MR WESSELS
No, not in that sense.  He must come and he must place facts before you to indicate full disclosure, but if there is a suggestion that for instance, like in this case there was "you didn't make full disclosure because there were nails attached to the bomb", then that should be put to him so that he can deal with that aspect and point out what the probabilities are or call evidence or whatever to do that.  But it's not good to say just go through it and then at a later stage put a trap there and say: "I've got a witness here who puts a totally different set of facts before you and now from this it appears that you didn't make full disclosure" ...(intervention)