UNKNOWN
I am glad that you are asking this question of me.   I don't want to involve my learned friend client Mr Marx in this regard, but Mr Reuben Marx finds himself in a similar situation.   My submission to you is that one cannot categorise this matter, in other words, now you're busy with a political objective, now you're  not busy with a political objective, now I'm again busy with a political objective, now I'm not busy with a political objective.
      The facts in this matter are, that there was an interrogation.   This interrogation had to do with the combating of the broader situation of unrest, and in the course of this interrogation with regard to the broader situation of unrest, Mr Beneke rushed into the room with the intention of inhibiting what he thought as an attack by Mr Biko, but one must consider the broader picture, rather than attempting to compartmentalise the events into little pieces, and that is why I say that you must look at the subjective occurrence, and the broader intentions of the gathering of that persons that morning.   
      You must recall that Mr Beneke was in fact a member of the Security Branch, even though not of that particular investigating team.   He was particularly involved in considering terrorist acts.   I will at a later point refer you to the case of Steyn, where I will link to this question again.