UNKNOWN
Madam Chair and members of the Committee, without repeating what has already been said, my opinion, or I am of the view that notwithstanding the omissions that the applicant has made in his application, it does appear, I mean the political objective does appear from his application.
	For example in page 43 he says the act was committed in the struggle of large oppressed community, of a country, South Africa.  He does highlight the violence during the 1990's even though he doesn't specify the actual incident that he committed.
	Without repeating what my colleague has said, I would have no objection is amnesty is granted.  I don't know whether the Committee would like me to address them on a certain aspect, because I am avoiding repeating what my learned colleague has said.
	Also,  when looking at the independent Board of Enquiry which the Committee has copies of, and my learned friend also have copies of,  I don't know, I stand to be corrected, but from the way I heard the applicant's evidence to be, he didn't say that there weren't taxi attacks that occurred in the area, he just said that they did not occur all the time, or they scarcely occurred, I don't know.