CHAIRPERSON
I think I could just place it on record from what I've been told relating to this.  If you take a look at page 92 which is a similar affidavit to the one signed by the previous applicant who testified, which appeared on page 84.  The heading of that is Sworn Affidavit as an Addendum to Application for Amnesty and it's dated the 12th of December 1998.  Sorry 1996.  Obviously, the implication being that there was an application completed prior to the application form which appears on page 85 of the papers, the one that was signed by both applicants, each of the applicants on the 6th of May 1997.
	It would appear from the correspondence of the attorneys who at the time represented these applicants that  the applicants did indeed complete an earlier application, but that was before that they had instructed their attorneys, and that it would seem, certainly from the records available to us here, that that earlier application never in fact reached the TRC.  And the attorneys themselves, namely Messrs Nel Kotze and van Dyk, never had sight of those applications, but they were informed of them and that's why they filed this affidavit as an addendum.  
	When it appeared that the earlier application hadn't been received, they completed the ones which are now in the docket, so it would seem the prospects of us tracing and finding those earlier applications are almost zero. 
	Is there anything you would like to add Ms Lockhat?