<UNKNOWN>
Hassam decision, the Prosecution has agreed that they may consult with Captain van Jaarsveld.  In this way 
they were able to obtain the necessary information as well as the background information should General 
van der Merwe give testimony they could then make - state the evidence to him.
	The Prosecution is not closed with regard to the general public and so forth, they allowed our 
learned friends to consult with Captain van Jaarsveld and to obtain the necessary information from him.
	The request that he must bring testimony, however, is it was a spurious application and now 
Captain van Jaarsveld, the State witness must now be called.
	While I am on this point of sketching background, this morning the names of other persons were 
given who might bring some information to the fore with regard to the background theory and policy in this 
regard.	I was only provided these names this morning and I doubt whether in this very limited period of 
time, they were able to contact these other persons.  
	Mr Chairman, on the previous occasion I have already presented to you the possible prejudice of 
this very, and in fact, key witness, State witness who might be subjected to extended hearings.  He is 
indeed a key witness to the Prosecution.	As in my previous presentation to you, when such a request was made at the beginning of the hearing, there is however a crucial difference which must be understood Mr Chairman, these are a request from the applicants with regard to amnesty.  It is their detailed knowledge, the way in which they thought and the acts which they took part in which is at hand here.  If 
there is information peculiarly in the mind of Captain van Jaarsveld, PRETORIA HEARING	AMNESTY/