MR RHEEDER IN REPLY
A short reply Honourable Chairperson.  I would like to differ from my two learned colleagues and I, with respect, submit that they should also differentiation between the political motive of a person and I submit that they're both referring to his political motive and not the political objective of the act.  The political motive of Mr Siyali is only one of many factors to be taken into account in determining the political objective.  The political objective as described in sub-section (ii) of Section 20 of the Act, relates to various numbers of situations, either acting on behalf of the struggle, or acting on behalf of the State.
	I submit it's not necessary for this Committee to decide on which side Mr Siyali acted at the stage when he committed one of the possible offences that he could be prosecuted for as long as it was committed in a political context, as defined in sub-section (ii).  His political motive as a requirement described in sub-section (iii) (a) is not so important  because there are further other factors also to be taken into account.  Nothing further Honourable Chairperson.