MR MBANDAZAYO
Thank you, Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, my submission is that the Committee should take the evidence and the application all as a whole in totality, and take them into account, all of them.  And taking into account the circumstances under which the application form was filled, and also to take into account that the applicant, at the time he was filling the application was not legally represented, in that sense somebody who understands the contents of the application form, what is required in the application forms.
	When taking his testimony, that the Committee should take into account that it had an opportunity this time when he was giving an oral testimony under oath to question him on some of these aspects regarding the application and also regarding his testimony.  And that should be taken all in totality when deciding the matter.  And also, Mr Chairman, that the shortcomings of the applicant most of the time, as it appear in the - he was honest, Mr Chairman, that although he did not refer to him personally, that most of the time as how I interpreted, I may be wrong, Mr Chairman, that though somebody will find him that he goes up to standard  10, it's not necessarily because it reflects his ability, sometimes it's because he managed to get in that high standard, if I interpret it, in an improper manner.  It's not necessarily that it was his ability to go there.  That's how I interpreted that.  
	So, the Committee should take into account that, you know, somebody who is going to say look, though he did not say it in many words, "That you must understand that it's not necessarily that it was because of my ability that I managed to get to that standard".  So, we have those problems, Mr Chairman, and I want the Committee to take those into account.  Thank you.