MR LOWIES
The second paragraph, Chairman, is of relevance here
"The Commission finds that KwaMadala Hostel residents, together with the police, planned and carried out an attack on the community of Boipatong and the surrounding informal settlement, Slovo Park, on 17 June 1972 ..."
It should read 1992, of course, because the TRC was not in existence in '72.
Secondly, in other words the 3rd paragraph:
"The Commission finds that the police colluded with the attackers and dropped them off at Slovo Park."
And then the 5th paragraph, Chairman:
"The Commission finds that the police were responsible for destroying crucial evidence, in that they erased the tapes of the transactions in the control room of the ISU."
And then the 7th paragraph, Chairman:
"The Commission finds that the SAP colluded with the KwaMadala residents in planning the attacks.
			The Commission finds further that they obstructed the ends of justice by tampering with the evidence relating to the matter.  
			The Commission finds further that two of the suspects died whilst in custody of the police."
	Now Chairman, as a result of these findings which were published, and as a result of the documentation attached to the affidavit of Fredrech and Malan, my clients were concerned - and this is the purpose of this application, that the matter may have been, or may be prejudged.  And please, Chairman, there is no accusation that it is.  There is a concern that it may be as a result of the fact that this Committee sits as an extension of the TRC, the Commission.  The argument is, in a lay person's mind, the following, but it's one and the same.  Now to canvass this further I would submit the following is relevant, and that is why I would submit there is a need for this, yes, I must concede immediately, Chairman, that there is no way that the TRC can review a decision regarding amnesty by this Committee.  And that is trite law because it is inaccurate as such, in the Act.
	However, Chairman, when one deals with - and you will remember I handed up summaries of three cases, for instance the BTR matter and the MONING matter and so forth, when one deals with a likelihood of bias or a perception, very important I submit, only a perception, then one has - sorry?