ADV VISSER
Yes honourable member, that was in fact our 
position right at the outset in October last year that we merely 
intended placing our version on record because we do not have a 
ruling as to what other further evidence may affect Mr Coetzee's 
amnesty application.  I think it's quite clear that the Committees 
are waiting to hear all the evidence before bringing out some 
findings.  Now if there is a ruling that the evidence led here will 
not  affect that application, then you are completely correct and 
that was in fact our position right at the start.  However there 
was a very clear indication last time and I accept that the 
Committee is comprised differently this time, but there was a very 
clear indication that his evidence is very necessary and that these 
issues are considered, the differences are considered as material 
disputes and would have to be canvassed.  -  As it pleases.