MR VISSER
I'm not wishing to portend that I want to put in the last word Chairperson, but there is a matter of Kubeka about which I wish to say very briefly something.  I know that you are not going to be involved with that matter but least we find ourselves in the same position, Chairperson, may I briefly sketch what has happened?
	We received an additional bundle.  From that bundle it appears that a body had been found with a bullet hole in the head.  Now there is a lot of evidence set out in that bundle, in the additional bundle, regarding identification of this body.  The point here, Chairperson, is from that very bundle two things appear.  One is that there was a dental inspection and a dental report during the post-mortem examination which described certain deformities of teeth.  The husband of the late Mrs Kubeka made a statement in which he said that he knows that she visited a dentist and that dentist he could point out.  Now we don't know whether that has been followed up but it occurs to us quite clearly that a dental report may very well, one way or the other, settle the whole issue of whether this was her skeleton, yea or nay.  Surely Chairperson the skeleton is still available so the teeth are still there so it is quite easy enough in our submission to have a report by some dental expert by way of affidavit or whatever and to approach the dentist whom we don't know who it was but on the instructions of the husband of Mrs Kubeka and get any records that he may have of her dental condition when he saw her if that is available.  Now if that can be done, Chairperson, clearly we won't have to sit here and listen to witness after witness who tries to identify her dress etcetera and to link the two bodies in that way.  We don't know, we rather presumed that this investigation would have been done by the investigation unit so perhaps through the Chair if we could establish (i) has it been done, if so what was the result and can we see the results, or (ii) if it hasn't been done can it be done post haste Chairperson, before we come to Kubeka's case because it's only going to mean one thing and that's we're going to have to postpone that matter sine die the way things are looking now if we start with it next week.