CHAIRPERSON
Although his role, particularly in the ELC incident has been very central, he's not just an implicated person who is on the fringe of matters, so the reason for subpoenaing him is understandable.  His evidence could certainly throw a light on events and possibly assist the Commission.  Taking that into account and also the fact that he's willing to give evidence, the fact that the Attorney-General has been consulted and the fact, the provisions of the Act which state that the evidence given here shall not be used as evidence in a trial, I believe we should proceed with his evidence.  I don't know if he's ready to proceed now, but when we do, who will lead the evidence?  Will it be Ms Coleridge, or yourself?