MR LOWIES IN REPLY
Chairman, I would suggest - there's a lot of what Mr Mapoma said that I agree with, you are at this stage limiting cross-examination, I know from my own experience, when I want to cross-examine on certain aspects, which normally in a criminal court I would be entitled to, to start afresh on any aspect that Mr Strydom has covered, you limit us and everybody else down the line, so from that point of view I would say yes, there is.
	But my - where I also find common ground with the argument of Mr Mapoma is really, is it necessary to lead evidence regarding a sexual assault?  It reflects badly and that is definitely something which is irrelevant here because you can't get amnesty for it and the applicants are not applying for that.  So that is for instance one instance where I think it's completely unnecessary to lead such evidence.  I have nothing further to add.