UNKNOWN
Yes, Mr Chairman, I would agree with that with respect, but I would also submit that if one reads the full report it is clear, especially with reference to the history of the amnesty process, that what the Constitutional Court says here is that as many people as possible who could be taken into account for amnesty, should be granted amnesty.  It's a wide interpretation of the Act.
	For instance, why would the reference to people supporting the apartheid regime, the previous government, be necessary in comparison to people supporting the struggle if the Judge did not here intend to indicate that in the interests of national unity and reconciliation and the future, that as many people as possible should be included in the amnesty process on as liberal a basis as possible.  He was definitely not here only referring to the fact that it doesn't only apply to criminal but also to civil claims.