MR DU PLESSIS
Mr Chairman, I don't want to get into adebate with that.  I must say, however, as I recall the argumentof the Attorney-General was that if the State witnesses wouldgive evidence his case would be prejudiced.  I don't actuallysee the reason for us going into a debate on that.  I just wantto place on record that I differ from the Attorney-General andthat we still fail to see the difference between any of the Statewitnesses.  If the argument was that the case of the State wouldbe prejudiced that would be the case in respect of all the witnesses. But we will abide by the decision of the Committee and the victimscan testify.