CHAIRPERSON
We are reconvened to hopefully finalise the De Meillon application.  The matter stood down for a while since this morning, to give Mr Swart an opportunity to come through to the venue.
	I was informed that he was originally under the impression that it would not be necessary for him to attend today and to testify and therefore he had gone back to his duties as a member of the Police Service.
	He is present now and I should perhaps add that Mr Van Schalkwyk, who had appeared and is appearing on his behalf, had given us an affidavit by Mr Swart and after having had regard to the contents of that affidavit and having considered some of the other aspects of the matter, we have decided that it would be necessary for Mr Swart to testify.
	Although initially he had been under the impression that it would not be necessary for him to testify, the panel is in fact calling him as a witness and to testify in the matter.
	What I intend doing is to ask Mr Van Schalkwyk which I think would be of some assistance to us, although he is not strictly speaking, calling Mr Swart himself, but to present his testimony, to lead his testimony and then of course the other parties would be able to canvass what issues they want to canvass with him.
	Mr Van Schalkwyk to lead him specifically in regard to the affidavit which is before us.  What I am going to do, I am going to ask Mr Sibanyoni to administer the oath to Mr Swart and then I will ask Mr Van Schalkwyk to assist us in presenting his testimony.