UNKNOWN
Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman and members of the Committee, the bulk of my argument has been covered by the cross-examination on the applicant, sorry, so I won't go back to obvious things that are on record.
	I would just go by way of a point system, just enumerate and direct the Committee to have a look at these things, that is all Mr Chairman.  One is that the deceased was killed when the applicant was not sure that he was an informer.
	Point two, the killing of the deceased took place without any authority whatsoever, either of the UDF or of the ANC at that time.  That is the evidence on record.
	Point three, the applicant has told this forum that what they sought to achieve, was to be safe in the area.
	Point four, I am asking this Committee to consider the manner in which the applicant struggled in answering questions that were put to him.  In short the demeanour of the applicant which impacts on the credibility of the applicant.
	May I resist Mr Chairman and members of the Committee, to be tempted to respond to Section 23(1)(b) that was alluded to by my learned friend incorrectly, as well as 23(1)(a).  That is all Mr Chairman.