UNKNOWN
I'm simply asking whether he agrees with that portion of the evidence being that he decided to fire shots in retaliation because of the man with the AK47 firing in their direction and I think the response was in the affirmative.
	Now Mr Zuma am I correct if I would put it to you then that the question of the existence of the man with the AK47 rifle or not would either have warranted your actions on the day or would not have warranted it?