UNKNOWN
Of course.
MR VISSER
"... a misidentification by photographic superimposition of skull and anti-mortem photograph has been reported ..."
you say - well, they say one, well let's leave that aside and we go on to read -
"... the error was confirmed after positive identification using fingerprints ...",
so what he is saying here is there is on record a misidentification.  Be that as it may, the article goes on to say -
"... this illustrates the danger of over-estimating the capability of this method.  In conclusion, despite some limitations in obtaining a positive identification, the Computer Aided Facial Reconstruction and Video Superimposition methods are very useful in enhancing the process of identification, especially in the case of a severely decomposed or mutilated body and skeleton remains."
That would meet with your approval as well?