CHAIRPERSON
You see my problem is that his testimony is that it was not usual for the attacks launched by hostel dwellers against the township residents, to be in the form of attacking taxi's, that was not usual.  That was the first incident where in such an attack had been launched, that is an attack on a taxi with passengers inside.
	But there were occurrences of attacks, but not taxi's.  Why would he believe that this attack would still be the same as the attacks which had been directed at persons who were not in taxi's?