UNKNOWN
I want to submit it to you that there are 
people sitting together and making a decision to execute the task. 
 For example, when a military operation has to be done, the 
people sit together and make a decision.  There is always a 
leader, a leader who takes the initiative.  
	These two people sit together, they make a joint decision to 
do something.  There are political discussions which have been 
held - I don't want to refer to all that again, in which it was said 
that something had to be done.  
	Now Mr Derby-Lewis comes and they have certain talks, he 
comes and he says "Here are people, we have to do something".  
On his instruction this murder list is prioritised and then the 
decision is made, like when you consider a decision, what will be 
the best target to serve our purposes.
	And jointly they decided that it would be Mr Hani,  then 
they had to go further.  Now the decision had to be made - as I 
understand Mr Prinsloo's heads, how this person had to be 
eliminated was to shoot him.  It's not that Mr Derby-Lewis 
decided all by himself that he should be shot and he gave the 
instruction.   
	I want to submit that during their discussions Mr Derby-
Lewis was the leader and that Mr Walus acted on his instructions 
and said "I will shoot him".