UNKNOWN
Now, I am actually just looking for the part 
where, sorry on page 47 Mr Chairman, at line 20, because you will 
recall that the applicants were also charged with attempting to kill 
you, attempting to murder you?
	Quentin Cornelius, as we have already seen, was a visitor to 
Cape Town.  He was in the company of Lindi Anne Fourie, 
Bernadette Langford and David Deglon.  He sat at the same table on 
the platform.  He suddenly heard a pop sound and immediately knew 
that this was rifle fire although he did not see anyone firing.  He 
dived towards the left, but while diving, he was hit by one of the 
projectiles which flung him two metres further onto the ground.  He 
realised that his lower body was lame and pulled himself by his arms, 
under one of the tables to hide.  There was pandemonium in the 
Tavern.
	My question to you Mr Cornelius is, why are you only saying 
that there were two of these killers inside the Tavern because you 
saw the video evidence?  Is that the only reason why you are now 
saying - because may I just add before you answer, that in your 
statement to the Police which I had Mr Chairman, but somehow I 
can't get hold of it, I don't know if Mr Prior's got a copy, you don't 
say there either that anyone was inside the Tavern?
	Why are you  now insisting that there were two people inside 
the Tavern and also before you answer, in your own prepared 
statement which is in front of us, on page 28, you also say that you 
believe that there were five gunmen firing automatic rifles at random 
at the patrons inside the Pub.
	I've got the statement now in front of me, Mr Chairman, 
maybe I should just read this bit.  It is paragraph 3 and it is in 
Afrikaans.  Roughly at midnight I heard shots, I jumped up.  My 
back was turned towards the attackers and at that moment, I was 
injured in the back.
	"There were numerous shots fired, but these were single shots 
and not automatic fire".  
That is what you said in your statement.  The date is unclear because 
of the photocopy.