MR NDOU
I'm saying when you read the affidavit, it talks about the youth in general and then it goes to specific instances where that particular Applicant states as to what he or she did.  Now, here if you read paragraph 25, it says
"Further meetings were resolved to allow the deceased to leave the area to allow for political activity."
Now, what you read in that is that what he's saying is that the Youth held further meetings whereas they resolved that the deceased must be removed to allow for political activity which is a fact.  But then he'll go on to point out as to the time when he was there and just what he did at the time when he was there.  Because all that he then tries to do is to give a broad outline of what the facts are and, most of the facts are not in dispute.  What I think would be in dispute will be that which the particular Applicant is said to have done, even on that paragraph, I don't see any contradiction, I don't see any trying to take the situation out of ambit.