MR DU PLESSIS
Yes we say that if the Commission or theCommittee should not want to make a decision to subpoena thesewitnesses right from the outset and if they want to consider theapplicability of some of the statements of the State witnessesand if they want to take the contents of those statements intoaccount in making a decision if these witnesses should be subpoenaedor not, we say that we have trust in the Committee, we have trustin the procedure and even though we don't know what is containedin those statements we say that if it differs from our versionit would not be the truth and we believe that if those witnesseshad spoken the truth they would corroborate our versions.  Andon that basis we do not have any objection if such a procedureis followed.
 Mr Chairman may I just make one further submission on this point.
(Tape 2A ends....)
2B of/...
47
...of the affidavits for purposes of the amnesty applications. That would only relate to the questions should the witnessesbe subpoenaed.  The reason for this is that the applicants obviouslyif there's a discrepancy between their evidence and the Statewitnesses' evidence would obviously want to cross-examine theState witnesses if they give evidence.