MR DORFLING
Could we lastly turn to paragraph 54 at page 25 of the Goldstone Submissions?  It relates to the security guards positioned on the parapet at the time of the main shooting and it relates to whether any of them could have injured any of the marchers in what is referred to here as a retaliation.  I'm specifically interested in the last sentence and it pertains to the guards on the parapet as I've said, it states "they are not likely to have injured anyone because of the difficult angle they were firing from as they were taking cover behind the parapet.  Do you agree with me that that is an untruth, the evidence from the Shell House inquest shows exactly the opposite?