MR VAN RENSBURG
Yes.  Well, apart from the fact that I have to stress that it is possible that he had forgotten about it.  I have to also stress the fact that is was the part of his evidence that he personally has made his own peace with the victims.  And I would submit therefor that there would be absolutely reason for him not to make full disclosure at this stage.
	And, I also submit that from his evidence and the way that he has presented his evidence, it is clear that he in fact did try to make a full disclosure as far as possible.
	May I continue?  To continue then, Mr Chairman, I submit that Mr Netshivale has in fact met all the formal requirements stipulated in the Act.  That is it from the evidence clear that he was at the time, an employee of the state who acted under orders.  And that there was action taken against members of a liberation movement as stipulated in Section 22b of the Act.
	The fact that he was acting with the necessary political motive, I take it is also not in dispute at that this stage, as well.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.
	To then conclude my address, I would submit that Mr Netshivale has in fact made full disclosure to the Committee, that he has met all the requirements and that he asks for amnesty for the assault and torture of Rev Phoshwana, Mr Phosiwa, Mr Chikororo and Mr Mahumela.