MR WESSELS
Yes.  Mr Chairman, Mr Bizos says that  my client elected to make application for only these few matters or offences that we're dealing with now.  If Mr Bizos had read his application, he will see that there are a number of other offences that he also made application for here in this application and some of those have been dealt with and others or another one is to be dealt with in due course.  We have been brought here only on these three matters where we've made application for amnesty. 	Mr Chairman, the Act gives you jurisdiction in terms of Section 20 to grant amnesty.  After considering an application for amnesty, if that act or omission or offence to which the application relates, is an act associated with a political objective committed in the course of the conflict of the past in accordance of the provisions of (ii) and (iii) and the applicant has made a full disclosure of all relevant facts, it shall grant amnesty in respect of that act, omission or offence.  It is not so wide as to allow you to deal with all matters that may have ensued over 10 or 20 years, apart from that particular act.  If that had been the intention, it would have been possible to frame it more widely than it did.  If that is the intention, then certainly this Committee will be busy with the CCB for a very long time, if we have to deal with all those issues.
	It is my submission that you are here to deal with all relevant facts concerning these various offences for which amnesty has been applied for, that you are not here to go outside that and have a review of the Harms Commission and to all aspects of the CCB internally or externally.  We have been brought here, we've prepared only on the basis of these three offences for which the applicant has applied for amnesty and it is my submission that you should restrict the questioning in so far as relevancy is concerned, to these issues and anything that can contribute to these particular three offences.  Thank you Mr Chairman.