MR DEHAL
Would have been stronger, indeed.  Secondly, Mr McBride begins be referring to two other acts in 9(b)(i) on page 106 wherein he records the names in the Klein incident to the persons injured, principally that (ii) he refers by name to the persons deceased and injured in the Edendale saga, (iii) on page 107 he refers by name to the persons deceased, but he could not refer by name to the persons injured.  He begins and that is the third point, he begins by referring to the trial record and charge sheet.  I submit respectfully that in parenthesis, his reference to the application handed into the Commission is a reference and a submission and an addition ex abundanti cautela through excessive caution and perhaps if it did not have that, the understanding would have been just as complete and correct in the absence of the words in parenthesis.   But the words in parenthesis was as I have said, added through excessive caution and nothing should be read into it, more than is intended.  Thank you.