ADV MATHANA
They could have come to this conclusion by unreasonable deductions, through unreasonable deductions.  But if they believed truly that this person having broken away and knowing that there were some funds missing and for which he was still required to account, funds that were supposed to be used in furtherance of their objects, it could have been easy for them even if unreasonably, it could have been easy for them to believe that this person will surely seek protection from the other side, from the enemy and therefor allow himself to be used by the enemy in order to be protected against them, because he must know that they are still wanting something from him.
	So under those circumstances even if a reasonable person cannot accept that, they should believe that he must have been collaborating.  If in their situation under these circumstances I have just mentioned they did believe so, then I request the Committee ...