MR VISSER
Lastly, I just want to refer to Forensic Sciences again, Loth and Iskan, they say at page 359 under "Skull to Photo Superimposition", they say this
"... this method can be attempted if photographs or X-rays are available of individuals that answer the description derived from a skeleton with the skull and mandible intact."
I then go on a sentence later -
"... if the bony landmarks of the skull align with the size, configuration and replacement of the features in the photograph, a match becomes possible, but cannot be considered conclusive.  If however, superimposition reveals an obvious disparity, such as the position of the orbits or the length of the nose or size of the chin, that individual can be eliminated as being the victim."
That is basically I think what we have come to an agreement on, already?