MR MALAN
Because if I look at the judgement and if I understand correctly, they were acquitted because no evidence was brought in against them.  Isn't that correct?  If you look at the - I do not know if we've marked this but it's the continuation on the 18th.  If you look at his judgement, page 2549.  It says
"Accused number 7 and 8, will you stand up please?  The state has not lead any evidence to connect either of you with any of the charges."
But there was a charge of terrorism against all of them.  So the State had no evidence against them?