MR DORFLING
Maybe I am not expressing myself well. What I am trying to convey is the version put forward at the time of the inquest that there were shots fired at the security guards downstairs which was the gist of this witness' evidence. He perceived there to be or not perceived, he saw shots being fired at the guards downstairs. And that was one of the reasons why he retaliated. The objective evidence has now shown that there is no proof of that fact being in existence on the day of any such shots having been fired at the direction of the marchers. The witness now gives an explanation. He says there was a lot of firing. There was firing emanating from the crowd and I perceived that, that might have been the position. In other words he is now backing down on the very strong position he put forward at the inquest court because he can't find any support for that proposition in the ballistic evidence. That is the proposition I am putting forward.