CHAIRPERSON
You see I think on this one, you get the situation, this acts done in the furtherance of a political party or liberation movement, etc., etc.  Not every act omission or offence committed has to be done in the furtherance of the objective of a political body in order to qualify.  For instance, many cases, like the matter we heard previously, although we haven't made any finding on it because we didn't actually, we only heard the sort of finished matter on it.  But if you get a situation where you've got a political funeral let's say.  There's somebody being buried.  And trouble flares up at the funeral between another political party.   Now one can't say there that whoever committed an act or an offence at that funeral was acting in the furtherance of the objectives of his political movement.  It was a political situation, and I think that's covered by section 23, 20 subsection 3(b).
	Now one might say, well, the gathering of the two sides at the sports field that night, even if it happened, just happened, that the two sides got together, that was an event as anticipated in section 20 3(b), and then trouble starts, etc.  So it doesn't necessarily have to be in furtherance, like we're going to blow up this railway bridge to further our objectives in stopping the military communications of the other side.  That sort of thing.  It doesn't have to be that.