DEPOUTCH ELESE
I will go against that in these reasons.  Because they want to claim now a victory around the whole thing and get a political side because the applicant didn't prove to us that there were people who have been attacked by a gangster in Crossroads.  There was no name whom you mentioned saying that so and so was attacked by a gangster in Crossroads, so and so was attacked by a gangster in Crossroads and each and every gangster have a name.
	He didn't even say it was Americans, Chicago's and etc.  He was keeping on saying it was a gang.  As a person who was staying next to Crossroads, a road which divides, he should know everything that is happening in Crossroads.
	Even if you cannot read papers, even if you cannot, you are not watching the TV, by mere fact people are talking in and out, and as a member of a political organisation, which is claiming, you are eligible to attend meetings, general meetings of your Branch and everything, it is being reported to your Branch.  
	Me, I was a member of MK.  50 percent was politically and 50 percent was military, because as a soldier, in the liberation movement, you have to understand the politics.  Each and every attack which you are doing, you have to be given a motivation why you have to carry that particular incident, so that at the end of the day, it must be linked with the politics.
	In this instance, he is keeping on saying the order was that to attack a gangster, who was attacking PAC members.  As a person who was staying opposite the road, he should know how many people have been attacked by the gangster, and he is supposed to gather information himself as a person.  Are these gangsters armed, what arms are they having, these gangsters?  Are they having knives, are they having firearms?  He is supposed to know that, but in this instance he didn't come up with those information to this TRC so the TRC can believe on him based on the facts which he is putting on the table, but he was keeping on saying, the instruction which he got, is to kill people, is to attack and even on those instructions, there was an instruction that said that they have to defend themselves, but when he was answering, he was giving information which is contradictory from one another.  That is why I am saying the whole thing, it was not a political thing, but it was only a gun for hire.