MR PRETORIUS
I'm quoting for you from page 2710 of the previous record, Mr Kruser.  You are being examined by Judge Nugent at this stage.  You were asked:  "So what you said in these statements, these three statements, is the following
1.  No record was kept in the firearm register.
2. In your second statement, I have no recollection of details concerning to whom firearms were issued.
3. If I look at the firearm register, they will not assist me to find out to whom I issued weapons."
	Your reply was:  "That is correct."
	So you were referred to three different statements you made under three different occasions under oath.
	It then proceeds:  "And all of that is untrue?"
	Your reply was:  "Yes."
	Now just to place the Chairman and Honourable Committee Members in the picture, at that stage the firearm register was presented and from the firearm register it in fact appeared that this witness did write in the names of certain people who he issued firearms to and what firearms he issued to them.  In all three the previous statements that Judge Nugent referred to here - he referred to untruthful statements made by this witness concerning that particular firearm register and this witness then replied when he was referred to the three statements that he made "and all of that is untrue?" and his reply was "Yes."  Is that correct Mr Kruser?