GAUTENG
93
the evidence of their account and the extent of their participation in whatever they are applying amnesty 
for.
	It may be that if we can avoid a repetition of hearing evidence, in other words if we can avoid 
calling a man simply because his name is mentioned and he is given notice in terms of Section 19(4), for 
him to come here and respond to what was said yesterday about him, and then find out that he has made an 
application for amnesty and he will be repeating what he said then, one certainly wants to avoid that.  
	You understand the time constraints within which this Committee is functioning.  We are always 
looking for ways of streamlining procedures and it would seem that if you furnish this document with what 
your clients have to comment on and in what matters they are implicated in, it will facilitate matters and 
that document should be handed to counsel for the applicants.
	Now we understand you are telling us that your clients do not object to the applications for 
amnesty by the applicants.  That is a matter of some importance.  It is a question of hearing their version of 
what is being said and we will have an open mind in that regard and I can assure you on behalf of the 
Committee, that we will do so.