S R NAIDOO
That's right, yes.  I in fact - as the Commission would read that I actually made a note that
"Please note, the above formula provides not the precise estimation and the actual height calculated may be considered to be inaccurate.  However, the figures do point to a considerably short individual."
You know I think with due respect, you know very much like facial reconstruction and these parameters, what we're doing is giving some guidance and leaning towards a particular area of a person.  It would be certainly incorrect to state that we could calculate a very precise age, or even a reasonably precise age and a weight, a height.
	I would think that - you mentioned 1,49 or 1,5, that would be 8 centimetres.  Yes.  That would naturally be a closer, amount to a closer more probable you know, give you more probability than 1.6.  So I can't say very much more than that, apart from saying that it wouldn't amount to an exclusion.