MR STEWART
Thank you Ms Committee Member, indeed that then is the end of it on that point.
The next area which is the one where there is some more difficulty perhaps, is in the area of random attacks, so called random attacks to call this terror.  And one had for example the Clewer(?) incident, where Luthuli and others were travelling in a car, some pedestrians said something insulting about Inkatha recognising the car, and that knowing that it was a car associated with Mr Jamile, and consequently Inkatha, and they stopped, and on Luthuli's instructions they went and they fired into the pedestrians.  That was one of the so called random attacks one might refer to.  The others being, perhaps falling into the next category, but these categories overlap very much, is into the area clearances of identifying a particular area as an ANC area and then going and burning houses, firing on people, and so on, in those areas.  And I've already addressed, to an extent, the background to that, but what I've sought to do as well is to identify specific motives, or rather objectives, in those attacks, and these objectives emerge from the explanations given about those attacks in the evidence before the Committee.  And I've set them out here, I mean the first one is, this is on page 20, is the objection of creating terror in ANC areas thereby making political organisation there difficult and dangerous, making people scared to live in those areas.  That obviously supports an IFP cause at the time.
	Secondly that demonstrating that those areas are vulnerable.  Thirdly demonstrating that the ANC to be incapable of defending its people in those areas.  Fourthly demonstrating the continued resilience and strength of Inkatha.  And fifthly making it very risky for people to support the ANC or UDF or to live in areas where there were many supporters of the ANC.
...(intervention)