MR PATEL
The question as I understood it initially was as follows:  "There was violence in the Piet Retief area, my instructions are that there was no violence, you say that you were there in Piet Retief for a short time in '89 and sometime in 1990 you came to Ermelo.  For the period 1989 to 1991, my client Mr Msibi will testify that there was no violence".  On the basis of that the question is: "If you say there was violence, what did you do insofar as it related to that particular situation"?
	The witness has testified that when he came to Ermelo this is what he did insofar as it's related to Ermelo.  
	Insofar as any acts before that he hasn't claimed amnesty, whether it be with regard to specific instructions, whether it be with regard to general instructions but before getting to Ermelo he has not claimed amnesty for anything that he has done and therefore this sort of questioning opens him up to offences for which he hasn't claimed amnesty.