CHAIRPERSON
There may have been others.  Unless we have sight of the judgment I don't think it's a fair question.  There are cases where the Judge has said exactly what he thinks of a witness and an accused person would be left in no doubt, whether he was a lay person or not, that that person had been believed or otherwise.  But we don't know in this case, it may have been a question of fingerprints, bloodstains, all sorts of technical stuff.