ADV DE JAGER
It wasn't, according to what you are suggesting, it wasn't that I'm only assisting a member of my organisation against an attack by another member, because that wouldn't be political still.  It could be two opposite parties having a private quarrel between them, but the evidence was, these two members, the one in the one party and the one in the other party, didn't know each other, so there wasn't a private quarrel as far as we could ascertain from the evidence.  If in fact we accept that there was an attempt to attack the witness, Mr Lucky, that could have been connected with his brother sending somebody to attack him.  Could we then say that was a political attack, on the evidence?