ADV POTGIETER
Or let me just ask you. Let me just ask you, just linking up with my colleague Sandi's question.  What are we to make of the testimony of Mr Jack concerning how the assault was sparked off?  Mr Jack says that at a stage when he referred to Mrs Blackburne, your client lost his cool and then assaulted him, because your client apparently didn't like the reference to Mrs Blackburne. Which of course is totally opposite to the version that your client is putting before us. What are we to make of that?  If that is in fact how this assault was sparked off, does that not put paid to the argument that the assault was linked to the political objective of stopping the consumer boycott and breaking down the resistance of Mr Jack?