MR PURSHOTAM
Well, as I said earlier on, one has to distinguish between common criminal acts and acts which are committed in order to further a political objective.  Putting a bomb on the border and killing farmers is a barbaric act of terrorism, it's a pure and simple criminal act.  One cannot construe any act which does not bear any discernible relationship to a political objective if it does not bear any discernible and reasonable relationship between the act and the objective, it's not a political objective, it's a criminal act, it's an act of terror.
	The last Sub-Section on which reliance was placed is Sub-Section (f), but if one has regard to Sub-Section (f), one cannot bring oneself within the ambit of Sub-Section (f) before one has brought oneself within the ambit of Sub-Sections (a), (b), (c) or (d).  But it's my submission that none of the requirements of (a), (b), (c) or (d) have been complied with and therefore the question of reliance on Sub-Section (f) doesn't arise for argument.