MR MALAN
May I pursue that too, because I really have difficulty with this line.  What is very clear from Mr Rosslee's statement, both in his application and in his Section 204 statement, is his recollection of two persons who were the targets of assassinations, at least two, in one he says two or three, but two we go by the application.
	Secondly, it is very clear that the individual was interrogated.  Thirdly he remembers the reason, the purpose of the interrogation which concerned the second person in his mind, which was also targeted and he referred to some other information that we will get to later, Mr Visser.
	Now you happen to have heard some of your fellow applicants on this incident, they deny interrogation.  Suddenly now, you are quite happy to accept that you again are remembering that something did not take place.  I am overstating it, but why would you switch?  Is it simply to protect or assist your fellow applicants?