CHAIRPERSON
I don't understand that aspect of evidence.  You have just given us a background of the activities of the Toaster Gang, how terrible they were, the mayhem they caused in your township, then you are a member of a self defence unit, it is your objective to defend your community.  You are in possession of an AK47 in order to achieve that objective which is to defend your community and you want us - you are telling us that if you had established that the people who had been shooting in the township and who probably would have been shooting at the community you have been tasked to defend but if you had established that these people were the Toaster Gang, you wouldn't have used your firearm, you wouldn't have followed them, would you not be shirking your responsibility?  I just cannot reconcile what you are saying with what the duty of an SDU member was?