MR LAX
That evidence says one of the assailants, it is not saying the same one.  I think you put questions in a very lose way and then you try and pin him down to a very specific understanding of that question.
	It is not fair Mr Leopeng, as the Chair said, if you want to cross-examine a witness, you must lay the foundation, then you must put your specific question.  You can't come from a generalist kind of, what you have read is that another of the assailants, we don't know which one that is, we don't know who that refers to.
	Unless you put it to the witness specifically, you can't then try and pin it down afterwards.