JUDGE PILLAY
Mr Dehal, to the extent that the onus is relevant, isn't it correct that the Act tends to lean towards accepting that such information and documents are presentable at this hearing, subject to any cogent reasons why it shouldn't?  If that be the case, isn't it then for you or your client, to prove if an onus is necessary, that these documents should not be ruled admissible?  On those cogent reasons, shouldn't they be coming from you?