MR DREYER
: What I don't understand then is during the Criminal Procedures, when you were asked about it and I would refer you to page 640 and 641, and your representative refers you again to the statement;  and he reads from the statement -he says look at the statement, the following paragraph, and then you say:  `The vehicle that we were driving in was a Mercedes and a White Sentra.   At Andre's flat, all of us drank from the First Watch Whisky,' and then you say:  `That is correct.'   And then your Advocate asks something else, and then you say:  `There's an addition to that.   We had consumed or we had a bottle of Brandy.   We didn't drink it there.   We drank it while we were driving, and then now and then we stopped and divided it.'   You see that is my problem, and I confront you with the diversions and then you are unhappy.  It is as if you do not know where I get this from.   Would you please tell me then?   When, once again, during the Criminal Procedures, when you were given the opportunity in relation to this statement that you made under pressure, to correct this and you spontaneously say:  `No, no, no, no - we did not just have a bottle of First Watch Whisky at the flat, we had a bottle of Brandy as well, and that's apart from the bottle of Brandy at Martin's house.'   Can you comment on this?