CHAIRPERSON
May I just interrupt.  If during Codesa, when 
the major role players had gathered to try and solve the problems, 
a group saw that Codesa would not serve their purpose and they 
regarded that their particular cause was lost in these negotiations, 
that belief in a group of the people that negotiations would not 
serve the purpose, that belief gave rise to unhappiness and 
aggressive talk on the part of such people, does that mean that we 
must come to the conclusion that there was a climate of war, just 
because one section of the community did not accept the 
proceedings at Codesa?  Does that mean that there was a climate 
of war just because one section of the community did not have 
faith in these negotiations?