MR BOOYENS
It's also based on the fact that he had training to commit acts of terrorism, not necessarily implies that he had at that stage committed such acts already.  You refer specifically to the fact that he could continue with acts of terrorism as if that implies, yes, that he had already committed acts of terrorism, but that's not what you wanted to say, you wanted to say that if he went back to the opposition he could have continued with his initial purpose, is that correct?