MR DEHAL
Mr Chairperson, I did not want to object earlier.  My difficulty is whenever I do, Mr Richard says I should have rather waited until he finished his question.  I've heard his question now fully.  This morning when Mr Richard and I talked, he explained to me that he had approached the Panel in chambers and sought permission to have a second bite at the cherry.  He led me to believe that this would be confined to the Klein issue.  I see that he's traversed on the Why Not aspect and now on the Edendale aspect.  A level of latitude I concede is necessary, but I think this is now getting a little too far.  The Edendale aspect, pertinently to this question, was raised yesterday, answered yesterday.  I in fact objected at some level even yesterday to this aspect and I think this is now the third, perhaps the fourth bite to the cherry.