The 144% from the example are a "max" value, observed on one node at one point in time. That was 144%/4(cores) = 36% of the total CPU capacity of that node at that time.  It makes more sense to look at the averaged value, 81% in the example. 81%/4 ~ 20%  load on each node, relative to one node's full CPU power.  As the 81% value was averaged over the cluster already, 20% is also the average load of the cluster relative to the cluster's full CPU power.  Cheers  -- Peter
Hello Everybody!  some of our jobs consuming more than 100% of the CPU.  That's looks for me a bit confusing, cause I would expect a value from 0 - 100.  SnapshotDelete[79851] phase 1 (2016-02-18T14:21:01) --------------------------------------------------- Elapsed time:                      763 seconds LINs deleted:                    57474/57474 Snapshots deleted:                   7/7 Snapshots truncated:                 7/7 Errors:                              0 Total blocks:                  3189996 (25519968 KB) Freed blocks:                  3189996 (25519968 KB) CPU usage:                         max 144% (dev 1), min 0% (dev 2), avg 81% Virtual memory size:               max 128680K (dev 1), min 127656K (dev 1), avg 127992K Resident memory size:              max 15300K (dev 1), min 12864K (dev 3), avg 14093K Read:                              280687 ops, 1750104064 bytes (1669.0M) Write:                             525454 ops, 2843091968 bytes (2711.4M)  Like here in this outpout I got a max CPU usage of 144%. Is this because the isi job reports view shows me the sum from all 3nodes in the cluster? And what does (dev 1) & (dev 2) stand for?  Thank for you help! - Alexander
CPU usage more than 100%? in isi job reports view