MR LANDMAN
Mr Chairman, it may well operate against the witness.  My submission, the enquiry really at this stage is an enquiry of an objective basis as to whether Mr Malan has indicated in his questioning, that he has formed a particular view that the actions of Mr Barnard and the others, on whose behalf those actions were done.
	Our submission is that this is clear that what Mr Malan was attempting to achieve here, was to attempt to destroy any suggestion that there might be in the evidence, that Mr Barnard might have been acting on his own, alternatively that Mr Barnard might have been acting on behalf of another group.
	What Mr Malan has attempted to do in this questioning, and these are the questions of Mr Malan, not of the witness, it is Mr Malan who suggests to the witness but those are only alias, what was being done by these so-called alias groups, was in fact being done as part of the planning and the agenda of the AWB.
	In our submission that indicates quite clearly that that is Mr Malan's view of the matter and that is Mr Malan's clear view, that that is in fact what he intends to find.
	Mr Chairman, the other aspect of the matter is of course that Mr Malan has asked these questions and clearly in his own mind, he will know what the effect of those questions must have been, with respect.