MR WESSELS
Yes Chairperson, I am indebted to my learned colleague.  Perhaps we should read the entire piece of what is said by the Judge, from page 212 onwards.  The Judge is evaluating the evidence and he refers to Willy Smit as follows
"There is a stigma which is attached to this witness because during the Webster post mortem inquest he changed his evidence after an adjournment.  It would appear from his evidence that at that stage he was threatened or intimidated during the adjournment to do so.  Upon reading the Webster post mortem inquest it was crystal clear that something must have occurred during the adjournment which would have led him to recall his evidence completely, therefore his explanation does not sound far-fetched especially when considered that Badenhorst......."