MR DREYER
: It reads as follows:  I am going to read it again.  `I had a .38 Special revolver and a pipe shotgun that I manufactured myself, in my possession.'   And then the Advocate asks him:  its still his evidence in chief.   Is that correct?   No that is not correct.   Afterwards I understood that there were two pipes at the scene and the manufacturing in my statement, I said that I manufactured them to protect General Nick Fourie.   That is the crux of my matter.   He does not say that I said that I had it in my possession, because I was protecting Oelofse.   He also does not say that I did it in the manner in which I did it, was to protect the deceased Nick Fourie.  Therefore, I say it's impossible that he could foresee this.