UNKNOWN
Chairperson, I shall not repeat my Heads, I shall stand by that.  I would just like to add that criticism has been voiced in Mr Bizos's heads with regard to the evidence of Gen Webb, for example on page 8
"All the applicants failed to act within the course and scope of their duties, Section 20(2)(b), in that they breached the CCB's internal rules by omitting to do the following
19.1	By failing to take proper steps to ensure that information received from an illiterate gangster was probably verified and checked before an act of violence was perpetrated."
	The only thing I would like to say concerning that, with regard to the criticism to Gen Webb's evidence, you have to bear in mind and see it in the background that Gen Webb was appointed as Commander of Special Forces.  He came there, there CCB was already in existence, so he took over an existing structure and just continued with it.  
	And furthermore you have to bear in mind that he was never involved in the identification of a project, he was involved in the collection or verification of intelligence, he was not involved in the planning, he was not involved in a pre-study, and he depended on what his subordinate, Col Verster told him.  So his evidence and what he knew of a project or did not know, you have to see that in that light.  That is all I have to say.  Thank you, Chairperson.