MR LAX
Just while you are looking for that, one other issue is that - and maybe your client could just answer this, it is clear from this judgement that the first deceased was shot with a pistol.  That is clear from the post mortem.
	In other words he was shot with a G3 in his upper body, several shots, but the coup de grace was with a pistol.  Now, your client and the applicant agrees that he shot that person and his evidence was, well, I couldn't have shot him with  a pistol, I didn't have a pistol.
	Maybe he could just explain that?