MR AVENANT
That is correct.  I won't take that any further.  I don't think there is any need for that.
	In respect then of the disclosure, and full disclosure I'd like to mention that General Griebenauw acted or he revealed and disclosed everything to the best of his ability, everything of which he was aware relating to this operation and I can imagine that where an operation of this nature and extent is launched that there could be several smaller operations which would follow from this bigger operation of which General Griebenauw was never aware of, and will never be aware of.  It is my submission that if any information is disclosed or revealed in this regard then that should not be laid at his door and say that he did not disclose that.
	General Griebenauw expressed his concern regarding certain statements regarding his evidence and perception of the words used, words such as "take out" etc, and he asked me to bring it to the attention of the Committee that that was his bona fide perception after he received feedback and report-backs from Major van der Merwe to the effect that there was planning put in place which would lead to people being killed and that that was the reason why he immediately withdraw from the Plan.
	If you look at the statement of Major van der Merwe in this regard it's interesting to note that in paragraph 12 where he mentions the fact that there was no planning to kill anybody done in his presence he referred in fact to the meeting of the 10th of November 1986, and there had been a further meeting after that date on the 11th of November 1986.  There is no reference to that meeting.  
	So it is in light of these circumstances that I would like to just mention my client's concern in this regard.
	If there are any further aspects which the Committee needs elucidation on then please just ask.