UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman, there are certain things that I would like to place on record before Mr Jones gives his proposed evidence.  The first is that on behalf of the applicants.  I was only informed last Wednesday of these sittings before the Amnesty Committee this week, by Ms Ntanga.
	The second thing is, I received no correspondence whatsoever that Letklapa had not received his subpoena, had said that he was not going to testify, and at all stages I was under the impression that he was under subpoena and would be here today to testify.
	As I understood it, last time we were at the hearing, Mr Chairman, it was the Committee's desire that Mr Letklapa should come and testify in view of the fact that I handed in certain testimony that he had given in the Bisho High Court.  I didn't understand that Mr Jones' evidence was as important to the Committee as that of Mr Letklapa.  
	I believe that in view of the fact that Mr Letklapa's not here, and I was not privy to any of the discussions that took place in Pinetown, neither was I informed thereof until today when my learned friend has just addressed the Committee, I believe that my clients stand to be prejudiced if Mr Letklapa is not here to give evidence in view of the fact that I have seen Mr Jones' affidavit and seen the nature of the evidence that he is to give.  I would ask for some form of a ruling on that in the interests of my clients.