MR RAUTENBACH
Mr Chairman, I just want to at this stage, just before my learned friend starts with his cross-examination, put the following on record.  We've been handed a document, a document containing notes made by Mr Bellingan.  We've been told that this note will be used during the re-examination of Mr Bellingan.  At this stage we do not want to merely object against the note, we just would like to place two concerns on record.  The first concern is, and I must immediately point out that I haven't been able to read through the document, I could, well some portions of it I could read, others I just couldn't make out what is stated here so I don't really know what exactly is stated in some of these paragraphs.  But the two concerns that we have are the following:  The first one is, from a reading of the bits that I can make out there seems to be contained legal argument.  If, and I think I would just like to emphasise this and ask my learned friend to take it into account, that he should stay away from legal argument as far as possible.  I just think if we spends, if Mr Bellingan especially, spends too much time on legal argument, whether it's legal argument or whether it's argument on how, on the record, on the evidence as to what evidence should be accepted or how evidence should be interpreted, that that's a matter for argument and that we shouldn't waste time on that.  I just would place that concern on record and that everyone should be alive to that issue.
	The second concern that we have is that we all know that there's always a temptation for lawyers in re-examination to lead a witness, to put leading questions to a witness.  Insofar as the contents of this document may actually be another form of putting a leading question to Mr Bellingan, that he actually reads what is suggested in his own note, that should also be taken into account.  I would also ask my learned friend to be careful as far as that is concerned.  It is a bit unusual to put a document like this before a witness, we're not going to object against it in its entirety, but we would like you to take these considerations into account.  Thank you, Mr Chairman.