MR DEHAL
Judge, if the approach is premised on the understanding as you formulate it, I would agree, but my submissions would be in due course that that understanding is also incorrect, that the view ought to be in the reverse and I will deal with Section 29 and Section 31 in that regard.   Again, for fear that the incorrect impression may be created, my contention is that the onus does not rest on us, but on the other side, thank you.   Mr Chairperson, before I even begin ...(intervention)