MR RHEEDE
That may be so, Chairperson, but we have not yet found ourselves within a position where he himself has sat down under oath and stated precisely what took place.  As it has been indicated by my learned colleagues on my right, there are certain differences in the evidence which has been delivered and that may influence the opinion of the A-G.  If my client comes forward and states under oath precisely what took place, it may have serious ramifications or could influence the final decision for the instatement of prosecution.
	Chairperson, just to add to what my learned colleague has said, my client is not unwilling to testify, he has declared his willingness, however I would like to thank the Committee for the fact that they have obtained legal representation for him.  It is clear to me from the past week's consultation that he did not understand everything that is going on.  For example, it is my instruction that he didn't understand the meaning of the amnesty application and that he never applied, and this is due to basic ignorance.  He is one of the persons here who stands a lot to loose.  There could be very grave consequences that he may find himself in, purely because he was subpoenaed as a witness to testify here.