MR PRIOR
I'll explain the question again.  I read to you a portion of the Judgement that indicated that the vehicle was obtained by a threat to blow up the house presumably with the hand grenade, if the keys were not handed to you people and later - let me finish, and later a shot was fired by a fourth person standing outside the house.  How do you reconcile that set of facts with what you told the Committee earlier, that you had explained to the occupants of the house that you were freedom fighters and that in fact the vehicle would be used in assisting you pursuing the struggle for liberation?