MR BANADE
Mr Chairman, perhaps I could counter that with a counter question.  That is Mr Erasmus's evidence.  If you can remember correctly he gave evidence after Mr Harrington gave evidence.  Mr Harrington himself had already told the Committee that he had strangled the deceased with his own belt.  And that has already been brought before this Committee.  What would Mr Erasmus's reason be for withholding such information and to suppress it, to use your own word.  He can't possibly have motive.  Besides, it wasn't his own actions which he was being questioned about.  	Just for interest's sake I consider that part of your question, I followed your line of questioning yesterday, and I followed it on the Afrikaans channel.  And the interpreter used the word, instead of "belt", used the word "band", and I thought that perhaps it confused Mr Erasmus somewhat - band - until he realised that the actual word being used was "belt".