UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman I am caught a littlebit unawares.  I was under the impression that I would, at theend of the hearings give full argument in respect of all the incidentsand I intend to do so in respect of this incident as well.
 I just want to make one or two off-the-cuff submissions pertainingto my learned friends' submissions which they have made now.
 If it is expected of an applicant who applies for amnesty todo a full police investigation about a matter in which he wasinvolved in; if it is expected of him to go and speak to all otherwitnesses involved in the matter, at his own cost, to try andfind out their versions to give further evidence to this Commissionabout happenings where he wasn't present, which he has no furtherpersonal knowledge of; if it is expected of him to try and obtainother facts such as for instance the names of the victims, whichhe didn't remember when the applications were drawn, if that isexpected of him Mr Chairman then I would venture to bet that 4Bvery/...
226 ADDRESS
very few applicants to this Commission would ever get amnesty. I do not read the Act as placing an obligation upon an applicantto make such enquiries.  I don't read the Act and don't interpretthe Act as meaning that an applicant should do more than makefull disclosure of that of which he has knowledge of.  That iswhat...(tape ends)
 No witnesses have been called to show that his evidence is untrue.