MPHITHIZELI NELSON NGO
But will this point avail you if in terms of the then Act, for some reason or another and not on the strength of a superficial view of the Act, if in terms of that particular Act, he would not have qualified for indemnity in respect of all these things?
	Of what use would that have been for him to have included them?  If for some reason because of his own advice or someone else's advice he would not have received indemnity, what would be the purpose for him to have applied?