UNKNOWN
Thank you.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.
	Then, Mr Chairman, my conclusion that Section 2)(2)(a), (b), (c), (d) actually does not qualify or the applicants do not qualify or do not satisfy.
	Then we move to Section 20(3).  That deals actually with the criteria to be considered when applications of this nature are made.   I will deal with them seriatim as they appear on the Act, (a) up to the last alphabet.
	(a), Mr Chairman, is about the motive.  I want to state to this honourable Committee that the motive for the death or the motive for the killing of the deceased was to cover up the applicant's bad deeds.  To conceal the torture and extreme assault on the deceased.  There was no, at any moment, there was no desire to change any unjust situation.  There was no desire on their part to bring about any political change whatsoever, and no evidence was ever tendered that when they did what they did, it was their desire.  But one can safely say that the killing came as a result of the anger and that is all.  The killing didn't come because they wanted to change the political situation or they wanted to change any unjust situation that prevailed.  But it emanated from the anger, human anger.
	Mr Chairman, for us to determine exactly what we are talking about when we speak of political objective, criteria has been laid down and I want to state to the Committee that the following are to be looked at in order to assist in the ascertainment of political objective.
 	These are.  One, use should be made of the evidence at the trial.  We have the copy of the judgment in the criminal trial.  Right through the judgment, mention is not made of any political objectives sought to be achieved by the applicants.  The applicants went as far as petitioning the Chief Justice and when one reads through that petition, the petition is clearly on the merits, strictly on the criminal aspects. Further in that petition no mention is made.