ADV PRIOR
The impact of his evidence, it's the first occasion that we have a senior member of the APLA command giving evidence which flies in the face of what the applicants have told the Committee.  This letter if one understands the reason for which he's being cross-examined, is obviously to credit.  The inference will be argued that at a stage where he indicated to the Attorney-General that his evidence would destroy the State, will militate against his credibility in this hearing.
	I am not satisfied from what I have been informed by Mr Mbandazayo, and I communicated that to Mr Lax at the tea or just before the tea adjournment, that that serves the interests of justice in this matter.  There may well be, and I believe unless this matter is properly investigated there are underlying and further reasons why this letter was drafted and why this witness confirmed these instructions to his attorney.  
	Mr Mbandazayo indicated this morning when he came and gave an explanation, he said the letter that was submitted to the Attorney-General, it was given for ...(intervention)