JEFFERY T BENZIEN
Your Honour, I presume like anything, or any legislation, it could have been used, be abused, but my idea of Section 29 and more specifically in Mr Forbes' case, after the initial arrest and interrogation, yes he was detained in terms of Section 29.	I am speaking specifically of myself.  After the person who had been detained, had been to a District Surgeon who had already then noted any injuries or what have you, he would have been, what I am trying to convey to the court is, even your interrogation methods were not to have any marks or hurts on that person.
	So as for - I am not quite following Mr Forbes.  If he means Section 29 per se, if I can speak Section 29 as far as Mr Forbes is concerned, then I think he is the only person detained Section 29, who I then practically lived with for six months, for his duration of his 29.
And that was, I did all his questioning, day in and day out.  Taught him to smoke, took him on a trip in the country.  I don't want to elaborate on that if I am not on the right track.  I would like to get clarity from Mr Forbes.