CHAIRPERSON
I understand what you're saying.  I don't say I necessarily agree with you.  Deal with the second issue.  According to the Act, as we understand it, that the information and the merits of any particular incident for which amnesty is applied for is privileged until that particular matter enters the level of a public hearing.  Now, we've heard that there's one incident that is still being investigated.  It has nothing to do with the so-called Black Cat activities and therefore the applicant's right to that privilege must be respected, whether we agree with it or not.  How do you overcome that problem in respect of the incident which is not part of this application?