CHAIRPERSON
I think what Mr Malan is merely expressing is his off-the-cuff opinion, but are you, do I understand you to be saying that full disclosure does not impinge on what happened to the body after the deceased had been killed, for purposes of amnesty where we are dealing with victims, where we are dealing with compassion where we have to disclose to the relatives about what really happened to their loved ones.  You're saying in so far as you are concerned, you are able to argue that full disclosure does not extend that far, that an applicant can lie about what happened to the body as long as that does not affect the conviction, then he would have satisfied the requirement of full disclosure as envisaged by the Legislature?