CHAIRPERSON
It seems to be a separate matter.  Let us deal with that separately if it does become a bone of contention.  It does sound serious, if you are correct.  Let us deal with the status of these two statements first.  That's what we were dealing with.  As I understand your point that you want to make, is that you feel that having been provided with both statements, you are entitled t use one of the two in cross-examining the witness who has elected to adopt the other one?