CHAIRPERSON
But that was a specific instruction with regard to a specific target, and a lot of people were killed.  It may be that the objective envisioned namely to create fear or to break down morality or whatever the case might have been, may have been close enough to the action involved.
	But let us take this case if you are looking at the element of proportionality.  Your client stormed into the guard house and shot according to all versions, an innocent young man who was doing his work.
	At best for your client, he took one side arm and they disassembled it and threw it away in a dam, somebody was killed.  Somebody was killed for the sake of this firearm that was now thrown into the dam.  How does one arrive at the proportionality?  How much worth was attached to that person's life under those circumstances?