MR PANDAY
Mr Chairperson, I may concede that point that it can still be very well construed as political.  	Now the second test of this application is that there has to be full disclosure.  Now as my learned friend has pointed out, he cannot submit or make any submissions with regards to full disclosure.  The full disclosure of the applicant is hampered seriously by the evidence of Alzina.  Even if one has to disregard or not hold the evidence of the brother Frederick Mbukazi in much light, it is my respectful submission that Alzina was straightforward, she was candid, she was able to give a detailed account and a precise account of what took place.  She was not able to have been broken under cross-examination and she merely related what took place on the day in question.  Now if one has to look at the version of the applicant who suggests that she was there to just merely see the people punished, a person of that sort, Mr Chairperson, would not have been able to sustain a detailed cross-examination.  She gave her evidence straightforwardly, she had no problems in relating the sequence of events that took place.  She detailed the place where they were at as well as the incident and as to how the body got to the hospital.
	Now the applicant would like us to believe that the incident took place at the ANC stronghold, that being Dangani and she quite emphatically denied that.  She states that they were on the way to the market and this took place near the power school, that is in the Hlangesi area and that is where the incident took place where the applicant attacked, together with two other, attacked the victim.
	The applicant further denies there being a person namely Mbambo, Kwazi Mbambo.  Now judging from the evidence delivered by Alzina she was very sure as to who was present.  She gave a detailed account, there were three people.  So and so gave the knife to the applicant and he did the stabbing.  Shows the person that did not add frills and thrills, if she did not know something she blatantly denied it, "I do not know, I can't say for sure" and that was it.
	Now even if one accepts this entire in the mind of the applicant there was a political feud going on, everyone accepts he is an ANC activist, he is an ANC supporter, everyone has to accept that the victim was an IFP supporter or IFP activist, that will cover the political aspect of this application. 
	The second issue to address is the full disclosure.  It is my respectful submission that the applicant has not made any full disclosure or has not made full disclosure.  It is common cause that the victim was killed but the circumstances under which the victim was killed and as to why exactly he was killed, that in my respectful submission is not full disclosure and it is therefore my respectful submission that the applicant has failed the test to be countered amnesty and accordingly his application should be refused.  Thank you.