ADV PRIOR
Well with submission, if one really analyses the situation that Tjabane was in, if you look at his evidence shortly before what the Committee put to him, I submit he wasn't evasive.  The answer that the Committee sought flowed from his earlier answer.  The Committee sought to get an opinion from him regarding Mpahlele's contradiction of his evidence, in other words his statement that they did not know about the cessation of hostilities.  It was implicit in his answer - that's my point with respect, it was implicit in his earlier answer that Mpahlele must have been mistaken and was mistaken or was not telling the truth.
	My submission is that in general terms and in the material respects of this application, one can place reliance on Mr Tjabane's evidence.  It certainly seems to be supported by Palapala's evidence at the trial, or his statement at the trial.
	We come down now to the ...(intervention)