CHAIRPERSON
I think in just speaking, it has just come to mind now, in matters of this nature, very often we have applications that aren't opposed.  They are not opposed very often, because people don't really have a vested interest in the outcome, etc, so we are getting evidence coming mainly from the applicants, not always, but very often in these matters.  Should one in those situations then apply the normal test that is applied in the civil law or the criminal law, with regard to the assessment of evidence, in other words, when you are just getting the version coming from the one side?  In such situations, can we not place heavier emphasis on probabilities?