MR PANDAY
Madam Chair, it's my submission that whilst one accepts that there has to be a full disclosure and we accept that there has to be full disclosure in so far as what has happened to the body, and one accepts that one should be told, be it the family, be it all concerned parties as to what did happen to the body, Madam Chair, my submission is that we have two conflicting versions in so far as what had become of the body.  It is a possibility, or I submit that the Committee accept my version, the applicant's version as to the body that was left at the point where it was killed, of if alternatively the Commission does not accept the version of the applicant and chooses to believe the version of the witness in the matter, that the body was buried, Madam Chair, the weight to be attached to that evidence, I submit that the applicant's version as to what happened to the fody, may be viewed as being in terms of full disclosure, a harsher step that was taken to leave the body to either rot or to be, or to lie by the wayside as opposed to the witness's version that was to have covered the body.