MR MBANDAZAYO IN REPLY
Just two aspects, Chairperson.  The first one will be the evidence in the Court of law.  Chairperson, my comment will be only that we know all of us, when we go to the Court of law everybody wants to be acquitted,
 he uses any evidence in a Court of law in order to be acquitted.  That is why the Committee does not make much emphasis on what has been said in Court, because everybody, people always come up with a bad denial that they know anything about the offence, yet they know about it.  So that is my comment I wanted to make regarding the question of what happened in a Court of law, everybody wants to be acquitted, he would say anything.
	The second one, Chairperson, will be the one raised by Mr Prior about Thandukolo, handing over of the money.  Inasmuch as I have considered the question of Thandukolo, that there are many possibilities, it raises many questions, but I think they gave evidence that they have to hand it over in a proper way after they have arrived, because the money, because even if the money was there - in any event they have denied it, even if the money was there they have to count the money, they did not know it.  So they have to make a report after that, that how much money was handed over to him.  So definitely the probabilities are that the operation was not yet over because they have not yet arrived at their destination where they can hand over everything, if the money was there.  Which of course the police indicate that the money was found in their possession, which of course they deny.  Thank you, Chairperson.