MR WILKINSON
If that's your approach Sir, certainly.  I just wanted to emphasize that they're not requirements.  The legislator could have used the words, "the Committee must" and then refer them to the criteria.  They could have made them obligatory - absolute - but my submission is that these are at the end of the day, criteria and the absence of one should not cause an application to fail.
	And then I want to refer you to this - I don't unfortunately have copies of this.  29th of March 1991, the third applicant says on the front page, "I'm sorry" and there's a long account of what he did.  And more specifically - now this is addressed to the victims who've testified today:
"Unfortunately, there are certain things in life you can't make right.  Words and apologies can't make it right.  Even if I get the death sentence, it won't bring back the fathers and husband's of those people.  It won't and that is what I regret the most".
So to my colleague, five years ago there was an apology.  You're right to mention it's not a requirement to apologise but this has in any case been done five years ago.  That's all Sir.