MR PRETORIUS
If you look towards line 20, actually line 22, you will see that the court asked you certain questions.  It reads:  "But look Mr Mangena, as I understand your evidence and tell me if I'm incorrect, when you fired shots on that day you fired shots because you told me that you thought you were in danger", your reply:  "Yes".  "Not that Shell House was being attacked?", "Yes".  "Is that correct, you were concerned for your own personal safety?", "Yes".   "You did not fire shots because you thought Shell House was under attack?", "I do not know, maybe.  Can I just try to explain this thing because when the shots were fired at me because I also, Shell House was behind me so when I was hit and died at the same time I think maybe a certain part of the marchers would have got access into the building, but now for protecting myself it automatically meant that I'm even protecting the structure behind me".  "But I mean is that what you thought was going to happen, that Shell House was now under attack?",  "I beg yours?".  "When you fired that shot?", "Yes".  "Is that what you thought in your head that Shell House is being attacked?", "It is not what I thought".  It carries on from there Mr Mangena, in fact for several pages up to page 3365 and it ends, if you page to page 3365 again as from approximately line 18:  "Well will you then explain to me why you were shooting?", "My life was threatened that is why I had to open fire", again: "Because your life was threatened?", "Yes".  Do you see that Mr Mangena?