MR TERRE'BLANCHE
Mr Chairman, may I just at this stage, because I don't know what the proceedings are going to be like, mention that in all three of these cases there never were any gross human rights violations.  If I could just refer back to the tarring and feathering situation again during which an historian was tarred and feathered.  I would just like to mention that often, especially with regard to the statement being read here yesterday, quite often people stand outside of politics in a specific career, but because of their knowledge and the opportunity play a large political role and could move political thinking in a certain direction.  Churches do the same as well as historians.  Professor Heyns, because of standpoints he took, gave a specific direction to politics and played a large role to the extent that everything points to the fact that it was political activists who also killed the professor.
	I would like to mention those two cases and I would immediately like to add that it was not the style of the AWB to, either within the act of politics or those people getting direction in politics, to kill those people or to in any way harm them bodily.  The furtherest the movement went in our case was to tar and feather the person without there ever being an intention of doing bodily harm to him.
	Coming to the Ventersdorp situation, I would also like to have something to say on that.  I thank you for your patience Mr Chairman.