MR SAMUELS COMMITTEE
Thank you for the indulgence.  It is my instructions that two courses of action may occur.  If this - we wish to argue that the acts for which the applicant will apply for, are cases where instructions, orders were given to defend the neighbourhood and the applicant is aware of situations where members of the SDU didn't follow completely those instructions.
	However, the argument being presented is not as simple as to say it is only people who acted outside the code of conduct therefore committed an act which is liable for amnesty, that the code of conduct, while the words code of conduct suggest a strong and finite, defined set of principles to act by, in the situation it wasn't a proper military operation and therefore the code of conduct is not as simple as; did a person act in or outside that code of conduct.  And that is why the application for amnesty is in part general in sense that one cannot specifically say yes, it was out of the bounds of the code of conduct.  That is why I wish to call this applicant and the two main issues, well apart from a brief background on history, the two main issues are the nature of general commands given and the fact that people did act outside those commands.  However, because of the situation of those code of conduct, it is not as simple as just to say yes, they acted outside that code and therefore ..(intervention)