UNKNOWN
Yes, that is correct.  The climate created by the ANC did not differ substantially from that created by the PAC, and here I would like to refer to a report in the Citizen, Monday, 1st of June 1992, and the heading
"Mandela warns violence may spread to White areas."
In other words, that can be interpreted as a warning of violence, and other people could perhaps interpret that as seditious, exhorting people to violence.  
	There was another report which preceded this, 28th of June 1990. Mandela was deputy-president of the ANC, he was in America and in Atlanta, in Georgia. He said -
"While the policy of non-violence was good some conditions did not permit this, ANC Deputy President, Mr Nelson Mandela said here."
In Bonn, during a visit three years later, on the 11th of May 1993, he was quoted in the Star -
"ANC leader Nelson Mandela ..."
He was then leader of the ANC -
"ANC leader Nelson Mandela warned German leaders yesterday not to expect a bloodless handover to power in South Africa."
So here we clearly see that there was a warning of possible bloodshed and violence.  (ndistinct - microphone not switched on).
	In 1991 Business Day .... (indistinct - microphone not switched on ...) 
"... code named Operation Prickly Pear.  Intended to eliminate SAP members and establish military training camps in South Africa."
So it was clear that there was still an armed struggle and that military training was still continuing.  That was the climate which the ANC created and it was (indistinct).