MPHITHIZELI NELSON NGO
I suppose you may, if that would be convenient for you in that regard if there is a number of them, you may perhaps just dwell on the question of -on the disputed aspects when you deal with them.  That is the instructions.
	What I don't understand though, if I could go back to 2.7 is, I don't understand, what should happen with previous evidence on this aspect?  What is the status of the previous - why are we to hear evidence again in respect of the same thing?  We have the evidence on record surely?