MR STEWART
Thank you Ms Committee Member.  Indeed, that is the starting point, insofar as any of the other documentary  reference are concerned, those are only corroboratory, and that, but that they are public documents and in that sense can be placed before you.  The other amnesty decisions and the decision of Mr Justice Hurt and so on.  But in Zazi Khuzwayo's case, yes indeed the evidence before the Committee is that he was a prominent political leader in Claremont.  The problem that he represented for the IFP is that he was resisting, or leading the resistance to the incorporation of Claremont into KwaZulu and played a prominent role in that respect, and he was clearly a political opponent of Mr Jamile and indeed of the IFP in the area as a whole.  And the IFP was weak in Claremont at the time.  We know that from the evidence of Mr Luthuli and Mr Khumalo who was also involved in that hit.
	But in any event, even if Jamile's motives were that Mr Khuzwayo was a business opponent and should be eliminated on that basis, there's no suggestion that in the minds of Luthuli and Khumalo, who were involved in this murder, that they thought that their involvement was on the basis of him being a business opponent to Jamile.  They thought that they were pursuing a political hit against a prominent ANC or UDF community leader, and that's what they were involved with.  And the same goes, my submission, in the case of Pearl Tshabalala, notwithstanding that she was a business person in Claremont.  She was clearly a leading political figure in Claremont, and a political figure in the opposition, and there's certainly no evidence before the Committee to suggest that her businesses were the same of Jamile's and that they were in conflict in some way, or in opposition to one another in any way, in fact and very similar explanations in respect of each of the other targeted assassinations that I've referred to.