UNKNOWN
The top of 66 yes.  The bottom on 64 to the top of 66.  What you did say is that you didn't know about the CCB and you would have to be informed, that you would not make a general ruling, but that you would deal with specific questions.  That is the main ruling.  There is another ruling to which a specific objection was upheld by, made by Mr Wessels which appears on page 107 and 108 in which three cases were mentioned, that you will not be making findings in relation to those three matters by way of example, but what you did say in your original statement was that when objections were made, we would deal with it.
	Now what I want to say is that when the evidence of Mr Barnard was led, there was no objection to its evidence being received because instead he was cross-examined at some length if I remember correctly and there is no ruling that you could not or would not take that into account.  That's all I wish to say Mr Chairman and not argue it any further.