CHAIRPERSON
I have one particular problem with regard to his appointment.  I don't think we have been given the Command structure in a manner that one is able to discern the clear functions, responsibilities and duties of Mr Ntshetha.  Now what troubles me with regard to his office of Command is the fact that in one incident involving the deceased, the group collectively takes a decision in Mr Ntshetha's presence, does this amount to undermining his office?  Is this acceptable?  When is there room for this shift where a group collectively decides on a function that would ordinarily be assumed by the Commander, in the presence of the Commander, they decide on the fact that some kind of punishment should be metered out on the deceased and collectively they proceed to do that, in the presence of the Commander.  They decide collectively as a group that the deceased should be released and proceed to release him, in the presence of the Commander.  Ex post facto the Commander reconsiders the decision taken by the group, after quite a number of, a chain of decisions had been taken and had been acted upon by the group, including the Commander, then conveniently the Commander takes a decision that this person should now be killed.  I don't have a problem with that, because I don't think you have presented that as a problem, you now seek to rely on the fact that Mr Dlamini was acting on instructions as if he had not been party to the chain of activity that had been taking place within one incident.  You isolate his instruction with regard to the fact that he was told to shoot as if it is separate and it doesn't form part of what was going on and that constituted this incident.  I have a problem with that, I still do not see my way out with regard to that.  May you please address me on that one?