CHAIRPERSON
I have just discussed the following issue with my two colleagues.  We seem to be in agreement because it is convenient, the nature of the affidavits are that there is one main deponent and the other two applicants align themselves totally with the contents of the main affidavit.
	Unless there is cogent reasons, we do not see the necessity for the two who align themselves with the main affidavit, to come and give evidence merely to say under oath that they align themselves with it.
	Unless there is serious objection, so that we propose that be the way that we proceed in the matter.  Unless you have contrary views?