MR PRINSLOO
With respect, the Committee is looking at this in retrospect.  The purpose was to obtain the firearm, but now you have to consider the full testimony, because this applicant had now been wounded.  Things had gone wrong, and as a consequence of the fact that they had gone wrong, they would be hunted by the police.
	It was the most natural thing that the people would do away with that firearm.  The first applicant didn't tell them to throw it away, but they knew they were in possession of hot property and it had to be thrown away, they were in that situation.