ADV DE JAGER
Ja, Mr Zilwa, Section 22(a) deals with the status of the applicant, whether he would qualify as an applicant, that's the only thing that 22(a) is dealing with and on the evidence before us, he was a supporter of a publicly known political organisation.  He was involved in the struggle of the past so as a person, he could apply, he qualifies as an applicant.
	Now Section 22 (iii) deals with whether such a person, even if you're a members, even if you're a supporter, deals with whether you acted with a political motivation or an act associated with it, that deals with the act.  So if we divide the two things, we've got the person now and now we're proceeding to the act and sees whether he's qualifying.  As far as the person is concerned, I think he would fall within the ambit of the description of or the definition of 22(a).  I may be that he did not act on behalf of the movement but according to his evidence, he acted in support of the movement.  Now you could you act in support of a movement if you're acting contrary to the policy of the movement?  Isn't that the only issue in this as far as this is concerned?