PROF DE KOKER
Quite correct Mr Chairman, and I was not attempting to link it, if that came over as linking them, I ask the pardon of the Committee.   I proceed only the basis of the 1993 statement, the statement that was so - according to evidence, so harshly rejected by the police but which is now acknowledged to be a statement containing incorrect information.
	Was it surprising in the light of the fact that this statement was not correct, that it was rejected by the police and by the prosecutors - yes or no?