MR ZILWA
My submission Mr Chairman would be the Act makes reference to the motive of the person who committed the act, the motive of the person.  As I say, this would seem to introduce a subjective element, his motivation, what drove him to do the thing.  Now the evidence of the applicants was that their belief was such that they felt that by committing this offence, the objective which has already been referred to, i.e. the retaliation and the sending of the message for the -to other would be assassins, would have been achieved.  So to address your question, it would be my submission that even if it could be said that with the benefit of hindsight and all that, in fact their act was not on all fours with the policy of their organisation.  If they subjectively believed, as I would submit that there's no evidence to indicate the contrary, if they genuinely bona fide subjectively believed that their actions were such that they were furthering their interests of the organisation.  In my submission that should be sufficient to make them qualify for the amnesty.