ADV PRIOR
Mr Chairman, yes, I may be able to assist.  In the preparation of this hearing, it was discovered that the Commission did not have a full copy of the record.  Strenuous efforts were made around the country to obtain such a record, even the appeal record was not, had been unbundled and - we then made enquiries from Mr Dehal at a very early stage and he indicated that he did have an archive of documents at the trial, but that he would also require, because they weren't specifically at his office, he had to also make time to go through them and satisfy which was reasonable in the circumstances, given the extent of time that had elapsed.  We did indicate in writing that any documentation to be used, we would welcome at an early stage, and I understand when we got into Durban, enquiries were made for access to the record.  I understood that Mr Richard and Mr Dehal were in contact with each other as was the case with other legal representatives, and because we did not have a pre-hearing, it was agreed that the legal representatives would be able to communicate formally with each other and obtain whatever documents, and I think at the beginning of the hearing it was also raised, and there was an indication from Mr Dehal as I recall, that he would make the relevant documentation available to Mr Richard, that we could at least, from the victims' side at least, that he could prepare himself on that evidence.  I cannot take the matter any further than that.