SISI KHAMPEPE
Now you have also testified that you did not advise Mr Van der Merwe, nor Mr Coetsee of the fact that you had assigned Mr Swarts to investigate the matter in which he already had been a participant which investigation would then make him both participant and the referee. You then proceeded to state that you however had a perfectly good reason why you had assigned the task of investigation to Mr Swarts.  What I want to find out from you, Mr Erwee, is why did you not advise your superiors if you had a perfectly good reason why Mr Swarts had to be assigned to this investigation? Were you scared that if you had advised them something might be discovered which you didn't want them to find out?