UNKNOWN
I would suggest that had that happened, one would have seen a set of amnesty applications setting out in great detail why Michael Evans was targeted and not Gavin Evans but be that as it may.
	Now we've looked at a number of decisions from other countries concerning the law of extradition, the law of asylum, in regard to the circumstances under which the murder of a civilian might ever be construed as being proportional to the objective pursued.  Now might I ask you to please just read what is here stated together with what is contained at paragraphs 53.1 to 53.8 of the Heads because what - if maybe I could just turn there briefly, what we've tracked there is some attempt to look at the themes which emerge in literature concerning the circumstances under which the targeting of civilians might ever be justified and one starts off from the understanding that in almost all the foreign literature where you're dealing with people who say my response was proportional, I committed a common law offence but the political nature of that offence outweighs its common law nature.  They say I was in opposition to the government, I was forced to resort to such steps because these were the only means by which I could effect political change in the country in which the crime is being committed.
	Then if you look at the cases.  When people come and say that, the courts looked long and hard.  What we say in paragraph 53.2 to see whether the proportionality of the crime to the alleged goal is such that the political element of the crime outweighs its common law character and those cases, I should just mention in passing, they draw a distinction between crimes which are per se political and others, like treason and so on and so forth.  But as soon as you move into this sphere of murder, what we say at the top of page 27 is that people who commit such crimes and here I would obviously include conspiracy to murder, have a hard road to hoe.  The tendency is not the brand such crimes as political unless the claimant can show that the regime against whom the offence was directed is repressive and offers no scope for change by peaceful and non-violent means, therefore I was forced into the situation where I had to resort to murder.
	Then we submit and I think this is of considerable significance in the context of this matter, crimes committed by governments for political reasons, fall into a different category.  We say it is difficult to comprehend how as a matter of international and comparative law serious common law crimes committed by government agents against private citizens might be viewed as being proportional and thus capable of being branded as political crimes.
	I say as a matter of international comparative law because I recognise that in the context ...(intervention)