CHAIRPERSON
We are quite aware of that and our concern is that the implication of his evidence would go to the non full disclosure of your client in so far as the attack is concerned.  Your client says he and the persons that he has identified participated in the attack and the evidence of Mr Kuala seems to suggest otherwise.  The evidence of Mr Kuala is pointedly to the fact that Qeda, who is the applicant's brother, is the one who actually shot him.  He fired four shots at him.  Now that evidence was not disputed by you.  I mean that version was not controverted.