MR SMUTS
Not if they failed the objective test, Mr Chairman, they need to satisfy the objective test of the first two lines and the subjective test further on.  It may be appropriate at this time to deal with the bona fides in any event, Mr Chairman.
	All the applicants indicated that they were fully aware of the commitment to peace and non-violence of their organisation.  All of the applicants indicated that they were not aware of any change in that policy.  Their reliance for some sort of belief that they were furthering the interests of their organisation is dependant upon a suggestion that this was an act of defence rather than an aggressive act and I've dealt with the credibility of such a proposition.  It was reliant further on their wish to send a message to the authorities that their leaders would not, that they would not tolerate the assassination of their leaders and that change must be brought about.  Contained in this good faith promotion of the interests of their party however, are the facts of what they did.  Their evidence is that the message would not be sent by killing any whites, their message was that it was important to identify whites associated with violence, that would be what would send the message, that would be what would promote the political struggle and ...[intervention]