MR D'OLIVIERA
That is correct.  He knew of the unlawfulness of his actions, but as I have argued before the actions nevertheless flowed from his position as a policeman in this struggle.  One has to, I think, not take an absolutely literal meaning to the intention of the legislature in this regard.  One must have regard for the fact that if that was the case no member of the police that committed any offence which is obviously unlawful could take advantage of amnesty at all, and that's the point that we are trying to make.  	One has to go beyond that.  The case of HORNE v UNION GOVERNMENT makes that quite clear even in the most simplistic form where the State accepts liability, it would accept liability not because of a regular or correct action because then there would be no liability.  So in actual fact when we are looking at that we are looking at unlawful acts for which the State takes liability.