CHAIRPERSON
Are you quite finished now?  I don't know if you listened to me.  I don't know if you've acquainted yourself with the law.  I'm going to put it as simplistic as I can.  If he's not guilty then he can't get amnesty because it's pointless making an application for amnesty for something that you're not guilty of.  If he's guilty then he can make an application for amnesty, for which amnesty can be granted subject to the conditions as described by the Act.
	We have to accept that he's guilty in the first place.  If he comes to tell us he acted in self-defence or in defence of others, then we can't assume guilt and therefore it follows that he can't be granted amnesty for something he's not guilty of.  Now he's got to make up his mind.
	Lastly, I'm going to point out to you, that this process is not intended to be used as a mechanism to avoid prosecution.  The underlying spirit of this process is to tell the truth and reconcile with the victims and perhaps reconcile with oneself.  
	So he has got to make up his mind whether he wants to make the application or not.  In view of what you've told us it's going to be difficult for him to change his mind or his story.