MR RICHARD
It is quite correct.  On Ntombi Masekeri's evidence, she accepted the addition that the purpose of making the admission was to get the police off his back, for whatever reason.
	On other occasions in that list, similar statements have been made, that he had done the same.  What I argue on that point is if that had been Mr Dube's case, why did he need to fabricate all sorts of other points on which to corroborate himself or to corroborate his opinion?  He didn't make out that case at any stage at all.
  	The fourth point is that we need not ask ourselves to accept, is that there was a sufficiency or adequate evidence to justify the cell taking disciplinary steps against the deceased.  We have been through the matter of what evidence did he have, how long he had been out of contact and if he was an informer, which I submit there was no substantial evidence of.
	The fifth point, they had no alternative but to take immediate action to kill Mr Dhlomo.  Mr Dube's and Mr Makhubu's behaviour was completely inconsistent with the bona fide belief that Mr Dhlomo was an informer and that they were in imminent danger of being trapped as a result of the alleged transmission from the so-called transmitter.
	The next thing that I submit cannot be accepted, there is no basis for it, that the shooting of the deceased was a bona fide MK operation. 	Next point, that this assassination was or is sanctioned by the ANC or MK.  I have had reference to the ANC's submission to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, dated 12 May 1997.  The written submission set out in Appendix 4, does not make any reference to this particular event.
	The next point that I don't believe we need to accept is that there was any necessity at all for all four members of the cell to be present at the execution.