MR WESSELS
Chairperson, ...(inaudible) that maybe of relevance and might solve the problem.  On page 7 of this document it will be observed that the evidence was led from page 1 by Mr McNally and then he started off by dealing with the statement to Brigadier Mostert, that is the statement that appears in Bundle B, page 73, and then he goes through the questions and answers and that is then read into the record.  Then on page 7 at the bottom it says
"VERSTER:  Chairperson, no, is that question 50?"
	"MCNALLY:  Yes, I believe it was about the Bishop Tutu incident."
	"MR HATTINGH:  With respect, this statement was made to Brigadier Mostert.  Since then this witness has made a statement for purposes of the police wherein he states that he relies, this has to be the Commission's purpose not the Police's purpose where he relies on the privilege not to answer questions with regard to the Tutu incident and I requested no questions with regard to this be put to him any longer."
I think that places the matter in perspective, Mr Chairperson. Again reference to the previous Mostert statement:
"No further questions are put"
and then they carry on ...(intervention)