CHAIRPERSON
Just correct me if I'm wrong - sorry, Mr Bizos to interrupt.
	If you've got a file which says, just for instance "Dullah Omar File", it's been decided to monitor Mr Omar and also to kill him, in the file, that is the authorisation given down to the ground, there in the file, then you go to the Harms Commission, but prior to going to the Harms Commission that file is hidden away, right, no-one can have access to it.  Then you go to the Harms Commission and then nothing comes out about the conspiracy, from your evidence, wouldn't you be in a worse position to return that file afterwards?  Wouldn't it be better to destroy that file forever?  Because if it comes back again, then they can see that what you said in the Commission and what is contained in the file is wrong.