NORMAN ARENDSE
Mr Chairman, could I also just mention for the record that I'm really disappointed about this - to put it mildly, we have done our very best to assist Mr Prior in getting this process on the go under really difficult circumstances.  Those difficult circumstances also relate to what we are paid, we are not paid what other White counsel - there was an article which appeared in the Weekly Mail about the gravy train, Black counsel here have definitely come to the station and that train left or we're in 3rd class - we don't get paid the same amount of money.
	I accept that we accept the brief and that we must fulfil that brief but we are also doing that under very difficult circumstances, including making the arrangements for these applicants to come from various prisons outside the Western Cape when we have to do that in our own time and for which we are not remunerated Mr Chairman.  So Mr Mabala was the last applicant that came there on Wednesday and that is only when we had an opportunity of sitting down with all three in order to get out ducks in a row.  
	So really - and that is why I indicated that this will raise problems with the credibility of the legal representatives and I don't think it is proper for that to be raised in this forum.  If we are to be involved Mr Chairman, in other or future amnesty applications then we have to reconsider our position.  These applicants do not have the opportunity of - when they fill out these forms, of legal representation and guidance.  Mr Gqomfa, - as you can see as it's clear from the record, is clearly way above the other applicants as far as his education is concerned and also the way he articulates himself.  The other two haven't had the benefit of legal representation. Now we come along at a late stage and we tried our best to assist and then our integrity is put into question, I don't think that's right.