CHAIRPERSON
Yes, there is no apparent interested party victim, in respect of the possession of the arms and ammunition.  But in any case, the application form itself does foreshadow SDU activities on the part of the applicant.
	And of course, the possession of these arms related directly to the SDU activity, so it is not as if it is something that was not covered at all in the original application form.  Although it was obliquely covered there, it does refer to the fact that the applicant was engaged in some or other SDU activity.
	Just, can you just confirm the affidavit was drawn with the assistance of legal representation?