CHAIRPERSON
Mr Prinsloo please, no, Mr Prinsloo, please I don't think you should, I think you should ask this type of question within the context of your client's own version.   As far as I can recall, she never said, "I did tell the truth, I was caused to discard the truth in favour of the untruth".   So you are proceeding on the premise as if your client had said that what she had initially written was true and then later she was caused to throw it away and then accept something which was true.   That was not her evidence, and you go on therefore to argue on the premise, you go on to argue that well, what she had, what was discarded could have been to her advantage, and that argument is based on the premise that she had told the truth initially, but that's not what she said.   All she said was that she said certain things and then later she was confronted with other things, and as a result her statement was change.