MR VISSER
Yes Mr Chairman I appreciate fully that the questions which I am putting to the witness now are largely based on argument, and certainly I don't want to now start arguing the requirements of the Act and particularly the requirement that it has to be an act, omission or offence which should be interpreted to mean an incident.  But all that I am attempting to do at this point in time is to give the witness an opportunity to say where he disagrees so that at least by the time we come to argument that I know on what evidence I should address you.  That's the only purpose at this stage.
	Can I give you an idea of what the confusion is which we are suffering under.  You gave evidence and I believe the reference is Exhibit A paragraph 51 to 55, I am referring to your Exhibit A.