MR DORFLING
At the bottom of the page, the last paragraph, Mr Justice Nugent at that point in time deals with three prominent features in the ANC's version of how things transpired on the day and he here deals with the first prominent feature.  He says "What is perhaps the most significant feature of the evidence of all of them is that they alleged that they were being fired at from amongst the crowd as it was advancing towards them in King George Street.  In our view the weight of the evidence is wholly against this.  The evidence of both Mr Von Eggerdy and Mr Diaz was that the first sound of gunfire the crowd immediately disintegrated and fled.  We have no reason to doubt this evidence and it is quite inconsistent with the version that the firing was coming from the crowd before the security guards fired.  Mr Von Eggerdy had heard about three shots being fired earlier but that was before the group had yet even converged in the intersection.  He also identified the main gunfire which he heard as having come from what he described as 'defensive positions' by which he meant the armed people he had seen south of King George Street.  The evidence of the other witnesses is all consistent with the evidence of those two witnesses on this issue and inconsistent with the evidence of the ANC guards."  Do you understand that dictum?