<UNKNOWN>
Visser is allowed, in respect of a dispute, if we take that, because where they admit the correctness of the 
applicants' evidence I don't have a problem.   But if there is a dispute of one of his clients with the 
applicants' evidence, if he is allowed to cross-examine an applicant it would mean that he could place his 
client's version before this Committee by way of affidavit which would not give me the opportunity to 
cross-examine that witness, but he can cross-examine the applicant on that version and put his witness' 
version to the applicant without the applicant having the opportunity to do it vice versa. I haven't 
considered that position yet, but that seems to me to lead to a direction where there might be prejudice for 
the applicants, Mr Chairman, and I am raising that now although that hasn't occurred yet, but it is going to 
occur.  Tat situation is going to occur.