ADV MOTATA
If I may interrupt you Mr Terreblanche, that what you are telling us now is not before us other than in argument.  We've got to look at your argument, taking what evidence was presented to us viva voce.  We don't have that kind of evidence from the interested parties, like for instance the AWB.
	What we have before us is the evidence under cross-examination and the applicant's evidence only.  We don't have the side of the AWB of the situation that obtained on the 11th of March 1994.  We are faced with this problem, please help us, that we have the applicant.  He says on the 11th of March 1994, a war situation prevailed.  It stops there.  We get a reporter who says I can ascribe the situation that prevailed on that particular day to a war situation.
	That is the end of the evidence before us.  Even in cross-examination, this has not been put in the clear terms as you put it, that we have been requested to leave and we abided with that request to leave Bophuthatswana, but it only surfaces in argument and I have a great problem there, how far would I take the argument you have presented in coming to a decision whether we should grand or not grant.  I have a big problem there, if you could just take me over that.