CHAIRPERSON
And we, before we have it formally admitted, earlier on I asked you what the purpose was because I had thought that the purpose was to meet possible criticism that the witness said certain things to us which he did not mention to you, which purpose could have been served if you only confirmed that.
	No, in fact the witness did mention those things even earlier on, although he did not mention them, or might not have mentioned them in chief, but he did mention them to me earlier on.  You see on the other hand, well really at the end of the day, you know what the contents is.  If you think it will be fair to the witness to accept that statement and not open a can of worms, I think you should think seriously about that.   We don't know what the contents is, but we don't want to have a situation where we should open a can of worms and whereas the witness must then be re-cross-examined all over again.
	It will have to be done if it has to be done, but I think you will obviously have to give good thoughts to that.