UNKNOWN
Mr Chairman, I want to tell the Commission something which I think can be relevant in the further procedures.  Sorry Mr Chairman, during the long adjournment I spoke to Mr Nieuwoudt and he told me that he is feeling a lot better and would probably be ready to testify tomorrow.
	I have arranged to see him at four o'clock and if I am satisfied and according to what his Doctor tells me that he is ready to proceed with his evidence tomorrow, he will be ready to proceed tomorrow.
	The reason why I mention this, I believe that because this begins and starts with Nieuwoudt, he would have been the logical first witness and once his evidence has been heard, in all probability would substantially shorted the evidence of all the other applicants in this regard as well.
	I thought I would mention that for the convenience of the Commission and for the information of my colleagues in this matter.  I know we will lose an hour, but we will probably lose more than an hour I would guess that if, for example one of my colleagues is to lead one of his applicants now and lead them substantially in detail, which will have to be covered by, which they will cover with secondary evidence, whereas Nieuwoudt in fact could cover it with the original evidence as to investigations and that type of thing.
	I just mention that for the convenience of the Commission, Mr Chairman, and for the convenience of my colleagues.