MR HATTINGH
No, what I say, I don't have an answer readily available from the Act to say that yes, you are entitled to do so or not.  But I would suggest, and I've made this suggestion all along, is that yes, to test this applicant with regard to his motives you've got to be allowed to cross-examine him on those other matters.  Now, the reason why I'm saying so is the third point I would like to make, and that is in section nineteen (19) - sorry, that would be section 20.1(c).  Twenty two zero and then subsection (1)(c), where it is stated that
"The applicant has made a full disclosure of all relevant facts it shall grant amnesty in respect of that act, commission or offence."
	Now, if we have to look at the Act, I cannot see that one can say and that the society can recognise it as full disclosure of all relevant facts to be considered by this Commission if some facts are to be withheld, although they may very well form part and parcel of the other incidents for which amnesty application is being made.  So, based on that, a full disclosure of all relevant facts I say yes, my submission would be in the circumstances it would be necessary to be allowed to cross-examine.