UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman, just one or two things.  Although the victims are in principle not opposing the application, it is still the view of the victims, the family at least, that the applicant must carry the onus of at least convincing the Committee that he was able to meet all the requirements of the Act.
	It is the view of the family at least, that the act of the applicant was clearly not done with any political motive whatsoever, he was a trained soldier.  In the circumstances, he attacked a person on his own account, he wasn't really quite sure whether or not she was active in any political actions whatsoever.
	Furthermore, it is also the view of the family that the act of the applicant was not proportionate to the political objective sought and therefore he is not meeting all the requirements of the Act as stipulated, he could not discharge the onus as placed upon him by the Act, and his application must therefore fail.
	As you wish Mr Chairman, thank you.