MR MADASA
Let me answer what I meant by one matter.  By one matter I meant the fact that in the Supreme Court at the time both cases on which the applicant was convicted were dealt together as different counts.  So this is, this was my interpretation of referring to a one matter.
	In addition to that I would request a short adjournment of about five to ten minutes so that I can clear with the applicant as to the evidence we agreed between ourselves which we should lead, but I am taking the blame in connection with what did I mean by one matter.  By one matter I meant the cases upon which the applicant has been convicted and my impression, when I consulted with him, was that if these two matters, which are referred to as one matter, still do not implicate other police, in which case it would have been proper for them to be notified.  So, I ask for a short adjournment of about ten minutes so that I can clear with the applicant the fact that in these two matters, upon which he was convicted in the Supreme Court, his application will not implicate other policemen in both matters which are referred to as one matter.