MR LAX
If I could just intervene for one second?  You see the problem as I see it as Mr Mapoma is putting it is that your client is a constable and as such he is applying for amnesty pursuant to section 22(b) as an employee of the State or any former State or a member of that State's security forces.  Now for there to be a political objective it's got to be against a known political organisation, liberation movement engaged in the political struggle.  Now if there is no political objective then the act, no matter how he might have thought it was, can never be something that amnesty can be granted?