MR CURRIN
Mr Chairman, maybe I can just motivate ourapplication to recall him for cross-examination.  The cross-examinationof the applicants in regard to specific incidents will largelybe informed by the general background and the general motivationthat was provided by Brig Coetzee when he testified on behalfof all the  applicants.  In that motivation a lot was said aboutpolitical motive and about political objectives and the context. The questions that  we put to individual applicants should notonly be informed by his evidence in chief, but also his totalevidence in
1A regard/...
MR CURRIN 339 ADDRESS
regard to that submission.  We have a number of questions whichwe would like to  put to him which we believe will help to fleshout some of the ambiguities and uncertainties about certainlyour clients and we feel regarding that evidence.  He is the personthat testified on behalf of the applicants so we would like tocross-examine him.  We realise that his testimony was on behalfof all the applicants, which means that if any applicant wereto testify in regard to any of the incidents, and if one wereto start now with the Makope, Maake and Sefola killings, we wouldbe entitled to cross-examine those particular applicants regardingthat general evidence as well, but they didn't give the testimony,so we believe it would be right and correct to rather cross-examinethe person who gave that testimony.  So that is really the reasonwhy we would like to cross-examine him on that before we proceedon cross-examination on specific incidents.