CHAIRPERSON
I think you will be stretching it further, if you had to include the R50-00.  I think it is something that happened on the spur of the moment.  It was decided there and then when they recognised that the person who was driving the kombi, is the same person that they had, they thought was responsible for the shooting on the 25th of January.
	It was a spur of the moment thing, I wouldn't call that planning and the way I understood Mr Selahle's evidence was the other way around.  If there was any planning, the planning took place immediately after the 25th of January and definitely preceded the identification of Mr Mkhabela by Titus.  If you could allude to a plan, you could allude to a plan before the second sighting of Mr Mkhabela by Titus because the evidence of Selahle is that after they had witnessed the running into the hostel of the three men, who were armed with AK47's, they went to the scene, spoke to people who gave an explanation and from which it could then be deduced that the three persons they had seen running into the hostel, must be responsible for the shooting.
	They then went back and that is when they decided that they will have to get to the whereabouts of the three persons, with a view of making sure that they get, they got eliminated and he kept on using the word accosting and I had to get clarity on what he meant by the use of the word accosting.
	If there was any plan, if you want to put in any plan, I think that plan could be put in respect of the facts as I had described, which emanated from Mr Selahle's evidence, which definitely precedes the identification of Mr Mkhabela at a factory, by one Titus.