MR DEHAL
I concede Mr Chairperson, there are those difficulties.  The only interpretation I seem to come to is if you add those two comma's, it is probably there where the interpretation ends.  I think if they used the words "in criminal proceedings", without the reference to "in a court of law", then it might have had a wider interpretation in criminal proceedings, perhaps before another Court like the other forums you have referred to, but I think it is confining itself to criminal proceedings in a court of law, and then deals different from that, to proceedings before any other body or institution, indeed.  Mr Chairperson, apart from those submissions, I just want to see very quickly, whether I have anything else to say.  Mr Chairperson, I concede immediately that Judge Pillay's apt recording of the question that this Committee is to rule on, is in fact correct.  Whether this is admissible or can be used, and I submit that is the question to be answered.  My submission is that the legal arguments I have adduced in the Heads of Argument, including the constitutional aspects, deal with this aptly and ought to prevent its inclusion.  I reiterate, all the aspects in the Heads, thank you.