MR TERRE'BLANCHE
Mr Chairman, thank you very much.  I don't want to put questions to Mr Rudolph, I also do not want to give evidence.  The evidence of Mr Rudolph is proof at least and
that is that this matter was politically driven.  For your information I would also like to mention, Mr Rudolph, for the past half decade is no member of the AWB and that is evidence was done in all honesty.
	I am grateful that on both sides, there is supportive evidence that wasn't changed by legal advisors and nothing was said prior to this and that it is a great privilege for me to my dignity, to see the truth and the relevance of that of a person who is no member of my party
	In conclusion, I would just like to say, like Mr Rudolph, that night I did not shoot anybody.  In fact my weapon was in a briefcase with my documents.  That was my briefing order to ask Mr de Klerk questions.  I did not have any weapons on me.  
	What happened that night, the AWB was not responsible for.  The AWB tried to prevent - because we were prevented from going to that meeting, people were killed by order of De la Roosa who misused the police in order for political gains.  In future, this should never happen again, that people in senior positions, when they want to promote their own political motives, use the State machinery and our security forces in order to build their political image and even go so far as to endanger peoples' lives.
	In conclusion then, neither Mr Rudolph nor myself could get any  political gain - sorry, financial gain from this and that there was no motivation about personal hate and revenge in any way.  It was politically motivated and that in the end we have been convicted as criminals, without having the privileges of the criminal where they could at least enrich either one.  We did not assault people who we have been cross with or wanted to do that.  We did not even have that satisfaction of somebody who assaulted somebody else because he proved himself as being in a superior position.
	I leave this case in your hands.  And I would like to associate myself with Mr Rudolph when he said that it stays the ideal, it is the right of each individual and it is the right of a nation to fight for him, for that nation.   I thank you for your patience and I hope that the mere fact that we who have been regarded as the far rights -  and I have been, it has been mentioned that I was somebody with his colleagues, that we actually, and his cronies. 
	In the other two cases for which I am applying as well, it was never a situation of white against black or an effort to promote Mr de Klerk or his government.  I suppose you have been confronted in the first opportunity here that it was about real Boers, Christians who fought against a watered down compromising government, which once again has been proved in this matter.  They used the South African Police and the South African Defence Force to save themselves whilst they could not come up with a political solution and never went to the nation or the other nations and opposition who were living with them in the same country.
	This was politically motivated without any serious human rights violations.  And we belong to the Boer nation which was through the Covenant of Blood River, in which we confirmed that we are bound to the God of our fathers.  I thank you Chairman and Judges, thank you very much.