UNKNOWN
Chairperson, I'm not certain as to whether I can answer that question, but my problem - my understanding of his evidence and the problem that I encounter in answering your question is that if he could admit to having seen the eyes being taken, what could have been worse to admit the eyes being taken, than admitting to seeing the body being buried, to me, if he had a reason to lie, he would have lied about the eyes as well, that he never saw the eyes being taken and as a result I find myself in a predicament as to whether the lie is material to the facts that should be fully disclosed before this Committee, or not.