HENDRIK JOHANNES PETRUS BOTHA
Honestly, I cannot recall how she was clothed. Her death created a dilemma.  Under normal circumstances the body of a person would be taken to the state mortuary after which the regular legal procedure would be followed.  If one of us were to take the body to the mortuary, there would be forms which would have to be filled in, in which explanations would have to be provided regarding, among others, the identity of the deceased, where and under what circumstances the deceased had died, where the body was found as well as other questions regarding the next of kin of the deceased and so forth.  The person who would take the body to the mortuary would have to identify himself, at least.  The risk that any member of the Security Branch or Vlakplaas would be placed on record in connection with Khubeka, was an unacceptably high risk from the perspective of the requirement of secrecy which was the fundamental basis of our intelligence research.  Furthermore, there would necessarily have been a post mortem inquest with the resultant controversy which it would have created in the press.  If it should appear during the autopsy that there were signs of assault on her body, the controversy would have been even greater.  Through this not only the activities of the Security Branch would have been exposed, but it would have created a tremendous embarrassment for the government.  The danger that this entailed was that the involvement of askaris could possibly be exposed which could lead to the exposure of the activities of Vlakplaas.  	Mbane, Dube and the other informers, who had initially been involved with her, would be identified and this could lead to their murder as traitors.