MR PHOSA
If it was - if it could be necessary in order to solve a problem, political or otherwise, assaulting would also naturally be legitimate, isn't it?  Do you understand my question?  Let me just repeat that.  If it was decided that this x, y, z, is a problem, say for instance he never admits it and yet he does it - he never admits his involvement and meanwhile he's causing more problems, then you feel no, let him eliminated.  Assaulting him would just be a natural part of it, isn't it?