we ask you to take it into 
consideration, then we can deal with it.
	We can't leave it as a loose matter, it is no different to a 1 
000 page document, to say I hand it in but somehow or other 
there may be something in it that somebody may take into 
consideration at some time or another, it is not the way to run a 
case.