UNKNOWN
Without saying much, I would say there's no doubt that the applicant had been subjected to previous harassment, by virtue of the fact that he was an MK member previously, and all the other reasons that have been stated in his affidavit, but I think the question remains as to whether - maybe let me not start there - Mr O'Farrell's version has been very consistent in court, today and even at the inquest.   As a result, there is no reason why - or it's my submission that there's no reason why the committee should doubt the evidence placed by Mr O'Farrell today before it.