CHAIRPERSON
We go on to the law as it presently stands.   Now would, I have had a look at that document, the preamble, etcetera, where was I, I've had a look at the prelims, and from the face of it, the law, as it presently stands, and the requirements which favour the deponent of such documents, have not been complied with.   It may have been complied with in terms of the laws that stood then, but not today.   If that be the case, would there be any purpose in pursuing this line of argument?