CHAIRPERSON
Mr Berger if Mr Visser didn't beat me to it, I would have.  The question was not directed at finding out the definition of a safe house, etc.  The point of the matter is, he was asked about the contents of his statement and he was asked a question about it.  I don't think Mr Visser was correct to stop him and deal with it the way he did, but the fact of the matter is, the bottom line is that the question was not being answered properly and simply.  Now let us stop this niggling asides and let's get down to the business please.  Mr Visser will you continue?