GEORGE BIZOS
The way I have always understood the Law that mere knowledge is not enough except in the case of treason that you owe a duty to report and it wasn't treason.  But what I am, with respect, submitting is this, that one cannot approach this case in relation to the conduct of the two Applicants and Mrs Derby-Lewis without having regard to what the evidence and their own admissions are and what the probabilities are in relation to the list.
	The list of nine was handed to, she is the one that asked, she is the one, she admits that she is the one who asked for these places to be reconnoitred and she in her own word says, "I couldn't say on the telephone what to Mr Kemp what they were, what it was intended for, he is a politically astute person and he didn't require any explanations."  
	Now, one cannot divorce that without taking into account that her husband with whom she has complete political and ideological identity and who also set herself up as one of the saviours of the country.  One cannot take or ignore that evidence because that is an executive act.  What she did with Kemp was not to give a list for the purposes of writing a journalistic article.  
	She did it in furtherance of the conspiracy that we knew was being hatched from the end of '92 by the First and Second Applicants.  It isn't something that is unconnected and not germane to their discussions.  On her own admissions on the probabilities on the high degree of improbability found to exist by the Judge President, the admissions that we have here, the improbabilities that came out on her questioning in cross examination by members of the Committee.
	So that although it is a theoretical possibility, it just doesn't fit with the facts as a whole in our respectful submission.  The facts are that she was in the thick of it.