CHAIRPERSON
Mr Shabalala, I think I have discussed the matter with my colleagues, and we think it is safer to explain the warning I have just given you, much more.
	You see, to an extent, in terms of the Act under which we sit,  people who testify are protected from further, from having what they said here, being used as evidence in other matters, such as criminal matters, civil matters, in respect of delict.   But we have doubts as to whether you are in a position to claim that protection, and given that, you have been asked questions about an incident in which you may be criminally involved, for example this has already been done, so there is nothing we can do about that, is that you told us that you were party to a plan, a conspiracy to assassinate at least Mr Steyn, who is known as a witchdoctor.  Do you understand that?  Conspiracy is a crime in itself and you are not compelled to answer any questions that may lead to implicating you.
	Do you understand that?  You don't have to answer those questions which you feel, may incriminate you.  If you have doubts, you can ask me whether you should answer the question or not.  As far as I can, I will help you.  Do you understand that?