MR VISSER
Mr Chairman, if I may interrupt you, just a moment please. Mr Chairman, may I interrupt, I don't often do this, but in this case with all due respect, the question is not based on the evidence.
	The evidence of Mr Rosslee is quite explicit, in reply to questions by Mr Malan that normal procedure would have been that there would have been prior authorization.  That is the point.
	He now says Mr Chairman, that I regarded the request as an order.  He is now asked but how could you have regarded it as an order if there wasn't confirmation.  Confirmation would have been prior to that Mr Chairman, and that is in line with his evidence and that is the only issue which I want to put straight.