CHAIRPERSON
Is the real reason for what they did the question of him being found in their view to be an informer, is that the reason or is the real reason the other one, that he and a group a whole lot of others,  who had been entrusting with collecting money for the purchasing of weapons, had despite a Commission of Enquiry failed to disclose to them what had happened to the money?
	Is that the reason why he was killed?  I understand you to lead that they looked upon him as an instrument of the government, as an informer.  Now there is some evidence that their gripe against this man was not because he was an informer, but because he had used certain money or not accounted for the money.  Which is the case?