MR DORFLING
Mr Kruser, I would like you to have the opportunity to respond to certain of the finding made at the time of the inquest by Mr Justice Nugent.  This is not a re-hearing of the inquest, we're not reviewing the decisions, I just want you to make your own position clear with regard to the findings by Mr Justice Nugent.  If you disagree with those findings, I would like you to state so and then once all the evidence has been placed before the Committee, the Committee has to decide whether those findings can be supported or whether your version should be accepted.
Mr Chairman, the findings is also contained in Exhibit C I'm going to be referring to the specific pages.  Page 181 of the Application - sorry, that is incorrect -page 184 - page 30 of the typed record.  
	I would on behalf of the objectors at the conclusion of these proceedings make certain submissions and I would like you to say whether, or give you the opportunity to respond to that at this point in time.  At page 184 at the top paragraph, Mr Justice Nugent deals with the so called information that was received by the ANC and which formed the background against which you gave your order for the guards to first fire warning shots and then to repel.  He deals specifically with this so called information and he makes the finding on a prima facie basis.  I read the last sentence of the first paragraph:
"Prima facie, in our view, the evidence to that effect has been no more than make weight which was fabricated after the event so as to bolster the explanations which have been put forward for the shooting which occurred at Lancet Hall and Shell House."
	I'm going to argue in front of this Committee that having regard to all the evidence, the ANC and your version that you had information that there would be an attack is nothing more but a make weight which you designed afterwards to make it fit in with your version of what transpired.  Would you care to respond to that, sir?