JUDGE MILLER
My recollection is that the last time this Committee sat and it was indicated that Mr Mbane - that the intention was to call Mr Mbane as a witness in this matter, it was the view of the Committee that the whole hearing should be postponed in order to allow him to obtain legal representation which he has now obtained for the very purpose, for the very reason that there was incriminating statements relating to this incident contained in his so-called affidavit, particularly just for example, paragraph 28 and 30.
	So I now ask, has the Attorney General been consulted in this matter, as envisaged by 31(2)(a)?  Section 31(2)(a) says that a person referred to in sub-section 1, that is - 
a witness who may be required to answer incriminating questions, shall only be compelled to answer a question if
(a)	the Commission has consulted the Attorney General who has jurisdiction.
That's one of three requirements.  Has that occurred or not?