CHAIRPERSON
And he was correct in saying so.  That is why we are saying that when he talks of an incident for example, whatever happened at Kliprivier police station, I and this Committee are happy to include all those incidental offences that occurred at Kliprivier police station, despite it not being mentioned because there is a clear intention that I am going to own up to everything that occurred at Kliprivier police station during that incident.
	That is what he meant, even if the application is silent, there is a clear intention to deal with that incident lock stock and barrel, with all the possible offences.  But where there is no suggestion even, or hint, of a particular incident, identifiable incident, then we are on a different footing, isn't it?