UNKNOWN
No, I'm not.
	Now please go to bundle G, page 1868, line 28.  I just want to read you a portion of your evidence there.  You're asked the following:
"In June of '89, did you regard Peaches as a reliable person, on whom you could depend?"
		"Yes, Your Worship, I did regard him as such otherwise I would not have asked him to do the project of Dullah Omar."
And then it said:
"We're talking about June '89."
And then the Judge says to you:
"Yes, but now what happens is three months has already gone by."
And your answer is:
"Your Worship, I still trusted him and in any case I had no-one else that I could use to execute that project for me.  Therefore, yes I regarded him as reliable enough at that stage to execute the project."
And then Mr Ackerman says:
"Is it correct that he misled you at various stages before June 1989?"
And then you say:
"Not that I knew of at that stage.  I only found out that Peaches had misled me when I was detained in February 1990."
Now that statement is untrue, because you could hardly have only discovered this when you were detained in February 1990 if you told Staal Burger on several occasions prior to your detention that you believed that Peaches was unreliable.  Or am I splitting hairs again?