ADV PRIOR
I can only argue on what the evidence is.  Mr Tjabane hasn't come and said that.  It's a difficult question to answer.  Advocate Collett has advanced that, that he was the man who gave the ... I'm saying the evidence on the probabilities overwhelming, on the probabilities and the direct evidence militate against that conclusion.  So Mr Sandi with respect, I have difficulty answering that question from where I'm sitting.
	Obviously if this Committee finds that Tjabane's a liar and he gave the instructions, well then obviously the findings may be somewhat different.  The Committee will still be seized with the facts that the armed struggle had been suspended and then maybe the conclusion is that Tjabane was acting for reasons of his own, for personal reasons.  But what we're saying is that we've got evidence from Palapala who says at the base he heard about this, they discussed it, they listened to the radio.  That supports what Tjabane has said.
	So it would seem unlikely that Tjabane in the light of his evidence and supporting testimony, would have in those circumstances still continued to give orders to carry out the attacks when he was reporting back and in liaison with the High Command.  And as he has said unchallenged, his evidence, that he was also preparing for the elections.  It was never suggested to him that he had another agenda.  So this would be speculation, with respect.
	Mr Chairman, the remaining matters would also fall into the same category.  Obviously they are of a less severe nature in the sense that although the attacks were on people, no-one died in those incidents and I would ask the Committee to also view those incidents on the same basis as the Bahai Faith Church.  Thank you, those are my submissions.