UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman I just want to make this clear
2B for/...
168 BRIG CRONJE
for purposes of the applications.  We divided the actions intothree different categories which we tried to motivate every timein the same fashion.  The first one deals with eliminations. The second one deals with interrogations.  The third one dealswith bomb explosions.  In respect of those three categories wedrafted a general motivation which Brigadier Cronje, the one thathe gave now is an example of, those general motivations we includedin each instance of each applicant where there was an eliminationor where there was a bomb explosion or where there was an interrogation. So you will find this explanation of Brigadier Cronje also hasa part of the explanation pertaining to the political motive inCaptain Hechter's application, in Warrant Officer van Vuuren'sapplication and the other applications.  It does not mean thatthat is the only motivation.  In each incident there will be aspecific further motivation pertaining to the specific facts ofthat incident.  But we deemed it necessary to include a generalmotivation in respect of these three different categories of actions. That is why I deem it important to lead the evidence now andto ask you to regard this evidence then in respect of each suchincident in respect of the other applicants.  I will indicateevery time when we deal with the specific action what motivationwas included without letting the witness read it.  I hope youfollow me.  Thank you.