MR KUBONI
If you look at the time, if you look at the judgment it was round about 6 am and it is in March.  Maybe by that time it is still dawn so to say and there are some huts and other houses in the yard.  Anything was possible.  The other possibility is that they are still in the other houses.  The other possibility is that they were there, but in their view they were chasing those people who had got into that house.  They believed whom they were chasing were in that house.  It must also be taken into account that the situation was tense in the area.  There was tension in the area.  So there was no time really to think about the fact that maybe there must be children there in this house, there must be innocent women in this house.
	As the judgment stands today there are some references to the evidence of the children.  I submit that maybe it is very important to if the version of the applicant is weighed against he version of the children, it must be taken into account that when the incident took place they were still very young and it a known fact that with young children they have got a tendency to imagine things that they never took place.  For that reason I submit that the version of the applicant, when he says they got out of the house and he was still having his gun, and when he asked the kids about the
3A - 13.2	people/...
MR KUBONI	236	ADDRESS
people who were shooting they just looked at him.  Then I submit that must be accepted as being probable.