This is the primary difference between the two products in respect of VM protection so your summary is correct.  Regards,  Rich Forshaw Consultant Corporate Systems Engineer - RecoverPoint & VPLEX (EMEA) Data Protection and Availability Solutions EMC Europe Limited Mobile: 44 (0) 7730 781169 44%20(0)%207730%20781169> E-mail: richard.forshaw[NAME].com Twitter: [NAME]
Hello everyone,  I currently have recoverpoint protecting my environment (100% vmware).  It is a VNX7500 to VNX7500.  I like it, but what I don't like is recoverpoint has to do the entire Lun/datastore.  Doing it this way I have to keep my VM's organized by lun, so my groups can come over correctly.   It would seem that with RP4VM's, it doesn't matter what lun/datastore the VM is on, it will just replicate the VM and it's datastores, so I could have VM's scattered across multiple datastores, and still create consistency groups with those VM's.  Am I understanding this correctly?  I have highly considered moving from RP to RP4VM's because of this.   What are people's thoughts?  Thanks,  Brandon
Have Recoverpoint, want RP4VM's