MR LAX
Sorry, Mr Mbandazayo, and with your permission, Chair.  Section (f) doesn't pertain to your client.  Section (f) deals with people who were referred to in (b), (c) and (d) which are employees of the State.  He falls under (a) really, and just to pick up on the Chair's point, Mr Mbandazayo, I'll just read it for you
"Any member or supporter of a politically known organisation or liberation movement, on behalf of or in support of such organisation or movement, bona fide in furtherance of a political struggle waged by such organisation or movement against the State or any former State or other publicly known political organisation or liberation movement."
So really, it's in that context that the bona fide issue crops up.  I agree with the way the Chair has put it.  This question of scope of duties and reasonable grounds of believing and so on, and implied authority crops up in relation to employees specifically, and he wasn't an employee.