MR BLACK
Well it applies to such an extent, that if a trial starts and the verdict is given after the coming into the constitution based solely on the confession, the whole thing gets thrown out, because the previous statement obtained is regarded as unconstitutional.
	The same with the pointing out, which I'm sure I can mention, the very, if I don't need to cite all the cases, the case law is precisely that, where a trial is pending and a pointing out takes place prior to the trial and the hearing of the trial takes place after the pointing out and after the constitution, of course, having come into effect, then the constitutional rights of the applicant are protected and the document and recordings of the events, or information obtained by unconstitutional methods, are disregarded.
	So, with respect ...(intervention).