CHAIRPERSON
It appears, reading the judgment, that although he said he, it was shown he had the firearm and it was used to shoot, for some reason he wasn't convicted of attempted murder and the robbery and basically is that he was in charge of the gang and that's it.  But it appears to me, subject to discussion later, it could be a little bit technical where a man is serving a long sentence for robbery, to say that well legally it wasn't quite robbery so you are not entitled to amnesty, although you would have been entitled to amnesty for another offence.