MR SWART
Thank you Mr Chairman.  Mr Chairman, I would like to form my argument on the basis of the criteria which are set out in the Act and refer to each specific criteria.  Firstly in respect of the first applicant and then in respect of the second and third applicants together and I think I can cut short my argument very much by doing it in that manner.
	In respect of the first applicant, Mr Chairman, if one looks at the first of the criteria set out in Section 20, sub-section 3 that is what the motive and I think on his evidence and on the evidence of all the applicants the motive was to obtain firearms.  I will restrict it to motive at this stage and not go any further.  The second thing to be looked at, what was the context.  Now there was a wider and a narrower context, in my submission.  The wider context is the context of the political situation in the country and in that township round about that time, but the narrower context is the context of what happened on that day and in that respect the first applicant had a problem in that he was not reacting against somebody who was attacking him.  He was, as was said before, acting almost irrationally.  He was doing what was completely unexpected.  He was shooting defenceless people.