ADV DE JAGER
He was entitled to come and cross-examine your client, and the converse is also true.  He may implicate your client even in cases which your client hasn't mentioned at all and you and your client therefore have an interest in his application but it's for you to decide whether you want to attend his application and the hearings in that regard.  Maybe that he will give evidence which is directly in conflict with your client's evidence.  So your client has an interest in his case but you must decide whether you will come and protect that interest.