MR VISSER
Chairperson, with great respect, I hate to interrupt.  My learned friend is putting points to the witness and he is misleading the Committee.  I'm not saying he is doing so on purpose.  Will you look at page 12 injury number 6 as an example.  What does the doctor say about this, he says
"The sixth wound is the penetrating wound which has the appearance of an entrance wound with a laceration of" such and such " that brings the body cavity to the left which was shot through posteriorally and the sixth rib stage through and the left lung in the vicinity of the leerus, it enters the lung itself"
Clearly on the left and that Chairperson, according to his finding is a fatal shot.  Then Chairperson, he says at the bottom of that page the last sentence:
"The wounds which caused the death of this deceased is the shooting wounds number 3 which went through the chest and number 6 which also went through the chest."
My learned friend is not putting accurately to the witness what the report appears to state, we having heard the doctor, we haven't heard any evidence but on the face value, Chairperson, there are four wounds that clearly according to the doctors and we will draw your attention to it later.  According to the medical legal report, it clearly penetrated at least on the left side of the body if not from the left side of the body.