CHAIRPERSON
Because usually if there's a distortion, it's to reduce the culpability of the writer.  Here it's just the opposite.  You know if you say:  "Look I had the task to establish the address, I did that, I didn't really know why they wanted the address except I believed that it was to take certain steps against Mr Evans of which I didn't know whether it was to break his window or kill him, I didn't know, but just to get his address", which is very, very straight forward, simple, it's against the law with that knowledge that steps might be taken against him, you might have been an accessory before the fact.  I don't know if it can be said that you were a conspirator, but in any even that would be for argument, but nothing too serious.  It's just difficult to comprehend, now this version then comes in, that you were there to monitor him which never happened.