MS MOHAMED
Those are the relevant paragraphs.  And then Mr Chairman, what had happened is, based on that affidavits, the TRC then said to, actually by means of a letter, to both these applicants that it seems as if they had applied unilaterally, one application, and the necessary applications will then have to be made to a Committee who hears the matter.
	The TRC then confirmed that they didn't have any written application before them.  So what has happened is, when the matter came before the Committee on a previous occasion, I think it was in March this year, the Committee was then appraised of the situation and the two applicants at that stage were not represented.  It was at that stage, after that adjournment, that we became involved in the matter, upon receiving instructions from Mr Shandu and Mr Malevu.
	They said to us that the contents of this affidavit was put to them, because by that stage we had received the previous bundle that was prepared in this matter.  They said to us that these affidavits incorrectly represent the position, in that there was a misunderstanding at some level, between themselves and the Investigators who took down these affidavits.
	They then said to me that they wrote out their applications, it was sent to prison authorities and they had each done this on their individual forms.   The High Court papers which were then submitted to the NPD were then drawn on the same lines.