CHAIRPERSON
But, Mr Hattingh, then you presume that there's everything wrong with his testimony and there's everything right with the contents of that document.   On what basis do you say so?   You're putting all your eggs into that basket and saying that what is contained there is rather the truth than anything else.   Surely we must be convinced of the truth of that matter so that it can be compared with what he tells us?   I can't just assume, and none of the Committee members can just assume what is contained in there is the actual truth and therefore he's not making any, or full disclosure?