SATHYANDRANATH RAGUNANAN MAC MAHARAJ
Paragraph 59, Chairperson, it's difficult for me to control my language when I speak about paragraph 59 because it's the biggest give-away to a cover-up conspiracy.  It says there that
"Charles Ndaba was privy to vital information about Pretoria systems.  The first ones", it says, "is that during Charles's stay in Swaziland and Zambia, Ndaba was coupled to the communications and logistics infrastructure of the Security Branch".
Now I have shown you documents which indicate that if we were to suppose he was recruited, he could only have been recruited late in 1988, but within weeks of recruitment would have gone out of Swaziland.  What infrastructure would he have learned?  What communications system would he have got known to except some telephone numbers to phone?  Then we were told by Capt Botha that when he was sent, told to go to Zambia, he was given no contacts in Zambia.  What logistical infrastructure and communications network of Port Natal would he have found out in Zambia and by his own admission Capt Botha says he had no contact with him while he stayed in Zambia, in fact he claims that the contact was established 4 to 6 weeks before the 7th of July inside the country at the initiative of Charles Ndaba.  What infrastructure?  So it puts this huge word, communications and logistical infrastructure that Charles Ndaba would have got to know in Swaziland and Zambia and then uses that to justify his murder.  Then it says:
"these communication and logistical networks were not only used by Charles Ndaba"
but they themselves said that he didn't use it.  I find that diabolical.  Then it goes that he had information about the Intelligence network in the Security Branch in Durban but they say in their evidence that he made contact 4 to 6 weeks before the 7th of July, which places it at its earliest in May and then goes on to say that he had 2 to 3 meetings and did not have him meet other people.  What again, is this huge word Intelligence network?  If Durban, Port Natal was working that way, making an individual informer know that elaborate network, then they don't deserve to be called Durban Security Branch.  And then, Chairperson, we come back to the smearing of Charles Ndaba's name, after they have murdered him because in the next paragraph they then throw a hint that there was another informant inside Vula.  I am satisfied, head on the block, they did not penetrate Vula.  I'm ready to say, on the contrary and Capt Botha referred to me the other day when he was giving evidence, he said: "Ask Mac Maharaj about the houses in Reservoir Hills and Chatsworth".  Sir, I won't tell you about that unless you ask me, but he raised the matter.  Those two incidents shows that we had penetrated Durban Security Branch right to the top.  These four reports that I have filed today is from that stack.  You show me one from the ANC, from Vula.