MR KINCAID
In June of 1992 you were convicted in the Supreme Court of robbing Mr Hansel of a shotgun, of damage to his property in that you cut his wires.  You were convicted of the attempted murder of Mr Cobus, of the crime of housebreaking, that you broke into Mr Cobus' house, of malicious damage to his property in that you cut his telephone wires.  You were convicted of the attempted murder of Mr Pretorius, of breaking into the home of Mr Senti, you were convicted of causing malicious damage to the property of Mr Senti, you broke his window and to the property of Mr Pretorius in that you cut his telephone wires.
	Do you concede that you were correctly convicted by the  Supreme Court or is it your contention that your convictions were improper or not founded in fact or in law?