MOKOTEDI MPSHE
Well, Judge, on the basis of the explanation given now, I will rest my case there.  I cannot take it any further.
	Then I move to 20(f), 23(f), sorry, and directly to the aspect of proportionality.  It cannot be disputed that the brutal murder is definitely not proportional to the intended PHOKENG HEARING	AMNESTY/GAUTENG
MR MPSHE	167	ADDRESS
taking of the keys, as it is the evidence.  
	Much has been said about regaining governance of the Baphokeng people. Now one really finds it difficult to say
killing or murdering another to obtain a set of keys or a bunch of keys, can be regarded as being proportional.  If governance was the issue, regaining was the governance of the issue, then one would simply pose a question and say the deceased was the chairperson of a tribal council.  There was somebody who was in governance of the Baphokeng tribe then, who was then installed as the acting chief, one George Laboni.  If then it was a question of governance, why was recourse not had to the chief then and not somebody under the chief, like it was done with Glad Mokgatle. 
	I want to make this submission then that the question of proportionality has not been satisfied by the applicants.
	Thank you, Mr Chairman, that is all.