UNKNOWN
Maybe I can just repeat the question as we seem to be arguing about nothing.
	The question was - I broke up the question and I want to ask it in two parts.  The first part is, your information, your instruction was to attack Yellowwood Hotel because military personnel went there.  I'm putting to you that the evidence is the facts are in this case, Mr Jerling was 18 years of age, he was unarmed and having a drink with some other people, some friends who were also unarmed.  He was not a member of the security forces, the police or the army and nor were the other people at the hotel on that evening.  The question being, that on the facts it would seem that your intelligence, your information gathering and your instructions were hopelessly out of line, out of synchronisation, out of touch with the facts.  Are you able to comment?