UNKNOWN
Mr Visser, is he being called as an implicated person, and he's being called - he's coming out of his own free will, he need not come, that's correct.  Why is he coming?  In order to tell the world that: "I'm being wrongly implicated".  And in that sense, isn't the sort of onus to say - I don't say onus in the ordinary sense, but isn't he coming forward - "I want to tell the Commission, this is what they said about me, it's wrong".  Now he's coming and saying: "I'm folding my arms, I've done nothing wrong" and we don't know in what connection.  But if he as a witness comes forward and says: "I want to clear my name about this what is being said about me", isn't he the one who should tell us on what issue does he want to clear his character?