ADV TEE
Mr Chair, that is not the point I am making.  The point is that the attorney who currently represents him had possession of those documents from the Monday, because he himself was here as well I believe.  So he knew about the statements made by the Nkuna brothers throughout the entire time before he was appointed to represent Skosana, during the time that he represented Skosana and yesterday he stated to the Commission that he would not be cross-examining.  Now, this is not a Court of Law where the failure to cross-examine sometimes necessarily means the acceptance of the version of the other side, because this is a Commission where the Commission looks at a broader perspective, but it is significant in the following respects.  He did not see it necessary to contradict Joe Nkuna.