MR SWANEPOEL
Yes, I understand that the matter is distinguishable.  What I would like ...(end of tape)
... is that the individual was held accountable for what was in his application, regardless.  And on that basis, the difficulty with illiterate applicants I understand fully, and the Committee is with respect, better versed than I am in these matters as to what extent leniency should be applied in that regard.
	My submission is that on the probabilities, and it if was only one particular paragraph or one particular circumstance for example, that was to be condoned, then that was of course a different matter but it just appears from the written document and the oral evidence, that the two are totally irreconcilable because of several difficulties there are in the document.  Not only one, but two specifically in each of the applicants' cases.  
	The other important matter is that it did not appear, and the Committee had the advantage of having sight of the applicants and asking them questions, it did not appear that Jabu was overly gifted as apposed to the other applicants, with respect.