CHAIRPERSON
Your client has come and said okay, there was a conspiracy to kill Mr Omar, I did actually take active steps.  So he's made a full disclosure of those relevant facts, there's no doubt about that, but what if it's found that he hasn't been frank and honest in respect of all the matters concerning that incident?  Can we just ignore him and say, okay we'll sift it through and those relevant facts that fall through the sieve, if they're sufficient to cover the crime, it's okay, forget the rest?