MR CLAASSEN
That is indeed true Mr Chair.  The question which I would like to address, which I think arises from this, is the question that I, that should be asked, is where they, for reasons of purely administrative reasons, dealt with on the same, or at the same time, or had the initial application been dealt with at a time different to that of the second one.  It is true as the Committee remarked, and I believe it was also indicated to me by Ms Lockhat, the problem that arose was that it was registered under different names, or different numbers, and the impression was also created that it was two different persons.
	Mr Chair what I would like to get at is, I think you also said so yourself, the decision of the Committee I think is purely based on the first one.  Obviously if the second one had been considered it would have been different.  It is, it is clear from the second one that the appliant does not deny his guilt but indeed admits it.