UNKNOWN
Chairperson, before Advocate van Wyk proceeds with his questioning, we seek clarity, Chairperson.  We have a list here of objectors that has handed - well, I mean we rode down the list of objectors on the first day of hearing because according to the legal representatives of the objectors, according to the statements that we have received from the objectors, the only three objectors who are objecting to the granting of amnesty with regard to the occurrences, on the fact of it, would be occurrences at Lancet Hall.  It's a Mr Chonco and two gentlemen, the Dlamini's, I mean the family of Mr Chonco and the Dlamini's, who say they were shot and injured at the entrance of Lancet Hall in Jeppe Street.
	For the sake of clarity we would want to know the interest Advocate van Wyk has because according to his list the people that he represents refer to being injured or shot at, at the corner of De Villiers and King George, the Shell House incident, and not the Lancet Hall incident.  In fact, it relates to all the legal representatives here, unless one of them can tell us that he represents Dr van Wyk, who mentions Dlamini and - the Dlamini's, we would want to know which legal representatives represent which objectors in - with specific reference to which occurrence.