MR CURRIN
What I am trying to now understand and maybe you can help me General, is in a way you 
are saying that one has to take into consideration the subjective mind of the policemen at the time, the 
perpetrator, the circumstances that prevailed, what had been said by politicians at around about that time, 
and weigh up his actions in that context, there are many uncertainties around that as far as I am concerned.  
Were there any implied guidelines, any criteria that you can possibly refer to which would help us to 
understand when a security policeman in that situation is going beyond implied authority that there may 
have been. Is there anything that you can help us to identify those sorts of guidelines that you think would 
have been there by implication?
GEN V/