It determined that the French court’s decision was not based on Séraphine’s capacity to look after her children ​ — something that was never called into question — ​ nor on hard facts but on “ observations of a general nature about Jehovah’s Witnesses . ”
It determined that the French court’s decision was not based on Seraphine’s capacity to look after her children ​ — something that was never called into question — ​ nor on hard facts but on “ observations of a general nature about Jehovah’s Witnesses . ”