GEORGE BIZOS
We have the comfort of being able to read at the end.  I think Mr Wessels has not had an opportunity of really looking at pages 9 and 10.  The way we see it and perhaps a short adjournment may persuade Mr Wessels that privilege was claimed in respect of the Bishop Tutu and the Early Learning Centre matter but in respect of the others, no privilege is claimed and it looks to us and page 10, paragraph 8, when he is asked about a statement of the 2nd February 1990, his answer is
"I confirm the correctness of the information embodied in this document"
in respect of the Omar and the Evans matter no privilege was claimed, there was a denial and also if you have a look at the bottom of page 9:
"Abovementioned person were monitored by members of the CCB as part of CCB normal work procedure in order to obtain information."
So you wouldn't have claimed privilege and did not claim privilege so it may - I actually sympathise with Mr Wessels having to deal with a document such as this which is obviously not the official ...(intervention)