JONAS HENDRIK DE WAAL
After she had written it, she went through it, she studied it again, I testified that she had admonished the female police officer regarding spelling mistakes, but there was nothing wrong with the statement itself, but that she did not approve of the spelling mistakes, she wanted to type it up herself.   She did, there were no more spelling mistakes and she agreed with everything that was said in the statement.   Why, when she studied the statement again, did she not point out certain facts which she was not satisfied with, why did she only point out spelling mistakes?