MS THABETE
Okay.   Maybe I should repeat this, I said there's no reason why the committee should doubt the evidence put by Mr O'Farrell today.   It's my submission that he had no reason to lie and it's my submission that he told the truth today.   It's also my submission that this puts a big question on whether Mr Sambo has made full disclosure today, and it also puts a big question on the issue of proportionality, as to whether the killing of specifically Mr Van der Spuy and the assault of Mr O'Farrell, or attempted murder of Mr O'Farrell, was proportional to whatever objective or political objective Mr Sambo wanted to achieve.
	Without getting much into Mr O'Farrell's evidence, it's not really clear what Mr Van der Spuy and Mr O'Farrell might have done to the applicant to suggest that they had intentions to assassinate him, which really poses a question as to why was Mr Van der Spuy killed and Mr O'Farrell attacked, because from the evidence of Mr O'Farrell, they introduced themselves as policemen, and from his evidence it's not true that Mr Van der Spuy shot the applicant first, as a result the applicant shot at Mr Van der Spuy.
	I think it covers what I wanted to say in a nutshell, Madam Chair, unless you want me to address any other issue, because I would really plead with the committee to consider the response of Mr O'Farrell when he was asked what is his comment on the fact that the applicant has applied for amnesty, and in the light of what I've said as well.
	Thank you.