UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman, can I just short circuit this, because before we broke up on the previous occasion the record will show that I referred Mr van Zyl to three statements that he'd made.  I then asked him whether any facts contained in any of those statements, were false.  Mr Martini raised an objection at the time and the arrangement was that Mr van Zyl would return on a subsequent occasion and then point out which portions of the record - sorry, not of the record, which portions of the statements were false or incorrect.  The word plural was used, the record will reflect - when the plural word statement was used, the record will reflect when we started off yesterday the plural was used on the previous occasion.  He was also asked on the previous occasion
"Have you read these statements?"
And he said:
"I have read these statements hundreds of times."
Can we just get a version maybe from Mr van Zyl at this stage.
	Are you saying that if I had referred you to the statement in the plural, then you would have come and told the Commission that the paragraph you've just read was untrue?