MR KAHANOVITZ
No, no, it goes a lot further than that.  I'll tell you why you've inserted that sentence there in that way, because it's in line with the fact that the entire paragraph is a lie.  What you're telling the reader is the following.  You tell the reader that you were going to establish whether he was involved in activities undermining the security of the State.  That's the first thing you say.  The second thing you say is that you realise that after you'd carried out that monitoring activity, that information might have been used for purposes of his elimination.  Are you with me?