CHAIRPERSON
Well I'd like to hear you on this subject.  It seems to me, and I think it seemed to all the Committee from the beginning, that the matters should be heard as one.  As I understand it, I haven't seen the papers in the others, but his attitude has been that he was in charge of the Repossession Unit and that he conducted numerous operations on behalf of that unit.  	Once one has come to a firm conclusion on that, then we can decide all the matters at once.  It would be very much quicker, very much more in the applicant's interest that they be heard as one rather than one Committee here, one Committee there and you've got to get transcripts and everything else.  So do you agree that the matter should be set down afresh, all the matters set down?