MR VISSER
Mr Botha and or Mr Du Preez, who are the two people who know the identities of the informers, should in the company of my attorney, Mr Wagener, attempt to arrange for a meeting with them.
	That suggestion has found general favour Mr Chairman, with my clients.  What we would suggest should be done is the following, that Mr Botha be given a reasonable time in order to set up a meeting.  He would suggest that a month would be a reasonable time.
	Mr Chairman, what is suggested is that depending on whether the two gentlemen in question would be prepared to reveal their own identities to Mr Wagener and whether they would be prepared to meet with him at all, and assuming that the latter comes to pass, it is probable Mr Chairman, that the two gentlemen in question will probably disguise themselves from Mr Wagener.  It is something which we foresee might happen.
	But in the hope that such a meeting can be laid on, it was suggested that what Mr Wagener would do, would be to inform them of the amnesty application, to further inform them that they might be implicated as accomplices and further to inform them that the Committee would like to hear anything which they may wish to add, if they so wish and then Mr Chairman, to make notes of their replies in that regard, and to feed that back to the Chairman of this Committee.
	We would also like to say Mr Chairman, that if there are any directions which you might wish to make as to what Mr Wagener should do at that meeting, assuming that it comes to pass, that we would appreciate receiving some indications from you and Wagener would then inform them or ask them about that.
	Lastly Mr Chairman, we thought that Mr Wagener must make it clear that it would be in their interest if they so wished, to consult an attorney or an Advocate of their choice, if they should wish to make any representations to this Committee, with or without disclosing their own identities.
	That is about as far as we have come at this stage Mr Chairman, subject to what you might want to add.