UNKNOWN
Which differed.  Van Zyl in fact instructed to establish suitable method to assassinate Omar who had already been selected as a target.  The information received about Omar could not be placed before a court and accordingly it was for this reason that the extra legal methods had to be resorted to.
	Now in paragraph 24, Mr Chairperson, we submit that the applicant, besides Barnard, either falsely denied participation and/or falsely denied knowledge of certain further acts prepared by the CCB involving the actual assassination or the planned assassination of persons which with a similar profile to Omar, we will develop that argument. But may I ask you to merely note against paragraph 24, A92 to 108.  
	Perhaps this is a convenient stage for me to place on record, Mr Chairperson, Minister Omar or Dullah Omar's attitude and our instructions in relation to the matter of his attempted assassination, we are instructed to place on record the following, Mr Chairperson, that Mr Omar accepts without reservation that Mr Barnard made full disclosure in relation to the attempted killing of himself.  He has publicly and wishes to repeat that he forgives Mr Barnard particularly as he, in Mr Omar's belief, has made full disclosure and he has instructed us not to oppose his application for amnesty on this ground of full disclosure.  However, Mr Chairperson, as a person in public life he is concerned that it should not be viewed in the light that the is trying to influence the Committee in relation to either the decision as a whole or the other requirements which Mr Barnard has to satisfy in order to obtain amnesty.  He has left it to our discretion to draw to the attention of the Committee aspects which may not entitle because he is after all part of a group and we cannot be selective in our submissions as to what is a proper finding before this Committee.