CHAIRPERSON
Thank you, Mr Black.   Mr Black, we don't intend to really put more questions, I think your argument has covered a lot.   There are two aspects, however, that are bothering this panel.   The first I have already attempted to cover with you during your address.   I then felt constrained because I felt like I was interfering with your argument,  I mean his reasonable belief that the two persons, the two white persons, at his premises on that day were the ones sent by the security force to assassinate him.  Is it reasonable to believe that the assassins would come in in broad daylight, and before doing anything else, expose themselves to all and sundry to see, by opening the doors of motor vehicles outside, instead of using methods that one has become familiar with that were used by the security force when eliminating political activists.   Now that's one problem that we would want you to address us on.
	Secondly, on the aspect of your applicant's, I mean your client's full disclosure, you have heard Mr O'Farrell testifying how he was assaulted by a small group of persons who were in the vicinity of where the shooting took place of both Mr O'Farrell and the deceased, Van der Spuy.   You have also heard Mr Sambo denying having seen any person in the vicinity.   We, however, have objective facts, the report is quite there, you know, in the judgment that Mr O'Farrell was indeed beaten to a pulp by a group of people.   Now, Mr Sambo's denial of having seen anyone at about the time when this incident occurred, hitting Mr O'Farrell, is a little disturbing to us, we don't know whether we can believe him on that.    
	Can you address us on those two issues?