MR NGUBANE
The difficulty that I have with that Mr Chairman, is that I don't see the difference between an informer and a person who is implicated.  People who are in a worst position than informers, had been mentioned before the TRC and those people are at risk of being killed.
	Then if now we come and say that informers because they are at risk, they shouldn't be disclosed, I submit that it would be flouting the constitution, we will be treating people unequally, we will be discriminating against people in favour of informers and I see no special reason why we should make this distinction.
	There are people who are exposed to victimisation, either physical victimisation or political victimisation, who have been mentioned before the TRC, and my respectful submission Your Worship, is that quite correctly one can say that the informers can be exposed to danger, although that is speculation at this stage, but it is potential possibility, but now the difficulty that we have is that one might argue that in all the amnesty applications, where people have been implicated, where their security is at stake, that information should be expunged from the record, and I submit Mr Chairman, that will lead to further complications.
	It is my respectful submission that the informers should be treated on equal footing as any other citizen of South Africa.