MR MALINDI
Yes, thanks Chairperson.  Chairperson, on Page 25, Paragraph 7, we deal with the question as to whether the Applicants were acting on behalf of or in support of the Conservative Party.  At 7.2, we make the submission that they could not have been acting on behalf of the Conservative Party because leaders of the Conservative Party, including Dr Hartzenberg who gave evidence before the Committee clearly states the policy of the Conservative Party which is that the CP had no policy to use violence to achieve it's political objectives.
	And Mr Bizos has dealt already with those submissions of and statements made by various political leaders of the Conservative Party.  Chairperson, at 7.4, I would like to add the following references, Second Record 791, 796, 799 and 811.  And at 7.5 I would like to add the reference Second Record 805 - 806 which is a reference to where Dr Hartzenberg said the CP was in 1993 committed to peaceful solutions and the CP is still committed to peaceful solutions.
	And at 7.12 which is on Page 27 on to Page 28, if I may correct the following references, it's R1 Volume 9 and at 7.13 it's Volume 9 again, R1 Volume 9, 7.14 R1 Volume 8.  Chairperson at 7.3 we respond to the reliance of the Applicants on various statements made by their leaders which also have already been dealt with by Mr Bizos and the submission that we make in relation to their reliance on his statements is that when Mr Du Plessis spoke in Parliament against people who interpret or interpreted Dr Treunicht's speeches as speeches calling for war and our submission being that that speech in Parliament was made after many of these speeches by the CP leaders were made and we submit that that Parliamentary speech cancels any notion that ...[inaudible] Monument speeches and the Voortrekker Monument speeches were a call to violence.
	And Chairperson on Page 34, 7.3.15, we make a point that if the Applicants are relying on Exhibit A3, which was only adopted on the 26th March 1993 then they were very much ahead of the CP in that they had taken a decision to assassinate Chris Hani long before the adoption of this document and we also dispute that this document, at the time of it's adoption meant that the CP had moved over to violence.
	We submit that the options that were still available to the CP were participating in elections or in elections in negotiations with other parties at that time.  Still on Page 34 at 7.3.17, Chairperson I would like to correct the reference there where it says 9 Record, that will be Second Record of this hearing.