CHAIRPERSON
You can argue in that event, that he doesn't comply with one of the two main requirements of the Act.  You told me on Monday and you repeated today, that the gist of your opposition is that it was not for political reasons that this witness committed all these offences.
	But yet you tried your argument on the right to use that document, you are telling me that you want to use it for the purposes of proving that inadequate disclosure if you want to call it, has been made, or wrong disclosure, or not full disclosure.
	Now, the aspect of full disclosure is quite separate from the requirement of committing an offence for a political reason.  How do you marry the two?