MR LAX
Isn't the argument this, that on one hand if the applicants are relying on an order, and the evidence points to the fact that that order was probably not given based on the fact of all the other surrounding facts.  In other words the probabilities based on the evidence produced by the applicants, in support of the applicants, is that there probably wasn't an order given, or even two orders given, cause if there had been there would have been verification on all those other issues.