MR DU PLESSIS
Section 29.  ... and the same there as an inquiry, and this same question arose and we then fully addressed the Commission on this.  We said that a decision has to be made then and if my client is to be forced to answer certain questions, we will ask leave to approach the Supreme Court of South Africa in this regard, for an order of clarifying at least the position.  We were also told that the matter would be referred by the Commission to the Attorney-General for possible prosecution.  Whether it was done or whether it wasn't done, I don't know, but certainly there was no prosecution up to this stage.  But Mr Basson's position was made clear right from the outset about this and I have advised him and his choice is he's not going to answer to those questions.
	And as I say, at this moment it's in any event highly theoretical because should he disclose any involvement with such deeds and there was for instance, the planning phase etcetera of those incidents if it did take place within the borders of this country, he can be prosecuted here and this Committee cannot grant him amnesty on that.  He obviously, on my learned friend's attitude, will - there will be the possibility, it may be found that he didn't make full disclosure.  I beg to differ about that, and we will fully address the Committee at the end of the proceedings on this.