CHAIRPERSON
...[inaudible] that accused number 2 co-operated with them after his arrest, not only in connection with this incident but a number of other incidents and quite clearly, if there was this complete frankness, Major Hugo would have investigated the political implications and if the applicants had not been telling the truth that evidence would have been disclosed to the court and it wasn't.  So as I understand the reading of this, the prosecution excepted the fact that this was political.
	I may say one of the few cases that have come before us where the applicants had at their trial raised the political angle.  Mostly because the trials took place some time ago there was a strong denial that it was political, but in this case the issue was raised and was apparently never contested.  Do you agree with that?