MR LAX
How do you deal with the fact that although he mentions those two incidents, and he relies on them so strongly, none of the other applicants mention it.  The first one or the second one.  We can understand Radebe wouldn't have mentioned the first one because he wasn't a member of the unit at that time, but certainly Mkhwanazi would have borne knowledge of it.  It would have stood out in his mind as a particularly impressive incident.  Nobody mentions these things.  These things are all done ex poste facto.  In the light of that, what weight do we then place on that evidence?