CHAIRPERSON
Just to add to that.  The Act makes reference to the limited rights of cross-examination.  If you have had an opportunity of looking through the Act.  Subject to what the Act says nobody has ever been refused the right to cross-examine witnesses and in fact in a number of proceedings that has taken place.  Witnesses have been cross-examined.  Maybe you are not aware of that.  What we are against is unlimited cross-examination.  I mean the activities of your client span some years and the number of activities in which he was involved are multifarious perhaps.  And cross-examination would be within limits in respect of what he is implicated in and nothing prevents him from coming forward if he is not allowed to cross-examine, nothing prevents him
23.1 - 1A	from/...
276
from coming forward and saying well, I'd like to put the record straight;  this is my version.  He may yet do so at any time.