MR HATTINGH
Firstly, if the applicant says that it is not the truth, then I believe that, on behalf of respondents or people opposing his application, we should be allowed to cross-examine him on the document to test whether his present attitude that it is not the truth is in fact correct.   That's the first thing.   Secondly, we're still not dealing here with the admissibility of a document.   The document, on my reading of the Act, should be before the Committee and should be considered by the Committee, and this applicant cannot keep this document from finding its way to the Committee.   If anything, there was an obligation on this applicant and his legal representative to divulge this information to this Committee, if ever they wanted to put full disclosure before this Committee, they were under the obligation to make this available to the Committee, not me or anyone else.