CHAIRPERSON
Mr Shein, you needed feel apologetic or bad about mentioning it, you are correct to have mentioned it to us.  You acted in terms of what is expected of an attorney of this country, and I thank you for that.
	I'm pointing out to you that there is a flaw in the application to the extent that the applicant is not going to admit to having committed a crime, and Section 19, I think it's (5) or thereabouts, creates a compulsion that upon application there must have been an offence, either by action or omission or whatever, upon which the application is based.  
	Now if there is no admission to an offence in either of the possible ways to commit it, either by omission or commission, then the application must fall flat.  Do you follow what I'm saying?