MR MBANDAZAYO
Yes Mr Chairperson, that's what I want to read
"During a trial within a trial the version of accused number three who was Kopane in the trial was put to the"
I take it was the investigating officer or policeman involved that he alleged that - then I'll read as it is in the judgment:
"The version of accused number three was put to Tiedt which was broadly that certain threats were made to accused number three and in particular that accused number three was a member of APLA that he would be held in terms of Section 29 and would not see his family and that accused three had the option either to testify against Monde or if he failed to do so Monde would be killed."
Did you at any stage hear that during the trial?